Bitcoin Forum
July 11, 2024, 03:59:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 546 »
361  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Lauda/TMAN/minifrij extortion attempt on: March 26, 2017, 03:23:17 PM
bumping for visibility

Whatever medication you are on, you need to start taking it...

Sup with the ad hominem?
362  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: After instalation and type passworld the program turn OFF on: March 26, 2017, 03:21:07 PM
Hello
I install electrum on my PC > windows 7. Make similar like tutorial and when I Type my password and next the program missing (turn off)
I put very long password 50 character Shocked


after hit next program missing

Try using a different name. Also are you trying to create a new wallet or restore one?
363  Other / MultiBit / Re: One numer of wallet on: March 26, 2017, 03:19:53 PM
Hello
I just install MultiBit.

Classic or HD? I will assume HD.

I would like to ask why when I request for payment is always generate new wallet .

It probably generates a new address, which is not the same as a new wallet.

How I can create one numer of my wallet ?

You can reuse any addresses of your wallet, but its not recommended for e.g. privacy reasons.

And send to my friends who will be make payment for me?
Or I not understand correctly this program (wallet).
Regards

Dont think of addresses as bank account numbers. Rather think of them as invoice IDs. If you give 3 people the same address and ask them to pay you 0.1 each. Two pay and all 3 claim to have paid you, how do you know who is lying? Also, if you only ever use a single bitcoin address everyone you give it to knows how much coins you have. That might not be something you want.
364  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: March 26, 2017, 03:11:02 PM
I signed and verified it with (Electrum 2.8.0) but I am happy to post another one.

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am Duomo from bitcointalk.org signing a message and staking my address. The date of today is March 26, 2017. My address is
14MY4WiJBmipa7y3dgikKJmCubjnyQct9X. This is a following signed messaged since a few people had conflicts verifying.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
IH9QN747sGt1e8x8edGsnTPapY7OGuEWogjW7yXOtUnYY8iID7R/y3bsR71gm79kWeyAHo0OyQheS2rXQX6jtCg=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Quoted and verified.



Might be something wrong with electrum. Its the only programm I can verify the message with. When I copy the data to e.g. core, its no longer valid.



Code:
$ bitcoin-cli verifymessage "14MY4WiJBmipa7y3dgikKJmCubjnyQct9X" "IH9QN747sGt1e8x8edGsnTPapY7OGuEWogjW7yXOtUnYY8iID7R/y3bsR71gm79kWeyAHo0OyQheS2rXQX6jtCg=" "I am Duomo from bitcointalk.org signing a message and staking my address. The date of today is March 26, 2017. My address is
14MY4WiJBmipa7y3dgikKJmCubjnyQct9X. This is a following signed messaged since a few people had conflicts verifying."
false
365  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mother of all spam attacks on bitcoin network! proof? on: March 26, 2017, 12:40:24 PM


Mempool is practically empty right now. Roll Eyes

Yep, fee suggestions by cointape[1] still high though. Still too many idiots not lowering their fees.

[1] https://bitcoinfees.21.co/
366  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: March 26, 2017, 12:39:12 PM
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I am Duomo from bitcointalk.org signing a message and staking my address. The date of today is March 26, 2017. My address is
14MY4WiJBmipa7y3dgikKJmCubjnyQct9X
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
H/BvY+YbXyPNOlXQbMfNUI0y1wxMBY1ze0CPJA0UleTSZf+rXlmKW9TWnEqRr5kpe/C+B0Koq78o0ZWYhjvOY1g=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----


to me signature verified  via https://tools.bitcoin.com/verify-message/ and electrum




Which exact message, signature and address did you verify?

367  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Would smaller blocks reduce Bitcoin energy requirements? on: March 26, 2017, 12:36:50 PM
I understand the point of PoW. I'm just pointing out that an aborted block is just as much a waste as an orphaned block.

Yes, but you still don't understand orphans

No-one is making the distinction you make between orphans and abortions, and the reason is that they're the same. Your description of an aborted block is simply one way that a block can be orphaned

I dont think so. The way I understand Jet Cash is that they call an "aborted block" a potential(!) block which the miner stopped working on when somone else already found a solution for it. A solution in terms of heigth not in terms of transactions included obviously. Thus I wouldnt see it as wasted energy. Thats like saying you wasted your energy participating in a challange you lost. You didnt know in advance you would lose it and there was a realistic chance that you could have won it. Whether this block is later orphaned or not is a different topic.
368  Other / Meta / Re: What is Partol Button for ? on: March 26, 2017, 12:29:17 PM
Recently i found that there's a button we can enable and disable which is partol button but i am unaware of it's function,Like what is it's use ?

It shows all recent posts by newbies. There is a rank among mods called patrolers which can handle only newbies. I think it was introduced for them.

