I admit, I have not understood much in this area, so sorry, if it's a stupid question: Since Titanium wants to provide the complete infrastructure in the future and you do not need your own computer anymore, can you also run your Titanium Masternode on the Titanium infrastructure?
|
|
|
have just flown over the revised whitepaper. Most mistakes are probably corrected. The new roadmap is much more detailed. I'm looking forward to the demo version of the Royal Platform on 1.6.18. I'm really curious how it all looks and will work
and on 1.12 is the luxcess party for investors. From which investment limit we will be invited? :-)
|
|
|
Yes, that was indeed very interesting info! But we're not talking 120$ here but 10.000$ from the get go. I couldn't manage to invest that much. But it's fine. Atleast I'll be able to mine it.
it's the good choice, there is another way to get it i also feel $10.000 is big investment although this will be very profitable but have many other purposes Wow, if only I could have invested $10,000 I truly think Titanium will be one of the top cryptos given plenty of time. I would like to see Titanium ( BAR) @ around $15-20 by late 2018 - mid 2019. Definitely some nice profits to be made here with this interesting project is there any reliable information on how much you have to invest for a master dinner? If it really is $ 10,000, then unfortunately I have to pass. But it's probably going to be a pretty big deal, cheap master nodes barely exist, and Titanium is such a big project, and for the sake of it, I can not imagine it going to be cheap
|
|
|
Only 2 more days to go until the main sale, is anyone as excited as me?
oh man, i'm an idiot. i put all my eth i wanted to spend in the ico in another token last night. Now i have to hope it will double within 2 days, so i can spend the profit it in savedroid:-) thanks for the reminder. Due to the turbulence on the market and the emerging FOMO fever, I have completely forgotten about my SVD reservation
|
|
|
I was going through the whitepaper and read this: "If you invest your tokens at the index value 1.00 and it increases to 2.00, you made a 100% yield. In case of withdrawal, the platform automatically deducts PROFIT SHARE (30% of the yield) whereas the rest of the money is transferred to Royal Luxcess Hold"
If I understand correctly any withdrawal is subject to 30% deduction of the profit; if there weren't any profits no deduction would take place?
Yeah but they’re investing on your behalf, they have to make money, all banks/asset managers do it therefore it makes sense that the Luxcess collective investment fund would also do this. I presume their cut of the profit they gain from is tiered based on % return of investment, would be great if a dev or team member could confirm this? What happens to profits below 100% what cut will Luxcess take? Probably there won't be any cut as there is no profit to take a cut from? It's an interesting question and I am curious how Luxcess will handle this, would be nice if there is a response to this question Yeah it would be good to get a response from the Luxcess team, I might post the question in their Telegram and find out the answer from one of their moderators. I think they're a bit more active on telegram compared to BCTTalk! Oh that's a good idea, I think on telegram they are more responsive since it is an active chat system Would be nice if you could address that question in telegram, perhaps post here the answer so that other people can find out how it works as well Thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Personally i'd hope the 30% take is actually from profit not from overall amount, if its 30% from profit it would make sense and be very reasonable as far as investment funds go but its definitly something they need to clarify asap to keep investors minds clear and in the right place for investing further funds. Cryptossi has already asked in their Telegram channel, and the 30% is taken off every investment, also if it loses. So this leads to the obvious question: 30% of what? 30% is alot, but I guess people can live with it if it's taken off their profits. But if it's taken off losing investments aswell, then there are no profits to take 30% off of them. That leads me to believe that 30% fee will be taken off the amount invested. Now if this is the case I think this is way too much and I doubt many people will agree to invest with such fees. Hopefully the team can clarify this for us as soon as possible. maybe he got some wrong information. what if they lose all my money, do i have to pay then 30%. For example i lose 100$, i have also to pay 30$? or did i understand something wrong? Hello, the 30% profit share is deducted only from profit that we make, it has absolutely no connection to your initial investment, and lets say that we do not make any profit on ceratain month, you won't have to pay anything. So as said 30% will only be split from profit making Luxcess group Thanks for the clarification. All the unnecessary excitement :-) So a poster in the telegram channel was given incorrect information I can deal with a 30% fee from the profit. And have no problem to pay 300,000 fee if i earn 700,000 :-)
|
|
|
