Bitcoin Forum
July 03, 2024, 02:36:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 [177] 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 ... 752 »
3521  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 05:53:31 AM
This is probably because confirming that she is in fact a 19 year old girl with a 15 year old brother will not prove her innocence. There are still many other issues, that alone would classify her as being very shady and untrustworthy.
Correct.I don't even know why are we investing so much time into another shady account who  hasn't scammed yet but shows the tendency that they might.

Post them here and I will address them one by one
- How many things have you addressed so far ?
 Things you need to "address"
 - Picture of your MacBook that is on the sale thread.

She posted a picture of a MacBook that matched the description of what she was selling with her writing a post in this thread upthread. I think this is address.
3522  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 05:51:57 AM
I wonder how her brother will feel when he gets to know how popular his sister is.....
Between I see no one is ready to Skype chat with Alia to verify if she has a younger brother or not. Not even the ones who painted her red. I kinda feel sad with this kind of behavior on this forum. If you are accusing someone, then give them chance to prove their innocence also. You can't just paint someone red and move on. What if she is really innocent (with respect to her brother theory)?

Although I must say, I am not a big fan of Alia either. She offers services regarding buying Bitcoins illegally in India via her relative in New Delhi. Not only she promotes illegal activities, put purchaser's money at risk (purchaser might get jailed also); but also makes way for India totally banning cryptos.
This is probably because confirming that she is in fact a 19 year old girl with a 15 year old brother will not prove her innocence. There are still many other issues, that alone would classify her as being very shady and untrustworthy.

Such as?

Post them here and I will address them one by one
The lack of proof of collateral when you tried to take your prior loan.

The misrepresentations regarding your gambling scripts (that you later corrected in this thread when called out on it).

This thread which appears as if you are trying to subtly trying to get people to engage in tax fraud (with your help).

The lack of proof of possession of the Dell laptop, although I will give you this one, even though I am hesitant to believe it was sold.

The almost certain fake investors in your naked gambling thread. This is actually a fairly major reason why I believe you are not who you say you are -- if you are a camgirl, I would understand that some people might get off on you doing this, however if you are not, then you may have been paying a camgirl to do this for you, and closing the thread will both reduce this expense, and make an appearance of trustworthiness. Also, you claim that your brother was one of your customers (WTF?). 

There are probably more.
3523  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 05:33:59 AM
I wonder how her brother will feel when he gets to know how popular his sister is.....
Between I see no one is ready to Skype chat with Alia to verify if she has a younger brother or not. Not even the ones who painted her red. I kinda feel sad with this kind of behavior on this forum. If you are accusing someone, then give them chance to prove their innocence also. You can't just paint someone red and move on. What if she is really innocent (with respect to her brother theory)?

Although I must say, I am not a big fan of Alia either. She offers services regarding buying Bitcoins illegally in India via her relative in New Delhi. Not only she promotes illegal activities, put purchaser's money at risk (purchaser might get jailed also); but also makes way for India totally banning cryptos.
This is probably because confirming that she is in fact a 19 year old girl with a 15 year old brother will not prove her innocence. There are still many other issues, that alone would classify her as being very shady and untrustworthy.
3524  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 05:23:16 AM
How about the fact that it was only tested for 10 minutes, you only gave it one try. You also seem familar with the gambler's fallacy, something you'd know would disprove her/his theory.
About the gambler's fallacy, I thought it was only for half/half games such as roulette and dice? I am very unfamiliar with crash websites, sorry.

No, the gambler's fallacy can be applied to any gambling situation as one who practices this fallacy is embracing the illogic that "past results can be indicative of future results".

A -EV (negative expected value) bet means that once placed, the bet is no longer worth the monetary value attached to the bet. So unless you get some kind of pleasure in playing -EV games, you should not play them as you are expected to lose money.
I honestly have no idea what you mean, sorry.
I think others have quoted your posts in this thread that indicate otherwise. I am not sure if you are an alt of her, if you were paid to give what was clearly an endorsement for a scam, or some other shady dealing, but in any case you have shown yourself to be untrustworthy.
3525  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: How to run a signature campaign? on: February 28, 2018, 05:03:58 AM
I am on the verge of launching my ICO and want to buy a bitcointalk Hero Member account.
Is there any place where these accounts are sold?

Also I want to run a signature campaign. Kindly someone explain to me what a signature campaign is and how to run it?

As you can see people have already suggested you NOT to do this. And if you go through with it anyway, there'll be negative consequences for your accounts and your ICO. Trust me we have good detectives here.
Instead, spend some money and hire a campaign manager, like myself.
Very interesting logic you present here...

