For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:
1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.
2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?
if all else fails
3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.
I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.
A simple thank you was all that was necessary.
I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations
If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.
If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.
So you have the proof, but don't want to provide it, and you say you did this research for free, yet now want 3 BTC to prepare a report. Hmm. How about this, just show the proof that the tax document is connected to the XC dev, and we won't need your report. You save time, I save BTC, and you stop the whole scam in it's tracks, thereby doing the community a service which you so righteously proclaim is your goal. Because here's how it goes otherwise: 1: We ask Dan, he say's "No, that's not me"2: We ask CoinsSource, they say "Actually, we contacted the dev and are awaiting verification. Currently no PoD stars have been awarded. Our article is based on an informal interview in IRC." 3: We contact the tax department and tell them we've found a guy called Dan Metcalf, who may, or may not be the same guy they're looking for, and that our guy is a coin dev who has got some bitcoins. We could say "Would you mind going and arresting your Dan Metcalf for us so we can see if it's the right guy? We're not quite sure you see, because there's more than one Daniel R Metcalf in Marshfield, and the guy who gave me the tax information removed the address and doesn't want show me how it's connected to the coin dev. Oh, one more thing, we have no reason to suspect that our guy has done anything illegal, we just want to make sure he's not the guy you're looking for." The condescending tone of your reply to my simple request for proof of the connection smacks of someone who has no proof, instead you attempt to deflect the issue citing your hurt pride as the reason you provide none. Has Dan actually denied being this guy? Then obviously he is not this guy either, right?: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1I'd like to see a link to his "denial". Maybe he denied it when he was "frustrated"... he tends to do that often. Firstly, I don't know if he has denied the tax lien or not. Why would he when there has been no connection shown? The address on the document has been redacted, and there are 6 Daniel R Metcalf's in Marshfield alone. Secondly, that is atcsecures LinkedIn profile. Common knowledge for months. Do you deny you are IconicExpert? Firstly, didn't you posted just above that Dan had denied being the same person in the documents? I am confused... Secondly, I don't know if it has been posted or not, if it has, it has. That is indeed the infamous Dan Metcalf and, according to the documents, he's the same individual. Thirdly: I believe IconicExpert is quite busy with his own coin project about to launch, tomorrow I think. At this point only people affected by profound retardation -or very unethical agendas-, choose to believe that lie that has been denied and demonstrated for months... and in frustration or not, the only, evident, repeated, obvious answer is NO, I am not. But you are more than welcome to believe anything you want... although I personally identify myself much more with Batman... You sound very confused I must say, where did I post that he denied owing the taxman $70k? I just said I didn't know if you cared to read my post. And if you think he has denied it, where is the proof that this guy: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1 is the same Dan Metcalf as the one mentioned in the tax lien here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.msg9476089#msg9476089There is no address on the tax lien. So there is no proof. I know which address I can connect to the dev, but is it the same as on the tax lien? Tax liens exists on Dan's Metcalf companies: http://corp.sec.state.ma.us/CorpWeb/liens/lienssearch.aspxSearch for Metcalf Daniel Two corporate tax liens are under his name: 044090004813 and 044090005922 Ahhh. Now I see. I stand corrected. |
|
|
|
For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:
1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.
2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?
if all else fails
3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.
I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.
A simple thank you was all that was necessary.
I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations
If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.
If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.
