Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 06:38:34 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 [151] 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 ... 317 »
3001  Other / Meta / Re: Is it allowed to lock a thread and move it? on: May 25, 2018, 12:31:53 AM
Or am I missing something and is it possible to move the thread in another way?
I am not sure if you know how to move a topic...

Scroll down a bit then on your left hand side look for move topic link


You will need to follow the next on screen instructions to move the topic successfully.


Let me know if that solves your problem.

PS: We all are stupid to some extent Smiley

Sir constructive poster of the year, OP didn't ask how to move a thread. indeed we all are stupid to some extent. Wink

OP, are you providing a service and have a Bitcoin payment? you could move it to service section if so. however if a mod has moved your thread, do not move it again or create a new one somewhere else under any circumstances. you should also report your thread to moderators and ask for permission instead of opening a thread.

#self proclaimed lawyer. Wink

You got me OP.  Wink
3002  Other / Meta / Re: [Suggestion] on: May 24, 2018, 11:29:01 PM
Why would this benefit people at all? Is it because you want to hide your trust rating?

I would say he's trolling, but I can't even tell any more.

He's just trolling. He thinks he's funny but he's not. He's managed to get his account ruined with multiple red trusts so he probably figures he hasn't got anything to lose. I was hoping he'd learn his lesson and change his ways once he managed to get his initial negative feedback changed to neutral, but instead he ramped up the trolling for some reason and now look at him. Unless diagran is willing to change his behaviour I'd just ignore him from now on because I think these sorts of threads will just become more common.

Your slave has tagged me red again, he needs to keep tagging me in order to stay on DT2, right?

Translation of the bolded part: digaran has to be a good boy, he has to be my little bitch otherwise I'll ignore him.

EDIT: I would also like to suggest that DT2 members to pass a KYC procedure, theymos should be the only one who'd see the documents. I'd say that DT1 members who are acting as escrow should also pass KYC. one person has to have a way of tracking them if things goes south. we need at least to trust theymos to keep the information safe and never betrays DT1-2 members.

Otherwise, I'd advise people to avoid using any anonymous escrow for large amounts.
3003  Other / Archival / Re: Marlboroza is abusing DT power! on: May 24, 2018, 06:08:49 PM
Bump. if I'm trolling you should report my posts to moderators and not tag me if I'm not a scammer. tagging me for trolling is equal of deciding on behalf of moderators, I should be reported for trolling and tagging me for it is abuse of DT power.

If you believe that I'm a troll why don't you report me? if you have reported me and moderators haven't dealt with me, tagging me is violating the forum rules, if you are not a staff, you shouldn't enforce your own rules and make them as a scammer tag on me by default. I'm reporting you for abusing your power.
Really! do you think so? How would you explain this tag?


First time I have experienced something which could easily be addressed in a post but you had to tag me to get my attention. Do you even know how the trust system works?

This user continues to spread lies, harassing forum members, DT and moderators/stuff, running very shady law practice service which consist of trolling DT members and spreading lies all over the forum.
- I don't see anything wrong has been said here.

I see you have double standard in understanding. When thing goes against you then you come up with one theory and when thing goes in your favour then you come up with another theory.

Here he is calling me monkey like he is better than me, this member doesn't deserve to hold any power, he is calling me monkey and he is on DT2. this is the standard of dealing with anybody who disagrees with them. a.k.a abuse of power. he is not tagging me for scamming people, he just wants to hold his power over me saying that I'm wrong and he is right, he could say that in a post and not by tagging me red as a scammer.
Possible mental illness  Undecided

Theory of Everything again.



I quoted in your thread including the fifth amendment but a mod deleted my post. if you are trying to blackmail people you should read them their rights first. if I have tagged people and asked them to do something, I have done it so that nobody includes me into DT2, I don't want to be a slave. but even if I was a DT2 member, I haven't asked anything for my own gain. even if you could call me an extortionist, I have tried to extort people for the good of forum. I am transparent.
3004  Other / Archival / Re: Abuse of DT power by actmyname! on: May 24, 2018, 01:47:27 AM
you could tag me all you want if you are not DT member, but if you are a DT member you should only tag me for scamming.

