Hi Lauda, I have enrolled for this campaign by completing all the steps that were asked. All I want to know is, am I in?
|
|
|
19RidcN96xgXkWi8gDwxcmbjjdjfrxpxvv Expect a chance, this is my last try. If I won't get accepted, I will post and improve my quality more before trying to get into any other campaign.
|
|
|
Bitcoin Address: 19RidcN96xgXkWi8gDwxcmbjjdjfrxpxvv Please give me a chance, I will update the signature and avatar immediately after acceptance.
|
|
|
I want to join in here, please give me a chance. I know you may say that I have not posted since last few days as I was not online in order to make posts, but now I am back. • FortuneJack Username: Stedsm • Current Post Count: 984 • Member Level: Hero Member Will update the signature as soon as my candidature gets accepted. EDIT: Updated the signature and avatar.
|
|
|
I am sorry to everyone, I know and I can understand that breaking rules first and then expecting to be forgiven is not a smart way to deal with the situations, but one should never break the rules itself for not letting such situations occur. I will, however, now take care of this and will never try to break them again. I just wanted to thank you Lauda, and wanted to let you know that I will be on a vacation trip with my friends for few days, so I don't know whether I will be able to come here online or not. Please don't think that I have stopped posting because of the rating, but I had been busy in shopping and will probably be more busy now with my friends, I will start contributing again to the community as soon as I get back.
|
|
|
To tone down a rating that is negative means to make it neutral.
Thanks a lot for the clarification. I need to think about it more, I'm somewhat busy at this moment. Soon™.
Please take your time and do it whenever you want. Loved the way you wrote " Soon™" Thanks for the consideration, I am happy.
|
|
|
-snip- I saw about the ban theory, and also one thing that people who are banned for the 1st time, they get it for 7 days.. -snip- All I want to ask you is, can't this be fair in case of negative trust too that the review that takes place after 30 days should be done in 7 days only and give an opportunity to someone to prove themselves innocent?
To cover some things: 1) This is not related to banning, thus this comparison i a 'false equivalency'. 2) The banning policy has become much softer since BadBear is inactive. 3) Where did you get this '30 days review' thing for negative ratings? There is no such. You may be talking about the SMAS blacklist, which has a review period (on request) 30 days after you've been added. However, that has no relevance here.
Considering the circumstances, and your mature acceptance of this situation I think that this warrants a tone down to neutral (which puts you into my watch list). However, if this has landed you on a blacklist by SMAS, then you don't get a second chance early for that. Thanks a lot for coming here and consider what I wanted to say. I am not on SMAS blacklist currently, that's what I think as I have checked the list and I don't see my name there. The only thing I didn't understand here is what I have put into bold in your statement, I mean if that's your decision to put me in your watch list, what about the negative trust that is still on my profile? When should I "expect" it to be removed or at least get changed back to neutral? Do I need to wait or will it be removed some time later? Sorry to ask like this, I feel very ashamed asking this , but just took a chance by doing so.
|
|
|
give an opportunity to someone to prove themselves innocent?
You just admitted you were guilty... Yeah I did, and that's the only reason I created this thread. I know that sorry is not a word that could get me anything here, but giving it a try is what I did. The SMAS team isnt banning you from this forum. We are not stopping you from joining in any campaign that will accept you. We are not stopping you from conducting any trades on this forum. Youre still free to go about your daily business. Traders can read the feedback and see its from spammy posting activity, not scammy trading.
With all this being said, you self admittingly agree to the feedback. So you should accept the punishment(30 days) and move on. As stated we are not banning you from the forum(7 days, 14, 30, perma), youre just not gonna be allowed in many campaigns until you change your posting style and start contributing to this forum.
Your main concern should no be money and thats what everyone seems to have a problem with. Anyone who is a positive member of the forum is on board(at least from what i see) with the SMAS movement. The only people who seem to be pissed off or butthurt are those who are depending on filling their wallets from sig campaign money. Those ppl who have been running multiple accounts over the years are whom im seeing write all the negative threads this week from alt accounts.
