How would this website be different to those paid website out there? i dont really see how would that be possible because if those helpers that are reviewing these products would put negative review do you think they will get tokens for that?
That's 2 way, they can give a negative review because that product deserves the review they get, another one is the helper was paid by the rival company! Well there will be a lot of helpers to do the review and that will be a great balance for the company. they can give bad review, but that will have a conflict if some helpers will give a great feedback. Therefore, there is a contradiction about giving any feedback from the Helpers where the reviewers are free to give positive or negative feedback about the goods they are reviewing it. |
|
|
|
Surely this would be better than those review websites that are getting paid with their good reviews,blockchain technology should be able to resolve the problem,transparency will be acquired if those people who will be accepting helpers arent going to sell their reputation too.
Yes mister/miss the lina project review will be more better than the other review websites that are being paid by the other companies just to gain positive reviews. The legit and unbiased feedbacks will become one of the strength of the lina project, so lets be excited to this project. Moreover, for you to understand it easily try to check the strength of Lina.review in the old current system there is a lack of motivation for reviewers to improve their review quality. While in the current system of Lina users can become Helpers if they have many high quality reviews. Aside from that in the old current system revenue was not transparent, while in Lina.reviews revenue is completely recorded on the blockchain and very visible to the public. Paying review companies to manipulate review results is definitely one of the problems that block chain can resolve. They now can't just pay and poof with target percentage and no accountability. With lina, we can trust the end result to be accurate. How will the blockchain be able to resolve that problem? those greedy people who wants to earn money will always find their way to get advantage to the system's holes. Don't be so negative about this things, though there is truth on what you stated here. Lina.review is no that stupid to make that happen. Of course they knew about it, that's why if you are going to check thei differences from the current system in accordance to lina's WP you can check it over there the strength of Lina.review That's why Lina's platform was created. To avoid this kind of manipulation. Lina's objectives are very clear. He's right. Avoid negative issues and let's just hope for the best. I know Lina wants to end the problems and improve the system. Certainly, you are correct pal. Lina was design as the main public Ethereum decentralized network, which uses the concept of smart contracts, was chosen to serve as the decentralized settlement layer of the Lina Platform with LINA Token and provide transparency of payment transactions, reviews and bids. |
|
|
|
This is great transparency for the reviews should benefit all the merchant because the reviews cannot be influenced by anyone.How would these mecharnts pay the website?is it thru lina tokens or other cryptocurrencies?
What if these mechants tried to pay those helpers/experts to give a good review to their product? how would we know ? Transparency means all the reviews arent biased how sure these people arent going to sell their postive reviews? I think possible to be happen mate, and anyone can do that actually. But since the transparency is the Lina's main catch for the users they will be visible for this matter anyway. So, in this case honesty also must be implement of this project. |
|
|
|
What a great project,advertiser/merchants will be the main beneficiaries of this decentralized reviews,10% of advertising revenue will be put the whole system? so that the website will have something to pay those helpers so that these people wont need to sell their reviews to these brands or products.
Yeah you are right ,that should be the fees will go thru,to pay those people who are giving reviews to the products/services that these brands wants to get reviewed.So there will be no one that will sell their reviews? because they are already making money with just reviews. Those experts should be examined very well so there will be no biased/paid reviews in the website. Politicians and other government employee have high salary and pay roll, though they still corrupt the country they are serving, this can be apply with LINA.REVIEW! Yes they have payment and budget for helpers, but what will happen if some company that want the best review for their business or product pay some helpers 2 years of their salary in just 1 review? As far as I know, lina review will focus in the service of the firms and company, not in the government. And I think it is hard to integrate reviews in politics since we all know that the politicians don't have the plan to drop their position in just a matter of review. Based on my own understanding the lina review is not connected in any political reviews because the focus of this project is to give reviews of the products and services of the said company. The reviews will be reviewed, if a helper's reviews are not consistent, the helper will be demoted. Definitely,yes you're right pal. That's why there is an evaluation to be happen in reviewing the products, also the restriction in it was very high standard. So I believed the quality will also be high standard. I must agree with you sir/mam the lina project review set their own standards and criterias in choosing and creating reviews that is why we must trust lina as our review company. Right dude, The review system, such as Lina.review, is a review service built on top of the Lina Platform. It is designed to be easy for individuals or companies to build their own review systems on the Lina Platform using the Lina SDK and sample applications. |
|
|
|
It should some some positive and negative trust like what we have in bitcointalk.org so that people might know that those helpers are legit and not selling their reviews,so that the system wont be that easy to crack,because these greedy people will always find there way to make money.