Could you please remind us what happened when not-a-DT-member-at-the-time marlboroza tagged you for the first time? Didn't you come up with some bullshit conspiracy theory?

Blah blah blah blah

Read: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3502223.0
3005  Other / Archival / Re: Abuse of DT power by actmyname! on: May 24, 2018, 12:47:11 AM
So in this case you were intentionally trolling, in my case I mistook your jokes for trolling.  You claimed to be a merit source then resigned, then asked to have it back.  You "left" and then came back.  You make completely wild, baseless and frankly completely nonsensical bullshit.

You literally speak out of both sides of your asshole.  Now if you and I were to enter into a contract/agreement for goods or services (it will never happen so don't get any funny ideas LOL) how can I be sure you won't start to intentionally troll me or jokingly troll me or change your mind because a fart scared you.

For any sane person this is a quite logical reason NOT TO TRUST someone.  Please note that I have not called you a scammer nor have I even implied you're a scammer (I don't believe you've "scammed" anyone thus far) but I wouldn't trust you with a bottle of water dude!  Negative trust does not mean a person is a scammer just you don't trust them and should not give them a chance to scam you!!!!!  It can also mean someone has already scammed but one does not preclude the other as much as you think it does.

Lastly like it or not, believe it or not but I and EVERY other user on this site is allowed to have their own opinion of other users even if shockingly enough they are not the same opinions as Digaran's.

Actmyname was aware of my situation with marlboroza, so he didn't tag me because marlboroza had already tagged me. marlboroza changed his feedback to neutral and then actmyname tagged me for the same reason. that implies that actmyname wants to have it his own way, after seeing marlboroza removed his red tag on me, actmyname said(assumption):  let me tag digaran now, because marlboroza made a mistake and now it's time for me to show my power.

Now any other DT member could tag me and say: hey I don't trust you because you said this. that is abuse of power. telling me to suck for actmyname in order to get rid of my tag would give actmyname an unfair advantage. unfair to me. you could tag me all you want if you are not DT member, but if you are a DT member you should only tag me for scamming. otherwise I should always act like DT members little bitch to avoid getting tagged by them. anybody seeing this abuse of power and stays silent, is also their little bitch, they are afraid to lose their signature shitposting opportunity, nobody is man enough to speak against these tyrants. nobody has the balls to speak against these tyrants and the ones who do have the balls are all red tagged. they are trying to train us into being little bitches. hey come now good boy, come my little bitch. come to merit me when I'm talking shit to digaran. come suchmoon and merit whomever is talking shit to digaran. they all are abusing the merit and trust system and everybody here is their little bitch, speak against them to see for yourself.

He also tagged me after I posted this. we'll hear the sob story about causation and correlation, I bet on it. these are all just wild theories right? I do not believe that. check the time stamps of my tag and that post.
3006  Other / Meta / Re: [Suggestion] on: May 23, 2018, 10:46:06 PM
Let's decentralize trust and reduce abuse by making all default trusted users hand picked by theymos, with no possibility of disagreement!
Yeah let's do it! It would be fun.

Decentralize trust = Picked buy theymos  
Theory of everything

Is that alia's and humble Joe's baby in your avatar? Wink

I'm not happy about things and I'm trying to change them, people in power could hear my suggestions and ignore them, but at least I know that I have tried.
3007  Other / Meta / [Suggestions] of The Others a.k.a digaran on: May 23, 2018, 09:45:07 PM
Could we have a fork of DT? I'd say that DT should be visible only on altcoin sections if they are not on theymos's trust list, what say you? whoever is not on theymos's trust, their feedback should be only visible on altcoin sections by default. this way we would know who has tried to fork the trust system.

How is this for keeping trust decentralized and removing any chance of gaming and abusing the trust system?


We need a moderator in off-topic section. people are posting 100% garbage. I'd like to suggest to people start reporting a few of totally garbage posts on off-topic and any of the other forum boards with no moderators. let us clean this place together. you certainly don't want me to tag you all and ask you to report garbage posts do you? if I see nobody cares I might use force to make you all campaign shitposters to help a bit.




Why would this benefit people at all? Is it because you want to hide your trust rating?

