UNESCO gave green light to cryptos? That is big news!
|
|
|
We'll we got bitcoinplus.org and .net registered. Do you guys want to move on with those?
Main website for Bitcoin is at bitcoin.org so bitcoinplus.org would fit perfectly. Yes agree. Bitcoinplus for me. You have quoted me too fast and missed part about women, go back. GroundBEEF has already done some cool job on the matter so we are almost ready to rock da house!
|
|
|
We'll we got bitcoinplus.org and .net registered. Do you guys want to move on with those?
Main website for Bitcoin is at bitcoin.org so bitcoinplus.org would fit perfectly. Once we are are organization we can start initiating new members, preferably women! No one spends more money than women, offline or online. No one is more easily manipulated than women. Now, where is that book on (sex) cults I bought earlier this year?
|
|
|
You bring up some good points...
I think it would be a smart idea to gain control of the accounts before investing on a dev though. It may be more than just a facelift unless we get a hold of XBCPlus.com and the rest of the social media accounts. We would make a bigger and better impression for funding if we could have a site, project plans, and team info prior to starting a full fundraising campaign. It would be bad if the community raised the money to reamp the coin only to have the old team regain control of the accounts...
There is no need to regain control of those accounts because coin name is BitcoinPlus and it's ticker is XBC - xbcplus.com means bitcoin plusplus.com so it is not really fitting.
|
|
|
Good effort subSTRATA.Will the payment be in bitcoin or XBC?The idea of percentage of staked coins going to dev team is still a good one though because that way maybe those with the largest bags contribute the most as they also have the most to gain.It would be sort of like a fair tax system on hoarded/banked coins something like a DIRT tax on bank deposits.
I think Mindfox and others in XBC team already have large bags, do you see them contributing? Developers or bounties or whatever else should never be paid in XBC because it is almost certain those coins gonna end up dumped on exchange. It is much more desirable to pay in BTC and then if developers or whoever else see potential in XBC they would buy some coins. Pump instead of dump. Besides, if developer wants a mere 1 BTC for the job that would mean around 7% of all XBC = around 4,000 coins! Not only that much coins is hard to get but it is not smart to give 7% of all coins to just 1 person. To clarify more: Proposed wallet facelifting should be looked at as creation of different XBC wallet. Just like Bitcoin has Armory, MultiBit and other wallets, new XBC wallet would do the same job as current one. Unless there is a hard-fork event and one of wallets is made to go it's own route there is no need to make hard decisions - you can continue using current wallet but keep in mind it is outdated, unsecure and unstable and as such not really useful as foundation for future developments.
|
|
|
Developer agreed on payment only after new codebase is checked by Poloniex and MintPal and network is running on it correctly for at least 1 week. Users would not be required to upgrade but exchanges would certainly find it a good move to switch to improved wallet version (see the case with corrupted wallet above). As for Mindfox, there is nothing he has to give up but here are some disturbing facts about him: 1. He is nowhere to be found. 2. He possibly controls majority of network "hashrate" (stakes) and thus possibly generates over 50% of all blocks. 3. As far as I see, he wants money for any XBC upgrades, even minor ones - if it is so, I know much better developers who will do the job for the same amount of money, or less. From my perspective, Mindfox is major threat to XBC and PoS changes - if ever implemented - will be done in such a way to prevent any single entity or a group working together from again putting XBC in situation as it is right now. Currently used PoS systems (XBC or other PoS coins) are not final, there is plenty of room for upgrades. I don't want to talk more on that matter, other coin developers are around - it is not in XBC community interest to post good unimplemented ideas here. I'm aware of the fact Mindfox didn't intentionaly put himself into control of XBC network - majority of XBC users were simply too uninterested in running local wallets and staking so as a developer Mindfox went through trouble of creating countless transactions to make network work. As noble as that was, it puts him into postion where if he decides to go bad XBC network might run into stall issues or he could possibly 51% attack exchanges to oblivion. Prevention is always better than a cure. Could you or the dev itemize the "dozens of minor" issues and include a cost with these items?
