Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 02:04:46 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 [151] 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 ... 762 »
3001  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Up Like Trump on: June 18, 2019, 02:31:47 AM
...Kabbalist...Frankist.......goyim...goy...Zio-con scum... Zio-cuck  ...Lucifarians
I GET IT!
3002  Other / Politics & Society / Re: A world without borders? on: June 18, 2019, 02:13:30 AM
Let's think for a second.
Would such a world benefit mankind? Would it destabilize the current geo-economics? Is there even a remote possibility that we as humans let go of this ancient tradition of drawing lines on sand that have only served to create problems among masses and has done NOTHING good so far?

Everybody knows we need borders to keep the zombies out.
3003  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 18, 2019, 12:14:35 AM
^^^ NASA is documented hoaxing an image of the Earth in their window you fucking douchebag.
I DID NOT reach your conclusion from that part of the video.  I reached the conclusion that some morons were artificially creating really shaky video. Because video of the Earth from space doesn't look like that.

I reach the conclusion that morons were pointing their cheap crappy cell phone cams at pics of "Earthrise" and ranting nonsense while finishing their last brain cells off sniffing glue.

Please point out how and where "documentation of a hoax" is done. If you can.

This is what you get if you post a link, instead of clearly stating your argument.

But first, let's clear up this mystery about "cardboard." You've claimed a dozen times that the LEM was made from cardboard. I've asked for proof, and you've repeatedly changed the subject.  Now let's have the facts. Who supplied the cardboard? Where is your proof? what was it's weight, thickness, tensile and compressive strength? Were there termites in it?

This is really big, because if so, we might now have Termites on the Moon. They could have been destroying the Moon, bite by bite, since 1969. And next they could be headed here for Earth.

Let's have the facts, you fucking cunt. In fact, "You fucking cunt" doesn't begin to express my disgust of your denial of basic math and trig functions. After some research I've found a suitable response to your countless Ad Hominem logical fallacies, and without further ado I post My Ad Hom.


You swine. You vulgar little maggot. You worthless bag of filth. As they say in Texas. I’ll bet you couldn’t pour !@#$ out of a boot with instructions on the heel. You are a canker. A sore that won’t go away. I would rather kiss a lawyer than be seen with you.
You’re a putrescent mass, a walking vomit. You are a spineless little worm deserving nothing but the profoundest contempt. You are a jerk, a cad, a weasel. Your life is a monument to stupidity. You are a stench, a revulsion, a big suck on a sour lemon.
You are a bleating foal, a curdled staggering mutant dwarf smeared richly with the effluvia and offal accompanying your alleged birth into this world. An insensate, blinking calf, meaningful to nobody, abandoned by the puke-drooling, giggling beasts who sired you and then killed themselves in recognition of what they had done.
I will never get over the embarrassment of belonging to the same species as you. You are a monster, an ogre, a malformation. I barf at the very thought of you. You have all the appeal of a paper cut. Lepers avoid you. You are vile, worthless, less than nothing. You are a weed, a fungus, the dregs of this earth. And did I mention you smell?
Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly.
You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up, drive its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame of your ignoble blood. May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs.
You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You’re a fool, an ignoramus. Monkeys look down on you. Even sheep won’t have sex with you. You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in a land that reality forgot.
And what meaning do you expect your delusional self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have with us? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake?
You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and obnoxious. You are the moral[size] equivalent of a leech. You are a living emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a disease, you puerile one-handed slack-jawed drooling meat slapper.
On a good day you’re a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are deficient
in all that lends character. You have the personality of wallpaper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted. You are the source of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow wherever you go.
You smarmy lager lout git. You bloody woofter sod. Bugger off, pillock. You grotty wanking oink artless base-court apple-john. You clouted boggish foot-licking twit. You dankish clack-dish plonker. You gormless crook-pated tosser. You churlish boil-brained clotpole ponce. You cockered bum-bailey poofter. You craven dewberry pisshead cockup pratting naff. You gob-kissing gleeking flap-mouthed coxcomb. You dread-bolted fobbing beef-witted clapper-clawed flirt-gill.
You are a fiend and a coward, and you have bad breath. You are degenerate, noxious and depraved. I feel debased just for knowing you exist. I despise everything about you, and I wish you would go away.
I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid.
You emit more stupid in one second than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. Your writing has to be a troll. Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond
the laws of physics that we know. I’m sorry. I can’t go on. This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don’t have enough strength left to deride your ignorant questions and half baked comments about unimportant trivia, or any of the rest of this drivel. Duh.
The only thing worse than your logic is your manners. I have snipped away most of what you wrote, because, well... it didn’t really say anything. Your attempt at constructing a creative flame was pitiful. I mean, really, stringing together a bunch of insults among a load of babbling was hardly effective... Maybe later in life, after you have learned to read, write, spell, and count, you will have more success.
True, these are rudimentary skills that many of us ”normal” people take for granted that everyone has an easy time of mastering. But we sometimes forget that there are ”challenged” persons in this world who find these things more difficult. If I had known that this was your case then I would have never read your post. It just wouldn’t have been ”right”.
Sort of like parking in a handicap space. I wish you the best of luck in the emotional, and social struggles that seem to be placing such a demand on you.
P.S.:
You are hypocritical, greedy, violent, malevolent, vengeful, cowardly, deadly, mendacious, meretricious, loathsome, despicable, belligerent, opportunistic, barratrous, contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted, racist, sexist, avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged, imbecilic, insane, arrogant, deceitful, demented, lame, self-righteous, byzantine, conspiratorial, satanic, fraudulent, libelous, bilious, splenetic, spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb, evasive, double-talking, devious, revisionist, narrow, manipulative, paternalistic, fundamentalist, dogmatic, idolatrous, unethical, cultic, diseased, suppressive, controlling, restrictive, malignant, deceptive, dim, crazy, weird, dystopic, stifling, uncaring, plantigrade, grim, unsympathetic, jargon-spouting, censorious, secretive, aggressive, mind-numbing, arassive, poisonous, flagrant, self-destructive, abusive, socially-retarded, puerile, clueless, and generally NOT GOOD.


