OP, e foarte greu de urmarit problema ta, intrucat folosesti doar termeni nespecifici... Hai sa o luam altfel.


Ce cont? Contul de pe freebitco.in? Sau un un cont de portofel crypto?

Daca e vorba de contul de freebitco.in, atunci in 2014 ai folosit vreun portofel pe care sa-l atasezi contului freebitco.in (unde sa si retragi banii, de atlfel)? Daca da, atunci doar pe acel portofel iti sunt retrasi banii. Si, daca ai dat deja withdraw, ei acolo s-au trimis, in portofelul setat initial in 2014. Daca nu il mai ai, adio bani. Daca il mai ai, ai banii in el. Daca nu ai atasat niciun portofel contului de freebitco.in, atunci trebuie sa iti instalezi un portofel si sa il atasezi contului freebitco.in. Desi, fara a fi avut un portofel deja setat pe freebitco.in nu imi dau seama cum ai fi putut sa dai withdraw.

Cu alte cuvinte, tind sa cred ca avusesei un portofel in 2014, pe care evident nu il mai ai, si cand ai dat withdraw din freebitco.in acolo s-au dus fondurile. Daca iti amintesti ce portofel era; si, daca iti reamintesti ce parola aveai la el, sau ce pasphrase (o serie de multe cuvinte), ai sanse sa iti recuperezi banii. Altfel, nu.

Mai departe,


Nu cred ca ai inteles nimic Cu parere de rau. Telefonul nu conteaza. E ca si cum ai spune ca lucrezi de pe browser Firefox sau de pe un iPad Air 2. Telefonul este un instrument care iti confera acces la Internet, nu are treaba cu tranzactiile crypto. Pe telefon iti poti instala insa aplicatii crypto, cum ar fi portofele Bitcoin. Daca iti instalezi un portofel pe telefon vei avea si o lista de adrese. Acele adrese (siruri lungi de litere si cifre) sunt ca un fel de IBAN al portofelului tau. Intreoduci acea adresa pe un site si la acea adresa incasezi BTC. Sau o dai cuiva pentu a-ti trimite la ea BTC. In cazul tau, o poti introduce pe freebitco.in pentru a-ti retrage fondurile BTC de la ei. Dar, cum tu deja ai dat withdraw, momentan nu mai ai ce retrage. Eventual ai putea seta o adresa noua de BTC pe freebitco.in pentru a putea retrage fonduri viitoare.


Din propozitia asta mare lucru nu se intelege. De ce ar fi trebuit sa dai withdraw pe o adresa de portofel Blockchain.com? Retragerile le poti face pe orice adresa a oricarui portofel.


In ce portofel electronic nu apar? Daca tranzactia a fost OK, atunci evident ca apar. Unde nu iti apar tie banii?


Ce inseamna ca ai vorbit cu "astia de la Blockchain"? Cu "astia" de la care Blockchain? Si ce ai vorbit? Si cine sunt "astia"? Astia care?


Toate tranzactiile se fac doar cu ajutorul portofelelor electronice. Nu exista alt fel de tranzactii crypto. In plus, tranzactiile sunt imuabile (deci nu se pot modifica). Deci nici propozitia asta nu prea are sens...


Poti, evident, dar ce ar mai fi de vorbit? Din moment ce ai dat deja withdraw si tie ti s-au trimis banii (probabil la vreo adresa setata in 2014), iar tranzactia a fost confirmata... ce mai e de vorbit atunci? Tranzactiile sunt ireversibile. Daca nu faci rost de portofelul pe care l-ai avut in 2014 (si nu ma refer la aplicatia de portofel, ci la acea adresa folosita de tine in 2014) atunci nu mai poti recupera nimic.

Una peste alta, incearca sa iti pui un pic ordine in ganduri cand scrii ce scrii... este foarte greu de inteles ce problema ai de fapt. Ce am scris mai sus este ceea ce intuiesc ca s-a intamplat, dar nu sunt sigur ca am inteles ce voiai sa spui de fapt.


