A quick update after a few weeks of my post:
- jbg promise to make 1.4 public: undone.
- active public development in the last 17 days: 1 commit
- proofs that jbg is actively working full-time: still none
- proofs that Bryce is actively working full-time or even exists: still none
I have been chatting with a few people, one told me that jbg said to him that he has 25 years of experience. This is not exaggerating anymore, this is lying.
Also jbg has disappeared from chat, he gave only a quick update saying 1.4 is on track for end of Feb. My guesstimate is that it will not happen, and if any 1.4 will happen, it will be very little work.
Price is also crashing.
Jbg is releasing 1.4 in Feb, it is Feb 15th. A bit early on your update. Jbg has been active everyday in discord, you are not. He has most certainly not disappeared. He gave an update about 1.4 being released on schedule at the end of this month 2 days ago. There are moderators such as myself who speak with him directly. It does not matter whether brycl exists or not when releases are happening, perhaps he's trying to shift the blame on someone else for this controversial cryptocurrency which has illegal implemented tech and you are just too naive to understand why. Although this is not even the case as Bryce has spoken with the community. The price is crashing? Look at chart and the Books on Cryptopia? The support barrier is at 15K stats (this was the previous all time high!) Im sorry you were stupid enough to buy at an All time high. Stop bringing up your thread. Its dead. |
|
|
|
If SpectreCoin doesn't release more info on their game-changing stealth staking within 3 or so months, I will dump all my coins on the market before it starts crash and burning.
I'm way too wary of this whole thing with anonymous developers and promised something something.
And even with stealth staking out there's no guarantee that the price will go up a lot. It also requires user adoption and trading volume, but the dev(s) have already said they don't want to release it on big exchanges because "anonymity something something".
This coin is not just high risk but very high risk. I almost never invest in such coins and if there's still "shush hush stealth staking something something" in late April/early May and no proof of it working or even how it works, that's gonna be a huge red warning sign to get rid of everything I've invested.
It doesn't matter what everyone shills out here, I don't trust hype and I never fall for it, I only trust proof, what's delivered and my own research and analyze method.
Thats completely fine, 95% of these coins are backed by empty promises and hope. Many of which have much larger marketcaps and are simply useless tokens that run on the Ethereum blockchain. There is no reason to assert monetary value with many of these projects. Wait until the end of Q2 before you consider dumping your coins as your argument could go either way and has no backing. It would be stupid for a team so small to release this information prior to release. As someone with a legal background, I cannot stress enough how how stupid it would be for the Spectrecoin developers not to be anonymous. Many cryptocurrencies are illegal because of the third parties relevant to them (exchanges) whereas this cryptocurrency has OBFS4 implementation and is illegal for use in many countries where using the TOR network is illegal. But I genuinely believe the price will sufficiently increase after stealth staking has been implemented as this is an innovation cryptocurrency has yet to see. I've even funded video projects paralleling the release of this implementation. Name another cryptocurrency that has this in their roadmap? It's almost like magic and I still remember the day stealth staking was to be announced in Q3 2017, it has been a while and a working prototype is well in progress. If you have been involved in this project for as long as I have you will find the rich-list has not moved. These people are holding, and these people are serious about it. These are Bitcoin maximalists who have been here prior to 2015. This project will rank 1st in ROI for ICO's after stealth staking has been implemented and has already seen 3rd even with the tiny market cap Spectrecoin has maxed out at. We've come along way since the 68 satts ICO price. https://icostats.com/roi-since-icoCompletely possible. This project has been an underdog since its birth in 2016 and now we've found a support barrier at 15k stats, (the previous all time high). |
|
|
|
Is there any description available about how that OBFS4 tech precisely works? Is that some anon tech that XSPEC uses specifically or are there other coins using that, too? And on your OP you say it's anonymous almost anywhere in the world so I assume it depends you can use it anonymously wherever TOR offers exit nodes or what's the limitation to fully global anonymity, if any?
