Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 02:26:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 [149] 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 ... 214 »
2961  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [Scam Warning] [ANN] [BFC] Butterflycoin SHA-256 power for ButterflyLabs miners on: August 30, 2013, 09:26:38 PM
If you look up the address in the block explorer, you see 2 greedy retards, who actually sent BTC

Whats sad is, when I posted a few hours ago, there was only one.
2962  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [Scam Alert] [ANN] [BFC] Butterflycoin SHA-256 power for ButterflyLabs miners on: August 30, 2013, 06:29:09 PM
I applied the Scam Warning, not based on the coin itself, but because I do not believe that it is the OP's coin to release. It seems to be a bad copy and paste from its original release here https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/1092-pre-ann-butterflycoin-bfc-pre-announcement/ with the additional fee to premine, which is not an option in the real thread.

Thank you Sampey for finding the original coin announcement thread.

2963  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Coblee - Litecoin - Wired Article on: August 30, 2013, 04:05:21 PM
Coblee is a great guy, congrats on the article. Should Litecoin become the partner to BTC as invisioned, it will be interesting to see how the difference between knowing who the creator is changes the outcome and sucess of the coin.

Satoshi (unknown) vs Coblee (known)
2964  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Ripple Giveaway! on: August 30, 2013, 03:14:00 PM
Please LOCK this thread.


@Mods

It is not your thread to declare closed or locked, so I can not.
2965  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] 25 Block Erupters on: August 29, 2013, 05:45:18 AM
what are you doing in the picture or how did you connect the 25 erupters Huh

do you have a USB hub which has over 10 slots for usb then connects to your computer ?

I actually had 7 USB hubs each with 7 Ports, with 6 ports that were useable to Block Erupters.

Anyway, I am unable to keep up with the current price of Erupters in BTC, so I will be listing the remaining Erupters on Ebay.
2966  Other / Off-topic / Re: What's the newest cryptocurrency? on: August 29, 2013, 04:14:28 AM
Just wondering what the newest cryptocoin out there is? And maybe if you know, how much its worth in bitcoin?

Heh, too many to keep track of. It seems like a new coin is released in 10 minute intervals. Coinchoose is a good place to look for the somewhat established coins, as in the ones more than 15 minutes old.
2967  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Are folks using GPU to mine Quarkcoin? on: August 28, 2013, 03:05:57 PM
Even 4chan has mods, why no moderation here?  Undecided
edit: Yeah, report to moderator... we'll see if something happens.  Tongue

Rumbitla apparently posted their account info, and a mod got ahold of it and changed the password, so this should be the last of rumbitla.
2968  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] 25 Block Erupters on: August 28, 2013, 04:54:21 AM
Sent

Status: 0/unconfirmed, broadcast through 12 nodes
Date: 8/27/2013 23:43
To: 1JXwGd1N8eP4WWMP6mLe6UNAycDhzqvhJo
Debit: -0.40 BTC
Transaction fee: -0.0005 BTC
Net amount: -0.4005 BTC
Transaction ID: b756c3bd90cb4da48d3297bb1d469d7b82378b73ad8cb5064772c4ba0484fdd6



Recieved.
 .05 BTC to be sent after i3lome has recieved the erupter.



25 remaining, with a deal pending for 5.

20 Erupters, 5 Hubs, and 5 Fans actively available
2969  Other / Meta / Re: [CENSORSHIP] Matthew N. Wright on: August 27, 2013, 10:26:56 PM
And Inaba is free to post his bullshit for whole year. Now who is right about BFL being scam and who is jealous for not ordering his ASIC? Mathew made some very bad moves and is a general jerk but he makes useful posts from time to time.

Yep, that is an issue imo. However, if you read through Inaba's posts, a good portion of them are inflamatory, however, in response to another inflamatory comments. So the question becomes, whos more at fault, the angry customers, or the angry company representive. In a real business world, it wouldn't be tolerated, people would stop buying that company's products and that would be the end of it. However, that doesn't seem to apply here. What the community needs to stop doing however, which has been getting very very irritating, is provoking a response from someone, and then playing innocent and trying to use that person's response as damning evidence. I agree that Josh is an ass, but that doesn't give people the right to ask smartass questions of him, and then expect a calm response. He is posting bullshit in response to bullshit. There are exceptions of course, people asking actual questions, but there are also replies from Josh that are actual answers to those questions. In Matthew's case, I'm sure there was some more stuff going on behind the scenes, people aren't just banned for messing with a poll.