Daca ai un portofel instalat, la instalare iti da o serie de cuvinte cu care il poti restaura pe alt telefon sau in caz ca il dezinstalezi si reinstalezi. Acesta este seed-ul, sa zic asa. Cheia privata este ca un fel de PIN al unui card. Este un cod lung cu ajutorul caruia portofelul tau autorizeaza o tranzactie de iesire (adica trimiti cuiva BTC). Cheia privata iti este afisata undeva in setarile portofelului. Probabil la un meniu de securitate.


Cum adica la tranzactii iti apare de la cine ai primit? Pai tu in contul de freebitco.in primesti bani de la altcineva? Aia e o aplicatie, nu ai cum sa primesti bani de la altcineva... Deci nici din propozitia asta nu se intelege nimic.


Ce inseamna ca "te transfera oarecum? Cum oarecum? Nici de aici nu inteleg nimic.


Cred ca mai bine faci niste screenshots, le urci pe imgur si pui aici link-urile pozelor, sa intelegem si noi care e problema...

The white paper is part of Bitcoin's history... Who has no past has no future...  We must preserve the historical facts, documents, relics, especially something like the white paper. Otherwise why would there exist history...? Why study it in school? Why care about the past...? Why would historians exist anymore?

Our entire world has a history, many study it and learn it... Bitcoin has also its very own history and the white paper is one of the most important part of this beautiful history. Everything started from this document... Changes occur in time, of course, but this doesn't mean that we should not preserve historical facts.

In the end, this is also a sign of respect for Satoshi's work which - in time - changed the world. Similar to many historical books, which are translated in so many languages, white paper deserves also the same attention and respect. Bitcoin is taught in some schools nowadays... Most likely, the white paper is also a part of what teachers present to students.

I can see that. It's obvious.


Welcome. Anytime.


Yes, please do so. And just where you truly think you can contribute. Nowhere else.



No problem on my side. Before a few hours ago I never knew you exist.


Welcome. Again.


How ironic, isn't it? Misleading too. Is like seeing a cow eating grass and you tend to believe it's a lawn trimming device. Actually, it's an animal who's purpose is giving us milk and meat. If you don't get the riddle, let me know. I'll explain with more details.


This is obvious from any observer.


I never said I'm a mastermind of merit system.


All good then. Flawless communication.

But you are Towards me at least, and you do this while you don't even knkw what merit system is about, yet you're here for eight years already.


Actually I had an answer. And I wasn't patronizimg. Removing merits for posts not deserving them is always a possibility.


Then maybe you should stick to your business instead of engaging in discussion overwhelming your (poor) knowledge. After all, what's the point in involving in discussion you don't understand By the way, did you know that the forum wasn't built for business, but for Bitcoin discussion?


Uh-huh... then excuse me... You had only three years to understand the merit system, since it was launched in January 2018... Yes, it's not like you had 10 years to learn it


Yes, I see that. All is crystal clear.

Oh well, this happenes because Timelord is a very ill person and he can not judge properly anymore. Once I thought he is the village idiot, but I was wrong. Somehow, even c******unter observed (in one of his few good observations), that Timelord is a mentally disturbed person, which needs to be institutionalized for receiving proper medical attention. As you can see in the pointed link, his mental condition is not very stable, as he also started to accuse theymos for various things. He also accused me of FUD (lol?!) and many others for various imbecile suppositions.

The same is true in your inquiry.

The man is mentally challenged and I advise you to ignore him. A Romanian proverb says to not mess with crazies, as their brains are well rested You decide what to understand from here. Do you really want to challenge a guy which accuses theymos and protects game-protect...? I doubt that lol.

Lol, then who's jumping to conclusion, me or you? Also, being here since 2013 would mean you are familiarized with the merit system already...

Besides, if you would have read my previous post, you would understand more:



I also said that...


Well, you just answered yourself: only theymos (forum's Supreme Leader) or maybe Cyrus too (Global Administrator) can intervene.

Latest edit (March 13th, 2021): icopress had been added to the adulators and wannabees of Foxpup Merit Cycling Club.


icopress showed in many occasions his loyalty to this gang and his obedience toward the Supreme Leader ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]). However, as time passed and this brave padawan ventured forward into the wild territories of the forum, he realized that a helmet is not enough protection. Therefore, after an occult make-out ritual with the Supreme Leader, he asked for shelter from the smallest, yet strongest and sexiest gang of the forum!