When i clicked the button it showed me some weird random Posts made on this forum in which i am not interested.
Can someone go in details and explain to me that how it works ?
Thanks
Robo  Wink
369  Other / Meta / Re: My account Megashira1 compromised on: March 26, 2017, 11:10:47 AM
Pm'd admin with my signed message. How long does this process usually take?

Post the signed message in public.  Then we can tag the account with negative trust until you get it back.

Otherwise, you could just be someone with a grudge making up a story.   Undecided

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
My account Megashira1 has been hacked. Please reset the email to jremix1@gmail.com 02/28/2017
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1A3br1fdjG3rt5Wf5mSKE2q7BxvA7xKd3H
HDLwbhND5gTxHYhXhopR0JiDfluTAKT9aQcSJ2ZDGpb3pAzdgsTon0vNheeqnNIz8AcGyIPZRtyGGwm mUztNJDw=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Here is the unedited post where I posted that address: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=281850.msg9247189#msg9247189

Been about 3 weeks now. Can an admin please help me. Thanks.

Can someone verify my message and leave negative trust until this issue hopefully gets resolved.

thx

done
370  Local / Deutsch (German) / Re: Ist diese Seite OK ? https://automining.io on: March 26, 2017, 10:50:42 AM
Hat jemand Erfahrungen damit oder kann mir etwas mehr sagen! Nicht das man ein Scam hat!

Scheint auszuzahlen[1], sieht aber nach nem Faucet/Ponzi aus. Halte ich für Zeitverschwendung, selbst wenn es kein Scam ist. Wie hier neulich jemand so schön schrieb, geh ne Stunde Flaschen sammeln und kauf dir von dem Geld Bitcoin, da haste mehr von.

[1] https://blockchain.info/address/17334bYx618oko1durie6ybch6FW3LYPic [2]
[2] Address von hier https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDmdAJuYM5o
371  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: 13JF5274VuNthhwKkLrYyZW73smjSYAEen on: March 26, 2017, 10:40:53 AM
is there anyway to bug the address??

look at this addres  13JF5274VuNthhwKkLrYyZW73smjSYAEen

i played dice.. not important the sites when i copy the address then i paste it to make deposit, this is the address always shows 13JF5274VuNthhwKkLrYyZW73smjSYAEen
so i had made it twice .. yeah beacuse i dont notice it until asking myself why i dont get any confirmation.. then i check my wallet.. so i tried to copy again to paste it still showing that address

 https://blockchain.info/tx/a20094ca1589c02e960ed0de824e1abe6ba2a489c1baa5b09bbc7ee5bb771d07
https://blockchain.info/tx/a150d7f785480dfb1c5c21ac54526ba2d08bd31c6342b7480a82741785899d6e
not big but if you check the address those earlier depositors making big deposit got hack i guess...

There is known malware (dont remember the name) that finds and replaces bitcoin address in your clipboard. Sounds like you are infected.
372  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: How to sign a message?! on: March 24, 2017, 09:17:41 AM
A small update, got an answer from the bither team to my bug report.

Quote
Currently we do not support signing message option for HD account.

-> https://github.com/bither/bither-android/issues/21
373  Local / Anfänger und Hilfe / Re: Keine Blockquelle verfügbar - Bitcoin Core v0.13.1 (64-Bit) on: March 23, 2017, 08:34:17 AM
-snip-
@shorena: Kann ich mich nochmal zu deinem verbinden? Ist der online?

Sorry, hab ich jetzt erst gelesen. Ja, immer.



Es ist mir nicht möglich den Client zu benutzen. Das Synchronisieren hängt sich immer wieder auf. Hab nun auch schon zweimal einen Reindex gemacht, aber bei etwa 1,5 Jahren hängt er sich auf.

Die Exception scheint ganz interessant zu sein.

Das Log:

Code:
2017-03-23 08:43:06
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Bitcoin version v0.14.0
2017-03-23 08:43:06 InitParameterInteraction: parameter interaction: -whitelistforcerelay=1 -> setting -whitelistrelay=1
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Assuming ancestors of block 00000000000000000013176bf8d7dfeab4e1db31dc93bc311b436e82ab226b90 have valid signatures.
2017-03-23 08:43:06 GUI: "registerShutdownBlockReason: Successfully registered: Bitcoin Core wurde noch nicht sicher beendet..."
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Default data directory C:\Users\black\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Using data directory F:\Bitcoin\bitcoin-0.13.1\Data
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Using config file F:\Bitcoin\bitcoin-0.13.1\Data\bitcoin.conf
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Using at most 125 automatic connections (2048 file descriptors available)
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Using 32 MiB out of 32 requested for signature cache, able to store 1048576 elements
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Using 2 threads for script verification
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Using BerkeleyDB version Berkeley DB 4.8.30: (April  9, 2010)
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Using wallet wallet.dat
2017-03-23 08:43:06 scheduler thread start
2017-03-23 08:43:06 init message: Verifiziere Wallet...
2017-03-23 08:43:06 CDBEnv::Open: LogDir=F:\Bitcoin\bitcoin-0.13.1\Data\database ErrorFile=F:\Bitcoin\bitcoin-0.13.1\Data\db.log
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Bound to [::]:8333
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Bound to 0.0.0.0:8333
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Cache configuration:
2017-03-23 08:43:06 * Using 2.0MiB for block index database
2017-03-23 08:43:06 * Using 8.0MiB for chain state database
2017-03-23 08:43:06 * Using 290.0MiB for in-memory UTXO set (plus up to 286.1MiB of unused mempool space)
2017-03-23 08:43:06 init message: Lade Blockindex...
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Opening LevelDB in F:\Bitcoin\bitcoin-0.13.1\Data\blocks\index
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Opened LevelDB successfully
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Using obfuscation key for F:\Bitcoin\bitcoin-0.13.1\Data\blocks\index: 0000000000000000
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Opening LevelDB in F:\Bitcoin\bitcoin-0.13.1\Data\chainstate
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Opened LevelDB successfully
2017-03-23 08:43:06 Using obfuscation key for F:\Bitcoin\bitcoin-0.13.1\Data\chainstate: 597e1e0c1a6930a1
2017-03-23 08:43:12 LoadBlockIndexDB: last block file = 620
2017-03-23 08:43:12 LoadBlockIndexDB: last block file info: CBlockFileInfo(blocks=32, size=58037273, heights=428897...428991, time=2016-09-08...2016-09-09)
2017-03-23 08:43:12 Checking all blk files are present...
2017-03-23 08:43:12 LoadBlockIndexDB: transaction index disabled
2017-03-23 08:43:12 LoadBlockIndexDB: hashBestChain=00000000000000000bb916963d04aca7edad489d16748226cdfd112e5ad8f1bb height=365371 date=2015-07-15 05:30:59 progress=0.369934
2017-03-23 08:43:12 init message: Verifiziere Blöcke...
2017-03-23 08:43:15 init message: Verifiziere Blöcke...
2017-03-23 08:43:15 Verifying last 6 blocks at level 3
2017-03-23 08:43:15 [0%]...[16%]...[33%]...[50%]...[66%]...[83%]...[99%]...[DONE].
2017-03-23 08:43:17 No coin database inconsistencies in last 7 blocks (5212 transactions)
2017-03-23 08:43:17  block index           10448ms
2017-03-23 08:43:17 init message: Lade Wallet...
2017-03-23 08:43:17 nFileVersion = 140000
2017-03-23 08:43:17 Keys: 124 plaintext, 0 encrypted, 124 w/ metadata, 124 total
2017-03-23 08:43:17  wallet                   93ms
2017-03-23 08:43:17 setKeyPool.size() = 100
2017-03-23 08:43:17 mapWallet.size() = 29
2017-03-23 08:43:17 mapAddressBook.size() = 24
2017-03-23 08:43:17 mapBlockIndex.size() = 458527
2017-03-23 08:43:17 nBestHeight = 365371
2017-03-23 08:43:17 torcontrol thread start
2017-03-23 08:43:17 init message: Lade Adressen...
2017-03-23 08:43:17 Imported mempool transactions from disk: 0 successes, 0 failed, 0 expired
2017-03-23 08:43:17 Loaded 65201 addresses from peers.dat  434ms
2017-03-23 08:43:17 init message: Lade Sperrliste...
2017-03-23 08:43:17 init message: Starting network threads...
2017-03-23 08:43:17 msghand thread start
2017-03-23 08:43:17 dnsseed thread start
2017-03-23 08:43:17 addcon thread start
2017-03-23 08:43:17 net thread start
2017-03-23 08:43:17 opencon thread start
2017-03-23 08:43:17 init message: Laden abgeschlossen
2017-03-23 08:43:17 GUI: Platform customization: "windows"
2017-03-23 08:43:17 GUI: PaymentServer::LoadRootCAs: Loaded  44  root certificates
2017-03-23 08:43:18 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.13.2/: version 70015, blocks=458525, us=14.207.76.123:9690, peer=0
2017-03-23 08:43:24 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.13.1/: version 70014, blocks=458525, us=14.207.76.123:9694, peer=1
2017-03-23 08:43:25 ProcessMessages(sendcmpct, 5 bytes): Exception 'CDataStream::read(): end of data' caught, normally caused by a message being shorter than its stated length
2017-03-23 08:43:25 ProcessMessages(sendcmpct, 5 bytes) FAILED peer=1
2017-03-23 08:43:25 ProcessMessages(sendcmpct, 5 bytes): Exception 'CDataStream::read(): end of data' caught, normally caused by a message being shorter than its stated length
2017-03-23 08:43:25 ProcessMessages(sendcmpct, 5 bytes) FAILED peer=1
2017-03-23 08:43:25 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.13.1/: version 70014, blocks=458525, us=14.207.76.123:9696, peer=2
2017-03-23 08:43:28 P2P peers available. Skipped DNS seeding.
2017-03-23 08:43:28 dnsseed thread exit
2017-03-23 08:43:31 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.14.0/: version 70015, blocks=458525, us=14.207.76.123:9699, peer=3
2017-03-23 08:43:32 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.13.1/: version 70014, blocks=458525, us=14.207.76.123:9700, peer=4
2017-03-23 08:43:33 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.13.1/: version 70014, blocks=458525, us=14.207.76.123:9701, peer=5
2017-03-23 08:43:51 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.14.0/: version 70015, blocks=458526, us=14.207.76.123:9707, peer=6
2017-03-23 08:45:15 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.13.1/: version 70014, blocks=458526, us=14.207.76.123:9717, peer=8
2017-03-23 08:49:51 receive version message: /Satoshi:0.13.2/: version 70015, blocks=458526, us=14.207.76.123:9755, peer=9