Guys, look below link and rating. Its seems to be good going... Savedroid Team is working hardly.... https://cryptogo.de/en/savedroid-cryptocurrencies-for-everyone/5.9 SCORE Product6.5 Market5.6 Use of Blockchain3.6 Whitepaper6.4 Roadmap7.6 Business Modell5.9 Team6.8 Token Sale4.6 Status Quo 200k Downloads 10 Million € in Transactions 25k+ Telegram 3000+ Twitter 8100+ Facebook 3 Million € Funding This is quite low for a project like savedroid and this might push off potential investors from participating in the main sale I think you are right but if the investor does a bit research, the person will notice that the review itself contains some errors and should not believe it as absolute truth I always say DYOR, do your OWN research, information shown on external websites can always have other motives Yes, i don't base my decision on one review or rating, everyone has their own personal interest , some maybe obscured, how do we even ascertain the credibility of such site, i'm not been biased, just speaking from experience The rating doesn't reflect well on Savedroid, like you guys mentioned just a single review doesn't define a project, i will love to commend supports, investors and well wishes of Savedroid in here for your positivity i wont't dispute the fact that you guys are right tho.. but we should heed to the fact that there are a lot of lazy people out there who dont like looking for informations on their own but want to be spoonfed by others and those kind solely rely on site like this to determine what to do and not to? Agreed on that one; in many posts you it is people using those sites are proof and references in various inquiries. However I still think that those sites (well not all) do it purely for the sake of listing an ICO they do not bother diggin in and really understanding the ICO they are listing; like a genuine review. I think savedroid whitepaper is simple enough. Agree. Savedroid whitepaper is enough to study. But I mentioned score whatever I found while studying about Savedroid. If you still believe, have more links below with positive reviews : https://www.trackico.io/ico/savedroid/4.4 / 5.0https://icoholder.com/en/ico/savedroid-173754.1https://icobench.com/ico/savedroid4.1 there you can see it again, there are many pages to rate the ICOs. These three are at least pretty close to each other, so you can assign that to some extent. If I had to evaluate this ICO, the value would probably be somewhere around 4.5 / 5. Maybe I should also open a review page:-)
|
|
|
I was going through the whitepaper and read this: "If you invest your tokens at the index value 1.00 and it increases to 2.00, you made a 100% yield. In case of withdrawal, the platform automatically deducts PROFIT SHARE (30% of the yield) whereas the rest of the money is transferred to Royal Luxcess Hold"
If I understand correctly any withdrawal is subject to 30% deduction of the profit; if there weren't any profits no deduction would take place?
Yeah but they’re investing on your behalf, they have to make money, all banks/asset managers do it therefore it makes sense that the Luxcess collective investment fund would also do this. I presume their cut of the profit they gain from is tiered based on % return of investment, would be great if a dev or team member could confirm this? What happens to profits below 100% what cut will Luxcess take? Probably there won't be any cut as there is no profit to take a cut from? It's an interesting question and I am curious how Luxcess will handle this, would be nice if there is a response to this question Yeah it would be good to get a response from the Luxcess team, I might post the question in their Telegram and find out the answer from one of their moderators. I think they're a bit more active on telegram compared to BCTTalk! Oh that's a good idea, I think on telegram they are more responsive since it is an active chat system Would be nice if you could address that question in telegram, perhaps post here the answer so that other people can find out how it works as well Thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Personally i'd hope the 30% take is actually from profit not from overall amount, if its 30% from profit it would make sense and be very reasonable as far as investment funds go but its definitly something they need to clarify asap to keep investors minds clear and in the right place for investing further funds. Cryptossi has already asked in their Telegram channel, and the 30% is taken off every investment, also if it loses. So this leads to the obvious question: 30% of what? 30% is alot, but I guess people can live with it if it's taken off their profits. But if it's taken off losing investments aswell, then there are no profits to take 30% off of them. That leads me to believe that 30% fee will be taken off the amount invested. Now if this is the case I think this is way too much and I doubt many people will agree to invest with such fees. Hopefully the team can clarify this for us as soon as possible. maybe he got some wrong information. what if they lose all my money, do i have to pay then 30%. For example i lose 100$, i have also to pay 30$? or did i understand something wrong? Yes this doesn't make alot of sense to me either. We will have to wait for an official clarification. I hope we get a response soon as it is a very importabt issue. If this is really how it's going to be I don't think this is goana work for Luxcess. Of course, I understand that they do not want all investors to step off immediately if losses occur. But I wonder if 30% fairy in case of loss is the right path for it. For me these fees are definitely a reason to reconsider an investment
|
|
|
Nachdem crash bei den Cryptos ist der aktienmarkt heut ja auch stark in die Knie gegangen. Edelmetalle schwächeln auch ...Wo fließt denn nun das ganze Geld hinein ?