So you have the proof, but don't want to provide it, and you say you did this research for free, yet now want 3 BTC to prepare a report. Hmm. How about this, just show the proof that the tax document is connected to the XC dev, and we won't need your report. You save time, I save BTC, and you stop the whole scam in it's tracks, thereby doing the community a service which you so righteously proclaim is your goal. Because here's how it goes otherwise: 1: We ask Dan, he say's "No, that's not me"2: We ask CoinsSource, they say "Actually, we contacted the dev and are awaiting verification. Currently no PoD stars have been awarded. Our article is based on an informal interview in IRC." 3: We contact the tax department and tell them we've found a guy called Dan Metcalf, who may, or may not be the same guy they're looking for, and that our guy is a coin dev who has got some bitcoins. We could say "Would you mind going and arresting your Dan Metcalf for us so we can see if it's the right guy? We're not quite sure you see, because there's more than one Daniel R Metcalf in Marshfield, and the guy who gave me the tax information removed the address and doesn't want show me how it's connected to the coin dev. Oh, one more thing, we have no reason to suspect that our guy has done anything illegal, we just want to make sure he's not the guy you're looking for." The condescending tone of your reply to my simple request for proof of the connection smacks of someone who has no proof, instead you attempt to deflect the issue citing your hurt pride as the reason you provide none. Has Dan actually denied being this guy? Then obviously he is not this guy either, right?: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1I'd like to see a link to his "denial". Maybe he denied it when he was "frustrated"... he tends to do that often. Firstly, I don't know if he has denied the tax lien or not. Why would he when there has been no connection shown? The address on the document has been redacted, and there are 6 Daniel R Metcalf's in Marshfield alone. Secondly, that is atcsecures LinkedIn profile. Common knowledge for months. Do you deny you are IconicExpert? Firstly, didn't you posted just above that Dan had denied being the same person in the documents? I am confused... Secondly, I don't know if it has been posted or not, if it has, it has. That is indeed the infamous Dan Metcalf and, according to the documents, he's the same individual. Thirdly: I believe IconicExpert is quite busy with his own coin project about to launch, tomorrow I think. At this point only people affected by profound retardation -or very unethical agendas-, choose to believe that lie that has been denied and demonstrated for months... and in frustration or not, the only, evident, repeated, obvious answer is NO, I am not. But you are more than welcome to believe anything you want... although I personally identify myself much more with Batman... You sound very confused I must say, where did I post that he denied owing the taxman $70k? I just said I didn't know if you cared to read my post. And if you think he has denied it, where is the proof that this guy: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1 is the same Dan Metcalf as the one mentioned in the tax lien here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=841223.msg9476089#msg9476089There is no address on the tax lien. So there is no proof. I know which address I can connect to the dev, but is it the same as on the tax lien? |
|
|
|
When I'm gonna get my BLOCKs? Or is this a scam?  scammy for sure did dev receive ICO funds? No, not yet. They will be held in escrow until needed for development. And the 2 guys you quoted have been banned from this thread because they insist on spreading FUD. |
|
|
|
I disagree perfusely. With every successful coin there is a supportive community thread on bitcointalk. It needs to be open again and properly moderated with support for Arlyn and Teka coming from the community to accomplish this.
Open it! Enough said.
Perfusely? That's not a word, brother. Just saying... Your argument amounts to that of it being tradition that successful coins have active bitcointalk threads. It's a tad silly if you ask me. Tradition inhibits change and change is the one inevitable element to this universe. We either change with the change or we let the change pass us by. This place is old news. XC can certainly be successful outside of this disgusting 'traditional' forum. There are many means to an end. We've tried this one. It's time to try the next. When people have questions, they go to the thread, and you can usually get an answer in minutes. The XC forum just isn't as good as this one, both in that respect, and the general layout. It's people that are the problem, not this forum. Having a self-moderated thread gave the fudders more ammunition, and I'm sure they'd love the opportunity to spread more fud about how the evil XC scammers closed their thread and ran away from Bitcointalk. We must stay here. |
|
|
|
For any doubters whatsoever, I have 3 suggestions:
1. is to ask you the man himself. I am certain he will have a straight forward and concise answer covering all of the points you bring up.
2. Or maybe contact the CoinsSource POD service that signed off on him. Weren't they already paid to do something in regards to looking into the dev? Or does five stars come from sending them an id and a payment. Hell, they even said that Dan was a reputable businessman. That statement can't be made without some research right?
if all else fails
3. or call the toll free Lien Unit phone number provided on the form. I am certain if you explain the situation fully to them, that someone is claiming Dan Metcalf who is currently in control of ~600btc and possibly ~250btc more shortly from a coin ito is the same as a lien you saw. Give them the lien serial number and information on the form. I am certain they will clear it right up.