I would say he's trolling, but I can't even tell any more.

He's just trolling. He thinks he's funny but he's not. He's managed to get his account ruined with multiple red trusts so he probably figures he hasn't got anything to lose. I was hoping he'd learn his lesson and change his ways once he managed to get his initial negative feedback changed to neutral, but instead he ramped up the trolling for some reason and now look at him. Unless diagran is willing to change his behaviour I'd just ignore him from now on because I think these sorts of threads will just become more common.

Your slave has tagged me red again, he needs to keep tagging me in order to stay on DT2, right?

Translation of the bolded part: digaran has to be a good boy, he has to be my little bitch otherwise I'll ignore him.

EDIT: I would also like to suggest that DT2 members to pass a KYC procedure, theymos should be the only one who'd see the documents. I'd say that DT1 members who are acting as escrow should also pass KYC. one person has to have a way of tracking them if things goes south. we need at least to trust theymos to keep the information safe and never betrays DT1-2 members.

Otherwise, I'd advise people to avoid using any anonymous escrow for large amounts.
3008  Other / Archival / Re: Abuse of DT power by actmyname! on: May 23, 2018, 09:35:47 PM
~Blah~

You should realize one thing, whatever I tell you, it shouldn't affect your judgement when it comes to tagging people. if you are offended by my words and then tag me to show your dislike, you don't deserve to hold any power.

I'm intentionally trolling you(refer to ~blah~) to see if you can remain objective and not lash out to tag me for revenge. your feedback is not accurate. DT members are acting like a judge here, we can see that by the amount of threads on reputation. if the person who has added you to DT2 doesn't care about your actions, he/she is also unfit to hold DT1 power.

Whoever has added you on DT2 should care what you are doing. not caring could mean 2 things:

1: you are controlling that account.
2: he/she is indifferent and we don't want indifferent people to hold any power, they are already wealthy, they feel already immune to authorities. if they don't care about our reputation, let us know. staying silent means that you agree with DT2 actions. people are not stupid and they could see the truth.

After theymos excluding you from his trust list, keeping you on DT2 means that DT1 member(s) don't care what the admin thinks or wants, while all the DT is based on his trust network. you guys saying that DT is decentralized, consider theymos as the Bitcoin core, if you are not respecting his rules and protocols then you are trying to fork the trust system. a.k.a Bcash and stuff like that.

I would like to suggest that DT feedbacks to be visible only on altcoin sections, if they are not following theymos's trust list and rules.
3009  Other / Archival / Re: Marlboroza is abusing DT power! on: May 23, 2018, 09:21:16 PM
I'm still waiting for marlboro to defend himself. I have accused him of abuse of DT power, abuse of trust system and he hasn't come here to defend himself, maybe because he thinks that he is immune? are DT members immune and could they do whatever they want with their power?
3010  Economy / Reputation / Re: Bazinga442 leaving retaliatory negative trust that includes outright lies on: May 23, 2018, 09:17:15 PM
@Ultra, I'm still here man. I'm a victim of abuse of power by suchmoon, actmyname and marlboro, the best cigar in the world. you people are funny, you'd care about untrusted feedbacks and would call them butthurts but when DT members leave negative trust it is always accurate and they are always right.
3011  Other / Off-topic / Goodbye guys. on: May 23, 2018, 01:26:46 AM
It seems that I have no place here.
3012  Economy / Reputation / Re: @DT1 and DT2 members. on: May 23, 2018, 12:49:48 AM
one at a time please, I'm not alia to take a gang and ask for more. Wink
Oh but you're too sexy for bitcointalk and everyone wants a piece of you.

So I don't quite get what you're now asking of DT members.  You want green trust removed from accounts that have had their passwords/e-mails reset because you think they're necessarily being sold?  You know me, I can't stand account sales and will bend over, not only backwards, but will do high-speed backflips to red-tag account sellers.  I just can't understand the logic here.  People do change both e-mails and passwords for reasons other than a change in account holder.  I don't think that's enough evidence to justify removal of a positive feedback.

I do agree that leveraging green trust can be disastrous when an account is sold.  That's not even up for debate.  What's up for debate is whether there's some line of reasoning that I'm missing or if digaran is once again demonstrating his break with reality that likely needs more than fluoxetine to treat.

