LTC ratio on its way up??
And share price going down, go figure !
|
|
|
I've been following all the SWARM threads and am considering investing, but I can't find any info about what percentage of the one percent of coins launched on SWARM the holders of SWARMPRE will actually get.
The best I've found is "Our coin, SWARM, entitles all coin owners to a part of one percent of all future coins launched on our platform."
But a "part" of one percent, as we all know, could be extremely small. So have there been any actual numbers released?
IIRC, 24,000,000 SWARM will be divided proportionally between the SWARMPRE holders at the end of the fundraise (20th July) If 4500 SWARMPRE are sold, every SWARMPRE will yield 1 SWARM. Currently (33% raised) 1 SWARMPRE will yield 3 SWARM
|
|
|
The easiest way is going to be buying XCP and using that to place your order. That will eliminate the 1% anti-trolling BTC fee.
This should be advertised directly in counterwallet... This XCP/BTC dex is hurting users who spent fees for nothing
|
|
|
Tu cherches a refourguer ton scam/shitcoin peinard? Pas sympa ça Y'a un beau projet derrière ! (et non, je ne vais pas vendre à perte les miens, je rale juste de ne pas avoir vu ca plus tot)
|
|
|
Pour ceux qui voudraient acheter du SWARM, il y a moyen d'en avoir à prix soldé en l'achetant sur le DEX de counterparty. Si vous n'etes pas familier avec counterparty/counterwallet voici la procédure For those who are interested, you can buy SWARMPRE at discount rate (disclaimer : not mine) on counterparty DEX for 22.5 SWARMPRE/XCP Here is the orderbook 22.5 SWARMPRE/XCP 500 XCP (1) 500 XCP 22 SWARMPRE/XCP 297.69733491 XCP (2) 797.6973 XCP 21.38630317 SWARMPRE/XCP 2 XCP (1) 799.6973 XCP 21.2 SWARMPRE/XCP 118.39029443 XCP (1) 918.0876 XCP 21.0202994 SWARMPRE/XCP 0.4 XCP (2) 918.4876 XCP 20 SWARMPRE/XCP 250 XCP (1) 1,168.4876 XCP 22.5 SWARMPRE/XCP 500 XCP (1) 500 XCP 22 SWARMPRE/XCP 297.69733491 XCP (2) 797.6973 XCP 21.38630317 SWARMPRE/XCP 2 XCP (1) 799.6973 XCP 21.2 SWARMPRE/XCP 118.39029443 XCP (1) 918.0876 XCP 21.0202994 SWARMPRE/XCP 0.4 XCP (2) 918.4876 XCP 20 SWARMPRE/XCP 250 XCP (1) 1,168.4876 XCP Since you can buy XCP on poloniex or BTER for around 0.004, you can have 5625 SWARMPRE / BTC (actually a bit more since you can get XCP on those exchange for a bit less than 0.004) To do this 1) Buy XCP on BTER/poloniex with BTC 2) Transfer them to one of your counterwallet address 3) In counterwallet tab Exchnage / Buy and Sell / Buy SWARMPRE + Sell XCP / Override Market Rate and type at least 22.5 (or check market rate type up to the price you are willing to pay and wait for you order to fill if you want to pay less) Since this transaction doesn't involve BTC, it'll be automatic and you'll enjoy a immediate transaction.
|
|
|
counterwallet user: it's really frustrating to use counterparty exchange. Generally I like the idea, I want to use trustless exchange but there are so many problems. It's irrational. Everything matches (orders) and nothing happens for hours and hours. Probably because the other party is not online. And I can't log out. Fees are wasted.
and another thing.
The so called current market rate used when making orders is misleading. It's probably some sort of average price. I noticed (in btc/swarmpre trades) quite a lot of buyers do not use the override option, leave the "current market rate" and again nothing happens because actually nobody sells at "current market rate". This should be corrected
Yes, we're currently tweaking how Counterwallet calculates the current market price (Counterwallet GitHub issue #227). Also, fees aren't wasted if you don't log out (unless your order never gets matched). If you want to trade more quickly, easily, and cheaply, try purchasing assets with XCP. Great ! The "current market rate" was misleading a lot of people with unfilled orders. It should actually be the "lowest ask rate" and labelled accordingly Purchasing assets with XCP is really a great experience. BTW you can have a discount rate for SWARMPRE by purchasing them with XCP (at least 5625 SWARMPRE / BTC) as explained here
|
|
|
For those who are interested, you can buy SWARMPRE at discount rate (disclaimer : not mine) on counterparty DEX for 22.5 SWARMPRE/XCP Here is the orderbook 22.5 SWARMPRE/XCP 500 XCP (1) 500 XCP 22 SWARMPRE/XCP 297.69733491 XCP (2) 797.6973 XCP 21.38630317 SWARMPRE/XCP 2 XCP (1) 799.6973 XCP 21.2 SWARMPRE/XCP 118.39029443 XCP (1) 918.0876 XCP 21.0202994 SWARMPRE/XCP 0.4 XCP (2) 918.4876 XCP 20 SWARMPRE/XCP 250 XCP (1) 1,168.4876 XCP 22.5 SWARMPRE/XCP 500 XCP (1) 500 XCP 22 SWARMPRE/XCP 297.69733491 XCP (2) 797.6973 XCP 21.38630317 SWARMPRE/XCP 2 XCP (1) 799.6973 XCP 21.2 SWARMPRE/XCP 118.39029443 XCP (1) 918.0876 XCP 21.0202994 SWARMPRE/XCP 0.4 XCP (2) 918.4876 XCP 20 SWARMPRE/XCP 250 XCP (1) 1,168.4876 XCP Since you can buy XCP on poloniex or BTER for around 0.004, you can have 5625 SWARMPRE / BTC (actually a bit more since you can get XCP on those exchange for a bit less than 0.004) To do this 1) Buy XCP on BTER/poloniex with BTC 2) Transfer them to one of your counterwallet address 3) In counterwallet tab Exchnage / Buy and Sell / Buy SWARMPRE + Sell XCP / Override Market Rate and type at least 22.5 (or check market rate type up to the price you are willing to pay and wait for you order to fill if you want to pay less) Since this transaction doesn't involve BTC, it'll be automatic and you'll enjoy a immediate transaction.
