Evidence of alias (u=1764044) long con scam!

[scam_detector]

Maybe you could start with addressing the original concerns in the OP, which could be primarily done by:

It is weird that someone would enter into a three year signature campaign. Who is to say that aTriz will have something to advertise sex months from now, let alone three years from now.

When physical items are being sold, it is customary around here to post a picture of said item with a piece of paper that has the date written on it, along with the username of the person selling the item. This will prove the seller at the very least has possession of said item.

Thanks for the information, I was not aware of this. I'm happy that at least one good thing came out of this thread.

I'm 100% down for that. I would prefer nullius, condoras, aTriz, RHavar, theymos, Lauda - any of them. Let's put an end to the speculation, let me prove it to you.

Thanks, but no. I do not do video calls for several reasons. I'm really not sure who is *trustworthy* enough and is willing to do this. I've crossed out the people who should not do this or do not want to (me).

I agree, you probably would be unable to get a good handle of if they are telling the truth in two minutes.

I sent a picture of me typing out the literal post I sent minutes after. If that is not good enough proof, then I will send a "timestamped" image once I am back from college.

Could you please read the posts correctly before answering. This is about the three year contract between you and aTriz! But I think you do it on purpose. 

Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is?

I am a scam detector. That's why people like you are a problem for me! You may do everything to get money, but some of us have morality and decency. So again, people like you are a problem for me.

[1714833170]

1714833170

[1714833170]

1714833170

[1714833170]

1714833170

[alia]

Maybe you could start with addressing the original concerns in the OP, which could be primarily done by:

It is weird that someone would enter into a three year signature campaign. Who is to say that aTriz will have something to advertise sex months from now, let alone three years from now.

When physical items are being sold, it is customary around here to post a picture of said item with a piece of paper that has the date written on it, along with the username of the person selling the item. This will prove the seller at the very least has possession of said item.

Thanks for the information, I was not aware of this. I'm happy that at least one good thing came out of this thread.

I'm 100% down for that. I would prefer nullius, condoras, aTriz, RHavar, theymos, Lauda - any of them. Let's put an end to the speculation, let me prove it to you.

Thanks, but no. I do not do video calls for several reasons. I'm really not sure who is *trustworthy* enough and is willing to do this. I've crossed out the people who should not do this or do not want to (me).

I agree, you probably would be unable to get a good handle of if they are telling the truth in two minutes.

I sent a picture of me typing out the literal post I sent minutes after. If that is not good enough proof, then I will send a "timestamped" image once I am back from college.

Could you please read the posts correctly before answering. This is about the three year contract between you and aTriz! But I think you do it on purpose.  

Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is?

I am a scam detector. That's why people like you are a problem for me! You may do everything to get money, but some of us have morality and decency. So again, people like you are a problem for me.

Did... did you just say that being part of a signature campaign is morally wrong and indecent? You just insulted thousands of people, including Lauda. You really are nothing more than degenerate scum.

[Quickseller]

Maybe you could start with addressing the original concerns in the OP, which could be primarily done by:

It is weird that someone would enter into a three year signature campaign. Who is to say that aTriz will have something to advertise sex months from now, let alone three years from now.

When physical items are being sold, it is customary around here to post a picture of said item with a piece of paper that has the date written on it, along with the username of the person selling the item. This will prove the seller at the very least has possession of said item.

Thanks for the information, I was not aware of this. I'm happy that at least one good thing came out of this thread.

I sent a picture of me typing out the literal post I sent minutes after. If that is not good enough proof, then I will send a "timestamped" image once I am back from college.

I am satisfied with the trezor and mac, however, I would want to see more evidence of possession of the Dell XPS.


I am also concerned about trying to sell a gambling script that is fairly clearly not giving anything of value to a gambler.

Lastly, I am interested if you have evidence of possession of the coins you claim to have as collateral here.

[scam_detector]

Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is?

The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.

I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.

[alia]

Maybe you could start with addressing the original concerns in the OP, which could be primarily done by:

It is weird that someone would enter into a three year signature campaign. Who is to say that aTriz will have something to advertise sex months from now, let alone three years from now.

When physical items are being sold, it is customary around here to post a picture of said item with a piece of paper that has the date written on it, along with the username of the person selling the item. This will prove the seller at the very least has possession of said item.

Thanks for the information, I was not aware of this. I'm happy that at least one good thing came out of this thread.

