new acc? lol what happened with your other acc?
Got banned because someone else was selling netflix/paypal vccs LOL. People don't get banned for selling the same thing other people do or this forum would have only 5 posts. http://archive.fo/dTGJbBan reason was pretty much what I just said. You realize you can be banned again for creating a new account after being banned once before. That's known as "ban evasion."  |
|
|
|
new acc? lol what happened with your other acc?
Got banned because someone else was selling netflix/paypal vccs LOL. People don't get banned for selling the same thing other people do or this forum would have only 5 posts. |
|
|
|
Interesting bug: Quadruplicates  None can be accessed.  |
|
|
|
I left a flag on his profile, now he cannot scam anyone else.
Flag supported, but If you believe that you are very naive.  |
|
|
|
keygateways-> faskey.io scam is back. 2nd account today. http://archive.fo/tbNeC Looks like a hacked or bought account inactive for a year. |
|
|
|
bought the tools. they are working fine. finally one of the few genuine seller out here. had a lengthy discussion and the seller responded patiently
Amazing how it's always a newbie with 1 or 2 posts (in this case, just his first post) who vouch for this shit plus both both this poster and OP are logged in at the same time. Guess it could just be a coincidence. Or not.
EDIT: Guess it wasn't a coincidence as he deleted the fake vouch from rinku2012 that was directly above and quoted in this post.
Can't imagine why he would delete such a glowing vouch and replace it with a smiley face ...... obviously because it was fake. |
|
|
|
Posted in wrong thread but still same group of scammers. I can also get you whatever you need. US, UK, CA, or JP. If they cost money I can get them for you for no cost as well. My email is teege@protonmail.com |
|
|
|
|
Purchased a one month YouTubeTV account. Delivered quickly and for now working fine.
|
|
|
|
The first one was banned. |
|
|
|
If the starter of the tag used a type 3 (which would have been the correct one) it may be active already. It does show for a newbie who logs in.
Yes, it's a type 3 but unlike a type 1, A type 3 flag requires at least 3 DT members to support it for it to become active. Right now we are only 2 DT members supporting it. Hopeful another DT member supports it soon.  Also seems to be an alt of Soha and his multiple accounts.
That's what i also noticed sometime back. Nope, it's a "type 2" "casual or implied agreement". I had thought only a type 3 shows up for everyone reading the thread but not 100% sure.  hp laptop enter key not workingAnd it shows up when "guest or newbie" logs in. https://prnt.sc/smmhsgTry looking as a guest or newbie. |
|
|
|
|
If the starter of the tag used a type 3 (which would have been the correct one) it may be active already. It does show for a newbie who logs in.
Also seems to be an alt of Soha and his multiple accounts.
|
|
|
|
that's not my skype? wth?
LMAO, That was really dumb bumping a 6 month old thread and denying what you posted just 2 weeks ago, but evidently it IS your Skype, just look at the first post here in this old moved thread: http://archive.fo/Taf5CBusted |
|
|
|
That seller has been tagged & flagged multiple times. Did you see the big yellow box above his name when you logged in and the 7-8 red trusts under his name?
Probably he/she is not aware on how the trust system works. I supported the flag. Yea, but that big yellow "warning" should have been a hint. It kinda spells it out without any trust system knowledge needed. When I see a RED STOP sign on the corner I don't need to know how the traffic control rules work. |
|
|
|
I'm curious about your account and your proof. The last seen from your proof is "within a week" so probably you have contact him around 1 week ago. But your account is registered today at 12:21:27 AM. I mean, how you can know @norot44 if you never use this forum before? or this your alt account?. I also didn't find your name in his thread http://loyce.club/archive/topics/523/5230067.htmlSadly a lot of people do not register accounts before trading with people in threads where they give their telegram handle, email address or website name. I have seen people create accounts only when they are scammed, to open a scam accusation. Sadly you are incorrect. That BIG YELLOW flag shows up when NOT logged in. That changed over a year ago for just the reason you incorrectly stated. You also need to realize (while it may NOT be the case here but just in general) many "scam complaints" are done by "competitors" and/or just for retribution (as I have experienced multiple times). This case may very well be true but a lot of posts here are just fake retribution and or anti-"competition." That being said the tag was quite obvious and any buyer could have also provided a fake Google Play card as there are lots of them floating around. NOROT44 is obviously a scammer but that wasn't the point. This screenprint was when I was logged off:  |
|
|
|
|
That seller has been tagged & flagged multiple times. Did you see the big yellow box above his name when you logged in and the 7-8 red trusts under his name?
