Quelqu'un a-t-il des infos sur le BOOMcoin ? 116e sur coinmarketcap 46% ET "gros" volume Je pose la question ici car je m'y connais pas trop en shitcoins  |
|
|
|
How long is "temporary" Dooglus?
I think it's more like a permanent temporary But Doog will tell |
|
|
|
I won 0.10 btc and I withdraw it within a few minutes.
Seems legit.
0.1 withdraw is far from proving anything 1000 BTC would prove more Time will tell... dooglus once withdrew 100 BTC. One other guy withdrew 500 BTC. tl;dr: Even if someone was to withdrew 4k BTC, practically it proves nothing. all it proves is that our withdrawals are automatic(and working lol). Indeed, the final proof will come when you'll close (not too soon I hope ) and when you'll reimburse everyone like dooglus did |
|
|
|
I won 0.10 btc and I withdraw it within a few minutes.
Seems legit.
0.1 withdraw is far from proving anything 1000 BTC would prove more Time will tell... |
|
|
|
Its been over an hour since I sent my Storj from the Counterwallet Storj wallet to Poloniex... Whats the delay?
I've noticed that CounterParty transactions can take a while. It should get there soon. Actually it's poloniex that is slow Melotic is faster (1 Block conf) but there's no real volume... |
|
|
|
...
It is not possible that ONLY 68% of the holders are that stupid...
FTFY |
|
|
|
Quick question to the general populace:
Anybody know what Cryptx originally paid for the first batch of A2 Innosilicon miners that came online directly after the IPO? I didn't find anywhere where Cryptx mentioned it (naturally), so instead I'm trying to find information / pricing from group buys that happened early / mid May (and possibly a few weeks earlier than that). Based on what I've seen so far, I've estimated $10,000 each, but I may be a bit off if there were other deals going on at the time.
Are you trying to understand how they spent the 1162.281 btc of the ipo? Pretty much. Or rather, where did the money go? At $10k per device (when ordered in a large batch), that would mean there's somewhere close to BTC400 that have never been used. Even at $12,000 each (essentially the price to buy one at a time), that still leaves almost BTC245 in the air. On one hand, you whine because CryptX has scammed you with the intial investment On other hand your vote #4 because you want them to look for "future opportunities" Future opportunities for them to scam you again  It is not possible that 68% of the holders are that stupid, the vote is obviously rigged. |
|
|
|
|
Nice to see a professionally looking site taking up the place of the void left by the closing of JustDice !
|
|
|
|
im assuming everyone is voting #2?
More like option 3 +1 We already have seen how Cryptx managed Peta and Scrypt. I'm not going to wait and see if a new investment will be that beneficial to a stock value of almost 0 with dividends close to 0. If anyone wants to invest more... plenty of sell numbers available on havelock. i dont think i meant to write #2 im not sure what i was trying to write now that i look at it though edit: i meant #2 of the new voting round so really #4 #4 is leaving you money in cryptx hands... and they've not invested our money wisely so far #3 is getting back your money in your hands and do whatever you want to with it (might be another cryptX project if you trust them that much...) I don't get point of voting #4... |
|
|
|
im assuming everyone is voting #2?
More like option 3 +1 We already have seen how Cryptx managed Peta and Scrypt. I'm not going to wait and see if a new investment will be that beneficial to a stock value of almost 0 with dividends close to 0. If anyone wants to invest more... plenty of sell numbers available on havelock. That's honestly the best solution. Everyone decides what to do with his money... no forced reinvestment anymore. |
|
|
|
Looks like your address didn't received any SWARMPRE, you should contact SWARM team to get that sorted. |
|
|
|
im assuming everyone is voting #2?
More like option 3 |
|
|
|
Reinvestment is a lost cause.
I see you've never run your own mining farm before... No but I've seen CryptX running one. And I don't want them to run it anymore. |
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment is a lost cause.
If we had distributed last reinvest fund insted of buying (to cryptx?) more hash power, we would be richer now.
Why does everyone wants to keep digging their own grave ?
Distribute the fund among shareholder and save what can be saved, that's the only solution. Other options are delusions.
PS: indeed, div decrease is more than LTC/BTC + diff increase... indeed, no word from ScyptX... Who cares ?? not cryptX actually...
|
|
|
|
Maybe they already use a multipool...
But give you the LTC oupss....the BTC instead...and keep the diff coins...
They show what pool the equipment is pointed ? What hashrate ?
Don't don't even tell us how many LTC are mined since 3 weeks... really shady  |
|
|
|
People are selling their SWARMVOTETWO tokens on the exchange!
That's hilarious. And kind of genius. Especially if you're the guy who sold 10 at 1 XCP a piece.
SWARM is currently holding their second token-based vote, which is a novel way to involve "shareholders" in the voting process.
Everyone was issued 1 vote token for each SWARMPRE they held and instructed to send their tokens to the particular address assigned to the decision they wanted to vote in favor of.
It was fun, but I didn't think to try selling them on the exchange.
The guy that sold 10 SWARMVOTETWO for 10 XCP probably sold them to himself That would be fun if someone would actually buy SWARMVOTETWO for XCP |
|
|
|
Honestly, I'm quite disappointed with CP, right now this is no competition to a centralized exchange.
When trading with BTC, indeed. But if you tray XCP trading, you'll be impressed |
|
|
|
IT IS SIMPLE! We all voted for the original plan when we sent you money during the fundraiser. Issue over. 100% consensus right there. You, nor the rest of the team have any right deliberating on how you're going to play out a bait and switch. Hell I bought 200k swarmpre and I received no newsletter. I had no idea there was a vote about shit. Not that knowing about it would have made retroactively changing the deal okay. After the fact a vote will just result in a percentage of a percentage exerting their decision over the rest. Let me repeat in bold: YOU RECEIVED 100% CONCENSUS ON THE ORIGINAL DISTRIBUTION PLAN WHEN EVERYONE SENT YOU MONEY ON THE BELIEF THAT THAT WAS THE DEAL! To go any other route is unethical and depending on what choice "the team" makes, possibly plain thievery. What are you talking about "the relative importance of marketcap"? The only reason "the team" would be so concerned with manufacturing the highest possible market cap (which is absurd in its own right. Build a great product and the market will make itself) is so you can all dump swarm on everybody. What is more "the teams" concern? To appear to have integrity by doing what you say you will do and building a groundbreaking crowdfunding platform, or to dick around with investors and play kindergarten economics?
+ 1000
I think a discussion of refunds is in order. This is not what I invested in.
not sure about that And what the hell is a "coin holder representative" Someone who will represent the coin holders ?? In a trustless decentralized environment ? Do you realize how impossible this idea is ? |
|
|
|
|
I don't see why we should vote.
- Distribute the coins in the initially advertised proportions (24% of the coins to be distributed among today's SWARMPRE holders)
- Build the platform
And everyone will be happy
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