As soon as I know the prices I'll post them here. As for (minor) issues, some of them are already posted on this and old XBC thread, others will be posted once detailed report is done for developer. The most serious bugs are ones that were already fixed in Bitcoin, that is why codebase upgrade makes sense - for hopefuly not much money we get all the hard, months-long work by Bitcoin developers.
|
|
|
When devs promised to launch custom blockchains initially, in September?
Soon we will launch part of custom blockchains functional i think. All takes time, we collected 750 BTC, but we wan't to spend it in one year, we have long term project and we have budget. Last weeks we was looking for developers, R&D center, designers, had meeting in Moscow. About Windows client, i already sent it to test in our IRC. Guys tested it. It might be a good move to incentivize testing, as in you post wallet that must be tested and users do it then report in-depth reports. You pay them some money afterwards. If you want quality testing, you will have to pay for it. Not paying any money and then dealing with people who run into problems and can't explain in detail what happened and how to reproduce the bug is bad move, even big companies realised that so now many of them are paying money to professional (freelance) bug hunters. Almost all respectable applications in cryptoland went through paid bug hunting at least once - Bitcoin, Armory, Blockchain.info, Dice (gambling) websites, few online wallets, etc. We have a full time lead tester we hired (Sebastian) as well as a part time almost full time tester (Samsmith16) who is also working on it. Both are now part of our dev team and have a salary. We looked into some crowd sourced platforms other coins used but their devs said it was too hit or miss and costly. Usual way to do it properly is to just set prices for certain bug levels (minor, major, critical) and open a thread at forum. Also list known bugs and then just pay to everyone who reported some new issue, based on quantity and quality of provided feedback and bug level. There is no need to pay too much, many people gonna test it for as little as 0.001 BTC for minor issue and up to 0.1 BTC for great report on critical issue (repeatable bug that completely breaks Crypti or even OS).
|
|
|
I'm currently negotiating the deal with known developer (not Mindfox) to facelift XBC and eventualy add changes to how PoS system works. Facelift would include the following:
1. Upgrade XBC codebase to the newest Bitcoin - dozens of nasty issues would be fixed, database switch to LevelDB (faster startup and shutdown and less data corruption). 2. Icons for new logo and addition of it to wallet (Overview tab) - new logo is the one at starting post here. 3. Fixes for dozens of (minor) issues specific to XBC.
Those changes would not require hard-fork, user does not need to upgrade if he or she does not want to. Facelift is absolutely neccessary, current XBC codebase is outdated and having issues at multiple areas (just yesterday I had to pull wallet backup out because XBC wallet started complaining about some issue and refused to start). Any major future change or addition to XBC wallet would be much easier if foundation is stable, solid and secure.
PoS system should be changed but details on that (and consequently hard-fork) are months in future, if we actualy ever come to that point. For now, I want to know if there are XBC holders that would like to participate in facelift phase by donating some money to pay mentioned developer. I don't have a quote for final price yet, still waiting for it. Understand that it is not my fault if you decide to go full retard and go buy XBC now then cry later because there was no wallet upgrade - if price developer asks is too high and if I'm the only one who is willing to put money on table then the whole deal will be canceled! I'm nowhere near to be a major XBC stakeholder so I'm not willing to put much money into wallet facelift and eventual future upgrades.
|
|
|
I just checked the POS difficulty at Block 541114 and it is at .000092 is this what you guys are seeing now?
.000091 now. Great time for PoS staking! Lowest PoS difficulty I spotted was 0.000084. EDIT: It is at 0.000061 right now! So is that correct that if I use coin control right now and split some blocks right now (diff = 0.000061) it will give me more tek next month?? Thanx peace Hey, I have already marked that particular date and time on my calendar, go away! Jokes aside, there is no need to do anything right now - just do not stake until you see low PoS difficulty, it is as easy as that. No one and nothing is forcing you to stake exactly at the time your coins are 30 days old, you can do it at any other moment past those 30 days. You can wait 2+ months. Keep wallet locked and unlock it only once PoS difficulty suits you.
