All these posts "To the moon", "I like this project very much", "Will join, hope good luck to dev" etc are treated as SPAM!

What you are doing so far is leaving a very bad impression for the existing community here. If you use your telegram user base to make fake HYPE (supposing it's not just a paid bump service - for the moment benefit of the doubt), what will make us believe you will not make fake volume on exchanges, or cut any corner for more exposure, profit etc.

And also the cherry on the cake: Storeum - fake/ai generated team members!

If there was a prize for a bad start in business, you would be one of the nominees.

There is a team that handles any updates on the bitcoin core software and on the blockchain in reneral. But mainly there arr many trade-offs. They can make blocks bigger for example, for scalability purposes, but that might compromise security, make node setup much harder, increase the "oprhan" proportion between blocks and many others that we might not even think about. It is very hand to update the perfect system. You have to take too many variables into account.
It will take some time for the shitcoins to evolve and come up with better ideas and newer thechnologies that eventually can be implemented into btc if the community will agree.
The same thing is all over the tech world. Very hard to upgrade without screwing something else up. Patience my friend...

Like the shiw very much. Ep 2 S3 so far. Was surprised to see how much those kids grew )

If you are looking for business partners it would be better to move this thread in the Marketplace (Altcoins) board. And also a little more details about the project you have in mind. GL

I understood just a few BTC forks that use PoS have this exact vulnerability and also most of them were contacted by "The Decentralized Systems Lab at the University of Illinois" (the guys who reported the "fake stake attack") and most of them patched them up.

The way I see it is that there is a main currency, BTC, and the others are just on testnet. They try all sorts of tricks, new approaches, innovative implementations to make the blockchain better. Really hope they make more and more breakthroughs as these can later be patched on to BTC to improve it, on the security department, anonymity ( not just pseudo-anonymity), scalability etc.

PoS has it's faults, but and the very core is a pretty well thought out system.

One more thing... Libra is not a token! Is not crypto! It's just paypal 2.0 . Indeed...looks like it is, but isn't really. They "sort of" use a blockchain, if they had to choose between PoW & PoS it was a no-brainner. Do you imagine Zuckerberg allowing you to print your own money? There will be a handful on nodes (rumoured at ~$10M) sold to a handful of mega corporations that will validate the blocks. The rich get richer... but for a fee to FaceBook  

I seem to have found a fake ann also
   
[ANN] [STARNODES] [STR] POW + POS + MASTERNODE / QUARK ALGO / SALE / HIGH ROI%
User: AloneLeaveSrek


Archived

Original ann: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5112451

What Libra impact ? Did Revolut impact bitcoin ? Let's look at the charts. Revolut was founded Jul 1^st 2015. What happened to bitcoin at the time ? ...NOTHING !
And let's be honest, when did Trump became this worldwide financial trading guru that we all look up to ? Unless he decides to ban bitcoin usage in US there is nothing he can say to impact btc price IMO.

...like any other coin that is listed on third party exchanges, not just used on their own website. Not saying that your token is bad (did not get a chance to analyze it properly) but might want to take it down a notch. Even in the post above the guy mentions:
But here we are !
Would be better to focus on your own roadmap and project than comparing your ERC20 token to "the highly pumpable BTC" ... just a thought 

Pretty much no stable coin is reliable as they are centralized. They can be backed by all sorts of assets: fiat (USD,EUR etc.) gold, real estate... you name it ! Problem is the entity that controls them can mint (issue) any amount at any given time (pretty much that's the main reason for all the controversy behind it, as dkbit98 mentioned)

But at the end of the day they serve their purpose.

Why are you asking? Their not worth investing in, thus the name "stable". You just use them to buy other crypto. And for that you can just head in your exchange of choice and use what ever "they have on stock": USDT, TUSDT, DAI and go crazy!

Theoretically those guys issue money for a separate entity (or at least that was the plan).
Bitcoin will not be bothered by Libra. Paypal should be afraid tho. Centralised stable coin. Will not be surprised if I hear news like Tether's oupsy!

If SHA256 is "fracked"... we would have much more things to worry about than a big BTC dump. Satellites will crash, governments will fall..... BTC will be later on our problem list.!