|
Hey Ryan, not sure if this has been asked yet, but are there plans to accept any altcoins later? Like allow betting through CLAM, DOGE, LTC, whatever?
|
|
|
|
Great news everyone, Moneypot has incorporated!
This is awesome! And even better news (at least for me,  ) -- my main account magically started working after the last update to the site! Lobos said something about database cleaning mebbe acct. stats for u were needin fix. It wasn't stats, though... basically if I logged into my main account, the site would non-stop time out on me. All other MP sites worked flawlessly. If I logged into an alt account, I could access BB with no problems. Swapping between the two would result in main not working, alt working. But now it's working so I'm going to hope it stays that way, lol. |
|
|
|
bustabit... has half as many crashes
This is completely false. I've run multiple comparisons between the two (I actively play on both sites) and have found them to be equal. I don't get where these claims are coming from. The only difference is that with BAB there is a higher player pool, so the bonuses are bigger (note: bonuses are what push you over the house edge into +ev). Past that, both have been working the same as far as I can tell. |
|
|
|
Great news everyone, Moneypot has incorporated!
This is awesome! And even better news (at least for me, ) -- my main account magically started working after the last update to the site! |
|
|
|
Hello sir, I want to ask why the bet id is not consecutive? i see just only me play there but why the bet id sometime jump see tmage  I believe bets are based on MP's system, such that its ID is shared among all other MP sites. |
|
|
|
Giving 100 bits to the first 20 users (new or old) to type !freebits in chat (it will be done manually), AND post here with your moneypot username.
Your moneypot account must be at least 7 days old, and wagered at least 1000 bits in total on moneypot sites.
Just did! Username is same as here (Ranlo). |
|
|
|
I don't really get this... Who is paying for us to tag addresses?
You should explain how can anyone win BTC with this...
Ok I can add maptags with my fried's addresses but for what purpose?
His theory is that you'd take a tag like "amazon," so that the URL is mapta.gs/amazon, and then when Amazon wants to use that tag, they'd buy it from you. The issue is this system is more convoluted than it should be, and everything it does is already done by other systems. So for earn some BTC we need to sell the domain to demand/buyer right? so in this case we need to promote the link/address which we have already shorten right? actually who pays us? Yes, and who would pay is who (if anyone) wanted to buy that link. |
|
|
|
Septembers raffle prizes will be HUGE.... are you an Xbox or Playstation fan? Two winners, two choices; full announcement coming after August raffle winner is chosen on September 1st! Question: How do I earn these raffle tickets BetterBets?? Answer: Very simple here is a raffle structure, higher base bets will earn tickets faster: 1) Bets > 1 BTC count as 2500 rolls towards a raffle ticket (ie: 5 raffle tickets per 1 BTC roll)
2) Bets > 0.1 BTC count as 250 rolls towards a raffle ticket (1/2 raffle ticket)
3) Bets > 0.001 BTC count as 25 rolls towards a raffle ticket (1/20th raffle ticket)
4) Bets > 0.0001 BTC count as 10 rolls towards a raffle ticket (1/50th raffle ticket)
5) Bets > 0.000001 BTC count as 1 roll towards a raffle ticket (1/500th raffle ticket)
6) Bets < 0.000001 BTC do not count towards a raffle ticket
Good luck to all players on this month's raffle at BetterBets.io! Awesome prizes! Are you still doing the "or equivalent value in BTC" deal or is it just the systems this time? |
|
|
|
I think they already pay a lot for us doing nothing extra. These campaigns are supposed to be some free extra coins...not a job. They could all lower the rates and still fill up no matter what. Perfect example of beggars can't be choosers.
The sad part is most of the people that complain about the rates are people who would make a lot more if they'd quit being lazy and get a real job. 0.1 BTC is ~100-150 posts in most campaigns, if not more. That's $23. You can work at McDonald's and earn more than that in 3 hours, with less work AND get benefits like health/school/etc, discounted food, etc. |
|
|
|
real houses (like brick)
My house isn't real?  Didn't mean it like that... I basically view them in tiers (due to where I live): 1) RV 2) Mobile 3) Wooden 4) Brick (house) I did some thinking and I believe the reason why there aren't brick houses there is due to the heat and such, which could cause them to crumble/settle/etc. |
|
|
|
I don't think 0.02btc can somehow can make any profit but if you put effert in it then sure you will get profit in it too..how about invest in it on any gambling site's bankroll..or try to improve your trading skills with this
Well scattering it through many altcoins is also a good idea, but you have to choose them carefully. There are many ICO scams nowadays, devs just make 10-20 btc scam coins, they bankroll, and then abandon the project, then it either dies or it gets picked up by another scammer that also demands money. So you can make money but its risky, try investing in more reputable devs (sr member or above) and who are dedicated and serious about their coin.Don't take the rank into consideration, accounts can be bought for much less than 10-20 BTC. Even the trust is not a good indicator because there are flaws in the trust system and sometimes people sell accounts with positive trust too Yea but then its a deterring factor, if the scammer has to risk his own money then its more unlikely to scam people. Most ICO scams are created with newbie accounts, so you can already filter out 80-85% of the scams if you take into account rank. You can filter out 100% of the scams if you take into account the projects that don't even follow basic business logic. 99.9% of the people on this forum are investing in crap blindly, with no idea what they're doing. THIS is why the scams continue to work. If people would stop being morons, scams wouldn't work and they'd all disappear. But as long as people throw their money at random projects saying "LOL NEW PROJECT IM GUNNA BE SO RICH MEN BCUS BITCOIN MAKES US ALL BILENAIRS," this is never going to change. |
|
|
|
It's still up for the campaign managers to up their rates. After all, even if $ value of bitcoin goes down, would the quality of posts made by users go up if campaign managers raise their rates? They would still get the same level of advertising without any actual effect on their service, so why raise it when they really get what they want?