To understand OBSF4 in general, go to the Tor website : https://www.torproject.org/docs/pluggable-transports.html.enAFAIK, only XSPEC has OBSF4 fully integrated. XSPEC is "built" on TOR to anonymize the communication between nodes. Some countries (China in particular), however, is blocking TOR. To shield from such blocking attempts and make appear TOR communication as any other internet traffic, OBSF4 is used by TOR itself. XSPEC's technology leverages TOR and OBSF4 in its core. It is thus the only coin that has inherently the same level of anonymity as TOR communications in general, but cannot be blocked. (Actually, one small but important point is that since TOR is integral to XSPEC and XSPEC transactions never leave the TOR network, XSPEC cannot be attacked at the TOR exit nodes, like other coins which simply use TOR for transportation) I am not really an expert but it does indeed sound interesting from a technological standpoint. Should have paid some closer attention to you guys earlier on. Might be a good time to get into XSPEC now as you already crossed the $100 million in the past. Are there any major development milestones coming up or what's the future holding for XSPEC? I cannot stress enough how significant the stealth staking innovation is. Jbg quoted last year that when this is implemented, Spectrecoin will be 'hands down the most anonymous cryptocurrency on the market.' It has been mentioned that a prototype has been released in testing for this. We certainly don't want another Cloakcoin here with release promises. |
|
|
|
|
Have you heard of any cryptouccrency projects implementing ANONYMOUS POS? Yes, thats correct, an obsolete blockchain and rich list. We will know the amount in circulation but will have no idea where the supply is coming from. This magical feature will be in the Q2 2.0 release of Spectrecoin's wallet.
|
|
|
|
when it comes to "Privacy Coin", "ZCOIN" is what I am holding as a privacy coin for long-term, have made masternode too, since I don't plan to sell it any time soon. feel free to download and install the wallet to experience the tech, mint/zerocoin features. check it out yourself to understand it further [ https://zcoin.io/tech/ ] Checked it out, but the only POS Privacy coin with a roadmap implementing fully anonymous staking and transactions is Spectrecoin. Masternodes are centralized and are certainly not private, just saying. |
|
|
|
Just imagine if every person who got TOR BROWSER will use DeepOnion coins. This time is coming. Deep Onion will be the top Anonymous Cryptocurrency! Why people didn't see this?
Can we have a minus merit system? |
|
|
|
TL:DR I came across few suspicious things about XSPEC and I contacted jbg (lead (and only?) developer of XSPEC) privately. After the chat I had with him, I am still not sure if I trust the guy. Then after some thoughts and recent events, I have decided that it’s best for everyone to know what I know, and judge for themselves. I will not invest long term in SpectreCoin (XSPEC) as almost everything jbg says to people is very difficult to prove and some might even be lies. Note that this is my personal conclusion, and it is based on the facts explained below. LONG VERSION I have been looking for a coin to invest long term and I have come across XSPEC on this forum a lot, so I decided to take a deeper look. I am myself a software developer, so I do look quite closely to the code and its change activity. From the github commits, it seems that jbg started working on the project in June last year. There was only a few commits from June to December. From the end of September to the start of December, there was only one commit. From December onwards there has been more commits. Then I examined these commits further: most of them were UI changes. In the 8 months (Jun 2017 to Jan 2018) there were only 3 changes to the core (most of the codebase is ShadowCoin): a quick fix on ring sizes, OBSF4 and a new feature that enables people giving stakes to the developer (!). All the rest were UI fixes and some library upgrades. That means the codebase is basically ShadowCoin with a few UI bugs fixed plus the ability to give money to the developer. ShadowCoin was a good coin regardless so at least this has inherited all the good bits. I then checked who have been making these changes. I know that there should be two developers, each with 20+ years of experience, actively working full-time on this cryptocurrency. Weirdly when I looked into who made the code commits, only one person (jbg) had been making commits in the past 8 months. I could not see any commits done by another account. This already sounded suspicious so I researched more and have come across his real name! This is super weird for a privacy crypto developer who claims to be anonymous. I then found also out he is in his twenties (20+ years of dev experience in his twenties?) and he used to have a bar business for two years (20+ years of dev experience on his twenties with 2 years with a bar business?) which went bankrupt with a $90k+ tax debt. Also he is now running an ecommerce business (he claims he works full time on XSPEC? Anyway website also looks quite amateur to me).