https://tengaged.com/blog/OliviaSofie/29674/the-worlds-longest-insult

NOW LET'S HEAR ABOUT THAT FUCKING CARDBOARD!
3004  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 17, 2019, 11:59:23 PM
^^^ NASA is documented hoaxing an image of the Earth in their window you fucking douchebag.
I DID NOT reach that conclusion from that part of the video.  I reached the conclusion that some morons were artificially creating really shaky video. Because video of the Earth from space doesn't look like that.

I reached the conclusion that these morons were pointing their cheap crappy cell phone cams at pics of "Earthrise" and ranting nonsense while likely finishing their last brain cells off sniffing glue.

Please point out how and where "documentation of a hoax" is done here. If you can.
3005  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Who do you think will win the 2020 election? on: June 17, 2019, 05:55:03 PM
...Convincing them that the capitalist class structure is what failed them is going to be a much harder sell.

But why would you want/need to convince them? Are you smarter than them?

Can they not figure things out on their own?
3006  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 17, 2019, 05:48:49 PM
@Spendulus I've timestamped the link to the most relevant part. The video came from NASA and they're perpetrating a hoax in it!

#4 "NASA caught faking the Moon landings" -- https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM?t=871

No, that is the part I watched and I meant exactly what I said.

"... That link is a rambling, nonsensical thing with unfounded assertions and bad photography/video. ..."

I'll go further.

TERRIBLE photography/video.

But if there's something there that convinces you of something , please explain what it is exactly.
3007  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 17, 2019, 05:16:38 PM
"... "NASA caught faking the Moon landings" is especially relevant to this thread: https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM?t=871 ..."
"... That link is a rambling, nonsensical thing with unfounded assertions and bad photography/video. ..."

Hey shit for brains, why don't you actually watch the video before commenting?

I did watch it, and you've got my response.

... That link is a rambling, nonsensical thing with unfounded assertions and bad photography/video. ..

If there's anything there that supports anything you've claim, please provide a start point for that section in minutes and seconds and I'll check it once more.

See how easy and polite I am? No need to insult people.
3008  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 17, 2019, 05:12:44 PM
@nutildah there's nothing wrong with the story I linked, the rock is a proven fake.

Q: what about all the other moon rocks that aren't fake?
A: There are no Moon rocks that aren't fake....
I only need to look at a rock under a 20-50x power magnification to tell you it's from the Moon, and I have done that multiple times.

Anyone with a couple of semesters of geology could do this.

You are either very ignorant or outright lying.  All the Moon rocks I have looked at were actual Moon rocks from, duh... the Moon.

