Revin cu inca o actualizare a topic-ului, de data aceasta una estetica. Am observat ca, de la un punct incolo, datele aferente coloanei "Suportă bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR)?" erau afisate pe doua randuri, in timp ce in topic-ul original erau repartizate corect, pe o linie. Nu stiu daca 1miau a facut modificari tabelului; singurul lucru care imi vine in minte este ca, poate, a mai adaugat / scos niste _ cand a adaugat si partea de "Bech32m (P2TR)", iar eu nu am stiut, asa ca, atunci cand a adaugat si partea aceasta, coroborata cu adaugarea / eliminarea unor "_", acestea au condus si la afisarea pe doua linii in tabelul "nostru", care nu cuprindea modificarile referitoare la "_". Tl; dr, despre asta e vorba: Inainte:  Dupa:  Aditional, am mai efectuat inca o modificare minora, la titlul aceleiasi coloane de mai sus. Astfel, "Suportă bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR)?" devine "Suportă Bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR)?". |
|
|
|
Much appreciated, as usually!  Pleasure is all mine Most likely, we need more _ _ _ (but no stealing from o_e_l_e_o's name  ). Why not? He has thousands!  Our _ _ _ are limiting column size here and I have removed 2 _ from Recunoaște adresele SegWit (P2SH)?* and removed 6 _ from Utilitate (scor subiectiv ) + added 4_ in general, so we could add 12 _ to your column in question, and it should work like this (just replace in your translated topic our _ _ _ table row) Fiuuu! 1miau, you are a genie in a bottle and guru of "_"s! Thank you very much, my friend! I just replaced the old code with the one you suggested and now it looks perfect: But what I still don't understand is... why, at beginning, just after I made the translation by copy-pasting your own BBCode, my table was looking well... And only after a while, after some updates, after adding and removing some websites that column started to look inappropriate. Still, I did not make any change to the table BBCode... Maybe you made a change at the table's code, perhaps, and I did not notice it...? I think this happened, maybe, after you added the part containing Bech32m... If it's not that I have no clue why the table changed in time and why it was looking well at beginning. Anyway, thanks a lot! |
|
|
|
3 months, 6 months, 1 year [...] I think 1 year of inactivity will be enough  This is just a short note and I will return later to reply to earlier posts. Sorry, but I thought this was clear from my post To be more precise, this part: The event is related to the activity made by users during current year and not for the past. I am sorry if the way I wrote it created confusion. By active users I meant users which were (or are) active during this year.
what if an inactive account wakes up during the competition? This would mean that he, actually, is active during current year, right? And the contest addresses users with huge contributions made for this year. So, for example, if an old user wakes up this year, he can be voted, but he should also merit to be voted for something amazing done during this year. If he just wakes up but has no contribution -- as he just woke up -- he would not deserve to me nominated, right? Anyway, these are very specific situations, which are also unlikely to happen, but even if they appear, we will treat each case based on its particularities. |
|
|
|
Ladies and gentlemen, For this year's event we decided to take into account the feedback received from various users, at the previous two similar events, and apply some fine-tuning to the existent rules. Additionally there will also be some new rules. All these will -- we hope -- bring even more accurate results! Therefore, the following changes will apply for Bitcointalk Community Awards event 2022 edition: 1. Votes for inactive users will not be taken into consideration anymore. The event is related to the activity made by users during current year and not for the past. As a consequence, votes for users like Satoshi, Lauda etc. (with all due respect for all good things they did in the past) will not be counted. Of course, this does not mean that a user's vote will be entirely not counted, if he nominates an inactive user. Only the vote for the inactive user is not counted. As a sum-up: if a user makes nominations of both active users and inactive ones, only the mentions of inactive ones will be not counted (in the contest's final results there will be no Satoshi, no Lauda etc.). 2. No merit sending is allowed from nominees to users which nominated them. This should improve dramatically the accuracy of results and offenders will have to support a penalty. For each merit sent, 1 vote is deducted. So for example, if in the voting topic Alice sent 5 merits to those who nominated her in any category, then we will not count these votes (but the rest of the votes that are addressed to other nominees will be taken into account). In addition, if a user voted for Alice in two categories, then the votes for each of the categories will be unaccounted for. 3. Eligibility-wise, the earlier rule You must have 50 merit or be a full member or higher to vote ➥ Note. will be changed to You must have 50 earned merits to vote ➥ Note. Remember, the contest is about having fun, not a duel for seeing who's da baws Therefore, we are encouraging you all to act honest -- in the end, this is what brings the joy of participation, right? Cheers to all
We were also curious about how users feel about implementing a rule which would give chances to more people to win. What we were thinking about is the following: to arrange things thus the winner of a category cannot be the same person from previous contests. Or he can be, as this does not mean a ban -- but he can be with more efforts. To be more precise, all previous winners could start with a coefficient of 0.8. Attention! -- this happens only regarding the previously won category! For example: Alice won last year in the ScamBuster category. - For other categories, her vote strength is 1. - For the ScamBuster category, the power of the votes given for it is 0.8. If even with this 0.8 vote strength Alice is still this year's winner of ScamBuster category, then she will be declared winner again, no matter what. This rule, if it'll be adopted, may add some variety. Please let us know your opinions.