At this point I decided to contact him privately on slack. To summarize the discussion: - About his age and his experience, he said he claimed to have 20 years experience because he had been paid for a software project he made at school when he was 9. He agreed that he might have over-exaggerated this but commented that it's kinda ok as people usually do this. - About the bankrupted bar business (two years), he still counted this as dev experience since he developed the PoS system for the bar. - About the mysterious second dev, he said he is a cryptographer and he is working on stealth staking that will be available in Q2 2018. I asked if the community could see any of his work, not only stealth staking, but he said I should wait until Q2. - About the no commit period between the end of Sept to the start of December, he claimed that they were working on the UI rewrite and stealth staking. Both features were supposed to be hidden from public for now, so no way to check this. Here is what I assess the facts given so far: I thank him for being really transparent as he was open to discussion and didn’t deny my findings. However, everything becomes more suspicious. jbg is definitely knowledgeable in the crypto space, he knows his stuff, and always answers everyone’s questions on Slack. His coding ability is certainly good enough for library upgrades and quick UI bug fixes. Unfortunately jbg is trying to look much more experienced than he actually is. Exaggerating his work experience is problematic because it is skewing people’s expectation and assumption when investing. We would naturally feel assured as we expect him knowing how to run, scale and lead a team, working in multi-disciplinary complex projects, and so on. This is really suspicious especially in the crypto world where scams are everywhere. Not only his own dev experience did not check out, it is even more suspicious when there is no commits from the second dev, so-called cryptographer, on the repo. If there really had been some work done by two full-time developers since June last year I would at least see some public commits from them both. When he claimed that both stealth staking code and UI rewrites are hidden features, I found it really suspicious. Stealth staking code to be hidden I understand, but UI rewrites? He said he does not want to make the UI rewrite public but since December he clearly has made public commits on UI changes. That makes no sense. I honour his narrative on hidden development work but it is only his word for the last 8 months of development. As it stands, there is no actual proof apart from UI bug fixes and library upgrades. The current github commit history is definitely not enough to justify 8 months work by 1 or 2 full-time experienced developers. From my research, he's also running another ecommerce company on his own, that is a web application. I remain doubtful on the part where he says he is working full time on Spectre too. Suspicious. As I mentioned at the start, I was going to leave the project silently after speaking with jbg as people should do their own research and make their own conclusion. However there had been a suspicious activity that made me post this publicly. Literally a day after our chat, I noticed that the github repository has been moved to a new one. This means if he or his mysterious teammate did do private commits during Sept to Dec last year, we would probably not be able prove this anymore. And a new github account called Bryce has miraculously showed up! This account has done no commits so far, even though it joined in September, but it has now created his first pull request! And of course it is about a library upgrade, no structural change. This is now too suspicious. In the crypto world I am used to account for worst case scenarios and, in my opinion (and I stress this is my opinion!) the worst scenario for this case is: - jbg is a developer who found a good abandoned coin and tried to work on it - he created a nice community around it, he studied about crypto and SpectreCoin specifically very well so he is able to answer all the community questions - he is lying about his developer experience so he can look more valuable - he is also lying about another developer/cryptographer as Bryce does not exist - always from my research, he has an ecommerce company so he can work on the coin only on his free time, not working full time as he said - the only contribution that he can realistically offer is quick bug fixes as well as speaking to the community. That's why he is always available on slack - aside from other features he could have done, somehow he found time to implement the feature where the community can donate him money - his main motivation seems to be getting donations as he certainly is trying to keep the thing going. As the main revolutionary stealth staking is scheduled for Q2, he would have had 6+ months worth of donations by then. It is quite a good deal for him if you only have to do small bug fixes and answering all the common community questions on slack - he says that he does not have much coins so he's not interested in the coin price. However people have been donating a lot of coins to him: averaged ~$6000/month only on stakes donation at the actual rate, plus all the ones he received previously, plus the ones he owns on his own. These donations means a lot to the country he lives (yup I found out where he lives) as it has a very low average salary. This is my worst case scenario that I deduced from the information I found. It might not be true, but it is possible. If you count the number of times I wrote the word "suspicious", you'll understand why I am not going to invest now. It is probably better to wait and see the end of February when 1.4 is scheduled with a full UI rewrite. This is also suggested by jbg and I will pass this on but bear in mind that he is happily receiving donations in the meantime. Few last things: - I am not going to reveal jbg identity or how I found it. But I have proofs of our conversation, and I can share this if necessary (with all personal information censored). - I already spent too much time on this and I need to move on  . For this reason I don't think I am going to reply. - I really hope jbg will prove what I wrote wrong with the delivery of the Spectre road map on time. - I hope cryptographer Bryce really exists - crypto is full of smart people and scams, try not to invest on words, but invest on facts. I am fully aware of everything you have stated as a large stakeholder in XSPEC. It's how you interpret this