And you've repeatedly, and provably, misrepresented the facts on the story you linked to.
3009  Other / Politics & Society / Re: LATEST: Two oil tankers were damaged in a suspected attack near the entrance to on: June 17, 2019, 02:48:18 PM
....
Yes it was my first thought. Inside job chances 99 in 100.

I don't think you know what the meaning of the term "inside job" is.
3010  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 17, 2019, 02:08:54 PM
....

I post video of NASA manufacturing evidence and somehow that makes me a dishonest liar? Please explain.

BTW #4 "NASA caught faking the Moon landings" is especially relevant to this thread: https://youtu.be/pEE7OPKLhaM?t=871

I've got them "red handed" why does that make me the dishonest liar, I don't understand?

If you've got someone "red handed," I have no clue where and how and on what subject.

That link is a rambling, nonsensical thing with unfounded assertions and bad photography/video.

If you've got an assertion to make, make it directly.

I'm all ears.

And let's get back to that cardboard. Still waiting for proof on the cardboard.
3011  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 17, 2019, 04:27:59 AM
It's the same foil you wrap your fish in.

https://i.imgur.com/uUGyhJl.jpg

Don't we wrap our fish in newspaper?     Cheesy
What is "Newspaper?"

Most cities and towns still have it. Check out Phoenix - https://www.yellowpages.com/phoenix-az/newspapers.

Cool

To produce the trees that such archaic sheets might come from would require a high energy output from a source in the sky.

Such a source could be triangulated, and the size and total output in joules estimated. Also, it's distance from the Earth could be computed to a first approximation by an eight grade student.

That would require no flat earth. Since we are, according to Noblabman, on a flat earth, there could be no trees and hence no newspapers.

You are clearly delusional.

Thank you. I haven't read the comics in a newspaper for a long time, much less anything else. However, I buy one now and again for packing, or for placing my freshly polished shoes on.

Btw, the triangulation isn't all that precise, and it is automatic. I just look and do. Do you think it would work on a flat earth the same way?

Cool
No. Not at all. Even a long time ago, those targeting guns on battleships knew they had to use spherical trigonometry. Their triangles went from the center of the earth outwards.

In spherical trig, you can have a triangle up to 900 degrees, where in flat world, it would be 180.

This is why there are very few Flat Earthers around today. Whenever a Flat Earth Country went to war, they all got killed off by the more accurate targeting of Round Earthers.
3012  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 17, 2019, 01:41:59 AM
It's the same foil you wrap your fish in.

https://i.imgur.com/uUGyhJl.jpg

Don't we wrap our fish in newspaper?     Cheesy
What is "Newspaper?"

Most cities and towns still have it. Check out Phoenix - https://www.yellowpages.com/phoenix-az/newspapers.

Cool

To produce the trees that such archaic sheets might come from would require a high energy output from a source in the sky.

Such a source could be triangulated, and the size and total output in joules estimated. Also, it's distance from the Earth could be computed to a first approximation by an eight grade student.

That would require no flat earth. Since we are, according to Noblabman, on a flat earth, there could be no trees and hence no newspapers.

You are clearly delusional.
3013  Other / Politics & Society / Re: U.S government blames Iran for attack on oil tankers in Gulf of Oman on: June 16, 2019, 11:53:39 PM
...

Iran is being put under lots of pressure by USA and I feel it’s a dangerous situation for the gulf region, if USA decides to retaliate without concrete proof. Saudi Arabia has also blamed Iran for the attack, and has hinted that it could take actions if needed to protect their interests. Does anyone here think that USA and Saudi can attack Iran vessels to teach them a lesson, won’t it destabilise peace in the gulf region?.....

A certain level of destabilization produces optimum oil prices at minimal risk for an unscrupulous nation such as Iran.

Fortunately the USA is now energy independent and a net energy exporter, no thanks to the liberal and Democratic factions, and certainly no thanks to Obama.

There's no reason for complex conspiracy theories and no reason to mumble incoherently about false flag nonsense. There are numerous actors continually fomenting violence in the Middle East, and there are several who would like to see wider conflict, perhaps believing their little radical sect will come out ahead.
3014  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 16, 2019, 10:20:18 PM
It's the same foil you wrap your fish in.

https://i.imgur.com/uUGyhJl.jpg

Don't we wrap our fish in newspaper?     Cheesy
What is "Newspaper?"
3015  Other / Politics & Society / Re: LATEST: Two oil tankers were damaged in a suspected attack near the entrance to on: June 16, 2019, 03:06:26 PM
I guess USA go war again!
....