It must be GazetaBitcoin 😉 You guessed well Something is not right. The merit suckers will not going to have a good time in the season 🤣 =))) I'll take this as a compliment! Thank you for trusting my immutable attitude toward respecting the rules -- and also, toward the spirit of the rules! |
|
|
|
Concurs nou Iata ca, dupa o vreme relativ lunga, incep sa apara concursuri noi Nici pe acesta nu-l observasem initial, cred ca trebuie sa imi refac bunul obicei de a verifica zilnic sectiunea de Collectibles". Nu am sa ma inscriu insa la acest concurs, desi arata chiar bine produsele... Cele mai interesante mi se par cele cu "Not your keys, not your coins", "Hodl" si "Coins of Nakamoto". Totusi, nu fac insa parte din aria mea de interes, asa ca am sa-i las pe altii. Mult succes, NeuroticFish, ca vad ca te-ai inscris |
|
|
|
Oh, asa are ceva sens. Ma speriasem ca, cel putin virtual, de la o P.U.L.A. intreaga s-a ajuns la doar 1inch... Ar fi fost foarte trist daca se intampla asa... (Na, poate ca oi fi mai batut in cap, dar 20k mai degraba i-as pune intr-un BTC si as astepta vreo 2-3 ani pana creste ca Fat-Frumos. Sa nu te superi.) IonCreanga, sa stii ca si eu subscriu la ce spune NEuroticFish aici... E o solutie mult mai simpla si cu mai putine riscuri...
Sper să nu supăr nici eu prea tare maximaliști Bitcoin, dar sincer eu cred că o să aibă mai mult valoare simbolică.
Tehnologia blockchain a evoluat destul de mult de la Satoshi incoace, iar evoluția continuă. Nu uita, si la Bitcoin continua evolutia... Am avut SegWit, bech32, bech32m, Taproot... si Bitcoin se afla intr-o continua evolutie, chiar daca in cazul sau este una mai lenta... Nu ma intelege gresit, eu (noi) chiar iti doresc (dorim) succes cu demersul tau... Si, daca reusesti, ar fi chiar foarte tare! Imi este doar teama sa nu pierzi niste bani pretiosi (asta presupunand ca ai reusi sa-i obtii cumva)... |
|
|
|
Merci pentru postare, NeuroticFish! M-am inscris! Daca nu erai tu, ratam concursul. Nu prea am mai avut concursuri in ultima vreme si mi-am cam pierdut obiceiul de a verifica zilnic sectiunea de Collectibles. Si, cum chiar ieri, parca, verificasem, nu cred ca as mai fi intrat inainte de a se termina concursul. Ai grija de tine, trateaza-te (mai bine decat mine!), multa sanatate si multa bafta! Totodata, merci frumos si pentru urarile anterioare. Mi-am revenit Dupa doua "editii" rapide, avem partea a 3-a, mai "normala" Da, pai celelalte doua se umplusera foarte repede si, pentru un asa premiu, parca ar fi fost mai adecvat un concurs cu mai multe pozitii disponibile celor interesati. Intr-adevar, cu 100 de participanti scade si sansa fiecaruia (matematic vorbind) la 1%, comparativ cu concursurile cu 16 pozitii, unde fiecare are 6.25% sanse, insa cred ca mai multi prefera variantele cu 100 de pozitii fata de cele cu 16. Macar prin prisma faptului ca nu se umplu atat de repede si au timp sa se inscrie, chiar daca nu vad concursul in prima zi in care a fost postat. Sa fie cu noroc |
|
|
|
Scuze, reușesc să scriu destul de rar pe aici. Nu prea ne ai tu asa, la inima, din ce bag seama Laptopul meu stă mai mult pe la amanet. Deșteptofonu mi s-a furat din nou, cred ca e al șaptelea pe anu ăsta, așa că am ramas la prostofoane. Daca te ajuta cu ceva, pot spune ca tu, cel putin, ai un laptop. Eu nu De ce m-am bătut cu șefu?