which I disagree with. Coming from someone who has attended law school, please understand the actual legalities about this situation. For example, I have bank accounts in 3 countries. I've actually had to buy a company off a citizen in these countries to get 100% ownership to then open up a bank account in that country by which I do not have citizenship. How can you claim XSPEC development and being paid in XSPEC as your employment? How would you explain your income? Ask yourself, what are the legal alternatives here? That are of course, legal. Many of us are in debt on paper, the media can portray whatever it wishes. This is negative for whomever interprets it as negative. People told me how stupid I was for putting student loans into Bitcoin back in the day. The media cannot prove our worth in crypto  Dig some more into JBG, you will find he is quite experienced in this field. You may find this research betters his image as we can see a timeline in history. As someone who done very well in cryptocurrency, I've been like Morpheus searching for Neo with the development I invest in. jbg is legit. |
|
|
|
A simple google search will give you this information. You will also find in that same search that jpg has been working with easier ways to transact money back in 2007. |
|
|
|
I've been looking at a project called tokenpay last month. I have reviewed the whitepaper and realized that it is a project that places great emphasis on safety. Tokenpay can operate in an integrated manner with tor browser. recommend a look Look at TokenPay's wallet, then Look at Spectrecoins. Then Look at both of their Githubs. Look at the price difference and apply the appropriate financial decision. |
|
|
|
No one is saying that XSPEC is by default, a completely private coin in its current state. Yes, it's not completely private. Calling it a privacy coin is a MISREPRESENTATION. However, what it does show is the abuse and the huge disproportion of coin holdings in the current state by the address. The Top 100 holders own 82%, and the Top 1000 own 99%. So I guess it's a good thing it's not completely private currently to show that it's a scam after all. It's a coin with PRIVACY FEATURES. Not a PRIVACY coin. Two totally different things, and you are marketing it differently than what it really is. Looking at the INACCURATE blockchain viewer You're debating it's INACCURATE. It's not very inaccurate at all. XSPEC = SCAM Everyone see how this troll argues? Always goes back to the scam argument with giant red text as if that bolsters his non-existent points. XSpec is a privacy coin, I don't know why you would call it anything else when it can currently has Tor integrated, OBFS4 to trade in Tor blocked countries, and ring signatures. Thats far more current working features than some other privacy coins. There is no misrepresentation. When 2.0 hits, the only FUD talking point you'll have is the Top 1000 nonsense. XSPEC's ICO was more than a year ago. The distribution is now driven by market forces, not initial sales. Having said that, XSPEC's distribution is, indeed, 99% for the top 1000 addresses. This is what happens with every relatively young, relatively unknown project. I think people in the crypto world forget that even in 2018, crypto is not truly mainstream. As a percentage of the world's population, very few people hold BTC, and XSPEC is much, much, much, much less well-known than BTC. For such projects, the normal progression is 1) most coins are held by a small number of people, many of whom are close to the project; 2) coin experiences a pump; 3) some early adopters take profits, leading to a dump; 4) dump leads to redistribution to a larger group of holders; 5) repeat, with the amplitude of the pump and dump cycle dropping as distribution and market awareness improve. The key point here is that centralized distributions aren't great, but they are a fact of life in the earlier stages of most projects. They are NOT evidence for a scam (i.e., a deliberate attempt to steal money from people based on false information). Over time, if a project continues to follow its development roadmap and deliver on its promises, the distribution will improve. The currently developers picked up the project well after its ICO was finished, and did not take part in it. They are funded only by community donations either directly or by staking donations. Its clear by now that you don't understand the meaning of the word scam. See how an uneducated person argues? As an engineer, I find it funny. These are your words: No one is saying that XSPEC is by default, a completely private coin in its current state. XSPEC is not private by default, or a completely private coin. In the future, maybe. Who knows? Currently VERGE is better than this scam coin. But currently it's not a privacy coin and you admitted it yourself. Don't go back on what you said, it makes you look uneducated like you don't know what you are talking about. /Thread? There is no misrepresentation. When 2.0 hits, the only FUD talking point you'll have is the Top 1000 nonsense. As it's currently lacking privacy features that basic coins have. I find if laughable that you're defending it so much, it's almost like you have an agenda of trying to market this coin and pump up the price and scam people. If I can help 1 person think rationally, than I did my good deed at preventing people from being scammed. We however do know that it has a richlist and the Top 1000 is true. Look at it for yourself it's not inaccurate lol. I can see who owns what and to call it a privacy coin is a MISREPRESENTATION. It's a coin with privacy FEATURES (very crude ones). XSPEC is a SCAM and it's not a PRIVACY coin.Regardless of the innovations coming forwards with Spectre, the richlist, and the public blockchain. There is still the option to send stealth transactions, which are private. Spectre also has the obfuscation privacy feature in TOR blocked regions already implemented. These are the facts, you cannot manipulate facts, just like you are not KimJungUn, nor do you know him. |
|
|
|
|
When the stealth addresses become the default staking addresses in Q2 2018, this is a big deal. A lot of people don't believe that this feature is possible. A lot of people think this is magical given we will know the amount in circulation but have no idea where the supply is coming from. The richlist and blockchain will become irrelevant. Given no other POS currency has this feature even in their roadmap, once this feature has been implemented, this coin will see $100 fast and media will catch on.