Die neuen lambos werden diese woche ausgeliefert
|
|
|
I was going through the whitepaper and read this: "If you invest your tokens at the index value 1.00 and it increases to 2.00, you made a 100% yield. In case of withdrawal, the platform automatically deducts PROFIT SHARE (30% of the yield) whereas the rest of the money is transferred to Royal Luxcess Hold"
If I understand correctly any withdrawal is subject to 30% deduction of the profit; if there weren't any profits no deduction would take place?
Yeah but they’re investing on your behalf, they have to make money, all banks/asset managers do it therefore it makes sense that the Luxcess collective investment fund would also do this. I presume their cut of the profit they gain from is tiered based on % return of investment, would be great if a dev or team member could confirm this? What happens to profits below 100% what cut will Luxcess take? Probably there won't be any cut as there is no profit to take a cut from? It's an interesting question and I am curious how Luxcess will handle this, would be nice if there is a response to this question Yeah it would be good to get a response from the Luxcess team, I might post the question in their Telegram and find out the answer from one of their moderators. I think they're a bit more active on telegram compared to BCTTalk! Oh that's a good idea, I think on telegram they are more responsive since it is an active chat system Would be nice if you could address that question in telegram, perhaps post here the answer so that other people can find out how it works as well Thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Personally i'd hope the 30% take is actually from profit not from overall amount, if its 30% from profit it would make sense and be very reasonable as far as investment funds go but its definitly something they need to clarify asap to keep investors minds clear and in the right place for investing further funds. Cryptossi has already asked in their Telegram channel, and the 30% is taken off every investment, also if it loses. So this leads to the obvious question: 30% of what? 30% is alot, but I guess people can live with it if it's taken off their profits. But if it's taken off losing investments aswell, then there are no profits to take 30% off of them. That leads me to believe that 30% fee will be taken off the amount invested. Now if this is the case I think this is way too much and I doubt many people will agree to invest with such fees. Hopefully the team can clarify this for us as soon as possible. maybe he got some wrong information. what if they lose all my money, do i have to pay then 30%. For example i lose 100$, i have also to pay 30$? or did i understand something wrong?