You should only be posting casually to earn a few bucks people. Ive said it before and im saying it again here, this is not your weekly paycheck. Get a damn job, or offer a service to earn bitcoin. Your mentality shouldnt be, i need to make 400 posts this week so i can make 200$ on the forum from my 20 accounts.
Thanks a lot yahoo for replying here, I just wanted to hear from you guys. I did the wrong thing by posting in such a way which looked spammy, but most of my posts weren't spam and were on-topic. It was just that the time during which I did all this was too short for me to show myself innocent here, which is why I am sorry as I know I did it just for the sake of payment and nothing. All week long, I was not able to make any posts due to which I took this step. Even making 20 - 40 posts a day is not an issue as I know many users do that, but the way they do it and they post helpful comments due to which they don't get such a feedback I got. And yeah, my mentality isn't what you think, yahoo. I don't think that I need to make xx posts to make xx $ on the forum with xx accounts, I don't have alts and have just one account here and I am happy to have it alone. I needed the coins, so I committed the fault. Neither am I pissed off nor butthurt, and I am grateful to SMAS for not banning me from doing anything or joining any campaigns, but as the negative marking is from a DT member, do you really think anyone, even except you guys, would give me a chance to be in a signature campaign? I know that it should not be my main purpose to make money here, but being in a signature campaign is what many members are here for. The only difference is, few take it as a side business and others depend on it to live. I am the one who takes it as a side income, but all I thought was, as ban rules are 7 days for first chance, they should be fair in case of negative marking too and give another chance at a lower pace of time. As I said previously, decision still rests in your court, and I know it's not going to change.
|
|
|
Hi Lauda, I saw that you gave me a negative trust and I am not here to fight for the same, but say sorry to you for my behavior. I know I deserved it just because I posted for the sake of payment only, and I know it was spammy. But according to your rules, we need to wait for 30 days before asking again for a review of our account. I saw about the ban theory, and also one thing that people who are banned for the 1st time, they get it for 7 days and then unbanned and get a chance to get back into a signature campaign or conduct their trades or anything. 2nd chance is 14 days and 3rd one is 30 days, the final warning after which that user gets perma-banned 4th time. All I want to ask you is, can't this be fair in case of negative trust too that the review that takes place after 30 days should be done in 7 days only and give an opportunity to someone to prove themselves innocent? I know I had a job (signature campaign) and I didn't do it right, so even I believe that this spammy behavior should not be condoned or excused, but I am just asking about a fair decision I expect from you guys, especially Mods like you. Still, it's your decision in the end, I just wanted to ask you what I had in my mind based on the fairness purpose.
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply. Does the unconfirmed input mean the bitcoins I tried to send were not confirmed in the first place..? I recieved bitcoins earlier today and on blockchain wallet, it was confirmed before I tried to send it to the betting site.
The second transaction spent the Bitcoins at 1A1zkmNuk4ujc9CaiyR5iSS6Lr3rpBXWXc, which in turn the first transaction had sent there. So the second transaction had an unconfirmed input. That's not cause to worry, though. Both transactions have been confirmed now. I missed alot of timely options, what can I do in the future to prevent confirmations taking this long. (If they even will be confirmed...)
Increase the fee rate. If your wallet consistently recommends low fee rates and doesn't give you the option to increase them your only choice is switching to a better wallet. Thanks for the help. Blockchain does let me set the transaction amounts, but you are right, i think they are pretty bad at predicting how much I need. You should be able to calculate your fee based on kbs instead of the amount that you will send. Your transactions got confirmed late because miners decide whether or not they are going to take such low fee transactions. Yes, low fee because currently, normal ongoing fee is 0.0002 btc and what you sent must have been proposed to you by blockchain, isn't it? Anyways, changing of your IP or using VPN has nothing to do with your wallets and transactions, so don't get worried next time you do it.
|
|
|
When do you think will be a best time to buy bitcoin and when is the best time to keep bitcoin first before selling?