My solution would be to penalize everyone involved, the provoking and the responding party to the provokation, however, then we really do get into censorship and to what extent is Ok. Normally, if someone is having a spat with someone else, I'd forgive them as long as the heated words are flying from both directions, however, its been a nonstop spat for the last year, there is no progress to be made anymore by trying to further prove that BFL is or isn't a scam. There is enough info on both sides to write a book *starts writting* so starting new threads every 10 minutes isn't helping, its just spamming.

Back to the matter at hand, I find it somewhat ironic, that people are throwing the censorship flag, yet at the same time demanding that BFL's Ads be removed and Inaba censored. In a completely uncensored enviornment, wouldn't everyone be free to spam each other with Ads, Malware, hateful comments, people's personal information, and useless walls of text about making the perfect breakfast in a thread about recieving mining help? The fact of the matter is, the forums has a very very strict no censorship policy, and the only people who are banned or censored are those who abuse the rights of others to speak freely and read freely. If someone's asic device isn't working, and that person has to sift through 30 pages of pancake recipies to get to help, there is something wrong, and its time to start censoring.

What irritates me further, is people claiming misconduct on Theymos' part, especially when he isn't involved in half of it, or when it just doesn't make sense. He is not my boss, I am not covering for him, but for example, had I compiled together 10 posts from MNW that were all spam and troll posts, theoretically, I could ask a global mod, or more likely Theymos or John K to ban them. Would that be Theymos' fault? I explained a few posts ago, that unless Theymos decided that BFL's additional .017 BTC per week in ad revenue was enough to pay him off, the conspiracy theories as to why BFL is still allowed to purchase ads here are rediculous. Perhaps the Ads are still allowed here, because people have seen the hundreds of threads, and can judge for themselves whether or not they want to order from BFL. Perhaps Theymos doesn't feel the need to insult your intelligence by filtering out all unpleasantries and things that you need to think about for yourself.

also, I enjoy Gweedo's posts, for the most part he doesn't seem to be an annoying extremist who refuses to read anyone else's comments, so I don't mind reading his comments, even if they are critisms. No need to harrass him for a poorly worded sentence which he clarified a post later.
2970  Other / Meta / Re: [CENSORSHIP] Matthew N. Wright on: August 27, 2013, 12:45:32 AM
No it sounded like you were pawning off that these people can Ban people without talking to the higher ups, but in theory we have two admins now. So they are really the only people that should be with the IP banning. Am I not correct?

Well yes and no, Global Mods are allowed to ban people without talking to the Admins, although normally only on clear cut cases, and I'm not sure if they are allowed to IP ban or not. But anyway, who said anything about IP banning, Viceroy is banned for a week for spamming, its not a permaban or IP ban.
2971  Other / Meta / Re: [CENSORSHIP] Matthew N. Wright on: August 27, 2013, 12:37:43 AM
Also Theymos isn't the only one with the ban hammer.

Not true at all! If you look at John K's profile he when from a global mod to Administrator https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31288 which would mean he can ban people as well! Since Theymos has the same position!

Don't Spread lies mod to cover up for other people/your boss!

JohnK, Theymos, Badbear, Maged, MoonShadow, and Psy can all ban people. I'm not sure what your point is in quoting that Theymos isn't the only one with the ban hammer, and then telling me John K can as well, when thats exactly what I said.

I'm not going to spread lies to "protect my boss" I just personally like the guy. However, I will speak my mind if it means allowing people to see things differently, because right now, this is insanity. If someone breaks 100 rules, but is fighting for one thing, as soon as they get disiplined, it was 100% unwarranted, and the mobs assemble in the streets.
2972  Other / Meta / Re: [CENSORSHIP] Matthew N. Wright on: August 27, 2013, 12:29:39 AM
Today Viceroy was banned from the forums because he challenged the forums largest advertiser, BFL.

The admins clearly favor ad dollars over free speech.

Is this correct?