|
|
|
|
simple question: XSPEC is a cripto that used tor for stay anonymus. this fact makes it difficult to be listed in bigger and bester exchange. or i'm wrong?
Yes certain big exchanges requires the devs to share there personal info in order for the coin to get listed .So dont expect spectre to bet listed on bittrex ever  What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private. If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody. Every coin need recognition for success. If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at. How about Bitcoin? Satoshi Nakamoto certainly didn't want his identity revealed even after success probably relevant to to that of a nobel prize. JBG is anonymous for legal reasons. I certainly wouldn't want to put my face next to the only cryptocurrency that works in TOR blocked regions. Cryptography and Identity could not be more polar opposite. Think about it. You're comparing apples and oranges. Bitcoin was the first. It didn't have any competition, it didn't need to be promoted. It was the new shit. SpectreCoin is a privacy coin in a sea of privacy coins. What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private.
If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody.
Every coin need recognition for success.
If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at.
There's more than one way to define success. Verge, for example, has been successful from an investment perspective, yet arguably has been very unsuccessful at being a good privacy coin. Who knows how it will do in the longer term once the hype dies down. As has been said many times on this forum, XSPEC is trying to let the product speak for itself, for better and for worse. This means that it will take longer for the product to develop and gain users based on reputation alone, which can be frustrating for short-term investors. It is what it is. The quality of a privacy coin doesn't matter if nobody is willing to use it. The short or long term makes no difference. If people see this as a long-term coin, great, but remember, if this is used as an excuse for not promoting the coin, not attempting to move it more by getting it on better exchanges, and crawling development, then people will get bored of holding it. There will be other privacy coins which will have better tech, will be better promoted, people will jump ship and we will end up with a dead coin. Heres what is very important to recognize about the Spectrecoin roadmap. Spectrecoin is the only POS cryptocurrency that aims to release default stealth address staking. This means the richlisst will become irrelevant and the blockchain will become obsolete. Many people don't understand just how significant this is in cryptocurrency. This means, for all we know, 1 address could be staking 99% of the supply and 1% could be on exchanges for trading. Whether this is the case or not, no one will know. We will know the amount in circulation but have no idea where the supply is coming from. People are starting to criticize Spectrecoin for this being almost too magical to be true. Now that jbg is getting funding from 1.3.5, the Q2 release of this update is really not too far away. Whether your willing to take the risk and hold on till then is your choice, but if this update is made, we will see a $100 coin and a milestone in cryptocurrency and Spectrecoin will be the best anonymous cryptocurrency, hands down. If you can name a POS coin that has this in their pipeline, please let me know. You can't, because there isn't. This type of anonymity is unheard of. |
|
|
|
I live in Caracas, Venezuela, the murder capital of the world and most dangerous city on the planet. I'll gladly show you my 'stupid' face and you can lecture me on balls then.
