I think some people are just ignorant and they just don't want to read but feel the urge to post nonsense. If you use any social media networks just join a large group like traffic announcements or some general topic that is relevant to a lot of people. You will be amazed by the amount of people that post comments and do not have any idea on the subject or have not read or understood the post/message. It's the same thing here with some people. I know BTC and BCT are similar abbreviations but you will find the difference between the two if you read the posts on this forum  It's a fact i guess LOL. You will always embarrass yourself if you do not take enough time to understand a community in the first place. Truth is, as they go most of them figure it out. Like you said, it's the urge to post nonsense something. |
|
|
|
PPS- Still looking for a designer, anyone got suggestions?
Please check your PM from mdayonliner (me). I hope you do not mind missing the subject. That was an innocent mistake IMO. Good luck. |
|
|
|
You've done nothing wrong, but it appears that you don't have a coterie, so merit will take it's own time; also don't slip up carelessly; people out here are far too jealous to digest an objective honest review. They'll neg you without thinking twice and then call you all sorts of name to avoid reasonable arguments, while they wouldn't even criticize far worse actions by people who are in their pack.
Remember, probity is the best wisdom, but it rarely does the individual any good.
Thanks mate for all these kind words. I believe in my decency. I also realise that most of the time the odds can be against me. But it does not matter however I do take extra care. This is why I always believe in 2nd chance . It's a risky business to be dutiful to a community by being really ethical, those who will not agree with you they will attack you always with whatever they can. They will try to stop you. But I have nothing to lose here. I want to do something good for the community. I love the concept of decentralisation and Blockchain. |
|
|
|
~~~~
Well, I guess we can agree that different people see this differently. It's an extra responsibility either way, that's for sure.
Of course it is an extra sweet responsibility IMO it's an earning, a reward, a recognition of working for the community. Anyway Lauda, you have nice negotiation skills. Keep it up.
I didn't know this was a negotiation. No, I did not mean here. Since yesterday when we started this discussion I went through your other discussions as well to gain knowledge about you. This statement was based on overall impression. Take it as complement, I mean nothing else. PS: Yes I guess I also think that the discussion ends here. It's been a pleasure. |
|
|
|
@suchmoon : Ok that's bad, OgNasty does not make sense in there. No comment on Quicksy mate. Sorry OgNasty, really mate, you really is not making sense in ur argument Here's what I see. A long post gap with a sudden password change. Then posts trying to get into a signature campaign. Then posts shilling scamcoins and bumping the bogus scam thread against me. Like I said, if your account is engaged in shady activity maybe don't bring attention to it... Here I was about to remove it, then you start threatening and saying I abuse my rank. Time to ignore instead I guess. Good day with your purchased account. This is not how you justify others. Respecting each others is the key for any community. (Sorry if I upset you but you need to admit that your dimension was wrong)
- You know why people only point you out than the other members in ALU? Because they expect more from you IMO. May be (sorry, I am not a too old member) you have given a lot to this community so the expectation is high.
To be frank, that is just complete bullshit. Do you really think that Quickscammer is commenting because he expects more from me? If you do, then you've been spending your time here in a cave.. - You are wrong, I did not mean Quicksy when I said the community I meant the whole community not any specific individual. Seems like you and Quicksy has some personal issue. I really never dug the issue. Again I meant the whole community. [1] I don't even consider DT as "power", but rather an 'ungrateful duty' [duty only if you have some sense of needing to do *something*; some DT members rarely get involved in disputes (scams, abuse and whatnot) so they surely not everyone feels that way - which is okay I guess, there is no obligation to do anything, anywhere].
- Well I guess DT is a power for sure. People take extra care before talking against any DT member (i.e: create new account). It's a power of certified trust from the system (admin). Now it's up to the individual how they will deal with it. Use or misuse. Anyway Lauda, you have nice negotiation skills. Keep it up. Please no hurt feeling OgNasty, I said based on what I saw.