Increasing the rates probably means less qualitative posts and more spamming in general to earn as much money as possible  That's what it is. The quality per post wouldn't actually change in case campaign managers raise their rates. A campaign manager could actually check the posts of each user one by one, but that is such a tedious work to do on the manager's end. It's not that much work at all. Assuming there's, say 50 users, and each made 200 posts, that can be done in around an hour. Some of these campaign managers are earning multiple BTC per week/month, which is more than enough to pay for it. |
|
|
|
Our largest ever win: https://www.bustabit.com/game/1771047by kingprawn winning 9.4 BTC profit on his 0.5 BTC bet, letting him cashout a net 6 BTC from this session, and a total of 25.8 bitcoin all together. Sorry about the shameless shilling, just need to get some value for my moneyHe's gone even higher than that.  41 BTC profit as of now (assuming he won't lose any) According to 8/25/2015 preev.com, that's $9,229. This is awesome! I took 5k bits, built up to 9k, and lost them all. Huge respect for those that build up a lot more than that, . |
|
|
|
I don't really get this... Who is paying for us to tag addresses?
You should explain how can anyone win BTC with this...
Ok I can add maptags with my fried's addresses but for what purpose?
His theory is that you'd take a tag like "amazon," so that the URL is mapta.gs/amazon, and then when Amazon wants to use that tag, they'd buy it from you. The issue is this system is more convoluted than it should be, and everything it does is already done by other systems. |
|
|
|
1) It would keep from writing a script that constantly (x period) crawls the entire site, pulling images and everything (which would be a waste of bandwidth on your end)
A crawler script should not be loading the images, unless you are automating your entire browser or something. Any crawler scripts should load only the html markup which is still a lot more text than an api but it's not "too much" compared to the images. I was thinking about using something like a document import through PHP (it's been a while, but basically just pull in the page and parse what's needed from there). I figured that would also include images and such as well? Using something like file_get_contents(url)? That would only include the html markup text and not include any images. However lets not derail this thread too much, if you would like to chat a bit more PM me. Thanks, and you got it. I'm new to parsing data still, :p. I need to get into actually reading specific blocks but I suck with reg expressions. Anyways, you're right -- no more derailing, . No problem! With a little effort we could include filtering via URL. One question though. Why do you want to automatically grab the products with prices? I'm going to be expanding my game site to give each game its own page, and on that page it'll have places to buy from, along with the current prices, so people can compare up-to-the-minute prices for games across different places (g2a, K4C, Amazon, eBay, etc.). Essentially, it helps give some added value and save buyers some time. |
|
|
|
Could you please explain a bit more? Like a section for listing gameshop websites with affiliate programs or something like allkeyshop.com?
So, basically, my site deals with gaming news/reviews/guides/etc., but that's really all. The idea is to completely reorganize the site so that each game has its very own page, and part of that is going to have information about its publisher/release date/type/etc. etc. From here, it will also list places to purchase from (price, site address, any other relevant information). I'm actually planning to make it much more elaborate than that, but that's the high-level version. And I do plan to actually set up a shop as well at some point, but I'm not sure when. Essentially, though, it'll tie into all of that regardless. Think of it as being like Amazon. While they sell items as well, they also link to third parties so visitors can choose the one that is cheapest at the time. Hope that helps clear things up, . That sounds like an interesting idea but a lot of work as well, unless you just stick to the most popular games. Having reviews, all that detailed information, and even prices... if you're working alone you'd need to do most of it automatically by pulling all the relevant data from google and keeping it up to date. At the moment I do everything alone, but I plan to bring on more writers over time. I already have a ton of relationships built with big game publishers and such, just don't have the time to cover all the news they flood me with on a daily basis, :p. |
|
|
|
Little more relief for the investors.
Yep! Now I'm just 8% below where I was 54 days ago, :p. But we're getting close to finally leveling out to where it was. |
|
|
|
The conversion rate is 66points = 1 chip.