Iran has a long history of making provocative moves, seeing how far and how much it can get away with.

This is no different.
3016  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Boy arrested when 13 yo and facing execution at the age of 18!! (S.A) Edit -1 on: June 16, 2019, 02:32:09 PM
....
Btw. SA is the biggest contributor to wahabism, probaly the most radical movement of islam.

Although Wahhabism is radical it is certainly not the most radical movement of Islam, and it is not extremist violent Islam.

In fact the modern extremist violent Islam started with 30 pamphlets written by Sayyid Qutb, who was executed in Egypt for treason in, IIRC about 1966.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayyid_Qutb

This man created the Muslim Brotherhood, and was the teacher of Usama Bin Laden.

Today there are many radical Islamic sects.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_extremism

3017  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 16, 2019, 02:13:54 PM


Cardboard, tinfoil, curtain rods and BMX bicycle parts.

You're just regurgitating stuff you read on a flat earth website and ignoring the mountains of readily-available information that proves otherwise. The "cardboard" is a sophisticated form of heat shielding, as is the "tinfoil," which is called Kapton. ...
I stand corrected. Kapton is the name. It has pretty interesting properties.

The current NASA design for a lander for the Moon and Mars is strikingly similar to the LEM.

Altair is a key component in the Constellation Program, which is building the spacecraft, launch vehicles and surface support systems to establish a lunar outpost. This work will provide experience needed to expand human exploration farther into the solar system.

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/constellation/altair/altair.html

Due to anti-Trump media, bias, it hasn't been reported hardly at all, but ..... Trump intends to go back to the Moon.

Trump’s vision is to “see private American astronauts, on private space ships, circling the Moon by 2020; and private lunar landers staking out de facto ‘property rights’ for Americans on the Moon, by 2020 as well,” according to a summary of an “agency action plan” the president’s transition team drew up in January. Essentially, the moon becomes something of a fertile new ground for property development, mining operations for valuable resources, and an outpost for bigger scientific and technological development as well — especially at a time when other countries are decades away from capably traveling to and settling the moon.


https://www.inverse.com/article/32759-why-trump-pence-obsessed-with-returning-moon

At this time Altair is not an active program, but it isn't necessary to loop around the moon and return. A seven or eight day manned mission to circle the Moon and return to Earth is certainly realistic. This would be done using the Orion capsule.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orion_(spacecraft)

It's the same foil you wrap your fish in.

You've repeatedly claim the LEM was made from cardboard, now either produce evidence to support this claim or STFU.
3018  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 16, 2019, 12:16:02 AM

Would you kindly stop posting pictures without source attribution? It implies they are your work, which I would guess they are not.

That's against forum policy.




Spentulus the blind didn't get it even this time...




Irregular shapes, crimps? So? Looks kind of like any of a hundred other spacecraft.

Gaps? So what? If you are trying to get to something, just say it.

Tape. So? A way to hold metaled mylar to the landing strut. Kynar tape.

Are you going to prove there's cardboard or not?





A false color image? Which proves what exactly? Want to explain?

Please show the NASA document numbers.





Prove it. Show the NASA document numbers. Maybe your source just took the same picture and copied it left to right.
3019  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Up Like Trump on: June 15, 2019, 10:54:30 PM
...Even then I gave him a year more-or-less on the remote chance that he was playing '3-D Chess' or whatever.  In that time he fired the few people who were worth a shit and put in the likes of John Bolton.

Okay, that's 4D chess!

That is true.  (((They))) outplayed at least 99% of the goyim on both sides, and their fairly awe-inspiring game-play continues to this day.  When they chuckle about what stupid beasts of burden we goy are I really cannot disagree.  I still don't believe that God created goyim to 'serve the Jews' though.

I guess I should say that I hoped and thought there was a chance that Trump could/would play '5D' chess.  ....

Okay, it's 5D chess!@!!!!
3020  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Who do you think will win the 2020 election? on: June 15, 2019, 06:54:25 PM
I think Trump. I am not seeing anyone that is putting any formidable opposition to him.

The erasing of conservative voices from Google, Youtube, Facebook, Twitter, and Pinterest is the beginning of the attempt to steal the 2020 election.

Without those factors, Trump would have an easy win. i believe he will win regardless, because people see and understand what's happening.
Pages: « 1 ... 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 [151] 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 ... 762 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!