EDIT: PS: You (OgNasty) can still remove his/her redTrust ( screenshot). This will restore the respects you already lost from others. |
|
|
|
I am sure you already have your answers after reading all above comments. My suggestion: Avoid the Economics and Bitcoin Discussion sections, because that's where the thread titles are these vague questions that shitposters have pre-written answers to, and they just do a little spin trick and it becomes a bullshit reassembly factory, and the finished product is nothing you'd want to read. Check out Serious Discussion, Meta, and some of the others and you'll get a feel for which sections haven't been infiltrated by the goon squad.
-This is a good suggestion after all. If possible then follow it. Like BTCforJoe said, I will say the same don't get discouraged... Also do not forget to Stake your Bitcoin address here for you account recovery features. Welcome to the community, I wish you good luck and see you around. |
|
|
|
...That is why don't acquire essential knowledge about cryptocurrencies and the fact that they relate bitcoin to this forum is a sign that they are members who can't contribute well in the forum.
It drives me nuts when I read shitposts like "I join bitcoin because it gives a good income" or some ridiculous garbage like that. Indeed, like OP is saying, such people are getting BTC (the cryptocurrency) confused with bitcointalk (the forum). And the problem is, for a lot of people in 3rd world countries who heard about bitcointalk from friends, there is no difference between the two. Bitcointalk IS bitcoin for them, and they see this forum as a job...which is another issue entirely.
I could not agree more with you. Your (especially The Pharmacist's) analogy was perfectly presented.
Satoshi created Bitcoin, then founded Bitcointalk to discuss it. It's really not rocket science.
For some people it looks like a rocket science. Trust me if you look around then you will find tons of posts where people are really confused about this silly common sense. I agree that the post is not worth starting a thread but NO, it's not merit begging. Since people started labeling like that, I have never given a sh*t about merit. Clear?
I am not sure why it can be a topic but hey, thank you for you kind words |
|
|
|
Note: Whenever there is a topic accusing aTriz, we see he keeps almost silent. Excludes OP: 0/20, actively participated, 0/40, First reply after 43 comments - 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th... and few more out of 498 conversations. He goes on holidays? May be aTriz does not have much time to deal with these nonsense? Or he/she know these barking dogs (us) will eventually become silent someday cause Lauda has his back. Lauda I understand it's hard for you to be unbiased on acknowledging aTriz's errors. After all you both already established a trust with each others before even starting the ALU. This is not the only error (aTriz's) we are talking about. By the way I am no way in any position to accuse you for anything, I am talking human psychology. I've pointed out the people with valid, objective, points. , Quickseller, OgNasty, allahabadi, Bazinga442, suchmoon-If you read all the comments from each of these individuals then they DO MAKE valid points. Don't just read the only one comment those were on the screenshots. Please admit it that aTriz does not qualify to be a campaign manager. Your reputation is on stake because of the user aTriz.
It's not a black and white issue. Did he make a mistake? Yes. Does this mistake have consequences? Yes. Does this mean he isn't capable of managing campaigns? I can't come to this conclusion out of such premises. Despite the mistakes he made, he has shown to be very capable in managing them[1] despite his recent errors in judgement. - Yes, I understand it's NOT black and white however it's a start for you to become more careful. I will say the same thing like The Pharmacist said... I'm disappointed that aTriz chose to go the route he did, and to call a lie a "marketing strategy" is bending the truth past the breaking point.
I'm disappointed because I think he's an excellent campaign manager and an agreeable gentleman as well...
Honestly speaking if I were you and if I were a 100% morally honest person then I would kick out aTriz using my name and badge. It would look for someone else for my business.
