When some institutions offered a bitcoin futures contract in late 2017, the market exploded and pumped. I also think that it's one of the contributors to why the market reached that point of an all-time high.
Yeah, CME and CBoE bitcoin future contracts, but it also contributed to the bubble being burst. Yes, the bubble burst during that time and that's why people have thought of bitcoin as a bubble even until today. It's good to see that Goldman Sachs keeps on supporting crypto and not going on its way but this is a really different thing from the usual spot market that we have. But with this, it gives an idea and to their customers that cryptocurrencies and making a futures contract of it make it real. I just hope that not so many of their customers will be burned.
Still a lot of intricacies for average Joe traders. And I think it will be offer for corporate first not to individuals. But we will see what it can bring in the market as a whole. It could push the alt coin market and then goes to another bubble, so let's see. We will see the impact of it but IIRC, they've already have this plan exposed before but now that it had came into reality. There's going to be the awaited moment for Ethereum. The ATH of ETH can be surpassed, I think.  |
|
|
|
rich and poor has become a natural law because the world must be balanced. In my opinion, people who are poor in wealth do not matter, the most important thing is that all their needs can be met. and it is the role of the rich who helps the welfare of the poor. so all there must be intimacy and mutual understanding and mutual help. You don't have to be all rich and you don't have to be all poor
Survival is like a daily task to them. It is true that it's one of the important thing that they have to deal in their daily living. Like where they're going to get their food for their table if jobs aren't stable. That's how they deal with their daily lives which is a very difficult task if we're going to imagine about it. But with that experience, I've saw people who worked hard and smartly to overcome this trial of poverty. |
|
|
|
I’ve been reading up on bitcoin and saw that Tim Draper estimates the price will hit 250k in 2022. I honestly could never afford a ton of bitcoin even now at 37k but I could afford three. It would be a lot of my savings, not all, but a majority. Is it worth it to spend almost 111 thousand dollars buying three bitcoin? Will it make me back a substantial amount more money? Please help!
You're in a bitcoin forum and expect that everyone of us would be saying a big YES. But before investing, you should know if you're really okay to invest that amount. Because to us, if that's our money, it's an easy thing to buy bitcoin and will just have to wait until the price target that we set hits. It's not just about holding but also the patience that you shall apply as you hold because you might see it go down for a moment. But don't forget that it's temporary. Do you think that you're also ready to experience that moment before seeing bitcoin's price reaches to the top price that you have mentioned? |
|
|
|
Satoshi did it, didn't he? With satoshi's starting bitcoin as a project, AFAIK, there were no payments being made for those people he took to help him. I suspect it will be difficult to find on such terms.
And were there any examples in history when someone did it?
It is difficult if there's no guaranteed salary for those you'll take on board but there's a chance that you'll get those people interested on your project and willing to help you with the little that you can give. |
|
|
|
|
Institutions and upcoming another halving shall be enough to make the fundamentals better for bitcoin.
$100k at the end of the year is still a joke for some but they don't realize that even if it won't happen by the end of this year. We're still going to see some good news kicking in by next year and so on.
Just hold even it's only 1 bitcoin folks!
|
|
|
|
|
No.
You might have been misled by that advertisement that you saw. Before investing, you shouldn't just be into that advertisement but you have to do your own research too so that you're not going to end up asking if you did a good job or not.
Well, that's it. You just invested in a project that sounds like the other altcoin. I don't have to go through that project but if you can still got some stop loss and recover some of your money, do it while you can.
|
|
|
|
*BTC mining
In 2021? Nope. This isn't 2015. The current level of mining requires more electricity usage than most people can access. It's still but only for those who can afford to buy those miners and actual equipment for bitcoin mining. They're not cheap so it does really requires your capital to be able to mine bitcoin. It's still a thing and will always be. What about escrow or IRL brokerage?
There are a lot of escrows already in the forum but if you think that you can be trusted just like them. You need to build your reputation. |
|
|
|
|
When some institutions offered a bitcoin futures contract in late 2017, the market exploded and pumped. I also think that it's one of the contributors to why the market reached that point of an all-time high.
It's good to see that Goldman Sachs keeps on supporting crypto and not going on its way but this is a really different thing from the usual spot market that we have. But with this, it gives an idea and to their customers that cryptocurrencies and making a futures contract of it make it real. I just hope that not so many of their customers will be burned.
|
|
|
|
It's hard for OG to take that spot for the TI qualifier. There has been a lot of good teams lately and they will be having hard time taking that spot. But I'm rooting for OG.
They should have given some incentive to secure a slot because this year's majors weren't really a lot and thus, they're two time TI champs.