Time has come for icopress to choose famiglia!

This is true. That's why I said it happens only in rare occasions... And anyway it was not OP's case



A certain case when it happened was last year, when someone asked to have all merits removed:


Don't ask me why he wanted such thing But his wish was fulfilled. I see though he received merits later and that's ironic.

---

And I answered to the question. I wasn't patronizing. If a merit was deleted (although it wasn't), why would that happen? Maybe because of a bug, because the user asked himself (as in the above mentioned case) or... maybe the post did not deserve the merit. Can you see other reasons...?

Actually, it just says it can not be undone, not that merits can't be taken away. And that "undone" means that if you merit someone, then you can not demerit that user (i.e., like removing a Fb "Like"). However, theymos can remove merits if he feels it's needed. For example, I remember that once a user asked himself to have his merits deleted. I don't know why he wanted that. And theymos listened to his request.

This doesn't mean the system can be abused, nor that it is abused. Only 1 person (theymos) or 2 (theymos and Cyrus) can delete merits. This happens only in very rare occasions though.

Why not?!


theymos. Maybe Cyrus too. Actually, most likely, Cyrus too.


Maybe you actually did not deserve it... ever thought about that?


Yes, this can happen. And it happened on several occasions...

I just wanted to write that but I did not want to ruin your hopes for being accepted in the foxhole. But it's good that you are a rational person though and you realize that for publishing that kind of pics you are banned! Banned!!! I and o_e_l_e_o were giving our wives as gift or even young veals and you... disclose that? That's blackmail, not bribe lol =)))

It's not the main problem that you are a merit rascal but showing such pics Being merit rascal is also a problem, as we are not merit rascals, but we cycle them; however that pic is way bigger problem than the lack of cycling

P.S.: I just noticed that our Leader has such charm that only mentioning her, somehow, switched this topic, which was about Lauda, to having Foxpup in the center

Fillippone how dare you! :p Our Leader has never looked like that and never been is that situation! She hot as as hell a jailbait, look at her! (Not to mention all the other pics )

Now for the sake of the confusion discussion, please detail how that picture came up! Who took it? And in what circumstance?!

Why...? Oo


Why not??

Besides, this discussion about pregnancy brings up some memories...


This confuses me. Why did fillippone thought that back then?!


I am not sure unless I see with my own eyes


I always knew that our Supreme Leader is a role model of seriousness. I consider myself also a model of seriousness but I had to admit she is way more serious than me. Apparently I did not appreciate nutildah at his real level of seriousness and I apologize for this

Uhm... not patience is what I fear the most, but I hope I'm just paranoic now... It's something else I fear, but as a caution I won't mention this public until everything is solved... There is something that may go wrong during this pull request procedure, for not ordinary reasons to say so... but let's hope it's just in my head. Disclosing this fear in public may actually trigger what I fear so I'll keep it inside me until we finish everything...


Thank you for the guideline, NotATether. Let's hope things will be that simple...


Actually, it is. And not just "a bible", but "The Bible". Bitcoin's Bible!

I am coming back on this thread to announce that I never forgot about my earlier promise. I worked a lot for the new translation, which I made from scratch. It took a long while because I wanted it to be flawless or as close as possible to perfection. This takes times. A lot.

I also want to thank to NeuroticFish for his tremendous help in realizing the new document. His input was crucial for having a very good new translation and he also helped with adapting the diagrams in Romanian and with proof reading.

As we are speaking, the translation is done. It just needs one more final and thorough check before going to the next step: the attempt to change the actual one with the new one. And I am afraid that this operation may be even more difficult than all the efforts invested so far. I hope I'm wrong about this though... We'll see how things work.

However, the most important part is that the longest work is finished. But maybe the hardest part is ahead. I'll keep you all posted about how things develop.

I also take this occasion to thank to all which encouraged me to realize the new translation. Your words were really a great incentive for me to do this!