There's plenty of wrong with this statement, and I'll let you know why. If I was able to just simply kick someone out of a 3-entity group, that would mean that I effectively own it which is not the case here. Obviously, getting to consensus on this matter with the remaining entity shouldn't be too difficult. However, remember the last time I acted quickly without thinking? Oh yeah, I'm still being harassed for it to this day. Some people complain that I act quickly, and then when I don't, they complain that I don't. You can't have it both ways (I'm not talking about you in this particular example). I need time and more objective input on the matter; the *consequences* or whatever you want to call it from our side (Untold and me) will come. - You know why people only point you out than the other members in ALU? Because they expect more from you IMO. May be (sorry, I am not a too old member) you have given a lot to this community so the expectation is high. Again, Your reputation is on stake because of the user aTriz.
I disagree. I'm not responsible for someone else's actions, especially not when I had no knowledge of them. Your disagreement does not make any sense to me. The error in campaign thing is a part of ALU, you along with others represent ALU. If ALU make a bad name then you also become a part of this bad name. PS: alia thought I am scam_detector, actually I am not.
It doesn't matter to me as, from what I've seen, you seem to make sense and are not biased on *any* particular case. - Thank you for your kind words. [1] Weren't people complimenting this quite frequently, before aTriz caught my eye and before ALU even existed?
- Not sure (I am fairly new to this community, few months only) however I can say one thing which is again, May be (sorry, I am not a too old member) you have given a lot to this community so the expectation is high. They are doing whatever they want with the official/unofficial power or whatever you call it but no one is doing nothing against it.
Exactly what kind of power does the, non-staff, non-DT, youngling called aTriz have? Indulge me. - You protecting him a power, you are a DT member is a power, he ganged up with bunches of well reputed members is a power etc.
Aside from ibminer I wouldn't trust anyone on that list, particularly that suchmoon dude.
... adjudicate their personal quarrels.
Yea you are right about suchmoon dude. Another personal quarrel in between ibminer and suchmoon dude?  PS: I am not feeding anyone's ego. I always try to be unbiased. OgNasty seems a reasonable person (thoroughly looking). |
|
|
|
You have asked too many questions  Hello, please how many people are using bitcointalk forum? Take 2,009,932 registered accounts, delete 1,103,866 accounts with no sign on for 90 days, no posts and no trust and that leaves us with 906,066 active accounts. archiveBut probably there are more accounts than real people. - yes of-course. Many people have more than one alt accounts, publicly declared or even non declared who cares. is there any statistics about new members? - Sure there will be as it's a database driven site. Question is how to get access. How many of all members wear signature and are registered in signature campaigns? - Hard to say. May be the system can tell how many are wearing signature but that does not mean that this will be a correct stats. There are many members including me not wearing a paid signature. I am sure these should not count as bounty hunting. If everyone will do bounty and signature, then there will be no future, right? - What makes you think like that? Please us to understand your dimension. |
|
|
|
He's been tagged even though he can't be responsible for the actions of the project (just like any other manager can't). What exactly are you complaining about now? 
No. https://imgur.com/a/pFd3vIt was a marketing strategy and they tried to say they raised so much in just a day or 2. I doubt they raised anymore then 1 BTC. No, but when I'm 2 weeks into a bounty program I'm basically forced to go along with it.
- Accepting a misleading information and then pretend to be ok with it.https://prnt.sc/j1lsgshttps://prnt.sc/j1lsxvhttps://prnt.sc/j1ltqd Not sure about this DT3 things. Anyway, the point is, aTriz is just a Hero member and I see you are a DT member. I also see you are his/her business partner. There is a reason for awarding you a DT member. Being his/her business partner does not mean that you back them up even when they are doing things that are wrong wrong. If I had a service like ALU and if I were doing the same as aTriz then would you stay silent? I am not sure who elses are with ALU but I am sure that you are backing aTriz in public. One user means more for you than the whole community? ibminer, Quickseller, OgNasty, allahabadi, Bazinga442, suchmoon and the list goes on. All these people do not have a valid point? Note: Most of these people are Legendary. Please admit it that aTriz does not qualify to be a campaign manager. Your reputation is on stake because of the user aTriz.aTriz seems to be either extremely naive or outright malicious, neither of which is good for trust. And calling fraudulent misrepresentation a "marketing strategy" is really stretching the "naive" part.
