The fact that they don't own it has actually an opposite effect. Owning bitcoin means that you have your skin in the game and you wan to protect the bitcoin price. But this isn't new, and bitcoin mining has always been more centralized then people seem to think.

Remember this? https://www.coindesk.com/ghash-io-never-launch-51-attack

But even less centralized mining doesn't mean it would be worth a while for anyone to launch 51% attack, or that it would be as catastrophic as people think. It would REALLY expensive to execute, and would last 1 double spend before attacker would get kicked out from the network.

One would think that it would make more sense to mine money with all the gear worth 51% attack rather then waste it.

I am sorry but your sentence doesn't make any sense. What exactly would be cheaper? If something replaces bitcoin it will be more valuable by definition. And there's a reason why bitcoin needs to have value. Mining incentives need to be high enough in order to keep the chain secure.

Too little too late, and from what i've understood, this is a response to non-issue because quantum computers that could be an issue for blockchain safety are expected to arrive in decades from now. And when this becomes a problem, it will be solved relatively fast and easily. Just like Decent did now.

Something crossed my mind... I wonder if they have plans to jump in to NFT hype. Like releasing Betfury collectable NFTs as an achievements that you can win by playing. But if they would do that they should at least have an utility value, like unlocking new games or something.

Week #2
Signature
Bitcointalk Account : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2394392
Your Number on the Spreadsheet: 13

Bitcointalk post:
1 – (28/2): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5276159.msg56461594#msg56461594
2 – (28/2): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5320187.msg56462403#msg56462403
3 – (1/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5276159.msg56467122#msg56467122
4 – (1/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5145239.msg56468185#msg56468185
5 – (2/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5276159.msg56474177#msg56474177
6 – (3/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5308563.msg56484968#msg56484968
7 – (3/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg56485147#msg56485147
8 – (4/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5321563.msg56487240#msg56487240
9 – (5/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5308563.msg56494785#msg56494785
10 - (5/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162392.msg56495233#msg56495233
11 - (5/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5276159.msg56495702#msg56495702
12 - (6/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5321901.msg56503315#msg56503315
13 - (7/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5191601.msg56509470#msg56509470
14 - (7/3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5322109.msg56509685#msg56509685

I would be honestly suprised if they stayed on schedule on those. I believe that they can do it, it's just seems a lot things will be happening in a relatively short time.

Some of the people will put in in bitcoin for sure, but the marketcap is already so high i don't see it having a huge effect unless something else happens that makes things escalate and more money flowing in. Weirderst part is that it could affect negatively on the whole purpose of stimulus if btc goes down after people buy.

When you are talking DeFi as a whole, it can't be determined as safe or legit because it contains lots of scams and lots of projects that are trying their best. So your question is same as "are cryptocurrencies legit?" Some of them are.

But of course they aen't "safe", they contain risks, otherwise they wouldn't be profitable. Also ton of these DeFi yield farming things have high inflation with anon devs just waiting for a rug pull and i don't think that a single one of them can be compared to a bank.

You guys might want to check out what Dusk is doing with their XSC standard. They have been solving exactly this problem with a first layer solution.

With the current votes of 93.11% in favor of merging, i don't think it's even a matter of choice anymore unless there's more weight with the votes of large token holders that could affect in it.

By the way i voted for merging but i find it frustrating that i can't change my vote if i happen to change my mind because of the some arguments i see in here. It should be easy enough to have an option to change it.

What delisting are you talking about? They delisted from Bittrex ages ago.



Just calling it a scam doesn't answer to any question. How is it a scam exactly? And don't tell me that they "didn't protect the price" or something like that i've seen in here. Legit projects should avoid the price talk anyway and they shouldn't try to manipulate the price. What i am interested in is the fact there wasn't any adoption from anywhere. That makes me think that there's something wrong with the platform code. Because if the code would be superior compared to other solutions, there would be devs lining up to write dapps on this platform.


If the product is useless, i would say there's a LOT wrong with the code then.


I thought that you just said that the product is useless, how is it useless and a good idea at the same time? And what more do you want the team to do then write the code for the software exactly?

I seriously think that there's something wrong with the game theory of coinomics and the whole economy plan in here. Miner incentives should be high enough to keep the chain safe. Something is seriously wrong in here.

Have you checked it recently? I am guessing that's an older screenshot because that was an error and was just recently fixed for everyone, now my bounty tokens show up in 1 year section. And tokens won in demo tournaments show up in 3 year section.

For me it depends purely on the btc price and how much of it have. I wouldn't bother to divide 0.01 between diffent addresses because just the fees would make a dent in it but usually i keep my investment in 5-10 different addresses, even if they weren't some in altcoins. Some of them i hold in trusted in exchanges for trading and cashing out.

Why an earth this didn't ever took off? Fundamentals looked solid to me. Is there something wrong with the code? Wasn't this original enough to compete with others? Maybe "nomen est omen" effect was affecting people and this stayed "decent" as a literal sense.

I have won several times, once even the 1st price, but competition has been harder now that there are more members and prices volatile and unpredictable. Too bad my nmx prices from them are locked now, but i totally understand that they don't want instant bounty dump.

Farming with my bought tokens has turned out to be very profitable though.

Quick poll: Do you have an exit plan on what price will you sell BFG?

I am really conflicted when i think about my exit strategy.

I mean suppose i would sell if i got 3 year worth of mining dividends back or something. But even still it would be hard for me to give up this daily routine and not look back when they list new coins/games and worthune wheels and who knows what. I feel like i would be missing out not having any BFG.

And who knows, maybe they burn a huge amount of of them in the future rising the dividends or they will figure out some other new cool system to make BFG scarcer right after i sell. That would totally mess up my pricing estimate.

So have i understood correctly that this is an erc20 token right now and you are doing a swap later on to swap these tokens your own native blockchain coins that's based on cryptonote?

I am pretty sure that tactic is the right one. Befause i am assuming that when this becomes tradable, traded coins are removed from the staking pool as you have to keep them in your betfry account to get dividends.

This will most likely lead to interesting scenario where people withraw their BFG in order to dump them in the markets, and after they see dividens rising because they removed huge amount of BFG removed from staking pool, they will most likely rethink their selling price or just move it back to the betfury site for staking.

Pancakeswap already passed Uniswap volume according to dappradar. Also it seems that pump chasers went there too.

Even if Pancakeswap isn't as decentralized as eth, these nearly free fees made me try swapping and adding liquidity for the first time because i was put off by ETH fees and never got around to test uniswap.

So even if i am not going to stay with pancakeswap when eth scales, i am grateful for it providing me an opportunity to test it nearly free of charge, so i will be ready and actually have some idea how it works.

People use faucets to test games, they are not a way to get money, at least they shouldn't be. I think it's more attractive then having demo "play money".

And just for comparison; freebitcoin (one of the most famous btc faucets/gambling sites) is currently giving 2 sats per hour (if you accidentally don't win more).