Haha, digged old stuff out - still good and correct.
Small blocks was dictated by the 'best' software devs and a fiat based blockstream, blocking on chain stream.
Bitcoin business devs moved on, since on-chain scaling is provenly possible in the global money world.
Sure, not with Raspis, censure and social engineering, but with decent tech and investment like minres already achieved over last years.
Do you have a BIP? Or are you merely suggesting that folks here migrate over to bcash, since bcash is surely superior to bitcoin with its segwit and lightning network and other second layer scaling, right? KISS is king. Complexity will die or never take off. I agree completely. I mean look at computers, the internet, and automobiles. They're so complex that they'll never take off. That's why we're still using the abacus, 2 tin cans on a string, and horses with carriages. KISS is king. We talk about unneeded over-engineering - that's all. If a road is getting too small and you have space left at its sides, you simply create more lanes - not complex bridges or tunnels and crosses ! (and charge for ppl need to use the safer road) - esp if all the shops and merchants are already built next to that road. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) You are just making up shit. Surely sounds like a great analogy, but please snap back into reality for a while, no? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Forig00.deviantart.net%2F11cd%2Ff%2F2014%2F022%2F8%2F7%2F87169c6ad03f02ca3c39a31032a50f77-d73buod.png&t=665&c=E72F7aiIPde1Mg) Thx for both. We know exactly what and when ppl start dumb fights. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
We talk about unneeded over-engineering - that's all. If a road is getting too small and you have space left at its sides, you simply create more lanes - not complex bridges or tunnels and crosses ! (and charge for ppl need to use the safer road) - esp if all the shops and merchants are already built next to that road. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Hey HV? Have you checked out the new Bitcoin Core fork of BCH? There is an 8mb block every 60 seconds! Thats 10x throughput and 10x confirmation speed? Are you switching today? As a big block lover, you will find it absolutely fabulous https://thebitcoincore.org/ I heard that instead of 0 confirmation transactions, they'll have negative conf. Their wallet AI will anticipate and confirm future transactions before you even send them. And instead of double spend attacks, you'll be able to do quadruple spend. It's the original vision, yo! 0-conf works fine if you know your peers - buy your coffee, deposit Bitcoin at banks, pay TAX (you can in Zug / Switzerland) https://twitter.com/justicemate/status/1023877784337145857.. / sure it is not trustess until you wait - exchanges show you exactly that part.
|
|
|
Haha, digged old stuff out - still good and correct.
Small blocks was dictated by the 'best' software devs and a fiat based blockstream, blocking on chain stream.
Bitcoin business devs moved on, since on-chain scaling is provenly possible in the global money world.
Sure, not with Raspis, censure and social engineering, but with decent tech and investment like minres already achieved over last years.
Do you have a BIP? Or are you merely suggesting that folks here migrate over to bcash, since bcash is surely superior to bitcoin with its segwit and lightning network and other second layer scaling, right? KISS is king. Complexity will die or never take off. I agree completely. I mean look at computers, the internet, and automobiles. They're so complex that they'll never take off. That's why we're still using the abacus, 2 tin cans on a string, and horses with carriages. KISS is king. We talk about unneeded over-engineering - that's all. If a road is getting too small and you have space left at its sides, you simply create more lanes - not complex bridges or tunnels and crosses ! (and charge for ppl need to use the safer road) - esp if all the shops and merchants are already built next to that road. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Haha, digged old stuff out - still good and correct.
Small blocks was dictated by the 'best' software devs and a fiat based blockstream, blocking on chain stream.
Bitcoin business devs moved on, since on-chain scaling is provenly possible in the global money world.
Sure, not with Raspis, censure and social engineering, but with decent tech and investment like minres already achieved over last years.
Do you have a BIP? Or are you merely suggesting that folks here migrate over to bcash, since bcash is surely superior to bitcoin with its segwit and lightning network and other second layer scaling, right? KISS is king. Complexity will die or never take off. Get the fuck out of here with your assertion that segwit and lightning are complex, or too complex and that the purported complexity of these will be a meaningful hinderance for bitcoin. You are speculating without fact, and some kind of nice talking point that is NOT justified in reality (but it sure sounds nice, right?) And good luck with your KISS on bcash.... scaling has been playing out well on bcash, right? No traffic and so there is plenty of room for expansion... you guys are doing very well.. it's gonna be lovely.. you, Roger, Craig, jbreher, Jihan and PeterR... one bigblocker happy and quasi centralized family. Haha, yes its easy to trigger religious ppl who still believe their core is the center of the truth, and only these few! like https://mobile.twitter.com/BashCo_/status/1023593797127745541 as well. Nah, you ll get it little later then. Still all segregating forces active here. https://mobile.twitter.com/Bitcoin/status/1023477720036962304
|
|
|
1) Bitcoin protocol is not a playground for software devs 2) Bitcoins relevant business devs have moved their powers into Bitcoin the Cash instance of the white paper 3) SWLNcoin has achieved nothing except of a final dead ponzi bounce
Noobs do their own due dilligence and do not listen to Adams and Backward Trolls. You might buy a second layer TABCASH from these fiat payed sales chicks only.