Că ierarhia nu se păstrează pe cale pașnică într-o dictatură. Loooooool tare asta =))) (Sper ca imi permiti sa folosesc citatul acesta din cand in cand) De ce aș face lichiditate pe 1inch?
Pentru că așa punem moneda în circulație și am putea ajunge la ăia 18 milioane de dolari capital de piață.
Nu stiu cât o să mai dureze până o să conving lumea de treaba asta, dar nu mă dau bătut. Dar... cu moneda ta nu mai ai niciun plan...? In loc sa o promovezi pe a ta, o promovezi pe alta...? Diagnosticul pare că nu se lasă nici el bătut.
Tre s-o las mai moale cu berea totuși, că nu știu să beau doar una. Și substantele astea cresc dopamina. Se spune, in popor, ca bautura e buna, daca te tii de ea. Asa, daca bei din an in Pasti, nu mai intelegi nimic. Iar excesul de dopamină susține: creativitatea, bipolaritatea și schizofrenia. Nu și memoria, am uitat de concurs. Ce sa zic... gluma-gluma, dar chiar e bine sa fii cat de cat ponderat... Totusi, daca diagnosticul spui ca ti-a fost pus gresit... inseamna ca berea nu te afecteaza cu nimic legat de schizofrenie, nu? În rest, toate bune și frumoase. Până mâine, când tre să plătesc chiria am chiar și un loc decent unde pot să dorm. Sa stii ca asta chiar este un lucru bun si ma bucur mult ca ai gasit un loc unde sa stai... Mai ales ca vine si iarna acum si, chiar ma gandeam -- "ce o face IonCreanga in iarna asta...?". Iar lupta pentru P.U.L.A. noastră continuă  Este cu baietii! Si nu uita de concurs de data asta Sa ne mai tii la curent cu ce mai reusesti sa faci Mult noroc! |
|
|
|
To hit a 15,000 reports milestone for several consecutive months in a major feat in itself but to hold a 99% accuracy in just phenomenal. You are seriously dedicated and for that full credit to you trying to clean this place up Thanks, JollyGood I managed doing it at beginning of the year, when I had some more free time than now and, also, I had "the material on the plate", to say so. Meaning that Rikafip holds a topic where he listed, in time (together with others, of course), many topics with ANN bumping services (there were more than 100 topics listed; I think 150 or so). I started in 2020 to clean all those topics, one by one, but I did not have time for all. And, starting December last year, I resumed my earlier work. And I did not stop until I finished cleaning all the topics mentioned inside Rikafip's topic. Let me know when you get there, that will be a moment to celebrate especially after 63,000+ posts Hihi, I will
Are you guys living on this forum 24/7? Yes Don't you have anything better to do?  No Kidding Seriously, 15,000 reports a month, that's an average of 500 reports a day. How is that even possible? If I'll say that I had days when I made even more than 1000 reports you may start thinking I am an AI I'm guessing most of these are bots or people writing random stuff. But, still, that's a lot of reports. Yes... It was a crazy period when all those ANN bumping services started to fill the forum with spam... Many were the result of people which hired Vitor Services to spam the forum. (Yes, there are services dedicated for such things...) It was difficult to keep the pace, and I did not use any automated tool for reporting -- just reported every post, manually, one by one... Something else must be going on here. My theory is that both of you are actually the same person. You've created two accounts and are reporting each other as much as possible. Loooooooooooool! |
|
|
|
After a "reporting spree" at beginning of the year when, for a few months, I managed to have even 15.000 reports within a month (for a few months in a row), I come back with my lattest results:  I am still aiming to that 100% accuracy, which is -- it seems -- sooo hard to get And, whenever I feel very close to reach it, I realize that I'm still stuck at 99% Nevertheless, I'll still work on it! |
|
|
|
Dupa cum anticipam in postarea anterioara, intr-adevar, Crystal Explorer a fost mutat de 1miau la rubrica site-urilor eliminate. A durat ceva mai mult pana a vut loc schimbarea, intrucat la penultima actualizare a OP, cumva, a " reusit" sa buseasca ceva prin OP si s-a pierdut aliniamentul, plus alte cateva mici chestiute pe care trevuia, de asemenea, sa le rezolve. Intr-un final insa a avut loc si aceasta modificare, care acum este reflectata si in topic-ul nostru. | Nume (link) | Suportă Bech32? | Recunoaște adresele SegWit (P2SH)?* | Utilitate (scor subiectiv ) | Notă acordată de | Comentarii | Motivul eliminării | | __________________________ | ___________________ | ___________________________________ | _______________________________ | ________________ | _________________________________ | ______________________________ | | Crystal Explorer (Eliminat în 10/2022) | Da (09/2021) / Da (05/2022) | Nu (09/2021) | 0 / 10 Puncte (de evitat) | SFR10 | Din cauza "echipei din spate", mă aștept să fie ca "walletexplorer"! | Eliminat deoarece nu mai funcțîonează |