Signing a message wouldn't do it either. we need Timelord2067 to investigate each case and compare the posting styles of people before and after changing their pass/email. I would vouch for him to be a good detective.

I see people now stalking me and would mention my posts on different threads. stalkers. Wink
3013  Other / Archival / Re: Marlboroza is abusing DT power! on: May 23, 2018, 12:43:13 AM
Translation:
Digaran, bend over.

NEVER.

So have you PMed the DT1 members yet?

Bothering them for this pitty abuse of power? not yet, I'm waiting to see if you guys could actually listen to any reason. or if you want to have it your way, your words against mine. I'm not afraid of anybody, if I see abuse, I'll point it out.


I suppose, I got to you eh? look at your green trust with no reference.
3014  Economy / Reputation / Re: @DT1 and DT2 members. on: May 23, 2018, 12:37:01 AM
why should I start accusing people and create more unwanted discussions?

Why create any in the first place?

Create what? more threads? to expose people for their abuse of power. to point fingers at corruption.

I don't have the authority to question people and ask for signed messages, simply I can only suggest to admins with my posts.
You do have the ability to create threads and list out the people who have changed their emails and passwords. It's not as if you can't bring that kind of information to public attention: it would help out greatly if you have the time for it.

Anybody can still question others and ask for signed messages. That's how it should be here.

I don't want to poke people, I don't want to act as if I want to be on DT. this is the norm here, people would start poking their nose into other people's affairs and they could get a slave tag a.k.a DT2 status. I'm a nobody. why should I start accusing people and create more unwanted discussions?

You don't want this, you don't want that : what the hell do you want ?

Are you thinking straight ? You have no idea what's happening here, on this forum.
Your business to ask for 0.02BTC in exchange of 2 hours of your time to harass a DT2 member so he removes his negative feedback on your customer profile, is something for which people don't trust you.
I don't, because of that. Simple.
If people don't trust someone, they put feedbacks to warn others.

Go make more threads. Ultimately you'll be banned.

DT1-2 members should -blaaaah-, not doing so could -bleeeehhhh-

Yeah, they should. Yeah, it could.

That's not 2 hours but 200 lines, read before opening your mouth. it was for 3 days and 200 lines not 200 words.

I dare you to get me banned if you can. why should I get banned? what I'm saying is common sense.
3015  Other / Archival / Re: Voluntary service to defend your case! on: May 23, 2018, 12:25:48 AM
How would you know if marlboroza didn't ask for money to change his first tag on me?
Whether he did or he didn't, it doesn't change your feedback.

you don't and I could set him up easily just to get back at him, doing that would only cause more unwanted discussions.
?

but if there was a system where I could for example report some garbage posts and only then my red tag could be removed, we could have eliminated all the possible ways for colluding and for any personal use of DT power.
So you want scammers to be able to scam again? You could say this is a strawman but you would still have to consider the consequence of allowing scammers to have a way of removing their red tag.

No I want you to take back the scammed money by tricking them. easy. you'd take their money first and remove your tag on them, after the first post by them you could tag them immediately and ask for a larger amount of fine. keep doing that and take back the scammed money. never give a actual free pass to scammers though.
3016  Other / Archival / Re: Voluntary service to defend your case! on: May 22, 2018, 11:32:57 PM
Can you please explain to me how it is "wrong"? Why would you be called a scammer by default? Huh
What you are saying is that I should always agree with DT members otherwise I could get tagged by any of them at any given time. that is per-definition bullshit, pardon my language.
I'll pardon the language, but I won't pardon you putting words in my mouth. I said no such thing.

I never stated that you should always agree with DT members. I frequently don't. All I asked was for you to clarify how my definition of "Red Trust == Person X does not trust Person Y for #reasons" is, in your opinion, "wrong"? And, secondly, define what you mean by "being called a scammer by default".

I have stated what my interpretation of "Red Trust" is... am I correct that yours is simply "Red Trust == scammer"? Huh

But if I could only have a free pass and not get tagged is by agreeing with DT members, that is slavery. and yes I should scam somebody to get tagged red.