|
|
|
Eto ga ode dogecoin jos jednom u fazu pumpanja. jeste vec dumpali? ja izbacio 60% na *90
Kupio nekih 5M po prosjecnoj cijeni 30 Satoshija, bla...bla...bla... Ja sam proda 30 BTC na 590 i kupija 30 BTC na 480 i razliku isplatija na tekući. 20K kn za dva klika. Fino ali javi se i kada bude obrnut scenario, da ne misle ovi novi da mi cryptoveterani zaradjujemo milione kuna mjesecno. Evo ja sam u minusu sa MAX, XCR i DRK nekih 20 BTC sve skupa. Da bi bio obrnut scenario BTC mora bit 2$, a neće pa eto. Obrnuti scenario je kada prodas na 590 a cijena potom ode na 700+ i ne silazi ispod 590. Da ti se tako nesto nije desilo u to ne vjerujem, ma nema teorije. Najbolji trederi imaju ne vise od 75% uspjesnih trejdova. Tko tvrdi da ima (znatno) veci procent ili nije puno trejdao (znaci noob luck, trejdao sve skupa 3 puta i sva 3 puta zaradio novac) ili laze.
|
|
|
MaxCoin 0.9.3.1 releasedYou can now download MaxCoin 0.9.3.1 from maxcoin.co.uk and the project GitHub repository. This release contains a fix for the wallet synchronisation issue and will change the target block time to 60s from block 635000. Updated branding and a new wallet security menu have also been added. The release contains a Windows installer and source code. OSX is coming shortly. A VirusTotal link has been provided here as, on occasion, Chrome will block downloads due to the IRC bootstrapping and mining code within MaxCoin. The problem is known and we're in contact with Google about possible solutions. I have upgraded from 0.9.2 and successfuly synced from block 600,061 - old wallet was stuck there for 5 days - but now I see the following returned by getinfo command: "errors" : "Warning: checkpoint on different blockchain fork, contact developers to resolve the issue" I have not added any checkpoint reset (or ignore, whatever) to maxcoin.conf file but now I'm wondering if valid checkpoint was added after hard-fork point at all. Also, how many valid checkpoints were added to Maxcoin by now? For reference, Bitcoin developers are adding checkpoints with every few wallet updates. Also: 1. Coin control not implemented yet. 2. When minimized, wallet goes to tray instead of taskbar.
|
|
|
What are the details of the purchasing of BTCD and other coins at the end of the fundraising?
Reposting this question why would I be posting such details ahead of time? Of course it does not suit you to increase number of insiders, scumbag. So you're saying he shouldn't act in the best interests of investors now? He is already not acting in the best interest of investors, dumbass.
|
|
|
Eto ga ode dogecoin jos jednom u fazu pumpanja. jeste vec dumpali? ja izbacio 60% na *90
Kupio nekih 5M po prosjecnoj cijeni 30 Satoshija, bla...bla...bla... Ja sam proda 30 BTC na 590 i kupija 30 BTC na 480 i razliku isplatija na tekući. 20K kn za dva klika. Fino ali javi se i kada bude obrnut scenario, da ne misle ovi novi da mi cryptoveterani zaradjujemo milione kuna mjesecno. Evo ja sam u minusu sa MAX, XCR i DRK nekih 20 BTC sve skupa.