I agree OG is still lacking that stable carry even though they have Madara it's unlikely they'll go far this qualifier. Even if there's not a lot of majors during this DPC season, the regional league's still give out tons of points enough for qualification as there are teams that didn't earn any points in the major but still made it in the top 12. AFAIK, Madara was just a stand-in with their past matches but it's still Ana that's going to play for them as their carry. I agree about the regional leagues, those have given a lot of points. Look at some qualified teams, they didn't even finish any championship but just made a good run with those leagues like Alliance. Well, as in other talks: It is Psg.Lgd that took the trophy on this very last major. |
|
|
|
Honestly speaking, one spot from the Western Europe Qualifier probably belongs to OG so this game against EG is the last chance for Nigma though
It's hard for OG to take that spot for the TI qualifier. There has been a lot of good teams lately and they will be having hard time taking that spot. But I'm rooting for OG. They should have given some incentive to secure a slot because this year's majors weren't really a lot and thus, they're two time TI champs. |
|
|
|
Alliance vs Team Spirit: Alliance ML @ 1.59 | ANALYSISI also went with this pick since Alliance will most likely put up a good fight regardless of the points. With less games played Alliance have the better advantage since they could analyze the strengths and weaknesses of Team Spirit based on the group stage matches. In terms of playstyle I think these two are equal but Alliance have the better experience with Niko. 6 teams left. 2 at the two bracket. At the upper bracket, PSG.LGD and T1. While on the lower bracket, Quincy Crew and VG & Team Nigma and EG. I've eyed for Alliance that will be one of the teams that will be left until the finals but that's it. Just an update about Alliance, Boxi is back and Sumail is back again as a free player. Team Liquid confirms Boxi will return for The International qualifiers, SumaiL becomes free agent |
|
|
|
They probably want to cater to the anime watching fans of DOTA and non-DOTA fans that have the same interest in Anime. I think the reason is that it just sounds really good to the ears when you combine Anime and Major to make a portmanteau of a name. Or maybe the abundance of anime reference for different events in DOTA scene may have lead to the naming of the major. I think it's just a theme that they all agreed because usually their majors doesn't have that kind of theme so they made it to have something new. Since they're likely seeing a lot of these players have been watching anime. It's just to feel the theme that they're also liking the anime style that they've made. I think that we're going to see more when the last two teams are in the finals, more better cosplay I think. |
|
|
|
...
Probably it was Wirwox? The website people also used to buy a currency for a vidéo game (second life?) Yeah, they closed in January last year. Thanks! that's it! I forgotten totally the name but in my head if somebody mentions it, I'll definitely remember it. |
|
|
|
|
I remember I've used one but I forgot the name of that exchange and its website's design is very simple yet fine.
They've closed I think last year or two years ago. I'm trying to find that particular exchange that has the SLL / BTC conversion. But I cannot find any article on it, google search don't show the results from years ago.
|
|
|
|
Now, after all of those forced to give positive feed back. We're now seeing them go the other way round.
If those users have been saying that they weren't paid, well then that's believable than of those who have seem to comment as if they're posted automatedly.
Positive feedback of what exactly? That they get back the 50% of their funds without any concrete and solid proof? Whatever those newbies/ bots/ shills post doesn't prove a single thing. And yes, it's "easier" to believe that nobody gets anything from them. It makes much more sense. The thing is that if we don't make a group complainant (with all the difficulties that this action includes and require), we won't get anything back.  Those 50% payment that were posted automatedly, they were just forced positive feedback somehow but it's true that it lacks of evidence that they actually got paid. It is more believable to see these complains than those shills and I agree to you that there's no proof about those claims. And those posts are unlikely to stop, they'll keep on posting it and believes that there will be more people that will believe that they actually got the money that they've promised to give. |
|
|
|
|
Now, after all of those forced to give positive feed back. We're now seeing them go the other way round.
If those users have been saying that they weren't paid, well then that's believable than of those who have seem to comment as if they're posted automatedly.
|
|
|
|
|
I watched the match between Execration and Vici Gaming. The series tied 1-1 and all of the games made by XCTN got tied, all 1-1 in standing. I think that I'm impressed by them and other fans that have watched their games.
I thought that they'll easily be beaten by the other teams on the wild card seeds but they've proved me wrong and I think the others too. If ever they'll get into the next stage or group stage, they'll be considered as the dark horse but as of the moment, it's the No Ping Esports but they're at the playoffs seed. XCTN has to win both of their upcoming series against Nigma and Team Secret but that would be hard IMHO.
|
|
|
|
I don't think so, you have little chances to make money from gambling and it will take some time before you can set up a method or your own strategy so you can win, the anti-gambling sentiments are from people who are once compulsive gamblers or had one of their family members, it is to warn people not to consume all their times and money to gambling and not to be deceived that you can make money in gambling.
Each person has different views on what anti gambling campaign entails with. It may be negative for some and that's what OP thinks that he's being deprived of his chance of making money through gambling and that's understandable. But on the other hand, we all have views on it and that's why it's very subjective. Would really have positive and negative depending on the person who do view about gambling because we do have different impressions which means different comment about it. Its bit understandable on why they do came up with that decision of banning or having that anti gambling campaign is to protect out their citizens on possible gambling addiction. If there such rule or regulation into our own country then we wont have any choice but to abide with the laws. That's their goal and that's why they're making those type of campaigns because they think that it will harm their citizens. With what most of the media is showing around the effects of gambling, people would really think that it's only giving harmful effects. Because of those irresponsible gamblers that they are taking as an example, the government has to step so that there's going to be a lessen number of people who would become addicted to gambling. It's about the effect of gambling that they're looking to avoid and that's why they're helping in that case as what they think it's the best way for them to help their people. |
|
|
|
I don't think so, you have little chances to make money from gambling and it will take some time before you can set up a method or your own strategy so you can win, the anti-gambling sentiments are from people who are once compulsive gamblers or had one of their family members, it is to warn people not to consume all their times and money to gambling and not to be deceived that you can make money in gambling.
Each person has different views on what anti gambling campaign entails with. It may be negative for some and that's what OP thinks that he's being deprived of his chance of making money through gambling and that's understandable. But on the other hand, we all have views on it and that's why it's very subjective. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