It might not happen, why? Because the helpers will automatically remove from the service if the administration or the lina core will find something fishy with their helper. If the helper will always be given an opportunity to prove herself that she is not paid helper and if the lina review will turn to trust system, I think the helpers will take advantage the system. In our life, we have only one chance, one opportunity to prove ourselves! That's why death is always the risk of life. You might be right because if you are one of those helpers,you might find a way to get more profits even if you risk your reputation but lets wait for the developers to come and explain how this system will work. Perhaps, I know what you mean. It is true that there is a big advantage for being a Helper or experts. Due to before the approval the review is very high standard it has and it will only be pass by the Helpers according to their evaluation for the products, correct me if I'm wrong in this thoughts of mine, okay. Thanks  |
|
|
|
Lina.review will give users transparent and trustful reviews that will avoid companies hide bad reviews. Lina.review will give experts (helpers) a portion of advertising revenue in order for them to be motivated to maintain a quality review. This will help common users before making a decision.
More product selling online has no proper review or they gave not the real quality of the products, what happened next is bad image of the company.The lina.Review will help to gave the real quality of the product that made by the helpers,and we will have a peace of mind in buying a product. LINA.REVIEW can provide us a good platform where we can find the real deal of the quality of any product that they will feature, but there is a doubt on my mind which is happening all over the world. Yes, it is happening a long time ago until now. This LINA can give such a good and transparent reviews, but those reviews are just made by helpers and i hope this project can be with someone who can provide real quality of any product! what am I telling? Even any good review if there are so much FAKE circulating around, then the review can be true but not for the product we can get. TO MANY FAKE ITEMS NOW, REPLICA! With so many fake items in every corner, and we cannot stop it because millions of them are being made. And I think that is how Lina.Review will help consumers to specify and verify if a specific item that is being sold by a certain manufacturer is authentic or fake. If that so, the aim and goal of Lina.review was totally a great things to all of us here isn't? I can't wait to see what will happen to this project once their campaign end up..For sure many users of their platform will be satisfy in it. Due to its utilizing blockchain’s immutability to produce the best possible transparency. |
|
|
|
It should some some positive and negative trust like what we have in bitcointalk.org so that people might know that those helpers are legit and not selling their reviews,so that the system wont be that easy to crack,because these greedy people will always find there way to make money.
You may have a point on this one mate, but I think those people that who are greed will no longer be disappear in any form of business, especially in this type of business isn't right? So the better way for us to avoid this things is we must be careful in everything we choose to be involve in any project like this one. I think this is possible, we really are waiting to see what Lina.review platform will look like and how will it function. I hope I can participate in the testing of Lina.review. The lina project review wants to reduce the fake information or fake reviews that are given by the fake reviewees who are being paid by the companies for the sake of their reputation, giving accutate reviews is the main function of yhe lina prjoct review . DO you really wanna take it? do we really need to have those comments and review? how can we be sure that those are true and will be done in a good way? what is your measurable way to say that? if y0ou have! tell me cause I wanna know. Do we really need to have those comments and reviews? I think yes. In the advent of technology where almost everything can be bought online a practical review or even comments can help a buyer make a better decision in buying. Personally when I buy a mobile phone for example, aside from checking the specification of the unit I want, I also make sure to read comments, feed backs or related review so that I can get a better grasp of what I am buying before I finally buy. If people will find out that Lina reviews are reliable and Lina.reviewed products tend to be more competitive, I think this will greatly affect the market. Do we really need it? Yes we do. To save time and avoid wasting my money on products that won't satisfy me, I usually read reviews and feedbacks about the product that I am going to buy. This will help me decide which one should I buy. So a reliable review site is very important to avoid scams. That's a very much important actually. Perhaps there's customer that their capital payment for the goods will turn into nothing, of course we want it to be satisfy in it, therefore reviewing the item or checking them in the first place was just a normal things to do for the customer like us, isn't right? Because of my schedules, I don't have much time to go to malls to buy some of my stuff I needed. Thanks for online shops. And yes, online reviews are very much important especially to me as an online shopper. I usually buy online whenever I needed accessories for my gadgets because I am too lazy going out when I have my day off. Aside from from what you just said, as an online shopper it is true thru online shopping you saved time and energy and that's good! but there is also a disadvantages due to we cannot review the product as well it is because we didn't see it in the actual,instead it is only an images, so once it is defective or not quality we cannot turn it back anymore. |
|
|
|
Can i ask for clarification? Will a reliable (negative) review given by a Helper be allowed by Lina Review to be posted? Is that what they meant for transparency?