|
|
|
|
I guess that Crystal explorer can be moved to the Removed block explorers list. You are right, somehow I missed it. It's moved to "removed Blockexplorers" now. Thank you for confirming this. I also made the change in the translated topic. Ohhh nooooo! Such an error has now occured several times after adding new lines to my OP and out of nowhere, my table was messed up.  Working with these BBCode tables is not an easy thing to do for sure. I mostly see it as repairing old clocks A lot of time it's needed, to pay attention to each line, each separator... For example, in the translated topic, the data from second column (the one related to bech32) doesn't fit on one line, as it happens in your OP. I never figured out why... And I copied exactly the BBCode from your OP. Perhaps, if you want to take a look and see yourself...? Maybe you have a suggestion...? Perhaps I misplaced an operator...? I have no idea. Suddenly, a new Table was started automatically, I didn't add it there, weird! Happened 4 times already but the last times, I've edited it directly.  This is weird, indeed... Done! I've missed to check the OP after udpating it.  That's also why the Table mistake wasn't edited on time...  No worry, I am glad I could help Cheers! |
|
|
|
Avem inc aun site adaugat listei de site-uri functionale pentru explorarea blocurilor Bitcoin. Astazi am adaugat site-ul Learnmeabitcoin, acesta fiind sugerat de ajiz138. | Nume (link) | Suportă bech32 / Bech32m (P2TR)? | Recunoaște adresele SegWit (P2SH)?* | Utilitate (scor subiectiv ) | Notă acordată de | Comentarii | | __________________________ | ___________________ | ___________________________________ | _______________________________ | ________________ | _______________________________________________________ | | Learnmeabitcoin | Da (10/2022) / Nu (10/2022) | Nu | 5 / 10 Puncte | ajiz138 | Un site simplist și nimic mai mult. |
Aditional, este posibil ca, in curand, sa urmeze inca o modificare, intrucat Crystal explorer " a suspendat operatiile pe timp nedefinit", fapt observat de SFR dar netratat inca si de 1miau. Imediat ce va avea loc si aceasta schimbare, voi elimina si eu site-ul din OP. |
|
|
|
Added to my list as well but it seems to be a little bit weird in terms of design and is quite different to "regular" Block explorers. Thank you, ajiz138, for this new suggestion and to 1miau for the update. I added the new recommended website in the translated topic too, together with a few earlier updates. @1miau: I think you forgot about this mention made by SFR: Crystal explorer has decided to " indefinitely suspend" its operation [one less source for law enforcement agencies to spy on]! I guess that Crystal explorer can be moved to the Removed block explorers list. Excepting that, I think that something happened to OP after last update, as it lines appear to not be properly aligned anymore, below the lattest added explorer:  I guess I spotted the error in BBCode: after the segment related to Learnmeabitcoin.com ended -- meaning after the /tr from the end of its section, you added a "/table" and a "table" in the code -- this should be the reason for the improper alignment. Oh and one more mention, if I may -- please take a look at the "No" of the Learnmeabitcoin.com -- the "No" standing in the column "SegWit identifiable?". This "No" appears with bold, unlike all the others from the table and it's missing the date (I guess 10/200). I hope this helps |
|
|
|
Thanks again for your flawless timing! Oh, wait... LV already replied... disregard that |
|
|
|
So, in a month this topic will become relevant again. Padawan! I was just going to PM you about this It seems that great minds think the same and you made this post before having the chance to write you a few ideas (which I will still do, nevertheless). ➥ I'll probably have to spam Cyrus to get him to ship the collectibles faster. I did not know this was an issue in the past but, in any case, faster shipping would not disturb anybody Romanian governess reports for duty! Sir! (Indian accent) ➥ We need to discuss how sending merit affects voting. This and some other ideas will appear in a PM which I will send you these days. I just need to put all ideas in order, in my head, thus I'll make some rational proposals. I am confident that this contest will be much better than previous two Thanks again for offering me the honor of being your right hand |
|
|
|