Well, the best time to buy bitcoin when the price at $200-400 I thought and you could earn some profits by sell your coins if that's what you looking for. But, anytime is the best time to buy if you want participate in developing bitcoin which you won't loss due to bitcoin value keep increasing from time to time. If you are daily traders, quite difficult to expected fast profits as now bitcoin price seems stable enough. You will never see bitcoins again between $200 - 400 range, and the best time to buy it is now only. There are many good things coming, which will surely surge the price and let it remain stable at these high prices only.
|
|
|
Hi, While waiting for a proposal here you can check services from my list: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=985550.0There are PTC sites and even captcha typing, but if you have skills, you should find some interesting offers in freelance services. Good luck! PTC sites and captcha are just waste of time, and as OP is good in website related things, I think that he should go for Guru.comI used to work there before and once you get reputed there, there is nothing that can stop you from succeeding.
|
|
|
Billions of dollars of daily volume on Chinese exchanges (vs) Millions on european ones. Feel the difference!
but they are also many more that play in the market, 1 billion of chinese against 100M of eurpean or american or other, their influence is at least on par with their network mining superiority, so 70% Not just mining, but they can manipulate their markets hard whenever they want to. This is what is making the difference currently, but then we need to be precautious because if they get a hold on these European or American markets too, then the worst markets drive will be visible. Major factors that's helping them is their interest and money that they have, involved in bitcoins, they got a big hold on the markets through mining and money.
|
|
|
I think you should collect bitcoins first from any sources that you can, kinda faucets, signature campaigns, giveaways here and at other forums and news sites, and then you might go and invest your coins into an alt in which you have faith, and it might turn out to be the best investment and you may get your one bitcoin fast.
|
|
|
Buy some more and wait for it to reach the peak then sell. Then wait again till it gets to the bottom then buy. Rinse and repeat.
If he wanted to buy it, he would have mentioned it. He's asking for ways to grow his bitcoins and not adding his own money. OP, you should collect bitcoins as a hobby doing everything until you get a big amount, then start trading them for altcoins and ICOs, because that would possibly give a good return.
|
|
|
I don't do really good in gambling but most of my victory is coming from baccarat and roulette games, i like to play video poker and poker but my luck is not so good in that game, but overall i am still losing in each game i played so i will consider myself as "not a good gambler"
If loosing makes us a bad gambler then 99% of us are bad gamblers for sure. Actually a good gambler for me is not the one who makes high profits (he is professional actually), rather a gambler who knows how much he has to bet, when to stop and when to take a break from gambling is a tru gambler for me. You are correct at your point, but even professionals lose and none of us have the potential to win 100% of our bets. Playing anything and trying our luck everywhere is not a good thing because testing is good on one hand, but may be injurious to your wallets on the other as losing everywhere and taking experience is a bad thing.
|
|
|
I always go for localbitcoins because even when I need cash on hands, I have people easily available near my area which is cool. But I just want to alert you guys about one thing, never fall for very higher prices which seem too good to be true, because they will only scam you and you might get robbed and will be left with nothing.
|
|
|
Money management is by far the best thing actually to control self emotions and stop from being an idiot listening to our heart. It helps in listening to what our mind says is correct, in being calculative which is needed to succeed in forex or any other type of trading.
|
|
|
I would say that gambling is an addiction, such a bad habit that when gets involved in our daily life, could ruin our life completely. It is a way of making extra money by betting on something which we think might be able to provide us some extra money with their win.
|
|
|
I don't see any problems coming to anyone who would gamble under the age of 18 because if they have sources like bitcoins, no one would ask for KYC information due to which even minors can gamble. In other types of sites where KYC is needed, I don't think they would let underaged to gamble.
|
|
|
|