So how is the factor X determined?

Also, a question about coin control. I click on the check box that says custom change address, right? Is that all, or do I have to also check one of the input addresses?

I updated my signature. I hope everything is ok, with no errors.

Edit: It looks sweet.

So I guess I'll change after this week. I don't want to risk things.

Are the new signatures mandatory?

So the new rules will take effect next air drop and not this one right? I have two address in my wallet, the airdrop one another one with Onions that I bought. So that I can have a balance of 10,000 I need to transfer Onions from that address to my airdrop one, but I guess I  need to enable coin control for that.

Can someone post the coin control link?

This was an obvious scam from the beginning.

Well, since you haven't been here since I guess last year, the start of the bounty distribution was schedule at the end of September, but it was delayed by six days due to a script error. After that they are paying in batches. I believe first starting with Twitter, Facebook, etc, and now I believe it's the signature campaign.

What's interesting are the people taking advantage of those facts to fud this coin hard. Small examples, the bounties are currently being released in batches, like it has always been known. On a weekly bases it's being release. That's what's happening right now. And a person like yourself, who from your first post today I'm assuming you haven't read the thread in months. You're talking about people complaining that they haven't received their bounties, and that it's a big drama, concern, and represents impending doom. And that would make sense, if the distribution was over. What I'm trying to say is that if the first weekly batch was sent, and a person wasn't part of that batch, then wouldn't it be moronic to think that that means they're not going to get their bounties in the following batch. And throw an insane (fake) tantrum that would be so embarrassing if they were in public.

But the truth of the matter is that the fake exaggerated outrage that these couple of sock puppet accounts put forth just doesn't add up. You have a person right now saying that this coin is going nowhere, can't be trusted because of the bounties, but it sounds as fake as a person being outraged because Decent misspelled a word on the OP.

Doom, it's going no where, they hate the coin, saying all these bad things, they want their bounty so much, but they're going to make sure that the price drops before they get it.

Meanwhile you have a team that's so ambitious, with the coding, connections, partnerships, conferences. And what I love about them, they don't concern themselves with fudders. But I find responding to them entertaining.

See my previous post, two post before yours.

At the start of the signature campaign it was stated that the bounties were going to be released in batches, sometime after launch. Launch was on June 30th, and the bounties started being distributed 6 days late, earlier this month.

Unfortunately people take those facts to twist them and complain loudly.

A baiting troll?

The bounties started six days late due to an error in a script. And after that they have been released how it was always meant to be released in batches, on a weekly bases. I just have to mention that because the fudders with who knows what agenda would have you believe that the bounties are a year late, and act as if it's 9/11, and the the team does not know what they're doing.

But this team has been phenomenal, promoting Decent around the world, making partnerships, further developing, etc.

Who knows what the agenda of these fudder's are, because their exaggeration seems obvious, and coordinate. Actually, it seems as though it's one guy with a few sock puppet accounts who randomly come out of all of a sudden with a fake and contrived outrage. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's how it comes off to me. And I always like to point that out, because seeing how active the team is, particularly in making partnerships with various companies, the fudding could end up hurting their ability to create partnerships. What if one of these companies, groups, who are are just finding out about Decent and are not very familiar with decides to not do business with Decent, or look further into it because of that FUD? That could end up hurting the coin. All because of a possible loud a-hole with a few sock puppet accounts.

Your stake is divided by six, and you get one part every month, for six months.

Price has dropped down since I last saw it, during my last comment. Now it's a 33%, and the values of my ATMChains are about 17% more than what I paid during the ICO.

Just came on to ask about it, though I see that it's in the green 93%. I wonder what happened there. If all the coins were in circulation it would be in 17th place in market cap.

It also shows how much they care about the coin. The concept in my head is very hard to explain. But take a coin like eBtc. That airdrop was open for around a week, the only requirement was an email, and it had a supposed 8,000 members registered. Yet that didn't add up, because the thread was very inactive by the time the air drop ended. DeepOnion took around what? Two months to get 2,000 registered users. Yet a shit coin eBtc gets 8,200 supposed people in it?

What I'm trying to say is look at the fraud when you don't have requirements. eBtc went from .74 to .02, with even the deb dumping all of his coins and a lot of noobs lost a lot of money.

So I understand the frustration in those who are legit and haven't gotten in, but that other alternative is much worse.

Maybe he legit has a problem, that nobody else is having. But I focus more on the exaggerated tone that the fudders are using. "For fucks sake, again? really?? wtf is wrong with you?" Like again what? That reaction sounds so fake.

Or the fudder with the fake twitter picture, of a bunch of twitter user saying the exact same thing. Which reminded me of when something goes viral, and people all over twitter start repeating the same phrase in support, something like, "All lives matter, we are all one." #together

Except that Decent is a Crypto, and a new one at that. It's very niche. It would literally have to have tens of millions of users in order to get enough supposed outraged.

Seriously, what is up with all the FUD. I log in just fine. Yet we have these people with the same dramatic, outrage tone fudding. Perhaps you simply forgot your password, or are just fudding.

Those were sock puppet trolls spreading FUD. As it they're going to have inside knowledge, and copy and pasting the same phrase.

I'm checking the final stake sheet, which I downloaded on December 24, 2016. It shows that you're supposed to get 826. Since I haven't seen anyone else with this problem, just contact the team and try to resolve it.

These Fudders twisting and turning lies. And I like LBRY. Hopefully you don't represent their community.

Everything has been happening on time according to the roadmap. DecentGo is in beta, to go live in Q1. The bounties were 6 days late, and being paid in batches, like it was known at the beginning of the campaign. That being a request of the community. The bounty campaign started in August of last year, the ICO September of last year, the coin came out in June 30th, the bounties were 6 days late, but you want to twist those facts and pretend as if the bounties were supposed to be paid in October of 2016.

If Decent does well, the LBRY does well. If LBRY does well, then Decent does well. That's kind of how Crypto works. So stop fudding one coin because you think another is a competitor.

You're responding to a person with two sock puppet accounts, who randomly decided to FUD Decent. With fake outrage, and lies. Either that, or not bright enough to understand that like we all knew bounties were to be paid in waves.

Edit: Just noticed another on the following page. As you can see everything is normal, moving smoothly, the thread has a specific vibe and then one person and their socks start spamming one post with a different account after another with fake and contrived outrage.