Orrrr he could have been banned for spamming. Also Theymos isn't the only one with the ban hammer. What if it was a global mod who banned him, or a regular mod who requested he be banned who has no access to those tainted ad dollars? For that matter, I'm confused why people keep bringing up the ad revenue as Theymos' "source of corruption". The forum's wallet is public, and you can see that those ad BTC aren't being spent, wouldn't he need to be benefiting from BFL's advertising payments in order for it to be corrupting him? Approximately 25% of the forum's ad revenue is split between the forum's 36+ Staff members. Looking at the last ad auction, had Inaba not bid, the person who would have got his spot bid .75 BTC less per spot than him. That x 3 slots = 2.5 BTC less that the Ad auction would have raised, had Inaba not recieved any slots. 25% of that would have been used for Mod Payments, split at least 36 ways. Do you really think that Theymos is being corrupted by the extra .017 BTC that Josh's ad purchase gave him? Something just doesn't add up on that front.
2973  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] 26 Block Erupters on: August 26, 2013, 11:42:15 PM
Price dropped to .45 BTC per Erupter, as per approximate current market price shift.
2974  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BETA][EXCHANGE][REALTIME] CoinEX realtime exchange with ZERO FEES for beta on: August 26, 2013, 08:30:25 PM
i second this. we can't be sure who was it and if funds will not get returned we will start an official case at NYPD and that's their job
to trace him down.
i'm not sure how did they get that info and i kindly ask to remove the picture at least.

Thats not actually a picture of the person lol, thats Dog the Bounty hunter. He was some guy on T.V who chased down people who skipped bail, and then brought them into the police or something like that.
2975  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] 26 Block Erupters on: August 26, 2013, 07:56:48 PM
would you take 2.23 for 5 one hub and fan to Ca?

pmed
2976  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BETA][EXCHANGE][REALTIME] CoinEX realtime exchange with ZERO FEES for beta on: August 26, 2013, 07:44:03 PM
Erm, is anyone else uncomfortable with someone being doxxed with no evidence or information? That post should be removed imo.

Doxing is not disallowed by forum rules, as all information gathered by doxing is Publicly available. If you start posting someones SSN thats one thing, but posting name, address, phone numbers, etc can all be found through a google or whitepages search.

However, I would encourage 2kool to remove the dox and save it, while they and erundook compare notes. It really sucks when you dox the wrong person due to a technical error, and then some random guy starts getting hate mail and pizzas sent to their house.
2977  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] [OBC] Obamacoin, strongest coin in the world on: August 26, 2013, 03:49:42 PM
I suggest for your next project, make JFK Coin, and direct the hashing power to decrypt the governement files of what really happened to JFK, then sell that secret to the tabloids, and distribute the bounty based on total coins mined.

[/Serious On] Yeah, people tend to stay away from trying to mix politics and crypto. If you haven't noticed, the Cryptocoin community tends to be the sort of people who don't really like governments, especially the U.S Gov. I'm pretty sure this is all a joke, but in case it isn't, I'd strongly reccomend avoiding linking your coin to any government even in name, you will get far more hate about it than if you had named your coin fluffybunny coin.
2978  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: What'll happen to ASICs when they're no longer profitable to run? on: August 26, 2013, 04:16:20 AM
Someone who is heavily staked in low GHash ASICs will try and create a new SHA Alt coin, to attract all of the people who were left behind by the next gen asics. Same thing happened with GPUs and 1st Gen asics. The Scrypt Alt coin craze began to draw in all of those BTC Miners who didn't want to sell off their GPUs at next to nothing to buy promises of ASICs that would come in a year.
2979  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] 26 Block Erupters on: August 25, 2013, 04:49:59 PM
they are probably backordered because people are using coupons. you can get them in a group buy for .31 new

yup, but that involves purchasing >100 Units and also being involved in a group buy. If you just want to buy a few erupters, the aproximate going rate is about .5 BTC. Also, with coupon from BTCGuild, they are .4 BTC each.
2980  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTS] 26 Block Erupters on: August 25, 2013, 04:29:07 PM
What is your bottom line price?

I'm not entirely sure how much lower I'd go. Certainly if someone was offering to buy a fair amount, we could negotiate a price reduction, however the public offers I've recieved so far, I would not consider. As I posted in the OP, keep in mind that BTCGuild has now 388 backordered units at .5 BTC each. And there are many other forum members selling Erupters also at around .5 BTC each. With BTCGuild, you are preordering essentially. With one of the forum sellers, you have a definate shipping date.
Pages: « 1 ... 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 [149] 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 ... 214 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!