No one cares where you live, what they do care about is if you a shilling a shitcoin, especially if you know it's vaporware. Do you? Or are you just oblivious? You are the oblivious one thinking you can aggressively call people 'stupid' and 'have no balls' if they don't parallel that of your views. I don't care where you are from either, but I damn well know its a country with 52 states jacked up on freedom and ignorance. Your face will look stupid if you bet doesn't turn out right in Q2, and you will have balls if you show it after anonymous staking turns out to be vaporware--context. And if you did any research outside of those 52 states you would understand that mining is illegal in Venezuela because electricity is free. You would understand with respect to anonymity that the only hope for production is through POS low power staking. So before you go about bashing everyone who is not a Monero POW fanboy, understand that it is not always a choice. And I am not hoping for Spectrecoin to be the first POS coin to release untraceable staking, I am telling you that it will be. Your word means as much as the anonymous dev who won't explain how anonymous staking works--your circumstances are irrelevant in evaluating an investment, emotional pleas are the last thing anyone should bet their savings on. But again, I really doubt any of the current shills will be around to own the outcome if it goes as I expect. Asking others to invest on your word is absurd when dealing with systems that can be easily evaluated on the math that creates them. If the dev is advertising "15 years experience," he/she should be able to tell you the project(s). If they can't say, don't advertise it. Same goes for the anonymous staking claim, if you can't show your work, don't advertise it. It's just that simple. Actually, 20 years. Prove it. Just because fluffypony decided to put himself at risk coming out with his identity, doesn't make it the logical thing to do. This is proof you'll only find in the Spectrecoin updates, until then, your word stands. But, it wouldn't be your first correct or incorrect prediction. |
|
|
|
I live in Caracas, Venezuela, the murder capital of the world and most dangerous city on the planet. I'll gladly show you my 'stupid' face and you can lecture me on balls then.
No one cares where you live, what they do care about is if you a shilling a shitcoin, especially if you know it's vaporware. Do you? Or are you just oblivious? You are the oblivious one thinking you can aggressively call people 'stupid' and 'have no balls' if they don't parallel that of your views. I don't care where you are from either, but I damn well know its a country with 52 states jacked up on freedom and ignorance. Your face will look stupid if you bet doesn't turn out right in Q2, and you will have balls if you show it after anonymous staking turns out to be vaporware--context. And if you did any research outside of those 52 states you would understand that mining is illegal in Venezuela because electricity is free. You would understand with respect to anonymity that the only hope for production is through POS low power staking. So before you go about bashing everyone who is not a Monero POW fanboy, understand that it is not always a choice. And I am not hoping for Spectrecoin to be the first POS coin to release untraceable staking, I am telling you that it will be. Your word means as much as the anonymous dev who won't explain how anonymous staking works--your circumstances are irrelevant in evaluating an investment, emotional pleas are the last thing anyone should bet their savings on. But again, I really doubt any of the current shills will be around to own the outcome if it goes as I expect. Asking others to invest on your word is absurd when dealing with systems that can be easily evaluated on the math that creates them. If the dev is advertising "15 years experience," he/she should be able to tell you the project(s). If they can't say, don't advertise it. Same goes for the anonymous staking claim, if you can't show your work, don't advertise it. It's just that simple. Actually, 20 years. |
|
|
|
I live in Caracas, Venezuela, the murder capital of the world and most dangerous city on the planet. I'll gladly show you my 'stupid' face and you can lecture me on balls then.
No one cares where you live, what they do care about is if you a shilling a shitcoin, especially if you know it's vaporware. Do you? Or are you just oblivious? You are the oblivious one thinking you can aggressively call people 'stupid' and 'have no balls' if they don't parallel that of your views. I don't care where you are from either, but I damn well know its a country with 52 states jacked up on freedom and ignorance. Your face will look stupid if you bet doesn't turn out right in Q2, and you will have balls if you show it after anonymous staking turns out to be vaporware--context. And if you did any research outside of those 52 states you would understand that mining is illegal in Venezuela because electricity is free. You would understand with respect to anonymity that the only hope for production is through POS low power staking. So before you go about bashing everyone who is not a Monero POW fanboy, understand that it is not always a choice. And I am not hoping for Spectrecoin to be the first POS coin to release untraceable staking, I am telling you that it will be. |
|
|
|
I live in Caracas, Venezuela, the murder capital of the world and most dangerous city on the planet. I'll gladly show you my 'stupid' face and you can lecture me on balls then.