I sent a picture of me typing out the literal post I sent minutes after. If that is not good enough proof, then I will send a "timestamped" image once I am back from college.

I am satisfied with the trezor and mac, however, I would want to see more evidence of possession of the Dell XPS.


I am also concerned about trying to sell a gambling script that is fairly clearly not giving anything of value to a gambler.

Lastly, I am interested if you have evidence of possession of the coins you claim to have as collateral here.

I no longer possess the XPS, as I sold it. And I don't need to prove it, because I am no longer trying to sell it on here.

Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.

[Lauda]

Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is?

The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.

I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.

Yeah, nobody in their right mind would believe that. The thread is a subtle, yet still obvious, attack on those not involved. Anyone who agrees with Quickscammer is usually (but obviously not always) shady or dishonest in some way, as expected. The thread would have been quite more credible had you not intended to pull in innocent people into this.
See, the scammer is attempting to derail the thread in several subtle ways.

[Quickseller]

Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.

There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.

edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

[Quickseller]

Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is?

The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.

I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.

Lauda's go to answer for anyone critical of him is that they are an alt of QS. If you look through his history he will never give a straight answer (at least publicly, where he can be called out) to concerns that people bring up.

[alia]

Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.

There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.

edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.

[scam_detector]

Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is?

The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.

I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.

Yeah, nobody in their right mind would believe that. The thread is a subtle, yet still obvious, attack on those not involved. Anyone who agrees with Quickscammer is usually (but obviously not always) shady or dishonest in some way, as expected. The thread would have been quite more credible had you not intended to pull in innocent people into this.

That's your problem. You think your fight against QS should also be a fight of mine. QS thinks of a fight against you, it should also be a fight against me. You two see everything in black and white. I give a fuck on both of you, because you both just spread problems. I admit that I trust QS less than you, but in sum both are untrustworthy in my eyes. And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.

aTriz has put himself in this situation. I also do not think that aTriz is stupid, so I believe that another intention of aTriz is behind it. That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.

[alia]

Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is?

The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.

I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.

Yeah, nobody in their right mind would believe that. The thread is a subtle, yet still obvious, attack on those not involved. Anyone who agrees with Quickscammer is usually (but obviously not always) shady or dishonest in some way, as expected. The thread would have been quite more credible had you not intended to pull in innocent people into this.

That's your problem. You think your fight against QS should also be a fight of mine. QS thinks of a fight against you, it should also be a fight against me. You two see everything in black and white. I give a fuck on both of you, because you both just spread problems. I admit that I trust QS less than you, but in sum both are untrustworthy in my eyes. And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.

aTriz has put himself in this situation. I also do not think that aTriz is stupid, so I believe that another intention of aTriz is behind it. That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.

mdayonliner, you deserve to be painted red. You are accusing some very upstanding members of shady shit without proof. Don't be a pussy.

[Quickseller]

Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.

There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.

edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.

I did read your thread. You were implying there is a short term advantage to using your script.

the script is [...] is not subject to the long-run house edge advantage

That quote is also not in the OP, and was in response to someone pointing out that what you were claiming to offer is impossible.

[alia]

Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.

There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.

edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.

I did read your thread. You were implying there is a short term advantage to using your script.

the script is [...] is not subject to the long-run house edge advantage

That quote is also not in the OP, and was in response to someone pointing out that what you were claiming to offer is impossible.

I am saying that if the script is run for 10-20 minutes, then 9/10 times, there will be a high ROI. This is what I have experienced, and it is what I can prove.

[scam_detector]

Alright. I came with an offer for a signature campaign to aTriz, he accepted, and we entered a contract. May I ask what your problem is?

The problem for Quickscammer (aka the Forum's Iago) is that aTriz works with me, with whom he has a very sick obsession. Depending on who OP is, there are several possibilities. That contract is not even relevant to the accusation against you at all.

I had nothing against aTriz. I have previously classified him as very trustworthy, but when he did business with alia I questioned his trustworthiness. You are now trying to make me a culprit. But you're used to that. Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.

Yeah, nobody in their right mind would believe that. The thread is a subtle, yet still obvious, attack on those not involved. Anyone who agrees with Quickscammer is usually (but obviously not always) shady or dishonest in some way, as expected. The thread would have been quite more credible had you not intended to pull in innocent people into this.

