Denk ich aber auch, ich denk mal, dass man das differenzieren muss.
Zur Distribution war PoW perfekt.
Aber wenn alles verteilt ist, müsste eigentlich selbst BTC einsehen, dass ein sauberes PoS besser ist.
Oder wollen wir tatsächlich dann nur noch wegen der Transaktionsgebüren, die ja eigentlich so klein möglich sein sollten zig Megatonnen in die Atmosphäre blasen?

Gut, um vll mal wieder ne Diskussion hier anzustoßen, behaupte ich folgendes:

Sollte die Implementierung von ETH 2.0 problemlos ablaufen, wird das Flippening spätestens 2021 passieren.

Gründe:

• Zahl der Developer bei ETH, rasante Entwicklung einer Industrie rund um Ethereum
• Staking
• DeFi

Germany can be called the leading European state in the field of cryptocurrency and blockchain in general. In general, this state has always been friendly to the use of cryptocurrency. True, now I am a little worried by the statement of the German Finance Minister that since the currency is a key moment in the sovereignty of the state, they will not leave the cryptocurrency in private hands. Apparently, this means the release of cryptocurrency by private individuals. Perhaps it is in this connection that Germany and other countries of the European Union so categorically negatively oppose the circulation of Libra coins on its territory. Of course, private cryptocurrency carries a lot more risk to users than cryptocurrency issued by the state. However, states create only a centralized cryptocurrency and in this regard there will always be a difference between them.

As Bitcoin is declared legal in Germany it is right that they should adopt the blockchain technology too for their system. The blockchain is proven fast and secure it could be applicable in any system specially if the security is concern. Like in US Pentagon that they have already applied the blockchain technology to their defense system.

Hmm...
Würde man das so weiterspinnen und die vergangenen Zyklen einbeziehen, dann gehen sowohl BTC als auch die Top Altcoins steil, der Tod der Shitcoins wird erneut verschoben.
Ob das noch in diesem Jahr passiert... ja gut, weiß ich nicht. Mein Bauch sagt: keine Ahnung.  

Even the 'leaders' of ethihirium knew it wouldnt work and was a scam but listen to them here

https://twitter.com/notgrubles/status/1174408215674728449?s=19




HAHAHAHAHA THEY KNEW ITS A SCAM AND THEY STILL TOOK THE MONEY hHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH
typical delusional efirium bagholders will defend this

There is always the option of boycott, other wallets exist, like https://simply.cash/
If major issues WeiBlock.app would be full of complaints

Come on guys, right from the  start Craig Wright was Wrong when he said he is Satoshi because he can't prove what Vitalik wants him to do which is put a signature using the private key using bitcoin block #1.  Well, there are many things we can add up to prove he is just another conman. But we still give him props because he was one  of the Faketoshi who made it big and have his own cult.

if we no longer have the right to dream, then where the world is going

The Fed is rushing 53 billion dollars of liquidity into the financial system.

Markets were caught in a "perfect storm" on Tuesday, forcing the U.S. Federal Reserve to intervene for the first time in ten years.
This is the kind of emergency response that brings back bad memories, those of the 2008 financial crisis. The US Federal Reserve (Fed, central bank) was forced to inject $53 billion (€48 billion) of liquidity into the financial system on Tuesday morning to contain the level of interest rates on the repurchase market.

This market allows cash-strapped institutions to find the funds they need to spend the night, by temporarily selling securities in exchange, most often treasury bills. Repurchase operations are low-risk and are financed at rates that are expected to move in the same direction as those of the Fed, within a range of between 2% and 2.25%.

But these repo rates have tightened sharply, reaching 6% on Monday afternoon and 10% on Tuesday morning. Financial markets have been caught in what the Financial Times calls a "perfect storm", forcing the Fed to intervene for the first time in ten years. Clearly, there was no longer any money at a reasonable price and the Central Bank of New York had to make 75 billion dollars of liquidity available urgently (53 billion dollars were consumed).
There are many explanations: first, American companies had to pay their taxes on September 15, which reduced the amount of dollars available. Then, the U.S. Treasury, whose deficits are soaring, held auctions that were supposed to be settled on Monday for $78 billion, and the banks, by subscribing to them, had to consume their reserves in dollars. Finally, the same Treasury had an extremely low level of reserves with the Fed ($184 billion on September 11, compared to an average of $400 billion since 2015) and it would have been tempted to increase the level of its bank account after the debt ceiling was raised by Congress.

This would explain the crisis. According to a source close to the central bankers, it is assured that this is a technical problem and that there are no hidden wolves. Rates had returned to their normal level on Tuesday afternoon.
Nevertheless, the case raises concerns, as the Fed closes its two-day meetings on Wednesday, September 18. A debate is starting to take place as to whether there is enough liquidity in the financial system.

Since the 2008 crisis, the Monetary Institution had bought the banks' claims (the famous quantitative easing) to maintain liquidity in the markets, but it has since reversed its course and reduced the number of securities in its portfolio. As a result, banks have less cash reserves available from the Fed (USD 1,300 billion compared to USD 2,900 billion in 2014), making them more vulnerable to a sudden need for liquidity. Interventions of this type were frequent before the 2008 crisis," says French economist Thomas Philippon, a professor at New York University.

Finally, the Financial Times explores a final possibility, that of the recent ups and downs on the black gold market that could have created a market effect. In addition, there is the problem of Saudi Arabia, the kingdom being partially deprived of dollar revenues with the temporary paralysis of its oil installations. To meet its expenses, Riyadh could have drawn on its dollar reserves.

In any case, the case shows the nervousness of the financial markets despite the accommodating policy of the central banks.


Let us look at it positively, these 53 billion will most probably be squandered in the crypto world BSV - CLOAK - CROWN and others...

I don't think it's that important, because if we find Satoshi, a lot of people might be disappointed in him.

Its indeed created like any other ICO, just with long sale period...but then again, big chunk of BCH and BSV is created the same way...out of thin air,
piggybacking on BTC success

Now fraudtoshi aka Craig Wright writes shit about Hal Finney

https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1173953365342117893 (thanks again to Arthur Van Pelt)


Finney was arguably the major contributor to PGP, so his coding skills were top notch.

See what he wrote about Bitcoin, and we KNOW he mined Bitcoin very early.



What did Satoshi think about Finney ?


Two humble ultra skilled coders with mountains of respect for each other. Just the opposite of the fraud wannabe Satoshi.

You just described XRP