When you convert 66points you should get 1 chip.
When you convert 7 points you should get .106 chips.
Since they only use two decimal points, it gets rounded up to .11.
When you convert 7 points, you are getting more chips than you should.
Players shouldn't be punished for finding this error, but it is obviously an error.
Read the last page and a half. This is what I've been saying. wwwin, for whatever reason, wants to claim you only get 0.10 chips for 7 points, pushing this idea that I'm the one that's never converted before. It took me posting a screenshot to make him realize he has no idea what he's talking about. I'm not sure if he was just trying to pad his post count or what the hell is going on, but he clearly fails at interpretation, math, and critical thinking. |
|
|
|
, when you convert your points without putting big amounts each 7 points will give you 0.11 chips
that means 63 points will give you 0.99 chips , while when you conver big amonts every 66 points will give you 1 chip
He is not exploiting anything. You are supposed to get .11 for 7 betcoins. This is what I see when i go to convert...  This equals 0.106 chips per 7 Betcoin Points. What they're doing is essentially exploiting the rounding error from 0.106 to 0.11 (as Betcoin doesn't convert in fractions) to get a ~9% bonus. Betcoin said they round down...so next time you convert..do the math based on how many chips or fraction of chips you got...and you will see that it is less than 1 chip for 66 betcoins. SyGambler has not done anything wrong. What he said was literally "Typically, the correction is a round down scenario." In other words, that's what's likely going to happen when they fix the issue. Not what happens now. Aka, it is NOT working as intended, and they are going to be fixing it soon. Basic English, my friend. They are not going to fix anything as the way it is now you never get the full amount they always round it down no matter what...I have done the math, SyGambler has done the math...and you are naïve in taking at face value that you get 1 chip per 66 betcoins without confirming it. So if you convert 66 points at once, you get 1.04 chips instead of 1.00? I don't have 66 to test that with at the moment. Simple English....I said you get less then 1 for 66. And you don't need 66 chips to test it. It is always rounded down no matter what. I'm not seeing how you don't see the issue, then. Let's assume you get MORE for 66 chips (at 1.00). You get 0.11 chips for 7 points, which is equivalent to getting (.11/7 = 0.01571 * 66 =) 1.0371 chips when turning in 66. In other words, you are getting MORE when you convert 7 at a time, by a factor of at least 3.714% (and that's assuming 66 points gave 1.00 chips. If it gives less, the difference is even larger). This is seriously basic math. You are too dense...its not theory, it is what is actually happening when you convert...they round down 2 places in decimal in chips when converting... If you convert and the formula should give you 10.109 chips you only get credited 10.10. Same thing when you deposit except you don't get any credit for partial chips. Instead of bringing all these theories why don't you try it and see what you get and post the results. Post the number of betcoins you converted and post how many chips you got. Just converted 7 points. New balance: 0.11 chips. So 66 points should give (0.11/7=0.01571*66=1.0371). If we round that down, as you say, that's 1.03 chips. But you said it gives less. So converting 7 at a time results in more earnings than doing a block of 66.  |
|
|
|
, when you convert your points without putting big amounts each 7 points will give you 0.11 chips
that means 63 points will give you 0.99 chips , while when you conver big amonts every 66 points will give you 1 chip
He is not exploiting anything. You are supposed to get .11 for 7 betcoins. This is what I see when i go to convert... This equals 0.106 chips per 7 Betcoin Points. What they're doing is essentially exploiting the rounding error from 0.106 to 0.11 (as Betcoin doesn't convert in fractions) to get a ~9% bonus. Betcoin said they round down...so next time you convert..do the math based on how many chips or fraction of chips you got...and you will see that it is less than 1 chip for 66 betcoins. SyGambler has not done anything wrong. What he said was literally "Typically, the correction is a round down scenario." In other words, that's what's likely going to happen when they fix the issue. Not what happens now. Aka, it is NOT working as intended, and they are going to be fixing it soon. Basic English, my friend. They are not going to fix anything as the way it is now you never get the full amount they always round it down no matter what...I have done the math, SyGambler has done the math...and you are naïve in taking at face value that you get 1 chip per 66 betcoins without confirming it. So if you convert 66 points at once, you get 1.04 chips instead of 1.00? I don't have 66 to test that with at the moment. Simple English....I said you get less then 1 for 66. And you don't need 66 chips to test it. It is always rounded down no matter what. I'm not seeing how you don't see the issue, then. Let's assume you get MORE for 66 chips (at 1.00). You get 0.11 chips for 7 points, which is equivalent to getting (.11/7 = 0.01571 * 66 =) 1.0371 chips when turning in 66. In other words, you are getting MORE when you convert 7 at a time, by a factor of at least 3.714% (and that's assuming 66 points gave 1.00 chips. If it gives less, the difference is even larger). This is seriously basic math. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