That's your problem. You think your fight against QS should also be a fight of mine. QS thinks of a fight against you, it should also be a fight against me. You two see everything in black and white. I give a fuck on both of you, because you both just spread problems. I admit that I trust QS less than you, but in sum both are untrustworthy in my eyes. And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.

aTriz has put himself in this situation. I also do not think that aTriz is stupid, so I believe that another intention of aTriz is behind it. That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.

mdayonliner, you deserve to be painted red. You are accusing some very upstanding members of shady shit without proof. Don't be a pussy.

Call me what you want, but I'm not one of the user mentioned here.

Please do not send sMerits to this account! This account is only to find and expose scammer.

[Lauda]

And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.

No, you would not. You are confusing me with someone else from another 'entourage'. Just because I vehemently disagree with the way that you've handled this, that doesn't mean I would tag you for it. Trying to spread a false rumor that legitimate people are terrified or should be terrified of me is just nonsense.

That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.

You're supposed to know that someone is questionable before evidence is presented against them how exactly? I guess I forgot to teach aTriz how to be a fortune teller. P.S. You made a contradictory mistake.

Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.

I therefore ask a DT (not Lauda or the others from the "entourage") to watch aTriz, because what is going on there is very fishy.  I believe that both are involved in this scam.

Your whole thread setup was exactly that, negative of both aTriz and me who are not related to Alia. I think after hundreds of these attacks, I developed a new sense for them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Before someone attempts to edit stuff, thread archived: https://archive.fo/qPLZa.

[alia]

And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.

No, you would not. You are confusing me with someone else from another 'entourage'. Just because I vehemently disagree with the way that you've handled this, that doesn't mean I would tag you for it. Trying to spread a false rumor that legitimate people are terrified or should be terrified of me is just nonsense.

That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.

You're supposed to know that someone is questionable before evidence is presented against them how exactly? I guess I forgot to teach aTriz how to be a fortune teller. P.S. You made a contradictory mistake.

Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.

I therefore ask a DT (not Lauda or the others from the "entourage") to watch aTriz, because what is going on there is very fishy.  I believe that both are involved in this scam.

Your whole thread setup was exactly that, negative of both aTriz and me who are not related to Alia. I think after hundreds of these attacks, I developed a new sense for them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Before someone attempts to edit stuff, thread archived: https://archive.fo/qPLZa.

He's just a cock with a vendetta against you and aTriz, and he's using me to get people to subconsciously be distrustful of you.

[Quickseller]

Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.

There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.

edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.

I did read your thread. You were implying there is a short term advantage to using your script.

the script is [...] is not subject to the long-run house edge advantage

That quote is also not in the OP, and was in response to someone pointing out that what you were claiming to offer is impossible.

I am saying that if the script is run for 10-20 minutes, then 9/10 times, there will be a high ROI. This is what I have experienced, and it is what I can prove.

I don't see your 9/10 times disclaimer anywhere in your thread. Nor is that stat correct assuming a 1% house edge (most likely, and assuming there are not any kind of YOLO-type bets )

[alia]

Tell me - why does anyone even consider using a gambling script? In the end, the game is always EV- for players, right? Absolutely true, but I am simply giving people the script that gave ME results and continues to give me results. I have clients on here who can vouch for me (SyGambler, nullius) and I invite anyone to give me an empty account (with faucet bits) that I will run the script on, and I will generate profit for them. No point of saying it doesn't work without trying it.

There are plenty of gambling strategies that have high probabilities of producing returns in the short run. This does not however change the odds in any way, which is what you are representing.

edit: I still want to see evidence of possession of the coins you claimed to have for collateral for the loan, as of when you opened that thread.

I have made it abundantly clear that the odds are ALWAYS in favour of the casino. Check my thread.

I did read your thread. You were implying there is a short term advantage to using your script.

the script is [...] is not subject to the long-run house edge advantage

That quote is also not in the OP, and was in response to someone pointing out that what you were claiming to offer is impossible.

I am saying that if the script is run for 10-20 minutes, then 9/10 times, there will be a high ROI. This is what I have experienced, and it is what I can prove.

I don't see your 9/10 times disclaimer anywhere in your thread. Nor is that stat correct assuming a 1% house edge (most likely, and assuming there are not any kind of YOLO-type bets )

It's based on my, and clients', experiences.

[scam_detector]

And here you can see why I had to create an alt account. Had I not done it, I would have been branded now and would always be afraid that you would paint me red.

