You're... Terrifying...

Truly if people like you are usual in USA I understand why they're all talking about "politically correct" legion.

Why are you yelling like this? Why are you insulting us? They both said they were for gay marriage why the fuck are you insulting them like this?

Fine, whatever.  Let me know how you geat all misty eyed at the romance in Pocahantas 2, where Indian warrior Pocahanto and John Smith courageously walk into the Tribal Council to proclaim their everlasting love.  Where Pocahanto furiously humps John Smith in the Tent of Love.  

I hear it's going to set records for how many movie goers vomit.  Meanwhile, here in the real world, here's a portrayal of a gay that works in plot, with the audience, and which never was complained about.  From Dune.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mWq15lDh8yM

Baron Harkonnan, portrayed as a psychopathic gay monster, in Dune.

Oh wait - you don't like that?  You just want all goody-goody gay characters in a warm basket of feelings?

Lol....

Funny, when someone actually has a good point suddenly everything is a joke and none of your hateful rambling is supposed to mean anything. Smooth.

Well thank you for your approval of my speech. Your approval means a lot to me.

Back to the point at hand, if you were not speaking to me or about me, then why the fuck did you quote me when you said those things?

Speaking of Idris Elba...Stephen King's character Roland of Gilead, aka The Gunslinger, is now going to be played by Elba...I started reading the series when The Gunslinger was first released in the early 80s and would be shaking my head if this wasn't Hollywood we were talking about. For years Clint Eastwood's name was always tossed-around as who would be cast as Roland, of course he is too old now, but Elba??? Seriously, wtf?! And that kook McConaughey will be starring in this crock, also:


Roland Deschain:



http://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/mar/01/actors-stephen-king-the-dark-tower-film-project

In the real, really nasty and ugly world of espionage, playing gay is one tool used.  For blackmail, etc.

But the character of James Bond is well defined, first in the books by Ian Fleming, then in the movies.

No, he isn't gay.  Doing that would be creating a new character.  Or destroying the old one.

Please, tell me. What exactly did I say that is wrong? Quote me please. With an active link.

The problem is, there are some kinds of sexual deviants we don't want to see on screen talking about or exercising their light sabors.

Good to see your reading comprehension skills are up to snuff. Feel free to continue your intolerance of intolerance.  

P.S. "destructful" is not a word.

The problem with the logic that anyone who is against gay marriage is against homosexuals or homosexuality is that homosexuals and homosexuality don't involve the government. When you introduce government into the situation, it instantly becomes something that effects every resident of the nation, especially tax payers. Government does not solve problems, it only causes them. Homosexuals rallying for state recognized marriage is no different than begging for more wide distribution of the shackles every one else suffers from. Demanding the government regulate the people more is EVERYONE'S problem regardless of who or what you are sexually attracted to. Reducing this subject down to "you are either for us or against us" is a fallacy and has no place in honest debate. Not everyone who is against gay marriage is a right wing closet gay Jesus freak homophobic bigot.

Considering the amount of vulgarity you're spitting it might be a possibility yeah.

You're only yelling and insulting. You give few if no logical arguments.

You just abuse the Caps Lock of your keyboard and the emojis that's all.

the glorious guberments regularly release declassified documentations, usually after 50 years of it being classified, this is common knowledge as far as im concerned, and it is also a well know fact that any new technology that is found is jumped on by the military industrial complex, we very rarely get anything before the military gets their hands on it, e-cigs being a recent example as far as im aware. i remember when i was younger DVDs had just come out or so i thought, my old man found it hillarious told me they tried introducing these DVDs 15 year previous but the mass's were apparently happy with betamax and rejected DVDs untill my generation came along, what im telling you is very real the history you were taught was not a true account of history by any short of the imagination :/

I don't believe in Darwin Theory. And seriously it has not been proven. So, that meand i am still not proven by answer using Darwin Theory😊
It is still against to human nature also according to Darwin Theory because that theory  says every living wants to sustain its generation.

There is a strict and easy limit that can be made here. Pedophilia isn't a problem because it's youngs and olds. I don't care about the difference of age of two people for example. The problem of pedophilia is mutual consent.
A child can't give his consent for sexual intercourse.

Hence pedophilia can be nothing but a rape. Hence it can't be accepted.

Thanks.

Only correct comment I've seen here.
Gay marriage is granting freedom to some (the gays) while not touching the freedom of the others.

It's a simple equation. As everyone is or winning or not losing, it should be what's made.

A movie that was totally ruined by including a gay subplot was Alexander.  Way way too much lovey dovey honey boy crap ad nauseum.  We're talking about one of the best military commanders and strategists in history being turned into a little cocksucking on the brain slut of the ancient era.  That's ridiculous.  Nobody cares.  Nobody wants all the details of their little lover's spats.  

Many other examples of PC ruining movies, many other things not just movies.  And in opposition to Popcorn's comment, it's not "whether we can tolerate it" but whether the end product of all the decisions is ENJOYABLE.  And that's all it is.  A hundred thousand hours of work, and those guys produce a two hour movie.  And we buy it, or we don't.  And it gets a 5.5 rating on IMDB, or an 8.9.  

You know, there might just be some reasons why one is a 5.5 and another is an 8.9....

Well then you must be the absolute perfect parent.  Your kids can do no wrong because you have absolute control over them.  Every day must be a fun day in your house, rule with an iron fist!!!!!  Doesn't feel good to be judged by someone you don't know, does it?  But really I have no idea how you parent do I?
You are trying to judge how I parent and you know absolutely nothing about me.  I never said anything about my child having sex, where did that come from?  So, if one of your kids becomes a drug addict living on the street, you will just say, "oh, its so lovely when you are high, drugs are fantastic."  Because you are not allowed to hate their actions.  I hate it when my children fight, I don't stand for it, they do get punished for it (no I can't take away their phone or xbox because they don't have either, nor will they for some time).  I praise them all the time when they do good, they get rewarded for good grades, they get rewarded for doing chores, they get one on one time with their parents.  You said that its hypocritical to hate an action but not the person.  Just think about how stupid that statement really is.  I hate it when i lose my temper, but I don't hate myself.  If you want to know what all the parenting books tell you about praise and punishment.  1.  Praise first, there should be 5 positives for every negative.  2.  You don't praise the person, i.e. you're such a good boy, you praise the action, jimmy you did a fantastic job on your chores today.  If you label the child then they feel labeled, whether its always having to live up to being the good boy (which often leads to depression) or your stupid (obvious where that one leads).  Don't judge how I parent, I don't judge how anyone else parents.  Every child is different, there isn't cookie cutter mold on how to raise children because they all have different challenges.  I have a very good friend who is gay, i don't hate him, but I think homosexual acts are a sin and don't like them.  I can still love my son or daughter if they are gay, just like I would still love them if they were a drug addict, but I can hate the action. 
As far as the pedophilia goes, have you seen siecus (who they are).  They are in charge of a lot of sexual education in the US, much to the dismay of many parents.  They tried to push their agenda in our school district and was shut down.  Anyway, they want to teach kindergarten age children that masturbation is good, they also want to force high school age kids to read certain books.  The premise of one of those books is to get you to feel sympathy for the pedophile.  Read over this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1295601.0  I've read many other articles that say much the same.