Honestly speaking if I were you and if I were a 100% morally honest person then I would kick out aTriz using my name and badge. I would look for someone else for my business. [1] Which aTriz did, and not in the exaggerated sense that *some* are trying to push here. He messed up, nobody else.
- Thanks for admitting. Again, Your reputation is on stake because of the user aTriz. PS: alia thought I am scam_detector, actually I am not.  |
|
|
|
|
Looks like it has been deleted. Good work.
PS: Locking the topic might save everyone elses' time on reading this extra thread now.
|
|
|
|
|
@OP Better to lock this topic since the issue has been resolved.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Seems like BitcoinTalk became some group of peoples' private property. They are doing whatever they want with the official/unofficial power or whatever you call it but no one is doing nothing against it. Everything will evaporate if somehow they lose the power they earned from the administrator. This unfaithful group is using the good name of BitcoinTalk. Look at the dates, Jan 14th, Feb 28, March 05... My point is, does admin not have enough interest to look on these shady activities? PS: I'm having a feeling that after posting this comment some of the eyes will be on me. |
|
|
|
Which are your main objectives when starting the topic? Only or mainly for merit begging?
Dude please, don't over-smart yourself. This shit really bothers me a lot. Some people think that creating a topic means begging for merits, I have seen it a lot of people like you thinking the same way in a lot of new topics. Just because merit is here does not mean no one can create a new topic? Whats wrong with creating a topic when there are really something to discuss? I even gave an example on my original post about how people mix-up this little common sense and yet still you are logically finding it hard of the reasons of creating this post. Don't be paranoid with merit. Sir don't be paranoid sir. It's just a feature of the forum that directly related with raking up. Do something for the forum and the community, you will have their back. Do you think people are dumb or something?
Unfortunately, yes. There are some people out there who are lacking of common sense like the one on my original post. |
|
|
|
I think there is a similarity between bitcointalk and bitcoin. if bitcoin and the crypto market die then the bitcointalk will also disappear
Well if the whole internet shuts down then Facebook, Google or even Bitcoin - all gone! |
|
|
|
Just read this... LOL If "official" Bitcointalk is Buggy why should I trust BTC?
ArchiveI have seen similar thinking (wrong) from many other members. They think BitcoinTalk is Bitcoin, being a member of BitcoinTalk is involving with Bitcoin. Folks, Bitcoin is a currency. Think about the fiat currency we have: Dollar, Pound, Euro etc. Using Bitcoin you can trade (buy/sell goods) same as using fiat. One of the difference among many differences between Bitcoin and Fiat currency is, fiat has physical existence and bitcoin is digital. Read more about Bitcoin FAQ On the other hand, BitcoinTalk is only a forum. Satoshi (creator of Bitcoin) started this forum so that people like you and me who love Bitcoin can hangout with each others. So please do not mix up Bitcoin with BitcoinTalk. Mixing up Bitcoin with BitcoinTalk is like mixing up Facebook (today's biggest social media) with the entire internet.
Edit: Inspired by vit05's comment. For really newbies: Some topics/articles worth reading to understand Bitcoin and BitcoinTalkBitcoinTalk It is just a forum started by Satoshi. Read his/her welcome message here. ------------------------------------- Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ ( Archive) FAQ: Everything you need to know about forum 'activity, account ranks and merit ( Archive) Reading the stickys on the meta section is really enough. Bitcoin It's simply is a currency like currently we have our fiats (i.e: Dollar, Pound, Euro). ------------------------------------- Bitcoin.com FAQBitcoin.org FAQ |
|
|
|
Not sure about the problem. If "official" Bitcointalk is Buggy why should I trust BTC?