|
|
|
savedroid ICO: What the tokens will be used forA key question that everyone should ask before buying into an ICO is: what will the tokens be used for? In the case of savedroid, the token will become the key payment in the new crypto ecosystem of the company — and therefore has good chances to show a strong performance if savedroid’s crypto simplification strategy works. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn-images-1.medium.com%2Fmax%2F800%2F1%2AmZbzM5muSfXkKGyNKn0lrA.png&t=663&c=kuRUiZbuwxO1Tw) Read more at our latest blog post https://medium.com/@ico_8796/savedroid-ico-what-the-tokens-will-be-used-for-d88011554638 thanks for that, just read it and personally i find this point very interesting, since I'm sure that savedroid will find very, very many users: "So, eventually, our user growth will drive an increasing demand for savedroid tokens on the one hand and, at the same time, a decreasing supply of savedroid tokens on the other hand. Hence, the value of the savedroid token depends, among other factors, on our future user growth." So if, as I think, many new users come to it, the value of SVD can only rise :-)
|
|
|
NEWSFLASH! Titanium Blockchain will include the use of Proof-of-Stake Masternodes! oh man, i love masternodes:-) really great to hear. I'm sure some will ask again for the source of this information, so here it is, twitter, easy as can be: https://twitter.com/TBISINC/status/960889374857617408
|
|
|
What price will be on ICO? Price fixed in usd or in ETH? And what price was on pre-sale? You have working payments system already? ( I see, that you have app on 1st page)
That ist an interessanting question, especially when the market goes down like the last weeks. I hope the fixed rate is svd in Euro. You have to pay much more when your Payment is in ETH. I believe the savedroid team will have several ways of paying, I think they will accept Euro and the normal BTC / ETH as most popular payment methods, interesting times ahead with the market showing signs of weakness, I hope we can recover from here As they also accept fiat and they say the price per token is 0.01 €, I assume they will adjust the rate of tokens per ETH (and BTC) constantly. Maybe based on an average price of ETH over the last 24 hours, like some other projects did. Savedroid convert ETH/BTC through their payment system to keep in line with the current ETH/EUR & BTC/EUR prices. There is a bit of a spread but you do not lose a lot in the great scheme of things. So does this basically mean, that we will get the 'live' rates for ETH/EUR & BTC/EUR when we participate in the ICO? So, for example, when I'll send ETH, their payment system gets the current market price of ETH in the moment I sent it, and then calculates an individual SVD/ETH for me? We update ETH and BTC rates 4 times a day (0, 6, 12 and 18 o'clock CET) based on an average of Kraken and Bitstamp. very interesting, so now we can speculate on a better course during the 4 hours. that will certainly be interesting and exciting. This is really new for me, so I have to prepare well, to choose the right strategy when buying :-)
|
|
|
Yes, it was hard time for the ICOs in the past weeks, but we are expecting a huge turn around by the end of the month.
oh, here the professionals talk about a turnaround. good to hear, think luxcess has more idea of the crypto market than me, and if they are optimistic, then we can be too :-) Not that I have a lot of worries so far, my portfolio looks pretty good despite the losses
|
|
|
my first thought: good, an interview with michael stollaire. then I listened to a few minutes of the interview and read through the comments. Most give back what I thought: what a bad sound. I really did not understand a lot and then it was too exhausting for me to listen to everything. It may be that I missed a lot of information, but the sound makes it impossible for me to listen any longer. I read in the comments that the two guys are friends and supporters of him. that explains why he gives an interview to a youtube channel with 4500 subscribers (a very long interview) Of course it's good to promote his project in many ways, but that seems to have been more of help to them both than titanium helped himself. I think that an interview with this sound quality should not be published on the official pages of Titanium, the project is too professionally raised and the interview unfortunately not. Do not get me wrong, I think it's good that Larry and Joe are so enthusiastic, but maybe they should invest a few dollars in the equipment You seriously listened to this? The sound is so bad, even though I tried listening. I just could not focus. Too bad so much energy wasted on something that could have been really good I think that the sound could have been better. It was a little bit hard to follow. Maybe they need to try add subtitles on the next video this will make it a lot easier to understand it. I will watch it again later on the day again with headphones. i also thought, that subtitles would be a good idea. but the interview is very long, i don't think they can manage this. Since I do not want to miss any new information, I will try again tonight to watch the video. some of you have already posted information from the video, these will also help to understand everything better
|
|
|
I was going through the whitepaper and read this: "If you invest your tokens at the index value 1.00 and it increases to 2.00, you made a 100% yield. In case of withdrawal, the platform automatically deducts PROFIT SHARE (30% of the yield) whereas the rest of the money is transferred to Royal Luxcess Hold"
If I understand correctly any withdrawal is subject to 30% deduction of the profit; if there weren't any profits no deduction would take place?