Lool nullius!!! That sentence would deserve itself a 50 merits bomb, but if I'd do it I'd be accused of merit abuse =))) I almost spilled my coffee when I read that!


I was about to say that too. Timelord, the "grammar nazi", the one always correcting others, spelled "plagerism"... That's ironic, isn't it?


Seriously... what did you expect from the old, imbecile, mentally disturbed troll...? Did you expect anything else...? Did anyone expect anything else?

I think OP noticed this curious statement of nutildah:


Which, to be honest, intrigued me too. I thought there was a topic started by nutildah on this matter, but I didn't see any. I was not sure if the post was made for the lulz or if it was serious. And now I actually found a topic, but it isn't nutildah's In any case, I think that only nutildah can bring some more light about this investigation (which I tend to believe it is for fun purposes anyway).

Huh, wait... WHAT? Oo

Who doxxed him? And where? I may have been a bit busy last days and didn't see all that happened around, but I thought I got myself up to date, Ratimov's exclusion from millionaires' billionaires' gang being the latest news. Then I see this. Did something like this really happened? If so, that's disgusting indeed... I knew he had many enemies, but I did not ever think it could end up in anything like this. OK, may him be a plagiarist or not; may him be a DT1 with good use of the system or not; may him be... whatever else... but why doxx him though...?

I looked in the Investigation board, which is the only board where revealing personal information is permitted, but I did not see any topic about him... Therefore I believe the doxxing took course on a prohibited area of the forum, which is even worse, as anyone can see it... I did not interact with him too much, but I never saw him offering personal information, so this is a wonder for me... how it could happen. And, most important, why... You may not like someone, but why harm him that way...?

Salut Kosmin, bine ai revenit pe forum!

Referitor la topic-ul tau, acesta apartine de sectiunea Market, nu de sectiunea generala romaneasca. Pentru a-l muta in sectiunea corecta ai la dispozitie un buton in coltul stanga-jos al paginii, numit "move topic". Efectueaza click pe el, apoi selecteaza sectiunea corespunzatoare.

Nu este mare problema, insa fiecare sectiune are rostul ei. La "Presa", de pilda, apartin articolele legate de presa. In sectiunea generala (cea "mare") apartin toate topic-urile care nu se pot incadra la subsectiunile aferente.

Uhm... cu riscul (speranta? ) de a transforma acest topic intr-un nou Wall Observer, de cand am aflat despre Bitcoin am inteles principiul de functionare al Bitcoin, precum si ideologia crypto-anarhica si libertariana pe baza caruia a fost creat, mereu am fost de parerea lui Satoshi. Mai precis: "in timp (Bitcoin) fie va ajunge sa aiba o valoare foarte mare sau nu va avea nicio valoare". Din pacate, desi am cautat acest citat vreme de aproape o ora, nu am reusit sa-l gasesc. Am gasit altul insa, similar:


Dat fiind ca pana acum nu a tins spre o valoare 0 -- ci, din contra, a crescut constant in timp, in jos nu vad ca ar mai lua-o. In sensul ca nu spre 0. Fluctuatii vor mai exista, evident. Si dat fiind ca avem o cantitate finita, care poate doar sa scada in timp si deci sa devina si mai greu de procurat, valoarea nu are cum sa se duca decat in sus. Pana unde...? Asta este greu de estimat. Insa eu unul sunt ferm convins ca o valoare chiar si de 500.000$ sau 1.000.000$ pentru o unitate nu ar fi ceva imposibil.

Referitor la 66.600$, la un moment dat, in timp ce creste, va atinge si aceasta valoare, cu siguranta. Cum va atinge si valoarea de 58.000$, 58.001, 58.002$, 58.003$, [...] 66.599$ si tot asa. Referitor insa la partea cu speculatiile - ca va ajunge la acea valoare in 6 saptamani... ca de acolo o va lua in jos apoi va sari la 100.000$... e limpede ca lumina zilei ca asemenea afirmatii nu au niciun fundament, intrucat nimeni nu poate prevedea viitorul Dar oricine isi poate exprima dorintele... opiniile...