I don't know if I agree with the premise of using bitcoin holdings as votes but I'll contribute this anyway. As far as solving the double-voting issue, I've heard alt/sidechain Credits is able to distinguish Bitcoin already used to claim its credits from "fresh" Bitcoin. If someone were to implement a voting sidechain or something like that, the Credits code could help with it. |
|
|
|
I've been periodically checking https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin/ This shit is nothing. Are nodes doing a much better job of filtering or is this attack wimpy? Right now tradeblock is saying the mempool is only 2.47MB. I remember the mempool was at 50MB+ in earlier attacks. |
|
|
|
|
Typo in new OP:
"SHIFT is based on Ethereum and represents its first fork. This enables smart contracts and a full touring-complete
contract programming language."
Typos usually aren't a big deal but it's concerning to me and probably others to read that presumably the developer of this coin would write that. It's supposed to be Turing-complete.
|
|
|
|
After the hack of the DICE, I've decided to postpone the release of the wallet, we need to investigate about it and find out if we can have a new and secure DICE to put in the wallet or will be a feature that will be removed from it.
I've been even contacted from an user that is working on a poker site, it's a very interesting project and I think community will be more than happy to see it working with graffiti.
My plan is to go on with the project, I see interest from users increasing everyday and I'm very happy of this.
The dice is secure, but the admin left his admin password in a text doc and he had his pc exposed, allegedly. Tough there is proof of the oposite. EDIT: wait a second, this is a pos coin, is it too late to do something with the centralization? maybe few users could gather forces and reverse that shit if its not too late. That would theoretically require a fork before the event, but if that happened one would need to have the privkeys to that address and move the coins before the thief does. And it's a big deal doing it, all the transaction after the event would be non existent, so a lot of people could lose in that situation. Edit: did bleutrade block market? Bleutrade market is still there, just fell real low on their list because of not much volume. |
|
|
|
1 BTC is much more than he is accused of stealing from coinchat. Why would he steal dust from coinchat but not steal a whole Bitcoin from me?
There are a good number of people who create new accounts to scam in the lending and currency exchange sections. I am not yet an expert of reading minds, but something tells me they do this to avoid having their primary identities revealed as being a scammer. I don't understand your point. Are you saying tsp is someone's secondary identity? I've never seen him in the lending section. I am saying that the offense where which tsp had stolen money involved tsp's identity not being known at the time of the offense. From what I have reviewed, it was only until some kind of an investigation (maybe into IP evidence?) that it was discovered that tsp was the one who was stealing money via bots. If someone thinks they can hide their identity being associated with a scam they will pull off, then the threshold for how much money they would need to be able to take given the chance to scam will be less then if your identity would be clearly associated with a scam. You should review this thread. Scammer/troll Candystripees had created a brand new account to try to extort some amount of money from someone and clearly did not believe his "Candystripes" identity would be associated with this extortion. It was only until later, after BadBear conducted an investigation that the two were linked together. I have been told by someone who was familiar with the matter that Candystripes had tried to extort somewhere in the range of .2 BTC, and I am also aware of this thread in which Candystripes returned ~.21 BTC to someone who overpaid him. Or maybe because he knew that he had no choice except to return the money, or thought that you would not process any withdrawal request as long as he owed you money.
He did have a choice. He could have withdrawn the money, or he could have returned it. He chose to return it. I gave him no reason to suspect that I wouldn't honor any withdrawal request. Nobody has ever complained of being unable to withdraw from Just-Dice. There has been at least one instance that resulted in someone being unable to withdraw money from Just-Dice when they were in possession of money that was not rightfully theirs. He won a bunch of CLAMs and I froze his account. I challenged him about his scamming. He claimed twice to have no connection to KingDice, but finally admitted that he was the same person.
Do you really think it would be unreasonable that someone receiving a reputation loan would not have their account frozen until they repaid such loan, especially considering that there is precedent to freezing such accounts? How much interest exactly did you earn from this loan? Odd that this account dropped the previous pretense of appearing different from Quickseller, and turned into a Quickseller emulator with the multiquotes, inline links, etc. Quickseller as I'm sure you'll be dropping by my post history and finding I have an interest in clams and thus assume I'm some alt account, I'll tell you I'm not, I just followed a link tsp sent me. |
|
|
|
• Ticker Symbol: BYC
• Total Coin Supply (Including Unmined): 33,000,000
• Block Reward: 1 Bytecent
• Block Time: 60 Seconds
• Difficulty Retarget: Every Block
• Confirmations: 6
• Maturity: 300
• Timestamping: POW
• Still Mineable: Yes
The black reward doesn't change.
Thank you  |
|
|
|
|
I don't have the time to listen to the podcasts and I've searched the forum with relevant keywords. Can you just tell me here if/when block rewards are changed. This is what I'm after. Is it a steady 525,960 Bytecent per year for 62 years or does it increase or decrease and if so when?
|
|
|
|
|
This is Bitcointalk, where we are interested in coin specs. I also registered for your forum but there are no obvious threads in there that have the answers to my questions. Bytecent.com says there are 1440-2050 new coins generated daily, I assume this means the block target is set for 1 minute? The website does not say the emission curve (are there block reward reductions, and when?) nor total supply. Good cryptocurrencies generally tell you this information all in one place. There's no need to be cryptic about it.
|
|
|
|
Thank you for your comments and suggestions. This thread is not the official source of information. BYCTalk.com is the official community and source of information. You're shooting yourself in the foot if you're putting basic information like that behind a forum registration. Also that link is not in this thread's OP. |
|
|
|
|
What are the specs of Bytecent? Total coin supply, emission schedule, block time target and block reward, method of mining/minting (beyond just the PoB, is it proof of stake? CPU-using PoW?) These are things that should go in the OP. Also the image in the OP is broken.
|
|
|
|
Looks like a bunch of exchange data is outdated/missing including Poloniex. The site is a great resource and I hope you keep it going |
|
|
|
Remove blockchain and re-download it.
Done, doesnt helps... Still have missed coins. Waiting for dev. With that much hashspeed you should be solo mining anyway. It's almost as simple as pool mining and you get to spend your Shift much sooner. |
|
|
|
|
Graffitidice's entire balance withdrawn by someone with access to an admin's machine. It's dead apparently. The thief now has millions of GRF, I'm cashing out.
|
|
|
|
|
Haha this thread is too good to let it die.
|
|
|
|
That's all great but your currency's name sucks. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't trust in the possibility of a bounty unless it was held by a third party escrow.
Well, this would be a right question for this thread when it wouldn't start with "I wouldn't trust..." In this form from newbie account means nothing but just another FUD post. A newbie account registered before yours. Newbie  |
|
|
|
|
As a non-coder all I can tell you is it uses the same file names and structure as a Bitcoin-based coin would and also uses the same console/RPC commands.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
