The trust system has been changed and I do not see there are any significant trade he has done (no trade at all) except creating mess all around and bossing the users he do not like.
You think that everyone who gave theymos positive trust feedback all traded with him?
I think it's nothing personal with Jolly hating anyone, he is just over zealous giving negative feedback to anyone who is related with any scam projects.
He changed latest feedback to neutral so I see no point in creating this topic now, unless if you or your ego have something personal against him.
I never paid much attention to the OP after I felt their dislike, I had to un-ignore the OP just now to read their posts because my name was mentioned the in the thread title.
You are saying that I was lying when I responded to dkbit98 a few days ago?
He changed latest feedback to neutral so I see no point in creating this topic now, unless if you or your ego have something personal against him.
It's not about Iv4n drama, it's about overall JollyGood characteristics. Iv4n drama was just another incident of many so far. For the record,
I do not have any personal aginst JollyGood nor I am driven by my ego here. Don't you find unsual against him yet?
It is quite possible there is an ulterior motive behind this facade/thread but whatever it is I would not consider it being created for the good of the forum when something like this would be created by someone that I do not engage with. I think the few times the OP posted about me or to me was something designed to let me know their dislike therefore I did not pay much attention to their posts.
"ulterior motive behind this facade/thread" - "I would not consider it being created for the good of the forum" - now do I need your permission/approval before making a post?
Stop fucking around with me and stop being a piece of shit. If any of my word hurt you in the past then I apologize. I do not dislike you or anyone. Why would I? Why would I bring unpleasant memories and torture myself emotionally? I like few users on WO, If there are any bitcoin enthusiast left then some of these people are actually have reasons to be in this forum, we don't spread hate but brotherhood love all around. Do you think some random nerds possibly don't have a day job or a sustainable business to live a good life pressing their keyboard spreading jealousy really deserve an emotional place?
Look at you? You are trying to defend yourself like a 12 years old kid. Look at the responses you made for others.
... therefore thank you (how nice and humble)
... I am trying to keep posting at least once per page (stop the bullshit, do you think anyone gives an F?)
... I would probably start a thread asking all campaign participants to kindly stop promoting a known scam (yeah you will, who else has such free time to do dumb shit)
... from my side there is an element of respect towards you (really! you did not get enough excuse against him or time to exclude him.)
... It just so happens that the OP mentioned earlier that efialtis excluded me, I checked this and it is true. (efialtis is safe for now may be or we would see him next week in your shit list)
All sounds like a defence mechanism of a teen.
The only time I recall that I engaged with the OP was with their alt-account when their main account was hacked and I was offering moral support to them and chastising the hacker but that is a different matter altogether. I think I added or re-added the OP to my ignore list after a short time their forum account was regained as I did not see any improvement.
Yes, you did and thanks for that but that does not prevent me to speak against the bad practice you are doing. I had another guy who used to PM me a lot, they needed good relationships with higher rank members so that they can earn merit and have them in their side. After he became a legendary one day he showed his true face. Yes, there are users who are highly motivated by money. Have this signature disabled, let the admin prohabit all kind of affiliate promotions, I think you will be with those who will escort others to find a new place to earn some pocket money.
The OP excluded me around the same time that mass signature campaign cheat (figment) who operated farming accounts and maybe still has them, had not been exposed by
nutildah at that point (
excellent thread). Figment sent PMs asking users to exclude me from their trust list, at least one of them directly told me so they were asked/told to exclude me otherwise figment would exclude them. Later when the farming accounts and signature cheating was exposed, I realised I must have tagged several of his sleeper accounts red therefore hurt his account farming and he was trying to affect others in to excluding me.
I am not saying the OP and the figment signature campaign cheat and farming account operator are connected in any way... nor am I saying the OP was or was not influenced in any way by the figment signature campaign cheat and farming account operator - I am just saying the timing of both acts seems within close proximity.
What is this?
What do you think I am doing here? Do you think I am fishing for merits? Does it look like that I am desperate for positive feedback from DT(1&2)? Is there anyone who can tell me I am desperately trying to build up relationships with them to be included in their trust list? No! I even did not care to tell others who have excluded me from their trust list after my account was hacked. It was LoyceV (appreciate it brother) once create a topic about it and I think I did not care much to tell anyone that now all fine and get me back in your list. No, I am not telling anyone now too. Please do not get inspiration from this post. I really don't need it.
I love my life, I love my three years old baby girl (actually after one and half month she will be three), I love my beautiful wife, I love my bitcoin, I love football and Liverpool, I love WO and I love positive minded people around here in the forum, although I have to admit that I am not much active lately but this is temporary.
I think JollyGood is a bit too trigger happy on the negative feedback. I thought the same about Lauda back in the days. In both cases, many of their feedbacks are justified, but not all.
You may well be right but in the following example
I was not trigger happy at all. For example I wanted to exclude efialtis
For what it's worth: I comment was about leaving (negative) feedback, not about excluding users.
Make him happy and he will include anyone to his trust list. Aren't you JollyGood?
You have not defended yourself yet on how
35 times out of 41 you got them distrusted after they distrusted you first? Oh yes! Not retaliation, it's just co-incidence, am I correct?
You are trying to turn the table to me now and starting to accuse me by throwing stones in the dark with the hope of something might bring out from it instead of accepting the fact that
you are overzealous on your feedback leaving. In fact
you are misusing/misinterpreting the feedback system as well as the trust system. Admit it!
Show Posts
... unfortunately the atm was offline 