You can't point to a single scam attempt by me. tagging me red for everybody to see is wrong if I haven't scammed anybody. tagging people just because you don't trust them is fine as long as you are not a DT member.

How could you do that defending and acting as our lawyer when you yourself did not knew how to remove your own red tag you earned by harrassing and intimidating DT members, i think you should clean yourself first before making such statement.

@HCP, see what I'm talking about? people now are asking me why do I have a red trust if I can't remove my own tags, why would anybody take me serious and use my service? so DT members tagged me to say that I can't even remove my own red tags. that is trolling.

If a judge sentences a lawyer everytime that lawyer is defending somebody, it would render that lawyer's ability to defend people useless, DT2 members here are that judge and they are trying to obstruct justice. they are trying to troll me with their DT power.

Nobody tagged me before I started this thread. why? I was telling the same things before, they didn't tag me then. because they want me to be their little bitch. here digaran: be our little bitch or we'll tag your sorry ass because we don't trust you since you are not our little bitch. I'm not a little bitch. I will expose their sorry little asses one by one. I'm just getting started. I will start soon by questioning even theymos himself. don't get me wrong, I have no power here. I just hate hypocrites and corruption. if theymos is willing to close his eyes to abuse of power of his little slaves just to have them at their current position= keep being his slaves, this is wrong and unfair to me. I will not stand it. if he wants me to shut up, the only way is by banning me. then we'll know where he stands, we'll know if he is also a hypocrite or not.

I will question anybody as long as it is within reason. if I'm stopped by them, we'll know they are not reasonable people and they don't deserve our love and respect. if I say that theymos is indifferent to everything that happens here and I get banned, we'll know that he is also abusing his power, he shouldn't do that. I want a fair system for everybody to coexist peacefully without fighting all the time.

People keep tagging each other just because they feel it that way, is wrong. it will never end and all it can cause is more hatred and more fighting. I refuse to bend to the wills of a selected group of rich people. I have dignity and integrity. this is me. now tag me all you want.

3017  Economy / Services / Re: basic question about variables in reg. analysis on: May 22, 2018, 09:56:25 PM
Are you willing to pay for the answer? if so then please update your OP with price, otherwise you have posted this on the wrong section.
3018  Other / Archival / Re: Marlboroza is abusing DT power! on: May 22, 2018, 09:39:40 PM
Go yogg. infinite monkey theorem. have more positive trust without reference and come here to defend your fellow slaves.

if I'm opening a thread about abuse, it's merely to point out abuse of power to the authorities

Ok, well consider it fully "pointed out". Everyone here has taken note of it being pointed out. You can now lock this thread and all your other pointless threads.

Translation:
Digaran, bend over.

NEVER.
3019  Economy / Reputation / Re: @DT1 and DT2 members. on: May 22, 2018, 09:28:53 PM
I don't have the authority to question people and ask for signed messages, simply I can only suggest to admins with my posts.
You do have the ability to create threads and list out the people who have changed their emails and passwords. It's not as if you can't bring that kind of information to public attention: it would help out greatly if you have the time for it.

Anybody can still question others and ask for signed messages. That's how it should be here.

I don't want to poke people, I don't want to act as if I want to be on DT. this is the norm here, people would start poking their nose into other people's affairs and they could get a slave tag a.k.a DT2 status. I'm a nobody. why should I start accusing people and create more unwanted discussions?

DT1-2 members should spend their time investigating if people are changing their pass and email after receiving green trust, not doing so could imply that they are irresponsible and not fit to have DT power.
3020  Economy / Reputation / Re: @DT1 and DT2 members. on: May 22, 2018, 09:15:32 PM
Ask for signed messages. If they don't prove original ownership of the account, then make a thread referencing the absence of that. Just because passwords and emails are changed doesn't mean that the account has switched hands.

It is likely that it has, but you would have to verify it.

Hence, asking for Vod's help. merely pointing out the possibilities of abuse. I'd only have the power to point out and hint for the people in power to take action. nothing more nothing less.

I don't have the authority to question people and ask for signed messages, simply I can only suggest to admins with my posts.
Pages: « 1 ... 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 [151] 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 ... 317 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!