I had not previously drawn the connection between purchased accounts and signature campaign managers. (I do know in the past, what were very clearly purchased accounts were used to manage signature campaigns of various projects, likely run by those behind the project, some successful, some less successful, and some shady)
3526  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 04:39:31 AM
Also, it's okay, I don't need your apology. Do whatever you want. Turns out all that sweet-talking via PM was fake; I was actually starting to really really like you. There's no need to be an asshole to people without proper evidence. You're becoming just like the rest of them.

* nullius sobs quietly into a pillow.

Hello?  Alia, honey?  You still there?

I want for you to know that I was on your side all along.  I only faked being strict and tough so as to pull a sly one on theymos and ibminer and all those other big meanies, to buy time while I searched for the real killers looked for evidence which would prove your total innocence.

Please help me out here.  Please.  I’ve got tears streaming down my cheeks as I write this.  I am heartbroken!

Please, I am begging you on my knees, help me find some exculpatory evidence.  The video interview won’t fly, because we don’t have a suitable interviewer (and with your credibility now a thousandfold shot to hell, nobody in a trusted position would waste time with it).  “Dave” from Podunk Wallet Recovery Service with a domain name registered five minutes ago will not cut it; this is a tough crowd we’re playing to here!  You have got to give me something good.

I don’t know how I can live, if you turn out to be fake.  I may kill myself.  Please, Alia, please help me prove that you are real!
wtf? lol?
3527  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 04:02:35 AM
I guess that settles it - it's a different Dave.
Honestly, at this point you might as well give it up. Your reputation is pretty much gone as far as I am concerned. Further (immediate) attempts to legitimize yourself are only going to make you appear more like a scammer.
3528  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Lauda/TMAN/minifrij extortion attempt on: February 28, 2018, 02:47:46 AM

I do not think it is related. I think it is relevant because of the user "aTriz". Read my thread. Wink
Well it seems your thread is another example of Lauda attempting to distract from serious allegations involving his friends and business partners. He came pretty close to being successful at derailing the thread, and probably would have if theymos had not looked into the incident.

Oh man. Both of you are suffering from persecutory delusions. I give a shit on you and also on Lauda. The only thing you both do all day is to blame you. Like little kids. My God, grow up. Both of you should leave your house more to enjoy your life. Which adult person has "enemies" on the internet? You do not need to answer my question at all. I will not discuss with you or with anyone else about your toddler disputes.  Roll Eyes
Lol. Noted.
3529  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Is bitcoinfees.earn.com systematically overestimating fees? on: February 28, 2018, 02:38:50 AM
If you assume transaction volume drops off on weekends (and holidays), then changing the formula to only take 72 hours of data into consideration then transaction fee estimates will always be high on the weekend and will be too low on Monday/Tuesday, possibly to the extent using that fee rate will result in a transaction that won’t confirm (until the weekend).

That's missing where the problem is. From what I've seen all the mining pools are all using a 72hr expiry so earn.com is factoring in transactions that the miners will never include in blocks. That is what is inflating their estimation.

If a valid transaction does not get confirmed after 72 hours of being broadcast, it will be because the tx fee was too low. Including transactions that will never confirm (because the tx fee is too low) means the estimate will be lower, not higher.

That argument also ignores the potential for users to rebroadcast their transactions after xx time, which is often sufficient to get a transaction "unstuck".
3530  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 01:20:16 AM
Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.


There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.


edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.
I did read your thread. You were implying there is a short term advantage to using your script.
the script is [...] is not subject to the long-run house edge advantage

That quote is also not in the OP, and was in response to someone pointing out that what you were claiming to offer is impossible.

I am saying that if the script is run for 10-20 minutes, then 9/10 times, there will be a high ROI. This is what I have experienced, and it is what I can prove.
I don't see your 9/10 times disclaimer anywhere in your thread. Nor is that stat correct assuming a 1% house edge (most likely, and assuming there are not any kind of YOLO-type bets )
3531  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 01:12:57 AM
Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.


There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.


edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.
I did read your thread. You were implying there is a short term advantage to using your script.
the script is [...] is not subject to the long-run house edge advantage

That quote is also not in the OP, and was in response to someone pointing out that what you were claiming to offer is impossible.
3532  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 01:01:12 AM
Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is? Roll Eyes
The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.

I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.
Lauda's go to answer for anyone critical of him is that they are an alt of QS. If you look through his history he will never give a straight answer (at least publicly, where he can be called out) to concerns that people bring up.
3533  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 12:58:26 AM
Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.


There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.


edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.
3534  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Lauda/TMAN/minifrij extortion attempt on: February 28, 2018, 12:54:54 AM

I do not think it is related. I think it is relevant because of the user "aTriz". Read my thread. Wink
Well it seems your thread is another example of Lauda attempting to distract from serious allegations involving his friends and business partners. He came pretty close to being successful at derailing the thread, and probably would have if theymos had not looked into the incident.
3535  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 12:50:17 AM
Maybe you could start with addressing the original concerns in the OP, which could be primarily done by:
It is weird that someone would enter into a three year signature campaign. Who is to say that aTriz will have something to advertise sex months from now, let alone three years from now.