We cannot conclude that giving negative review makes transparency to all. A transparent review is a fairly criticism to all. Review must be published wether it is good or bad. Merchants paid the review, the helper will just based by how the service of a firm to the customer. That's I want to a review and as what I've read on the whitepaper of lina, they will do that. When we say transparency in terms of business it is accepting criticisms and reviews whether it is negative nor poaitive for a certain company to know their weakness and also their stength to be developed and that is the purpose of lina review. Accepting the reviews of the people to help the companies know what is there weak points and strong points. I agree with you about the transparency. In addition to this, the transparency also helps the users to determine what is really the reviewers needs to convey. These reviews can be used to develop a certain product to be able to be more saleable and to attain the highest quality. Maybe the reason why Lina.reviews has been created, it is because for us to prevent fake goods/items so searching it very well was one of the great things to do first and transparency will follow unto it. |
|
|
|
"7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
Lina Core private blockchain. Note that the review could be subject to being
approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers."
If reviews are subject to Lina.review staff's approval or by votes of Helpers, does that mean quality reviews are equivalent to positive reviews only?
Lina.review's staff can continuously assess a review and assessing it means that they're checking the credibility of an review, whether it's a positive or negative review, the important thing that matters is the accuracy of the said review. Is there a possibility that a big company can bribe this LINA>REVIEW company? well there is so many money involve around all over the world when it comes to product reviews. there are so many fake reviews that we can read. it just the matter of money. I hope LINA will never go down and destroy their company's credibility. Could possibly happen. Though they cannot bribe Lina I think because it is a blockchain but i read somewhere in their whitepaper that advertisers/merchants interacts with helpers. I was thinking also maybe this way that they interact which means they communicate, could also be a possible way to bribe the helpers. What do you think about it? What do you think about the process of submitting a review then having it be approved by lina staff or helpers? They are being careful so that reviews on the site would only be quality reviews. But doesn't that process mean that the results will not be transparent? It only means that some of the reviews are not good enough or doesn't meet the standards of a critic. That would make it seem that they are manipulating the results since not all reviews submitted can be seen. review could be subject to being approved by Lina.review staff or by votes from Helpers. They did not say that that they will be hiding the reviews if not approved. That is what is implied by " could be subject to being approved" What's the point of having that process if you can't do something about reviews that will not be approved? Whenever a user clicks on the ads link, the click will be recorded on the Lina Core
private blockchain.
7. Whenever a user clicks submit a review, the review details will be recorded on the
Lina Core private blockchain. The clicks will be recorded, clicks on ads, clicks on submit a review. That's the point of it being on blockchain. Everything can be traced. So I click on an ad, then made a review then click submit, then it's subject for approval. If it's not got enough, it won't be approved? What will happen to reviews submitted but not approved? Will they still be part of the score? This is an example walk-through of a bid for advertising request from a Merchant and the
reward sharing flows: This is just an example, it could be subject to change. They did not specify if the review will actually be hidden if not approved. They did not specify anything except that it "could be" subject for approval. They should answer the question on what will happen if a review is not approved. Why not approve a review in the first place? What are the criteria for a good review? What are the things that would make your review not approved? A white paper is just a proposal. They did their research and come up with what they think is the best for this project. I think what's on their mind is the ability to moderate the reviews so that the review site would be a good environment. In addition to that, it is only their provision which they think it attainable to be happen if the community will embrace their goal target. And since Lina.review has a high standard in it, I think all will depend on the result task of the helper if I am not mistaken from this understanding of mine. |
|
|
|
Here's a great article from one of our community members that describes how you can protect your ETH losses in a weakening market. The Coinvest token sale helps investors protect your ETH value while locking in higher bonus conversions with COIN. Learn more here: https://goo.gl/tkuNNBBefore reading the article, would you please confirm if we can remove the signature that all stakes and tokens had been calculated. I sent pm asking you to update news about signature campaign but still no response. Please check your inbox. dear @coinvest bounty manager.
we are very happy if you bring clarity to this situation. I sent you a private message and told to me that "you can remove your signature" but if you make a general statement, we would not have been in vain
. We know bounty is over, but if you do not give us information about the remove of signatures, it looks like we will continue to carry it. please clarity of signature carry situation .
thanks
Price Adjustment to Add to Total Stakes, COIN to be calculated and i saw in bounty spreadsheet "NOTE: Bounty Campaign ended on March 9th." Twitter team also said Bounty campaign ended on March 9th. https://twitter.com/CoinvestHQ/status/975128432337092608 Camapign manager have no response for removing signature https://imgur.com/a/Zxe9A . Checked me 1 https://imgur.com/a/Z9H7KChecked me 2 https://imgur.com/GTW8Mh8Checked me 3 https://imgur.com/AddZpucI removed my signature now. Yesterday i received a response from the manager informing me that i can remove my signature. Here it is: Hi! I apologize for the delayed response. Yes, you can remove the Signature. Thank you for supporting our Bounty Campaign program.
