Funny thing is, if that's him, He looks also exactly how I pictured him!
that's an easy one, all japanese look the same |
|
|
|
|
Panick that he may spend his coins. If it is him he will have to do it to protect his life. He needs to pay for a very safe shelter, guards, bullet proof cars etc.
|
|
|
|
I think she's just incredibly naive. I suspect she has no idea the can of worms she has opened with this about Nakamoto.
That's why I just tweeted this to her, verbatim: @truth_eater Leah: you clearly don't realize the future ramifications of what he has built. And why his anonymity matters so much. #bitcoin Be it true or not, this guy just went to hell: right now his house is probably surrounded by reporters. Criminals are planning how to invade his house or kidnap him. |
|
|
|
I find it strange that a person wich such deep and broad interests is just found on google for fire guns, trains and stupid things on Amazon. Also his english i not good, i don't know how he used to write here on the board(what was his username?) and other non formal means. But the articles could not be writen by him, excepet if someone else was reviewing the text.
satoshi, also his English in his posts is excellent. Just looked at it. judging by his posts here i would say that he is not Dorian . His texts on Amazon and the fire gun blog is horrible, while here on the board it is perfect and very focused. |
|
|
|
|
I find it strange that a person wich such deep and broad interests is just found on google for fire guns, trains and stupid things on Amazon. Also his english i not good, i don't know how he used to write here on the board(what was his username?) and other non formal means. But the articles could not be writen by him, excepet if someone else was reviewing the text.
|
|
|
|
|
the family is already in flames discussing the billions they have, his woman is asking for divorce right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Now that he has nothing to hide anymore, he is probably going to throw his coins in the market
|
|
|
|
Entendi.
Mas a receita não poderia cobrar do investidor a origem do dinheiro investido? Como ficaria?
Pode, mas acho improvável. Se ocorrer você simplesmente explica que trocou os bitcoins por dinheiro, guarde provas. E a origem dos bitcoins, se necessário, fica por conta do individuo que investiu na empresa. Se preferir coloca como se tivesse entrado dinheiro, você iria imediatamente trocar por dinheiro suponho. Eu estou supondo que é um investimento que vai ficar na empresa, se for uma cessão para o seu lucro individual a situção é diferente. |
|
|
|
I'm not convinced this information has been leaked. Identity theft protection from some company such as experian isn't a bad thing to have in any case. Other than that if it is proved that your information has been leaked then don't panic, but there isn't a great deal you can do other than get a new passport, change your bank account an consider a facelift  One may even make a new official passport pretending to be you and then you become the fake yourself. |
|
|
|
Please don't use bitcoind accounts for that purpose. They weren't meant for this, and you will start to get bugs. I'm not sure what exactly happens when you try to send whole balance of one account to somewhere else. Either it will fail with an error message, or it will take the fee from the amount as I said (unlikely, I think), or - which is a disaster in your case, it will take the fee from another unspent output without you knowing it until it hits you.
What bugs? It takes the fee from the account but when you send the whole account balance it gets negative due to the fee and send the fee from the main(my own) account (which was my issue). But suppose i make my own account system as you suggested, i will have the same issue. I still have to know the fee before sending any funds or it will be taken from me. - user has funds to send X - X + FEE is larger than user funds - user sends X - the system will send X + FEE anyway cause my wallet has enough funds I need to take X + FEE from the user, and avoid sending it if the total is larger than his funds. |
|
|
|
You CAN predict the fee, and YOU are in control of setting it. The algorithm is pretty simple (at this moment, it will change in next versions): ceil((TX_SIZE_IN_BYTES) / 1000) * 0.0001 So for 250 bytes you pay 250 / 1000 * 0.0001 = 0.0001 BTC. For 3200 bytes you pay 0.0004 BTC. Etc. If the amount to send + calculated fee is bigger then the balance, you have to subtract the fee from the amount itself, so you will send less to cover up for the fee. Thanks, but now i don't know how i will predict the tx size? My withdraw code is just: $is_valid = $api->call('sendfrom',$account,$address,$btc,6); Is not there a way to just tell the wallet daemon to not allow negative balances? thanks |
|
|
|
It is impossible to have a negative balance. The bitcoin protocol does not allow it.
Are you sure? I mean on an individual account, not on the wallet toal. Here it gets negative. |
|
|
|
|
Supposing an app(running btc daemon) where the user can withdraw all the funds from his account(sendfrom comand). When the suer withdraw 100% of his balance it may go negative due to the transaction fee, and such fee will be taken from the main account. How could i avoid that? I can't predict the fee if any as far as i know? What is the solution?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
