So you admit that you were in the wrong and suchmoon's tag was justified?

Owlcatz has literally nothing to do with that thread, thus the counter rating is valid. Don't drag innocent people into your dispute. Counter ratings are per-definition not abuse.

Suchmoon has been very clear why he has tagged you.


As a result of that tag, people see "Warning: Trade with extreme caution!" under your name. That would seem a perfectly reasonable trust feedback. It is there to warn people that they stand a very high probability of losing their money if they take up your service. That is not an abuse.

Hey Melon man. If you are going to post to wind people up, you need to hit the right buttons. It can be fun, but your brush is too broad. Target the third world school kid groups who are working together to milk the forun, and leave out the genuine guys who really believe in crypto, but just happen to be from the emerging 3rd world countries, and could well be first world in the future.

Remember the definition of a geek - it's the guy everybody picks on in school, and ends up working for after they have left.

I am sorry mate, what you mean by the right side of the world? Which perspective if you explain please.

- In addition it makes me made too. These people are resist, useless worms for the society.

No, they didn't. You're just acting like you cannot see the evidence, click the links or draw the inferences necessary to understand simple ABC logic.



Negative feedback isn't only for verified scammers. Negative feedback can be placed upon you for literally anything. It is subjective, not regulated/moderated and I can't imagine anyone disagrees with their rating.


Yeah, at this point I'll probably let you fade into irrelevancy, because you're not funny and you make zero salient points. I am very unimpressed and I hope that you will open your eyes. Just because your behavior warrants actions and feedback from others, this does not mean it is an abuse or targeted harassment. You are delusional, if you truly believe the things you say.

This is posted to counter OgNasty's multiple negative trust ratings against owlcatz.

Have you ever done this in the past? What if the trust rating is justified?


I thought we were talking about trust ratings, not money. How does DT members giving you a negative rating mean that you are entrusting them with your money? Your logic train is slippery as a wet lizard.


I would like to join your fight against the abusers of power. Please, share with us the information that you are planning to expose  for the whole community to see. Either you have evidence of abuses of power already, or you are talking out of your ass. Claiming that you will expose abuses of power, where there may be none, is simply nonsensical. I'd like some evidence, because leaving you a negative rating when you talked about extorting users to remove negative ratings is not an abuse of power; your bad jokes are piling up and I would ask that you take a step back to analyze.

First you talk about extorting scammers to remove your negative rating, meaning your word and ratings are worth nothing. Now you're talking about getting paid by scammers to extort DT members to remove their ratings. You are a very interesting specimen, digaran. You get in trouble, kicked out of your campaign and then grovel at the feet of other members until you are pitied enough to be given a second change. Then you slightly rearrange what you just got scolded for and are making another attempt at it.

No matter how much you polish a turd, it does not become a diamond. Stop trying to extort $ for ratings. I don't care who's rating it is, who's the receiver or what the reason is. If you know of some injustice and you demand a fee before taking a stand against this injustice, then you are a scumbag that doesn't care about truth or justice. You are concerned with lining your pockets. Please try to see how this looks to anybody on the outside. If I was marlboroza, this thread alone would be enough to make me revert my rating to negative.


If you can find proof of this I would be extremely interested in seeing it. To my knowledge there aren't many, if any, people that are DT members and willing to risk their reputation by working with such a volatile and controversial user on a minimally beneficial scheme such as this. I honestly doubt that is the case. More realistically, digaran got their negative rating from marlboroza changed from a negative to a neutral after throwing a fit around the forum for about a week. Digaran tried to backpedal and explain away their statements that resulted in the negative rating. The ending result is either, digaran is a troll or digaran is lying and extorting members further than originally intended/explained.

He got his own rating changed, and now he is laughing in marlboroza's face, while believing themselves to be on a special platform.

I assume my posts will be deleted in your self-moderated thread, but just know that you gave me a big laugh and smile from reading this thread.

May I see your license?

Weak sauce. You have proven quite comprehensively that your words don't mean anything.

And my feedback says you shouldn't be trusted so it's all working out exactly as you expected.

Escrow has nothing to do with DT. Just another proof that you have no clue about the very thing your service is about.

And of course your "service" isn't worth 0.01 BTC. You're a clown who pretends to be a lawyer.


I don't know when you bumped your application nor do I care. I also don't care if other DT2 members tag you or not. That's pretty much the point if the trust system. If everyone was subscribing to the same hive mind we would need this system.


I won't remove my tag because it's factual and you can't deny anything I posted in my explanation. I'm not sure how you can prove me wrong about something you just made up but have at it.

Let's see. The reference links to:

https://archive.fo/5Gh8i

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3779450

You are:

• Offering a questionable service in a self-moderated thread
• Claiming abilities that you don't possess
• Lacking any trade history
• Providing one vouch/reference - yourself
• Requesting upfront payment without escrow
• Admitting that you will abscond with the money if you don't succeed

I think for most users any one of the last three would earn red tags up the wazoo except this is digaran, the village idiot, so we shall give him a pass, right? I don't think so.

But don't despair, this is actually great for you. I'm not removing my trust rating under any circumstances so I just reduced the work you need to do by half. Your only option is to kick me out of DT. If you succeed you can add another solid reference to your service offer.

This isn't a good example of me being a "rebel", since there's ~no legal risk in refusing to help police who don't have a court order, and there's even less risk when they're not even trying to enforce a law which exists in the forum's jurisdiction. Anyone in the US who would help foreign police with a Bitcoin ban is seriously misguided, at the very least.

Look like you got the first case for Red tag removal service. I will like to see that tx id in which you are paid .01 BTC.

PS: When Theymos clearly says that forum is doing fine and he do not need additional funds you are constantly thinking of funds.
      If things go on the ways as you think, then there will be a rate list for each crime instead of punishment.

Oh mate, you are now facing that problem, hopefully, IF you will solve that and I'm sure you have many clients come proving that you can really depend on them as an innocent.
Power abusers or not as long as they have a reference to prove that you have a mistake, then prove in this community that you have a right to fight them back.

Well, once again good luck mate. Maye locking on this thread is much better.

So you finally got a client! You self-referred yourself for your own service. I guess now is a good time to prove your skills. If you get your red tag removed, then your business is surely gonna moon!! This trust dispute will be worth watching.

I think most who receive an illegitimate - get it removed pretty easily on their own just by bringing their cases to the public..
The ones that have a harder time are the ones that have language problems and/or have no concept of proofs. Still members seem to drag the relevant intel out of them..

You may find some cases where you could establish reasonable doubt but reasonable doubt doesn't really mean someone should remove their rating.. It might work for DT though because they can't really get away with destroying people based on their feelings alone..

I think it will be hard for you to find cases because those that deserve removal are pretty rare.. Evidence by you not having found a case yet..

You could cruise the scam accusations and reputation boards or something looking for clients like an ambulance chaser, offer your services..

Keep it interesting  

Suchmoon doesn't trust you, and frankly you've given people ample reason for that in the past couple of months alone.  I don't think you've scammed anyone, but you're obviously unstable in much the same way mixan was.  People here don't trust other people who go over the deep end, and you are presently at the far end of the pool, buddy.

There's also little chance you're going to get any support from anyone with this thread here because of your own trolling.  You've emotionally pleaded and raged against so much recently that folks are a bit tired of reading it, and my guess is that a lot of them have you on ignore already.