|
|
|
|
You sir are lame.. I do not understand your intentions I clearly can't understand. Am i making your VCC business go bankrupt? I dont know what else to think.. You won't ruin me with your bullshit lies
I most certainly am lame, considering I got scammed by a person that barely has a grasp on the English language. As far as this "pretending to be dumb" act goes, you are not fooling anyone so just shut up. Right, so not only I'm getting blamed for something that didnt occur, now I'm getting discrimanted by you for not being a native american speaker. I'm out on replying here, didnt realy sign up for this. Will await however mods cofnrimation hopefuly and this will get solved and you will look so freaking dumb Damn, you are pretty hilarious for a scammer and I agree with you, there is no further need for you to reply here, everyone can see through your act and karma is a bitch so don't expect you'll be getting away with scamming people forever. Unfortunately what you just said is the problem because even IF a scammer gets banned (they NEVER get banned for scamming even it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt, it's for other repeat violations) they just come back with a new ID so unfortunately they would always be with us. Here's an example of a scammer with over 30 accounts. Each one gets banned every day and he comes back with another one or sometimes 2. The "sales" forums are like the wild west and there is no control over it at all. That's why you should just consider it a lesson learned and move on just a little bit wiser and don't let it get to you so much. http://archive.fo/fGnYthttp://archive.fo/zayxEhttp://archive.fo/1PGjkhttp://archive.fo/7efxghttp://archive.fo/rAcZ3http://archive.fo/yX4kzhttp://archive.fo/bgEsHhttp://archive.fo/Cih03http://archive.fo/fiDAV http://archive.fo/Vs1Kbhttp://archive.fo/Xb9eFhttp://archive.fo/fEE0Uhttp://archive.fo/u1Aafhttp://archive.fo/RnTli |
|
|
|
Yes a Moderator/Staff can actually help you verify your claim that he sent that PM, just click on the "Report to Moderator" in the bottom corner of the PM and then in the "description box" and include a link to this post and ask the Moderator to post here to help you verify the PM.
You're saying mods have open access to PM's ?? I find that disturbing especially on a forum like this. Never was aware of that and while in cases/disputes like this it would be good but I do find it to be a bit intrusive. On most forums they do NOT for privacy reasons. That being said I've never seen a mod confirm or not confirm anyone's personal messages when asked to do so. Of course I haven't read every message on the system either so I guess it might be true! They don't have OPEN access to PMs, you read it wrong, they can only see a PM when it has been reported and I don't see anything wrong with, If I'm supposed to report a PM Pand the send is supposed to get a ban or something, there is no way to verify if they can't see the content of such PM. I've seen a case or two where this was done, and I don't think that's the worse thing on the forum. So let's agree to disagree on that. I do note they don't call it a "Private Message" here but just a "personal message" so that could be an out but I still generally disagree. Maybe if someone claims they have been personally threatened with bodily injury that may be an exception but for "run of the mill" scamming that goes on here all the time, nah. If mods do NOT moderate obvious scam threads which is the policy here why would they deal with digging for "personal messages" between people claiming a scam? Just my opinion from my experiences running & using forums since Radio Shack's MicroNet back in 1979 that later became Compuserve. I get your point but it's not digging in this case. This guy is claiming I faked a photo of a PM that he sent me proving that he was trying to scam me. It's a shitty person's effort to try to not look shitty and for that I see no problem contacting reporting the message in question so that the mods can confirm that this guy indeed is a scammer which would help people avoid similar situations in the future. I 100% understand and don't blame you for your position and feel for your loss despite all the obvious red flags. I've been there. However if every alleged victim or alleged scammer asks mods to do this they will pull out their hair. All this case is is a dispute of one person calling the other a liar. You have posted your proof which highly likely proves you correct but you are simply in a "s/he said s/he said" argument with your alleged scammer. I know it hurts your feelings to be called out as a liar but in the general scheme of things IN MY OPINION ONLY there is nothing to it that will change what happened to you. This scamming probably happens 100x a day here so my opinion is I'd rather see them spend their time moderating the obvious scam threads than have to go looking for PM's between 2 people calling each other liars. I HOPE THEY DO IT FOR YOU but it just doesn't follow how that kind stuff is generally handled here. Good luck! These are only my opinions and since I am not a moderator I can't speak to their opinions or rules or procedures. |
|
|
|
Yes a Moderator/Staff can actually help you verify your claim that he sent that PM, just click on the "Report to Moderator" in the bottom corner of the PM and then in the "description box" and include a link to this post and ask the Moderator to post here to help you verify the PM.
You're saying mods have open access to PM's ?? I find that disturbing especially on a forum like this. Never was aware of that and while in cases/disputes like this it would be good but I do find it to be a bit intrusive. On most forums they do NOT for privacy reasons. That being said I've never seen a mod confirm or not confirm anyone's personal messages when asked to do so. Of course I haven't read every message on the system either so I guess it might be true! They don't have OPEN access to PMs, you read it wrong, they can only see a PM when it has been reported and I don't see anything wrong with, If I'm supposed to report a PM Pand the send is supposed to get a ban or something, there is no way to verify if they can't see the content of such PM. I've seen a case or two where this was done, and I don't think that's the worse thing on the forum. So let's agree to disagree on that. I do note they don't call it a "Private Message" here but just a "personal message" so that could be an out but I still generally disagree. Maybe if someone claims they have been personally threatened with bodily injury that may be an exception but for "run of the mill" scamming that goes on here all the time, nah. If mods do NOT moderate obvious scam threads which is the policy here why would they deal with digging for "personal messages" between people claiming a scam? Just my opinion from my experiences running & using forums since Radio Shack's MicroNet back in 1979 that later became Compuserve. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