|
|
|
Eto ga ode dogecoin jos jednom u fazu pumpanja. jeste vec dumpali? ja izbacio 60% na *90
Kupio nekih 5M po prosjecnoj cijeni 30 Satoshija, spalio 3.5M na Dogeparty, jucer prodao 3x 100k DOGE za 80, 85 i 90 Satoshija pa dokupio oko 500k DOGE na 59 Satoshija. E sad ako Dogeparty bude skocio slicno kako je XCP skocio to ce biti posao - imam i oko 200 XDP asseta, dobra imena (kratka) pa mozda i tu bude nesto para. Ma LOL, ima me svugdje! Sve to skupa sa DOGE je nemoguce procjeniti. Prije nego su dodali auxPoW difficulty je bio oko 1,000 (znaci ekipa koja je kopala samo DOGE) a sada "plese" izmedju 5,000 i 20,000 sto bi znacilo da 80 do 95% i vise kopaca koji uopce nisu kopali DOGE sada dobijaju DOGE uz LTC ili sta su vec kopali. Dnevno se iskopa 62,500 * 1,440 = 90M novih DOGE e sad budi pametan pa reci koliko od tih 90M ide na instant-dump! U slucaju da svi ti coini idu odmah u prodaju to znaci da kupci moraju potrositi 63 BTC po danu da bi cijena ostala na oko 70 Satoshija. A sta ako skoro pa nitko ne dumpa - vide cijena ide gore pa holdaju? U tom slucaju bi cijena lako mogla preko 100 Satoshija, mozda i preko 200. Trenutno smo jos uvijek u uptrendu, a Fibonacci kaze da su leveli prema gore (extension tj. resistance): Jucerasnji dump je u biti bilo lako predvidjeti, pa vidis da smo se i ti i ja - neprofesionalni trejderi - fino iskrcali na oko 90 pa obavili dobar rebuy Ja za sada ne namjeravam sve DOGE prodati jer se nesto suska da bi Facebook mogao uvesti DOGE kao sredstvo placanja (navodno su vec dodali DOGE ikonu na meni kada se kreira Facebook grupa ili sta vec). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=361813.msg8374941#msg8374941Ispod 1M DOGE ne idem pa makar sve propalo!e fala na dojavi ja na 84 sve ma nist, i ja slucajno primjetio i ostatak sam bacio na 82 kad je krenio tonut, pa opet kupio na 60, moguca greska al bumo vidli ^^. smjesno kako izmanipuliraju talku masu novca Pa ne moze stalno prema gore, posebice ako ide prebrzo. Zato je tu stari pouzdani Fibonacci, evo nedavno sam postao na DOGE threadu, vidi i sam koliko su tocni Fibonacci leveli. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=361813.msg8826446#msg8826446Bilo je prekasno i bio sam umoran pa sam prvo propustio dump na 51 a onda stavio da kupujem za 59 umjesto 56 (a lijepo pise da je Fibonacci linija 50.0% na 56.5), eto budale!
|
|
|
I just checked the POS difficulty at Block 541114 and it is at .000092 is this what you guys are seeing now?
.000091 now. Great time for PoS staking! Lowest PoS difficulty I spotted was 0.000084. EDIT: It is at 0.000061 right now!
|
|
|
What are the details of the purchasing of BTCD and other coins at the end of the fundraising?
Reposting this question why would I be posting such details ahead of time? Of course it does not suit you to increase number of insiders, scumbag.
|
|
|
When devs promised to launch custom blockchains initially, in September?
Soon we will launch part of custom blockchains functional i think. All takes time, we collected 750 BTC, but we wan't to spend it in one year, we have long term project and we have budget. Last weeks we was looking for developers, R&D center, designers, had meeting in Moscow. About Windows client, i already sent it to test in our IRC. Guys tested it. It might be a good move to incentivize testing, as in you post wallet that must be tested and users do it then report in-depth reports. You pay them some money afterwards. If you want quality testing, you will have to pay for it. Not paying any money and then dealing with people who run into problems and can't explain in detail what happened and how to reproduce the bug is bad move, even big companies realised that so now many of them are paying money to professional (freelance) bug hunters. Almost all respectable applications in cryptoland went through paid bug hunting at least once - Bitcoin, Armory, Blockchain.info, Dice (gambling) websites, few online wallets, etc.
|
|
|
I was hoping for more from Doge, but the chart is pure classic bubble. Needs to go up, not down, from here and break the pattern.
But I'm sitting out to see which way it breaks.
That is why I sat out no one can analyze exactly ,and no body can predict the future except that chinese PEI or vc show up in the market. So far, Fibonacci predicted market moves very accurately (Cryptsy, low price 22, high price 91), check how price was "dancing" between and bouncing off horizontal lines.
|
|
|
|