No one cares where you live, what they do care about is if you a shilling a shitcoin, especially if you know it's vaporware. Do you? Or are you just oblivious? You are the oblivious one thinking you can aggressively call people 'stupid' and 'have no balls' if they don't parallel that of your views. I don't care where you are from either, but I damn well know its a country with 52 states jacked up on freedom and ignorance. |
|
|
|
Yes, can you tell me where is now money from that address. You seems to be a professional. I hope you will give me exact address ( not monero address, but house where this guy holds it). And not just where went from this Monero address, but where ended up at the end. Monero is circulating a lot. i'm sorry but i think crypto not work just like that sir event BTC, ETH can not do that too i think monero has potential to grow but since it has too much competitor, it should do something to gain more popularity What competition? Even the serious privacy projects can't figure out that you never make privacy optional--it limits the anonymity set and ruins fungibility. Until another project takes privacy seriously, Monero is the only game in town. Did you ever think some projects take privacy so seriously that even your giant ego are unaware of their coming?  You mean that vaporware worked on by a developer who won't even reveal what projects he's worked on? I don't need to see it, I can smell that pile of shit a mile away. Too bad you couldn't convince enough people the same in your scam accusation thread. Why would the developer of a privacy focused cryptocurrency that is the only one controversial enough to actually work in TOR blocked regions, and therefore be illegal, post a resume of their previous employment so someone like yourself (who has no background in cryptography) can make a judgement? Anyways, as I said on the first page of this thread, Monero has a great future. I think 50K in 5 fir 1 Monero in 5 years. Convince enough people? I don't care if people want to hand over their money based on moonware promises from devs who the shills claim 15 years experience but can't tell you on what. What I care about is throwing this back in your stupid face if you have the balls to stick around after Q2 when the vaporware stays in the vapor and you find out you were scammed. I live in Caracas, Venezuela, the murder capital of the world and most dangerous city on the planet. I'll gladly show you my 'stupid' face and you can lecture me on balls then. |
|
|
|
Yes, can you tell me where is now money from that address. You seems to be a professional. I hope you will give me exact address ( not monero address, but house where this guy holds it). And not just where went from this Monero address, but where ended up at the end. Monero is circulating a lot. i'm sorry but i think crypto not work just like that sir event BTC, ETH can not do that too i think monero has potential to grow but since it has too much competitor, it should do something to gain more popularity What competition? Even the serious privacy projects can't figure out that you never make privacy optional--it limits the anonymity set and ruins fungibility. Until another project takes privacy seriously, Monero is the only game in town. Did you ever think some projects take privacy so seriously that even your giant ego are unaware of their coming? You mean that vaporware worked on by a developer who won't even reveal what projects he's worked on? I don't need to see it, I can smell that pile of shit a mile away. Too bad you couldn't convince enough people the same in your scam accusation thread. Why would the developer of a privacy focused cryptocurrency that is the only one controversial enough to actually work in TOR blocked regions, and therefore be illegal, post a resume of their previous employment so someone like yourself (who has no background in cryptography) can make a judgement? Anyways, as I said on the first page of this thread, Monero has a great future. I think 50K in 5 fir 1 Monero in 5 years. |
|
|
|
Yes, can you tell me where is now money from that address. You seems to be a professional. I hope you will give me exact address ( not monero address, but house where this guy holds it). And not just where went from this Monero address, but where ended up at the end. Monero is circulating a lot. i'm sorry but i think crypto not work just like that sir event BTC, ETH can not do that too i think monero has potential to grow but since it has too much competitor, it should do something to gain more popularity What competition? Even the serious privacy projects can't figure out that you never make privacy optional--it limits the anonymity set and ruins fungibility. Until another project takes privacy seriously, Monero is the only game in town. Did you ever think some projects take privacy so seriously that even your giant ego are unaware of their coming? |
|
|
|
simple question: XSPEC is a cripto that used tor for stay anonymus. this fact makes it difficult to be listed in bigger and bester exchange. or i'm wrong?
Yes certain big exchanges requires the devs to share there personal info in order for the coin to get listed .So dont expect spectre to bet listed on bittrex ever What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private. If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody. Every coin need recognition for success. If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at. How about Bitcoin? Satoshi Nakamoto certainly didn't want his identity revealed even after success probably relevant to to that of a nobel prize. JBG is anonymous for legal reasons. I certainly wouldn't want to put my face next to the only cryptocurrency that works in TOR blocked regions. Cryptography and Identity could not be more polar opposite. Think about it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