|
|
|
Looks like you've got another problem. Bursts of andromeda wins in a row, several times. Check you logs, this is fishy. Maybe check your algo because the randomization is odd. EDIT: actually, it's a display bug, the same bet is showed 3 times
|
|
|
Any particular reason the volume has picked up so much in the last day?
Pressure on the bid. Mid size buys walls Bter 0.00390000 - 3896 XCP - 15.19440 BTC Poloniex 0.00400000 - 2921.72530837 XCP - 11.68690123 BTC 0.00380000 - 5400 XCP - 20.52 BTC
|
|
|
Sorry, I misunderstood your question. You are correct, in a YES vote the 24,000,000 SWARM will be divided proportionally to SWARMPRE holders. We anticipate that all 24,000,000 SWARMPRE will be sold, but if not the scenario you describe will happen. For example, if we sell only 12,000,000 SWARMPRE then every SWARMPRE holder will get 2 SWARM.
Ok, vote casted. Pay attention that the 68,000,000 SWARM in limbo should be stored publicly and not moved unless a future round is issued, unless you'll be accused of "premine", espacially if SWARM is listed on centrlized exchnage after the 20th
|
|
|
Announcement: Over the past few weeks, we've been doing a lot of work on the fee algorithm that Counterparty uses, and now transactions are effectively much cheaper than before. In particular, 'send' transactions can store all of their Counterparty metadata in a 40-byte OP_RETURN output, and you can now specify the exact fees paid for each transaction, as well as the default fee-per-KB amount, dust sizes, and so on. Multi-sig outputs need not be used, so no difficult-to-spend funds need to be sent back to your self at all. This transaction is an example of a modern send transaction that cost only US $0.01 in fees, with a $0.03 output to the destination. It was constructed and broadcast with the following command: counterpartyd.py send --source=SOURCE --destination=DEST --quantity=1 --asset=XCP --encoding='opreturn' --fee=.00002, and it was confirmed almost immediately. If you're moving lots of assets around, or sending one asset to many users, you can use this script to automate the process and keep costs as low as possible. Can't get the --encoding='opreturn' to work returns : counterpartyd: error: unrecognized arguments: --encoding='opreturn'
|
|
|
How much SWARM per SWARMPRE will be distributed if YES is voted ? 1 to 1. ok, I thought the 24,000,000 SWARM were to be divided proportiaonly between the SWARMPRE holders at the end of the fundraise. I don't know where I've read that if only 12.000.000 SWARMPRE are sold in the first round, every SWARMPRE would yield 2 SWARM. Thanks for the info, I know enough to cast my vote
|
|
|
I don't get it
How much SWARM per SWARMPRE will be distributed if YES is voted ?
How much SWARM will be in limbo for "future rounds of funding" ?
How much SWARM will "Swarm Reserve" be ?
How could 4500 BTC not be enough ?
|
|
|
Sorry.
Fuck you dude, you're not even sorry. You just come here to rub salt in the wound.
|
|
|
As I have the golden tickets in a blockchain account, any way to import the priv key to counterwallet (rather then sweeping the funds)? You can import one particular asset when importing funds in counterwallet without sweeping the entire balance of the address Imoprt fund / from another address, after entering the privkey you'll have a list of the assets to choose from.
|
|
|
The problem with editable odds is that they need to match exactly for a match to be made. The current implementation is logarithmic at 1/20 increments. I think maybe it would look cleaner as whole number fractions? Yes, let me fix the redirect, thanks. Well thought out Indeed, it would be better with 0.10 increments (bigger round increments after 2.00 odd, like 0.20 and round number after 5) Also, I just realized that the odds are fractional, you should add a numerical odd display (Thus even odds 1/1 are quoted in decimal odds as 2)
|
|
|
Excellent, testing right now edit : ok when clicking on the "Create Bet" after filling all the fileds, nothing happens (chrome browser) Sorry bout that, should be fixed. Indeed, it's working. You should let the odds field editable (and/or the return on win field), since the slider isn't really precise (eg. it goes from 2.86 to 3.33) Then it creates a raw transaction that should be signed with "sign transaction" in couterwallet, right ? Your link when clicking on sign with counterwallet redirects to testnet counterwallet. Great work !
|
|
|
Excellent, testing right now edit : ok when clicking on the "Create Bet" after filling all the fileds, nothing happens (chrome browser)
|
|
|
Excellent news coverage !
|
|
|
People are saying the LTC/BTC ratio will make a run upwards sometime soon, possibly in next 3 weeks. Then the dividend will sky rocket too. Any takers on this?
AS i mention before i am no techy.
That's possible, but it can go the other way. We are just stuck here and we cannot do anything else than wait. I regret my YES vote for the reinvest, we should have distributed the reinvest fund as dividends to limit the loss, now we are stuck with miners which will turn unprofitable if the LTC plunge isn't stopping.
|
|
|
|