I am certain and without a shadow of a doubt that they are one and the same. I could provide that info and without doxxing. But continually being chastised for clearly doing the right thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Mind you I did this for free as well with no dog in the fight. It weighed on me heavily and seeing more and more people sucked in to the quagmire of filth and deceit all with the change for it to vaporize at any second made up my mind. I could have sat back and said nothing and regretted the rest of my life. Or I could have sat back and secretly used to info to my advantage or called it in myself. Instead I gave it to the community and now I wish I had earlier. I tried to warn everyone multiple times and hinted at this for some time just hoping someone would figure it out all by themselves. Like I've alluded to before, thousand of people invested in this coin and thousands in xc and not one figured this simple thing out. This all should have been brought to light before blocknet was even a whishper instead look at what you have done. Do not shift blame, hate or negativity at me. You are the ones responsible for this mess. You were horrible stewards for your community.
A simple thank you was all that was necessary.
I do this type of research and plenty that is much more involved on a daily basis. If you are unable to figure it out and/or put eyes on it yourself with the single document I provided then I really am not going to hold your hand to baby step you through it. This is like someone providing a free mac wallet for a coin and you expecting they teach you how to build it. You might be surprised to find out, that research involves more than googling something. I am guessing you could find a copy of that document at least in 2 or 3 locations
If you want to send me 3btc to work on this a couple of more days and put together a report then do it. If you think that is high, to bad. That is about a rough after tax rate including hotel and food that I could make doing it otherwise. If you want me to teach you how I research I usually charge a student the first month of their pay so ~15-22btc, but I rarely take on a student.
If you want to continue to doubt the authenticity of the document then find an escrow and put up some btc.
So you have the proof, but don't want to provide it, and you say you did this research for free, yet now want 3 BTC to prepare a report. Hmm. How about this, just show the proof that the tax document is connected to the XC dev, and we won't need your report. You save time, I save BTC, and you stop the whole scam in it's tracks, thereby doing the community a service which you so righteously proclaim is your goal. Because here's how it goes otherwise: 1: We ask Dan, he say's "No, that's not me"2: We ask CoinsSource, they say "Actually, we contacted the dev and are awaiting verification. Currently no PoD stars have been awarded. Our article is based on an informal interview in IRC." 3: We contact the tax department and tell them we've found a guy called Dan Metcalf, who may, or may not be the same guy they're looking for, and that our guy is a coin dev who has got some bitcoins. We could say "Would you mind going and arresting your Dan Metcalf for us so we can see if it's the right guy? We're not quite sure you see, because there's more than one Daniel R Metcalf in Marshfield, and the guy who gave me the tax information removed the address and doesn't want show me how it's connected to the coin dev. Oh, one more thing, we have no reason to suspect that our guy has done anything illegal, we just want to make sure he's not the guy you're looking for." The condescending tone of your reply to my simple request for proof of the connection smacks of someone who has no proof, instead you attempt to deflect the issue citing your hurt pride as the reason you provide none. Has Dan actually denied being this guy? Then obviously he is not this guy either, right?: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=42275474&authType=NAME_SEARCH&authToken=Mj7i&locale=en_US&trk=tyah&trkInfo=tarId%3A1415552014018%2Ctas%3Adan%20metcalf%2Cidx%3A1-1-1I'd like to see a link to his "denial". Maybe he denied it when he was "frustrated"... he tends to do that often. Firstly, I don't know if he has denied the tax lien or not. Why would he when there has been no connection shown? The address on the document has been redacted, and there are 6 Daniel R Metcalf's in Marshfield alone. Secondly, that is atcsecures LinkedIn profile. Common knowledge for months. Do you deny you are IconicExpert? |
|
|
|
You cheeky fudding bastard, Jasin Lee is no longer part of the XC team: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg8720311#msg8720311"Statement on XC's relation to Jasinlee Hello all We would like to state the nature of XC's relation to Jasinlee. Jasinlee is not an official member of the XC Team, as has been reflected on our website for some time. Jasinlee chose to remove himself from the XC Team out of concern for the effect that ongoing misperceptions about his troubled ASIC project might have on XC. As such, XC is entirely independent of Jasinlee’s various projects, and clients of the Fibonacci ASIC project have no basis for associating its outcome with XC in any way. We consider this matter resolved. Now concerning a separate matter, that of public perceptions of Jasinlee’s character and actions, at no point has the XC Team had reason to lose faith in Jasinlee’s integrity of character or doubt his intentions, whether toward XC or toward Fibonacci. Furthermore Jasinlee is entirely confident that a resolution will be reached. As such we have confidence that Jasin will resolve the outstanding issues with the Fibonacci ASIC