No, you would not. You are confusing me with someone else from another 'entourage'. Just because I vehemently disagree with the way that you've handled this, that doesn't mean I would tag you for it. Trying to spread a false rumor that legitimate people are terrified or should be terrified of me is just nonsense.

That's not my fault if he acts with questionable persons.

You're supposed to know that someone is questionable before evidence is presented against them how exactly? I guess I forgot to teach aTriz how to be a fortune teller. P.S. You made a contradictory mistake.

Like I said, I'm an alt account that has never been in negative or positive contact with Lauda, ​​QS, OG, etc. I now know more exactly who I can trust and who can not.

I therefore ask a DT (not Lauda or the others from the "entourage") to watch aTriz, because what is going on there is very fishy.  I believe that both are involved in this scam.

Your whole thread setup was exactly that, negative of both aTriz and me who are not related to Alia. I think after hundreds of these attacks, I developed a new sense for them. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Before someone attempts to edit stuff, thread archived: https://archive.fo/qPLZa.

I believe I have explained enough why I trust neither you nor aTriz nor any of the other people (your enemies (QS, OG etc.) (so ridiculous that ADULT people have "enemies" on the internet)) who are constantly
have to fight their controversy in this forum.   It does not make any sense to argue with you all anyway. All of you always want to be right. Like toddlers. Grow up and do not bother us with your fight.

[nullius]

I have been lurking quietly whilst waiting to see if Alia would send me a PM.  I expressed my such intents to several people, including theymos.

This has not occurred; and I can no longer sit this out when issues are being deliberately confused by certain persons.  OP is a liar, and I have first-hand knowledge that #1887512 “scam_detector” is maliciously stating false and incorrect information:

From here I would like to warn against aTriz and nullius.

nullius write as much as you like, but I can remember a post in which he wrote that he met alia in person (I'll look for this post, but maybe someone could help me.). Suddenly he writes that he has never had contact with her except in the forum. Therefore, please be warned and question his actions especially!

It was clear to me from the first that this thread was a troll attack on me and on certain persons associated with me.  I gave it zero credibility until RGBKey, Joel_Jantsen, and ibminer put me on alert.  Whether a troll got lucky, or something else is going on here, I do not know.

I have more to say about new developments since my last post.  Will do.  Immediately, I must make a few things clear for the record:

• I am a pseudonymous user.  I connect to this forum through Tor; and I am quite careful about my identity.  Nobody on this forum (except me) has any idea whatsoever of my age, the continent on which I am physically situate, etc.  To suggest that I publicly discussed meeting another user IRL is preposterous.  If you wish to call me a liar:  Put up or shut up.  Cough up a link to the post.
• The attacks on aTriz’s signature campaign contract are clearly spurious.  aTriz saw a rising-star user account, made a business decision, and locked in a contract.  I don’t see what’s so difficult to understand about that.  I also don’t see any evidence that it occurred otherwise.
• I see that Alia immediately latched onto (at least) three points which I stated in my prior posts:  Care in determining innocence versus guilt, avoidance of a lynch mob (as to which I had linked a djb essay), and my off-the-cuff “little brother” hypothesis.  This would occur either in case of total innocence (and some astonishing coincidences), or total guilt.  theymos has suggested what I believe to be adequate means for the person controlling account #1764044 to adequately demonstrate that an Alia exists, is a 19-year-old girl, and has a 15-year-old brother.  In the absence of that demonstration being made, I will book bets⁰ on 1000000:1 odds that the IP evidence is conclusive.  Stranger things have happened, but—oh so very rarely.  Curiously enough, an innocent person would also understand how bad this looks.

For one thing I take responsibility:  I quite deliberately did what I could to bring another account instant fame and a rather high-level circle of admirers.  My first, last, and only concern is the truth here.  It is clear to me that somebody is opportunistically mud-slinging with lies and distorted half-truths amidst a very serious investigation.  That is distracting from the focus on aforestated first, last, and only concern.

Note:  I do not here reach the issues about the gambling script because frankly, I do not understand enough gambling.  Having interacted with RGBKey in Dev & Tech, I trust his technical correctness, and will defer to that.

(I will make a follow-up post with some interesting questions...)


P.S., quick question:  Alia, you have repeatedly said “scam_detector” = “mdayonliner”.  Why?  On what evidence?

0. For the record, this is a rhetorical flourish amidst all the gambling discussion.  I am not actually booking bets on this.