Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 12:30:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ... 82 »
341  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Double geometric method: Hopping-proof, low-variance reward system on: April 24, 2013, 07:06:17 AM
Quote
4. If the share found happens to be a valid block, then after doing #3, also do the following for each participant: Give him a payout of (exp(lS-ls)*(r-1)*(1-f))/p. Set lS = lS + log(o).

Is the 'p' used here '1.0/D' or is it 'd/D' (where d is user's difficulty of submitted share). If it's 'd' how is it affected if a user has their difficulty changed part way through a block? Is it the 'd' for the most recent share submission?
342  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 23, 2013, 08:13:38 PM
The pool had another 4x difficulty block, continuing its run of bad luck. Thankfully it was followed by a couple of short blocks putting us back to averaging 1.5x difficulty since the difficulty change. After seeing what's happened to Ozcoin, where a PPS bad luck run caused reserve issues and they had to disable PPS, I've re-enabled my DGM payment method testing code and am running that alongside PPS to test and compare results.

I may offer DGM alongside with PPS at some point, or leave it there to enable a switchover if PPS bad luck results in pool reserves getting dangerously low. I like PPS for its simplicity but I'd rather switch to DGM than go bankrupt if the reserves run low. Normally I'd just buy more reserves but the bitcoin price has risen so high since I started the pool that's not really an option when block swings can be 10,000 USD.
343  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 23, 2013, 12:56:58 AM
There were some pool restarts in the last 20 minutes while I added some statistics and monitoring data.
344  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 22, 2013, 09:07:49 PM
(@doublec: Or did you change this meanwhile?)
This hasn't changed, all addresses remain read only. To add an address you need to create a new account.

What's up with the run of bad luck we're having? The last block was a 6.7x difficulty and a few blocks back there was an over 4x difficulty. Since the difficulty change the pool has averaged 1.6x difficulty. Bring on the counterbalancing good luck please!
345  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 22, 2013, 08:03:19 PM
How are altcoins sent?
The same way bitcoins are. Press the withdraw button on the user page.
346  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 21, 2013, 12:10:06 PM
Ya, for now, I had a friend write a Windows service to screen scape the site and send me an e-mail, but I can turn it on or off Wink
Too late for you now, but for the future if you want to avoid screen scraping there's now a user stats JSON api:

Code:
http://mmpool.bitparking.com/userstats/username

Replace 'username' with the username and you get a JSON result of hash rate and balances.
347  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 21, 2013, 11:54:28 AM
This sounds awesome.  Thank you for this offer!  However, I'm curious if we decide to shutdown or mine a more profitable coin for a day or two, how would we be able to turn the notifications off?

Once you have it setup where we can change the hash rate minimum on the user end (add it as an input on our account page?), I wouldn't want to be locked in.  Otherwise, my phone would be blowing up if I decide to mine PPC for the day or something, heh.
Good point, that would be annoying. Best to wait till I have an interface set up allowing you to set and edit the alerts.
348  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 21, 2013, 04:41:30 AM
At some point I plan to add support for notifying miners if their miner's stop mining. I'm open to suggestions on how best to handle the notification trigger. For my own server down notifications I'm using Pushover to send notifications to my phone. As a stopgap until I've implemented something for miners, if you'd like to receive pushover notifications if you're miner hash rate drops you can bitmessage me at BM-BbgTgGa6LX3yYqwJSwdwrzysvfWjM2u6 (or post here if you don't mind it being public, or PM me, or email the bitparking admin address) with your account name, your pushover user key and the hash rate minimum you want to receive a notification and I'll set a notification up for you.
349  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 21, 2013, 04:00:56 AM
Can you please explain why speed in statistic http://mmpool.bitparking.com/user/ is 15% lower then i see in cgminer on my side ?
There were some server restarts today to try and track down the issue causing the stratum server crash that has been occurring on the mornings. Hopefully I've done the last of these just now to resolve the issue.
350  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [2000 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 21, 2013, 03:59:54 AM
Borked again? Accepted shares on my Avalon have stopped. It won't failover for some reason. Doublec please get this fixed.
I've looked into the failover issue and applied a fix just now. There was a short server restart as a result. I'll monitor the fix and see how it goes.
351  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 21, 2013, 12:01:23 AM
I never experienced anything like this while mining at mmpool.bitparking.com.
Seems there is a cache problem. After a while that cache is being cleared. Where have the missing shares gone?
The backup server does cache shares for a short time and this will always result in the website and stats being a number of shares behind. These are always submitted though. If you were to stop mining for a few minutes it'd catch up. Just in case though I've disabled the advertising of the backup server while I investigate to see if there are any issues.
352  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 20, 2013, 03:15:15 PM
I installed some monitoring on the pool hash rate to ping my phone if it dropped low and it triggered this morning. I was able to see the reason for the recent crashes and have fixed the issue. Pool had about 5 minutes downtime. I'll continue to monitor.

353  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 20, 2013, 02:10:46 AM
The getwork server is now randomly picking one of the stratum servers for the redirect header. If you want to connect to a specific server use the "stratum+tcp" address directly on your miner.
354  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 20, 2013, 01:21:35 AM
I have a backup stratum server operating on stratum+tcp://stratum2.bitparking.com:3333. If the main stratum server fails this one should continue operating. It's not a complete failover as it still relies on some features on the main server but will work fine for the types of stratum crashes that occurred recently. You can also pick the stratum server that provides the best latency for your miner. I'll continue working on a solution that works in the case of the main server completely failing.
355  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 19, 2013, 06:52:23 PM
Same here. Completely unreliable at the moment Sad
Thanks, restarted pool. I should have the backup server up today - it's been syncing the blockchain and is nearly complete.
356  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 19, 2013, 12:27:28 AM
I'm working on bringing up a second stratum server as a backup. You may see stats appearing on the main page and the JSON data for this second server while I test. I'll announce here when it's available.
357  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Double geometric method: Hopping-proof, low-variance reward system on: April 18, 2013, 10:38:34 PM
A pool with f=-0.25, c=0.2 indeed has 0% fee. You might be talking about OzCoin; the parameters displayed might be a relic from the time it was 0-fee, I don't know what parameters they actually use now. It's possible they added an additional 1% fee on top of the method formula; that defeats the purpose of having a parameter f for that.
Yes it was OzCoin, and I think Coinotron used the same parameters when it was running DGM. Thanks for the information.
358  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 18, 2013, 10:13:31 PM
Default difficulty on the stratum server has been changed from 8 to 16. You can adjust this higher or lower using "d=16" as your password, replacing "16" with the difficulty you want to mine at.
359  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1500 GH/s] Bitparking Pool, PPS 2.5%,vardiff,stratum,Merge Mining BTC,NMC+more on: April 18, 2013, 09:59:06 PM
Stratum server was crashing. I've restarted and will monitor it to track down the issue.
360  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Double geometric method: Hopping-proof, low-variance reward system on: April 18, 2013, 02:19:30 PM
I'm a bit confused about the term "fixed fee" vs average total fee" mentioned in the OP and what they mean. Is the "average total fee" the average fee the pool operator receives over the long term? Or is 'f' the fee the pool operator expects to receive over the long term?

I ask because I notice, for example, a pool that states it has a 1% DGM fee but parameters "f=-0.25, c=0.2, o=0.8". This makes the "average total fee" 0 which makes me think that that isn't the fee the pool is expecting to get on average.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 ... 82 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!