project. Furthermore we believe that current arguments to the contrary are poorly substantiated and largely speculative, and therefore lack sufficient warrant. Given their severity, these allegations are thus of a highly unethical nature. Finally, regarding Jasinlee’s past role at XC, he is a thought-leader, and we are grateful for his insightful and energising contribution and presence. However Jasinlee did not make any contributions to XC’s code and has not had access to it. Thus he has not been a developer for XC." He is a scammer. Proof is there, sticking your head in the mud and pretending its not true is disgusting, shameful, gutless, and pathetic. He stole from good people and you defending him is laughable. XC is involved and is protecting a known scammer. Shame on you all. Given the severity of Jasin Lee's actions, he's lucky he isn't in jail (but that potential is still there and will come about. Why are you willing to go to the mat for a scammer? BTW, you may consider the matter resolved but luckily no one gives two shits what Jasin Lee's defenders/accessories/partners in crime think. This matter won't be swept under the rug and its disgraceful someone would take the time to defend a scumbag like Jasin Lee. XC is not involved, and a characteristically diplomatic response from Synechist is not protecting him, it's worded just the same way as any normal business would choose to make such a statement. And I'm not defending him, look at the title of this thread. I agree that he's a scammer, I'd never heard of him, but it all came out when he joined the XC team, and plenty of us said to fuck him off. I don't think Dan knew about his history, I mean think about it, how could you employ him and expect all the ASIC allegations NOT to come out, seriously? It makes no sense. So concentrate on trying to put him in jail instead of bashing XC. He lied to us too you know. |
|
|
|
If you're wondering who unicornfarts was (one of the most prolific Block trolls), of course it turns out he was none other than a sockpuppet account for long time XC troll rdnkjdi  And danisdone was him too. I wonder how many other of these trolls accounts that have popped up are created by rdnkjdi. Such actions would be illegal in a regulated market. Ahh, it all makes sense now. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg9459644#msg9459644 |
|
|
|
You cheeky fudding bastard, Jasin Lee is no longer part of the XC team: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg8720311#msg8720311"Statement on XC's relation to Jasinlee Hello all We would like to state the nature of XC's relation to Jasinlee. Jasinlee is not an official member of the XC Team, as has been reflected on our website for some time. Jasinlee chose to remove himself from the XC Team out of concern for the effect that ongoing misperceptions about his troubled ASIC project might have on XC. As such, XC is entirely independent of Jasinlee’s various projects, and clients of the Fibonacci ASIC project have no basis for associating its outcome with XC in any way. We consider this matter resolved. Now concerning a separate matter, that of public perceptions of Jasinlee’s character and actions, at no point has the XC Team had reason to lose faith in Jasinlee’s integrity of character or doubt his intentions, whether toward XC or toward Fibonacci. Furthermore Jasinlee is entirely confident that a resolution will be reached. As such we have confidence that Jasin will resolve the outstanding issues with the Fibonacci ASIC project. Furthermore we believe that current arguments to the contrary are poorly substantiated and largely speculative, and therefore lack sufficient warrant. Given their severity, these allegations are thus of a highly unethical nature. Finally, regarding Jasinlee’s past role at XC, he is a thought-leader, and we are grateful for his insightful and energising contribution and presence. However Jasinlee did not make any contributions to XC’s code and has not had access to it. Thus he has not been a developer for XC." |
|
|
|
You cheeky fudding bastard, Jasin Lee is no longer part of the XC team: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg8720311#msg8720311"Statement on XC's relation to Jasinlee Hello all We would like to state the nature of XC's relation to Jasinlee. Jasinlee is not an official member of the XC Team, as has been reflected on our website for some time. Jasinlee chose to remove himself from the XC Team out of concern for the effect that ongoing misperceptions about his troubled ASIC project might have on XC. As such, XC is entirely independent of Jasinlee’s various projects, and clients of the Fibonacci ASIC project have no basis for associating its outcome with XC in any way. We consider this matter resolved. Now concerning a separate matter, that of public perceptions of Jasinlee’s character and actions, at no point has the XC Team had reason to lose faith in Jasinlee’s integrity of character or doubt his intentions, whether toward XC or toward Fibonacci. Furthermore Jasinlee is entirely confident that a resolution will be reached. As such we have confidence that Jasin will resolve the outstanding issues with the Fibonacci ASIC project. Furthermore we believe that current arguments to the contrary are poorly substantiated and largely speculative, and therefore lack sufficient warrant. Given their severity, these allegations are thus of a highly unethical nature. Finally, regarding Jasinlee’s past role at XC, he is a thought-leader, and we are grateful for his insightful and energising contribution and presence. However Jasinlee did not make any contributions to XC’s code and has not had access to it. Thus he has not been a developer for XC." |
|
|
|
So dan can code or not ?