When physical items are being sold, it is customary around here to post a picture of said item with a piece of paper that has the date written on it, along with the username of the person selling the item. This will prove the seller at the very least has possession of said item.

Thanks for the information, I was not aware of this. I'm happy that at least one good thing came out of this thread.


I sent a picture of me typing out the literal post I sent minutes after. If that is not good enough proof, then I will send a "timestamped" image once I am back from college.
I am satisfied with the trezor and mac, however, I would want to see more evidence of possession of the Dell XPS.


I am also concerned about trying to sell a gambling script that is fairly clearly not giving anything of value to a gambler.

Lastly, I am interested if you have evidence of possession of the coins you claim to have as collateral here.
3536  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 12:35:07 AM
Maybe you could start with addressing the original concerns in the OP, which could be primarily done by:
It is weird that someone would enter into a three year signature campaign. Who is to say that aTriz will have something to advertise sex months from now, let alone three years from now.

When physical items are being sold, it is customary around here to post a picture of said item with a piece of paper that has the date written on it, along with the username of the person selling the item. This will prove the seller at the very least has possession of said item.

Thanks for the information, I was not aware of this. I'm happy that at least one good thing came out of this thread.


I'm 100% down for that. I would prefer nullius, condoras, aTriz, RHavar, theymos, Lauda - any of them. Let's put an end to the speculation, let me prove it to you.
Thanks, but no. I do not do video calls for several reasons. I'm really not sure who is *trustworthy* enough and is willing to do this. I've crossed out the people who should not do this or do not want to (me).
I agree, you probably would be unable to get a good handle of if they are telling the truth in two minutes.
3537  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 28, 2018, 12:19:02 AM
It will now follow a long post from me, but first I have to collect some information!



Edit:

My post should show you all, what climate prevails in this forum. Triggered by a few DT members. Yes, this account is obviously an old account. No, it is not an old account of OS, OG or anyone else who often appears. I will not say what my other account is called, because I'm afraid of hostility from Lauda and her entourage. This only shows me that I can not trust Lauda and her entourage. But I also do not trust OS and OG, because they also seem very suspect to me!

At this point I would like to thank the user "ibminer" as well as the user "Vod". ibminer, because he got the thing rolling.. I would like to thank Vod, because in one thread of her he advised against doing direct business with her. Unfortunately, I can not find his post anymore.

From here I would like to warn against aTriz and nullius.

nullius write as much as you like, but I can remember a post in which he wrote that he met alia in person (I'll look for this post, but maybe someone could help me.). Suddenly he writes that he has never had contact with her except in the forum. Therefore, please be warned and question his actions especially!

aTriz I do not buy it, that he did not know about the scam and I think he is involved, so I advise you to be careful when doing business with him. I'm sorry, I've found you to be very trustworthy, now you've proven to me that you're the opposite!

I find it "surprising" that all who defended and supported alia before now suddenly act as if they did not know this person and only call them "user". In addition, they now all pretend they knew it. Of course they have never warned you before. Super smart seem to these people (some unfortunately also DT member) probably not to be.

As I said, I will collect more information. Take care that some people do not suddenly delete / change posts to cover their tracks.

That should be read by the admin. Please note the part in which I explain that I have to create an alt account to denounce suspected persons in the district of Lauda. One should not be afraid of a DT member, but unfortunately, Lauda makes you feel like you should not attack anybody from Lauda's entourage, because otherwise you'll be painted red. I repeat again. I am neither an old account of OS, OG or anyone else who has ever been in negative contact with Lauda. I trust neither OS nor OG nor Lauda!
Its QS buddy. Not OS
3538  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 27, 2018, 11:04:54 PM

If a 15-year-old boy could fool theymos with a pull and tuck, then the “verification” procedure is pretty much useless.
I know this is crazy, but I think there is a small chance, perhaps at least 1% that the verification process does not involve looking at naked pictures of the people whose identity he is verifying.

You do however retain the right to do what you want with your free time and can continue to dress as you wish. I am not sure how interested people around here are in this kind of expertise  Cheesy
3539  Economy / Reputation / Re: Why I think User "alia" is a (potential) scammer? User "aTriz" maybe involved! on: February 27, 2018, 03:39:08 PM
It is weird that someone would enter into a three year signature campaign. Who is to say that aTriz will have something to advertise sex months from now, let alone three years from now.

When physical items are being sold, it is customary around here to post a picture of said item with a piece of paper that has the date written on it, along with the username of the person selling the item. This will prove the seller at the very least has possession of said item.
3540  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Lauda/TMAN/minifrij extortion attempt on: February 27, 2018, 02:58:12 PM
Why do you think this is related
Pages: « 1 ... 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 [177] 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 ... 752 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!