This is insane LOL... Why do you think BitcoinTalk and BTC is related? BitcoinTalk is just a forum and BTC is a currency. It does not matter for Bitcoin if BitcoinTalk diaper someday. If Facebook starts selling your privacy then would you say, how would you trust Internet because Facebook started to sell your private information in public? |
|
|
|
Done , we are waiting for DT member to red tag this law breakers . Also , local sections are lack of DT members i think it is better to Add DT members in local sections I also tagged all three with another new one while I was digging the rabbit hole. |
|
|
|
Case#12mankeen, CryptoNine, Mr.Coinzer, SaaM78mankeen's merit summaryReceived | User | Sent | | 30 | Mr.Coinzer | Null | | 5 | SaaM78 | 15 | | 5 | Belal | Null | | 1 | YaseenMosa | Null | | 1 | TheKingInYellow | Null | | Null | CryptoNine | 37 |
Mr.Coinzer: https://prnt.sc/j16z29 received 17 from CryptoNine sent 30 to mankeen No doubt accounts (mankeen, CryptoNine, Mr.Coinzer) are tricking the merit system, possible alts exchanging merits to accounts. SaaM78: https://prnt.sc/j16ykwSaaM78's 5 and 15 merit exchanging with mankeen also questions SaaM78's account. Another possible alt of mankeen network. Not enough evidence for for others or I have not much time to dig the rabbit hole of this network. Ref: Below.
Hi , I have a good catch here
This guy send merit to his alt
Suspects:
1- MankeenUsed this wallet 0xdda03a2E46FbB97303350455ac842C2C49306654 in this post Click - here https://i.imgur.com/Mb94JPj.png And this Click - herehttps://i.imgur.com/Cp1dGDF.png2- Mr.CoinzerUsed this wallet 0xBB9cd47E267f7Bf7AB6da394Ff0CaA8EaE810BFc In this post https://i.imgur.com/GBgNzeV.pngAnd this wallet : 0xA681C50E167ae4546257B60B6e4e87abF318dA32 In this posthttps://i.imgur.com/MtvaMHT.png3- CryptoNine : no evidence yet merit summary for Mankeenhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=680704
Mr.Coinzer sent merit to Mankeen
And Mankeen sent merit to CryptoNine and
CryptoNine sent merit to Mr.CoinzerMankeen sent 32 merit to CryptoNine for this reply! بالضبط ما هو استخدام بلوكشين للمشروع، وما هو الحل هو أنه يجلب أو ما هي المشكلة هو تحديد، ما هي قيمة أنها جلب إلى كريبتو. Translation:Exactly what is the use of Blockchain for the project, and what solution is it brings or what problem is determining, what value they bring to crypto.
Yes it is 32 ! for shitty postCryptoNine gives 17 merit to Mr.Coinzer for this replyقبل 9 سنوات، بيتكوين بدأت على فكرة مماثلة لجعل المعاملات أكثر كفاءة والباقي هو التاريخ. ولكن توكن بيتكوين يختلف في حقيقة أنه في حين أنه يهدف إلى جعل المعاملات أكثر كفاءة، بل هو أيضا عملة مجتمعية.
Translation 9 years ago, Bitcoin started a similar idea to make transactions more efficient and the rest is history. But Bitcoin is different in the fact that while it aims to make transactions more efficient, it is also a community coin.
And Finally , Mr.Coinzer gives merit to MankeenI think the 3 accounts are for the same person And here is the proof from Ether scan Mankeen: 0xdda03a2E46FbB97303350455ac842C2C49306654 Mr.Coinzer: 0xBB9cd47E267f7Bf7AB6da394Ff0CaA8EaE810BFc 0xA681C50E167ae4546257B60B6e4e87abF318dA32 Etherscan Txn 1Etherscan Txn 2Etherscan Txn 33 transaction for Mankeen and Coinzer Wallets Mankeen- 0xdda03a2E46FbB97303350455ac842C2C49306654
Mr.Coinzer - 0xBB9cd47E267f7Bf7AB6da394Ff0CaA8EaE810BFc And Etherscan Txn 1Etherscan Txn 2Etherscan Txn 30xdda03a2E46FbB97303350455ac842C2C49306654
0xA681C50E167ae4546257B60B6e4e87abF318dA32
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