These coin reviews he does? are we saying he pushes the code out to freelancers to review?
Can someone really not verify yes or no the guy can code or not?
All the reviews I've seen from him have been so high level and without any detail and insight that anyone could've written those reviews. For example, the Stealthcoin's sms feature review - he just tried if it works and that's it. It wasn't a code review. thats because he was only capitalizing on his trust by the community, im guessing he has zero coding skills which furthur perpetrates his entire career here as nothing more than another lying con man. i think its fucking hilarious myself. when will people learn, you earn trust, just saying hey im legit trust me is never enough. ESPECIALLY in alts for shits sake. its messed up that people i called out as scammers months ago (alty, dagger, metcalf, moolah) are all proving me right while people i have been defending continue to quietly keep doing what they are doing and doing it well. This is actually a good time for all of us. get these fucking pukes out of here and lets get back to making money and not all of this manipulation. Think about it moolah and metcalf in one week, thats two big wins for all of us. Oh, so you're only guessing then? If you think Dan can't code, prove it. There's still an unclaimed bounty for anyone who wants to try. Or shall we just go and short BTC till they're a dollar each? missing the point brother, hes a scammer either way. i dont care if he can code or not but everything else is a lie so why wouldnt that be? you do what you want. XC wont recover from this and neither will his rep. Missing the point that you're guessing, or the point no-one broke Dan's code? Go and claim that bounty before you start "guessing" if a guy can code or not. |
|
|
|
So dan can code or not ?
These coin reviews he does? are we saying he pushes the code out to freelancers to review?
Can someone really not verify yes or no the guy can code or not?
All the reviews I've seen from him have been so high level and without any detail and insight that anyone could've written those reviews. For example, the Stealthcoin's sms feature review - he just tried if it works and that's it. It wasn't a code review. thats because he was only capitalizing on his trust by the community, im guessing he has zero coding skills which furthur perpetrates his entire career here as nothing more than another lying con man. i think its fucking hilarious myself. when will people learn, you earn trust, just saying hey im legit trust me is never enough. ESPECIALLY in alts for shits sake. its messed up that people i called out as scammers months ago (alty, dagger, metcalf, moolah) are all proving me right while people i have been defending continue to quietly keep doing what they are doing and doing it well. This is actually a good time for all of us. get these fucking pukes out of here and lets get back to making money and not all of this manipulation. Think about it moolah and metcalf in one week, thats two big wins for all of us. Oh, so you're only guessing then? If you think Dan can't code, prove it. There's still an unclaimed bounty for anyone who wants to try. Or shall we just go and short BTC till they're a dollar each? |
|
|
|
|
What the hell are you quoting that for? Getting a bit too warm is it?