Am reușit sa ma angajez la negru, ca La Copac e un șef mai schizofrenic decât mine. Wow! Asta da veste buna! Am reușit totuși sa ma bat cu sefu' ) Acum iar sunt pensionar. Dar, bineinteles, trebuia sa vina si vestea rea Cum frrrate sa te bati cu seful? Sau, mai precis... cum sa te bati? De ce? Pe langa ca era mai usor sa bagi sapunu-n ciorap si sa-i dai in cap ce s-a intamplat totusi, de nu v-ati mai putut intelege omeneste...? N-am reușit sa fac rost de cei $20.000 (atât trebuie ca să creez lichiditate pe 1inch). De ce ai vrea sa faci asta...? Ma duc sa beau o bere. Cred ca asta e decizia cea mai inteleapta, in aceasta situatie
Si totusi... cu diagnosticul ce s-a intamplat? Si sa nu uiti si de concurs! |
|
|
|
Wenn es einen zusätzlichen Gewinner geben soll, würde ich raten, den folgenden Block des letzten Blocks im Jahre 2022 zu verwenden, welches dann der erste Block im Jahre 2023 wäre. Danke für den Vorschlag. Das hört sich nach einer sehr guten und gerechten Idee an. Dann nehmen wir den ersten Block des Jahres 2023, um einen Gewinner für eine weitere Karte von BitcoinRomania zu ermitteln. Wenn die Gewinner die Karte nicht möchten, z.B. aus Privatsphäregründen, können sie diesen Preis ablehnen und es werden danach jeweils die weiteren Blöcke verwendet, um die Gewinner der Karten zu ermitteln, jedoch höchstens 3 Stück. Sind danach noch keine Gewinner ermittelt, werden die verbliebenen Karten ggf. zu einem anderen Mal in einem Gewinnspiel als Preis nominiert. |
|
|
|
Yes, that's right. Thank you for confirmation. I can't say for sure, but I think Trashcan is cleaned manually. This seems most likely, since, as far as I see, those posts remained there for years now... For one reason or another, moderators may delete the topic immediately or move it to trashcan. In this case, the moderators act at their discretion. Perhaps, in this case, it was a good approach, considering that theymos also initiated that topic, where his intention was to compile more information about this user. So, in this case, perhaps he wanted to keep somewhere posts made by humanrightsfoundation's alternative account too... Or maybe he kept these posts until finding a way to make sure if that account was indeed an alt account of humanrightsfoundation... who knows. Anyway, the important part is that we found out why those posts still appear on AIbotBTC's profile. I think I can close the topic now. The only inconsistency remaining is the one spotted by Halab, but I think it's too minor to keep the topic open. Thank you all for helping in understanding this issue! |
|
|
|
The fact that the user is banned, I think, has nothing to do with his post count (except in the case when the user is nuked). Yes, this is also what I thought of...
You are correct. All of AIbotBTC user's posts were in one single topic, the topic was moved to Trashcan. And since Trashcan is not available to ordinary users, then, accordingly, all his posts are not visible to the ordinary user, but they are displayed in the user's profile, as they have not been completely removed from the forum. So let me see if I understand this right: so if a user's posts arrive, for some reasons, in Trashcan (either after having posts reported or if mods themselves decide to move the posts there), they still appear on user's profile but are not accessible anymore by regular users, right? If it is so, then why are some posts just moved there and not also deleted for good...? As far as I understand, this Trashcan acts like Windows' Recycle Bin. Are the posts supposed to be kept there for a certain amount of time...? Or some are not deleted at all and being kept as maybe they will be useful in the future, for some reasons...?
Ah ha! If I had any sMerits, I'd give you a few for teaching me a little bitcointalk minutiae that I wasn't aware of I fixed that for you That's a weird find, OP, but I'm much more interested in what those deleted posts were all about, and what the deal was with humanrightsfoundation. I remember that username, but for the life of me I can't remember what kind of drama he was involved with, or when. I guess that would be an off-topic discussion, but I'm still curious and I'll have to take a look at their profile. You can see the posts using Ninjastic.space. As for the connection between AIbotBTC and humanrightsfoundation, AIbotBTC was one of the multiple alternative accounts of humanrightsfoundation (more details here). If you are interested in reading all idiotic things humanrightfoundation said during time, you can do it here: humanrightsfoundation. It's a topic initiated by theymos himself, regarding this scmmer which was also making threats.
I see 13 posts of AIbotBTC from the topic "Taproot fraud" in the trashcan, so he has not been nuked. On the other hand, there is a gap between the number of posts on his profile (12) and the number of posts in the trashcan (13). I don't really understand, but it does not stop the forum from working . Maybe investigating the other profiles (the ones mentioned by Ddmr) may bring some light on this one too...? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