Yes platform automatically deducts part of our profit to luxcess, but only from those 100% of profit that we made you, your investition of course remains intact. Luxcess group I think that's a fair offer. Of course, 30% at first glance seem to be a lot, but if you double my investment, that must be worth something to me. and they take "only" 30% of the profit, not the deposit. Somehow, they should also benefit from their good investments
|
|
|
What price will be on ICO? Price fixed in usd or in ETH? And what price was on pre-sale? You have working payments system already? ( I see, that you have app on 1st page)
That ist an interessanting question, especially when the market goes down like the last weeks. I hope the fixed rate is svd in Euro. You have to pay much more when your Payment is in ETH. I believe the savedroid team will have several ways of paying, I think they will accept Euro and the normal BTC / ETH as most popular payment methods, interesting times ahead with the market showing signs of weakness, I hope we can recover from here As they also accept fiat and they say the price per token is 0.01 €, I assume they will adjust the rate of tokens per ETH (and BTC) constantly. Maybe based on an average price of ETH over the last 24 hours, like some other projects did. Savedroid convert ETH/BTC through their payment system to keep in line with the current ETH/EUR & BTC/EUR prices. There is a bit of a spread but you do not lose a lot in the great scheme of things. So does this basically mean, that we will get the 'live' rates for ETH/EUR & BTC/EUR when we participate in the ICO? So, for example, when I'll send ETH, their payment system gets the current market price of ETH in the moment I sent it, and then calculates an individual SVD/ETH for me? That's how I understood it. Would make sense, what value should you otherwise take? Unfortunately, I'm on the road and have no time to look, but in the white paper is certainly something to read about it, right?
|
|
|
i hope this project will be successful in the future, I will support with join bounty signature campaign
Luxcess is an investment platform which brings in profit for their investors. If it isn't successfull then something really went wrong along the line.. But i know it will achieve its targets I am also optimistic. Even though the market is just going down a long way, he did that earlier, and Luxcess made good profits during that time. So they know what they are doing
|
|
|
my first thought: good, an interview with michael stollaire. then I listened to a few minutes of the interview and read through the comments. Most give back what I thought: what a bad sound. I really did not understand a lot and then it was too exhausting for me to listen to everything. It may be that I missed a lot of information, but the sound makes it impossible for me to listen any longer. I read in the comments that the two guys are friends and supporters of him. that explains why he gives an interview to a youtube channel with 4500 subscribers (a very long interview) Of course it's good to promote his project in many ways, but that seems to have been more of help to them both than titanium helped himself. I think that an interview with this sound quality should not be published on the official pages of Titanium, the project is too professionally raised and the interview unfortunately not. Do not get me wrong, I think it's good that Larry and Joe are so enthusiastic, but maybe they should invest a few dollars in the equipment
|
|
|
the whitepaper says that you can withdraw your investment at any time with from the royal platform. Of course this is a big advantage over the usual funds, where you often have to wait a long time to get your money back
This is indeed a very big advantage. Sometimes people need to withdraw their money immediately due to unexpected circumstances, so it's a good thing they will be able to do so. This encourages people to invest even greater amounts as they can withdraw them at any time. If this is implemented I think would attract alot of investors; it is a huge pain having to wait for your funds until they are released the worst part is when the withdrawal is rejected for some reason; imagine waiting long just to be rejected withdrawal. Yes, that's a bonus for the luxcess project, i've been pondering about that, still wandering if there will be any negative effect if it gets to a point where everyone decides to withdraw at once, does the luxcess team have like a safe protocol to counter this? The risk of bulk withdrawal is always there for such schemes. But there might be some way out and should have been set by the project in the begining. But honestly I did not come across such statements anywhere in the whitepaper of Luxcess. I am sure that this case would be taken care of. The whitepaper can not consider every contingency, even if it seems to be an important issue for us at the moment. But they are revising the whitepaper, maybe they will refer to it
|
|
|
|