Your OP won't save you. Only code, you got any?
|
|
|
|
God damn it, lieutenant Dan! What the fuck have you done ? It's not like your "loljosh"-made shitcoin  I would like to see a response from Dan about the image above to clear the air - this was never fully answered by the XC team and was constantly responded with ambiguous coverup like statements like "I didnt pay loljosh for the xmixer code" - It wasnt so specific to just the xmixer - loljosh might have created the entire PoS system for XC??? Dan should clear the air and tell us what he paid the copycat coin creator loljosh for - obviously he paid him for something and it was during the time XC was released. This is old story dude. He already cleared this long time ago. Big freaking deal. Dan has paid loljosh for something. Where is the problem? yeah.. what ? we need answers why is his paying a mass coin cloning service... This is scandalous ! why does he pay a rent a coin maker  ? And i see you are the new PR rep eh ? ya good call Blocknet- scam Team.. brilliant  You dont see a problem??? - you think anyone serious would invest in XC or BlockNet if they knew Dan had paid a copycat coin maker to develop a coin or certain portions of a coin for him? I dont think you have the right to tell us all to keep quiet when the image above is clear cut evidence that a transaction and possibly something fishy has occurred. You are obviously holding a very large bag of XC and trying desperately to claw your funds back. Im sorry. Dude this got dealt with way back when. Are you listening to the fud or creating it? |
|
|
|
|
Yo don't leave out the bit where he outlines what the premine paid for. Doesn't fit your agenda eh?
"He also shared with me that some of the premine was used to pay him to pay back some of the money he personally invested into XC's mobile app development. Some of that XC paid to him was then sold to buy his own stake in BlockNet, but he stressed that the XC premine was not directly used to buy BlockNet's ITO and has been used exclusively for development of XC and its related projects (including bounties, multi-pools, an ATM and the mobile app)."
|
|
|
|
Is there actually any real code that can be viewed for this or is it all private?
There will be the code of the Xbridge so basically of block-net will be open sourced and a preview will arrive soon I've actually tried to answer my own question. So far I've been looking over this: https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknetWhat the above appears to be is just a regular old litecoin/bitcoin fork. "Tokens" are just another name for "coins". There is no code in the above repository that is unique or in any way shape or form able to do anything with "Xbridge". It seems to be only a new coin with nothing else. I don't see how it justifies 2500 btc in it's current form. That's because it's a temporary wallet to keep your coins in until the blocknet launches. Then they will be redeemed for the proper tokens. Or would you rather leave them in an exchange for a few months until the launch? Or let the dev look after them? No, you get a wallet to look after your own investment. As has been explained, the Xbridge code is on the way. It would probably be here already if not for the fud. Is there a timeframe for the xbridge code to be released? Nothing definite, possibly this week according to Synechist. |
|
|
|
Is there actually any real code that can be viewed for this or is it all private?
There will be the code of the Xbridge so basically of block-net will be open sourced and a preview will arrive soon I've actually tried to answer my own question. So far I've been looking over this: https://github.com/atcsecure/blocknetWhat the above appears to be is just a regular old litecoin/bitcoin fork. "Tokens" are just another name for "coins". There is no code in the above repository that is unique or in any way shape or form able to do anything with "Xbridge". It seems to be only a new coin with nothing else. I don't see how it justifies 2500 btc in it's current form. That's because it's a temporary wallet to keep your coins in until the blocknet launches. Then they will be redeemed for the proper tokens. Or would you rather leave them in an exchange for a few months until the launch? Or let the dev look after them? No, you get a wallet to look after your own investment. As has been explained, the Xbridge code is on the way. It would probably be here already if not for the fud. |
|
|
|
Love this quote of the day and its for all you crying kids who just don't get that, without people like us you're nothing and would prolly be in chains cause you are just too happy to be scammed all your life and you don't have a second thought about the next gens or your peers!! "Sucks growing your coin in a circlejerk echo chamber and then being exposed to sunlight doesn't it" ~UnicornFarts Do you even know what this is: http://postimg.org/image/rmkvuhem3/Nah, didn't think so. Dan built it for us in own private echo chamber while the rest of you tools were running round chasing the latest pump rinse-out. You are the circle-jerkers, not us. |
|
|
|
'sue-your-slander-coin' ico for 2500 btc on trex tomorrow  Closed source of course and if you don't like it we are going to 'sue your slander' great coin motto It is not closed source ^ What he said. Xbridge code will be released shortly as proof of concept. |
|
|
|
I WILL FUCKING SUE YOU FOR TAKING MY NAME WITHOUT ASKING !
You heard me!
Bunch of noobs creating scamclonecoins, but now they even have to clone the nicknames of other people how weak is this ?
Sue my dick you troll fudding wanker. Yeah that's right, sue my dick. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