Bounty manager in telegram also replied to some signature participants that they can remove their signature but it still need an official statement. I will remove my signature now after checking that all my stakes has been correctly calculated and no real need to keep it. Thanks Coinvest for the awsome management of this campaign and wish you all the success. Till the bounty rewards distribution, i suggest for all the bounty participants to keep following updates in official channels and continue making this project a real success. Good luck Thank you for giving us a clarification on this matter anyway mate, It is my pleasure also to became part of this campaign. Hoping for the new more good plan for this project of coinvest in the near future, good luck! |
|
|
|
tell me please at what stage is the project now? Do you currently sell tokens? if so, how long will it last? and do you have soft cap and hard cap?
Hi Aknoe - Due to hackers overloading our website with DDOS traffic, it brought down the ability for our users to create accounts. The Coinvest token sale is still in progress. Please visit https://ico.coinve.st and follow our investment guide to aid you in your experience: https://goo.gl/oDSN1KThe token sale is open to all countries; however, US investors must be accredited and can go through the verification process here: https://accreditation.coinve.stThe min cap is $1M and we’be raised nearly a total of $5M. According to our analytics and our industry data, our results have been impacted by the two corrections in February and the latest marketer correct in March. We saw a decline in registrations since these events. We also see other peers in the industry holding token sales being impacted by the latest market corrections as well. Please note that unsold tokens will be moved to the reserve to collateralize the network. Raising closed to 5M$ is not really bad at all, and also this is a great news to your community here and to all your investors too. Then by the way, what do you mean by the unsold token will be moved to the reserve to collateralize the network? does it means it will not be burn? can you please clarify this one for me sir, thanks |
|
|
|
|
Yes I do agreed that being patience as a traders is the main factor for us to become successful in trading, and have enough knowledge in bitcoin and altcoins also in reading the graph, and everything in doing trade in the platform.
|
|
|
|
$BTC can break 18000 USD within this year?
so many holder for BTC, very hard to break 18000 USD
How do you think about breaking 18000 USD within this year?
I think would be hard/difficult to be happen, maybe next year that is very much possible. But still we cannot say what will happen since bitcoin value was very unpredictable and we knew that all here isn't right? |
|
|
|
Do you believe all Muslims are bad? How do they differ from the terrorists?
You may want to share your thoughts. Some think all muslims are terrorist. Reasons why they said that because they don't study about their culture and norms. They need more information about why there are msulims and how do muslim live, how are they related to ISIS and other terrorists group in the world.
I don't believed that all Muslim are bad. Actually, anybody in this world can be a bad person neither the good people can be a bad also. And besides the word terrorist is not referring generally to Muslim people but also to other people too. |
|
|
|
|
we cant tell thing to be right on that way, but let me lay my perspective !
educated people are ones who are intelligent and most of the time are the officials in the government! but the thread was shred even before they camme! thjeir parents and relatives are ones corrupt and they are just covering the crimes and starting to commit corruption too! it is the money that they waant but not at all! some un educated people and from the poor side of the economy are the one who has dignity and braveness to fight crimes in the government! but they are alone and powerless (money) they are being down all the time they want to throw a punch and ended corrupt in the future !
|
|
|
|
|
i rather stay at work! and will made their ass shut! i will give more effort on work and make sure to them that the next promotion is in you! once you are a level higher than then, thats the best slap you can make, they only have 2 choices! call you a boss or resign! OUT!!
|
|
|
|
|
everything that show up in earth have negative and positive sides as always !
internet provides us the tehnology to make communication way better or at its fines ! long distance relationship nowis an easy to cope with chats and video calls for free unlike before that you will talkk on the phone with expensive rates..
internet now can provide us answer so quick than before that we need to find it over expensive encyclopedias ! this are just few
|
|
|
|
|
I dont have any gun! never touch any single gun! i dont want the world to have a gun, i hope there wiwll be peace that we donnt need any policeman to protect people , i just want to see a world with peaceful people! humanity must born again and people should guide us , if there will be no gun and crimes people will be much happier and safe !
|
|
|
|
|
The real problem of a man is a woman ! most menare into troubles when it become to their partners ! the swing of moods and the temper of a girl is really crazy thing and no scientist can figure it out! even at school there must be a subject to understand woman's behavior coz it is really a maze for all of men !
|
|
|
|
|
CORRUPTION of many government employees and officials! no unity, most of people in the government are just doing a work for political purpposes and not for the nation and its people! hunger and less job opportunities ! theres so many problem!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