|
|
|
Haha, digged old stuff out - still good and correct.
Small blocks was dictated by the 'best' software devs and a fiat based blockstream, blocking on chain stream.
Bitcoin business devs moved on, since on-chain scaling is provenly possible in the global money world.
Sure, not with Raspis, censure and social engineering, but with decent tech and investment like minres already achieved over last years.
Do you have a BIP? Or are you merely suggesting that folks here migrate over to bcash, since bcash is surely superior to bitcoin with its segwit and lightning network and other second layer scaling, right? KISS is king. Complexity will die or never take off.
|
|
|
Muh,
If you want some reward > work for! PoW
Meh
If you already have too much wealth, let it work for you and get richer. PoS
Why on earth Vitalik wants the latter, now he is fucking rich?
PoW has just too many unforeseen external risks, nahh, he does not want to get decentralized by these again...
PoS = proof of shit
|
|
|
Bitcoin fees are higher than any other coin. This is due to a lack of scalability and thus high mining fees, which also effects transaction speeds. Ethereum and LiteCoin have much lower fees and send much faster. XRP is cheaper and faster than that. IOTA is free but their wallet is not quite up to par yet. This market is still very young and growing. Eventually these issues will be worked out. But the great thing about competition is that you can choose which method you want to use. And if you’d rather stay in the fiat world you’re free to do that as well.
I believe that for your requirements, only Bitcoin cache is great. First of all, this coin with a very large capitalization takes the 3rd place and meets your requirements. Processing speed and cheap price for translation. 8mb blocks is going. https://mobile.twitter.com/howelzy/status/1019950600514043904Sure, there needs to be more work on parallel computing and optimization- but thats worth doing to keep all txs onchain- safest way we know for about 10years now.
|
|
|
Man your getting desperate . Someone punch that dick on YouTube. Die Bcash die imposter edit: have fun with your ALTcoin We have a lot of fun, thx. Others needs devs for next 18m or can use blockstream's tabcash. SWcoin or LNcoin are not even alts.
|
|
|
They said Bitcoin is a bubble: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FIUvcahB.jpg&t=665&c=spvEdRul14jBcw) Thx, yes this is a very nice size analysis. And it shows where crypto is about to go over next years. IMO it would be just too stupid to self-restrict it to a single theme, like a failing gold religion narrative... Electronic money, what is the Broad Money part is the correct goal, and eFX trading a big junk here. Hmm, how and where do they do this in such a scale? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) goddamned useless BCH - these fuckers will attempt anything to destroy bitcoin.
How can you destroy bitcoin ( with bitcoin )? Small blocks, small brains? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Like I value your opinion Haha, digged old stuff out - still good and correct. Small blocks was dictated by the 'best' software devs and a fiat based blockstream, blocking on chain stream. Bitcoin business devs moved on, since on-chain scaling is provenly possible in the global money world. Sure, not with Raspis, censure and social engineering, but with decent tech and investment like minres already achieved over last years.
|
|
|
They said Bitcoin is a bubble: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FIUvcahB.jpg&t=665&c=spvEdRul14jBcw) Thx, yes this is a very nice size analysis. And it shows where crypto is about to go over next years. IMO it would be just too stupid to self-restrict it to a single theme, like a failing gold religion narrative... Electronic money, what is the Broad Money part is the correct goal, and eFX trading a big junk here. Hmm, how and where do they do this in such a scale? ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Bbut... but Anon, it's like when you want a car engine to 'scale' to higher horsepower and speed, the most straightforward way is to simply add more cylinders! V32 engines for everyone so we can get places faster, amiright? /s
Stupid analogy is stupid. If you want a transportation analogy, a closer analog would be passenger demand for a certain train route exceeding capacity solved by adding more passenger cars to the train. Still a stupid analogy, but an order of magnitude closer to the situation at hand. https://txstreet.com?
|
|
|
|