Nicht wirklich, da ist halt etwas mit den übertragenen Daten passiert oder die Nodes 0 und 1 senden Müll.
374  Local / Anfänger und Hilfe / Re: Ein Neuer! on: March 23, 2017, 07:01:34 AM
Verstehe.

Kann mich dann vielleicht jemand aufklären wie es richtig geht?

Ersetz Bitcoin im Kopf durch Euro, dann sollte die Antwort offensichtlich sein. Bitcoin erlaubt es dir einfacher Bezahlung online und ohne Mittelsmann entgegen zu nehmen, aber nicht ohne Aufwand schnell reich zu werden. Das war auch 'früher' nicht so. Die frühen Investoren trugen ein deutlich größeres Risiko das Bitcoin ein Fehlschlag wird.

Womit sollte man anfangen?

Am besten mit viel lesen und falls nötig Fragen stellen.
375  Other / Meta / Re: My account markyminer was hacked. on: March 23, 2017, 06:48:44 AM
My account has been hacked. I can provide any proof of ownership. But I still wanted to post this thread here as a warning.
I will PM admins as well. All I'm hoping for now is to prevent whoever is in control of the account from causing any harm.

Do it.
376  Other / Off-topic / Re: Text based Encryption (e.g. Bible Encryption) on: March 23, 2017, 06:39:57 AM
Hello guys,

I just tought about a kind of text based encryption.
There is already a so called Bible Encryption that can encrypt full words.

http://www.wikihow.com/Encode-and-Decode-Using-a-Bible-Cipher

This is not so hard to do and it's even possible to realize it with a program.

But what if I want to encrypt single letters instead of words?
I could do it the same way and simply add the place of the letter in a word.
So we can also encrypt an alphnumeric string to some number and all of this togehter to a hexadecimal number, can't we? Smiley

Sure.

With this strategy it would be simply possible to write a program to generate a "random" text which could be used for encrypting any alphanumerical string.

Sounds like one time pad, assuming you mean actual random data and not a text. Using a text would make this just another substitution cipher.

Concerning the bible there is maybe a problem with alphanumerical number so you would have to use outwritten numbers as normal numbers...

Is that at all a good idea... such a text based encryption, what do you think? Smiley

No, its vulnerable to probability analysis. Might be enough for some games though.
377  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Answer to the 1MB BitCoin problem! on: March 23, 2017, 06:25:26 AM
The New 0.14 has ASSUMED VALID BLOCKS!!! WTF!!!?

https://bitcoin.org/en/release/v0.14.0
-snip-

-assumevalid=0
378  Other / Meta / Re: Ethical issue about ignoring hacked account on: March 23, 2017, 06:18:00 AM
I have been in touch with the hacker. He has assured me he has just now returned your password to ashapasa account.
Please confirm.

Yes account has been returned, thank you so much for your help. He apologized and said he bought the account and that he is not a hacker.

Again thanks a lot.

Could be anyone claiming this. In order to avoid potential ethical issues I better leave a negative rating. Just to make sure.

For thos not getting it: Its a hyperbole in the hopes that OP will understand the problems with what they are asking for.
379  Economy / Reputation / Re: Quartx & Timelord2067 - are gossips and a liar on: March 22, 2017, 11:45:23 AM
Saying you're an alt of someone else doesn't necessarily mean you're doing something illegal or shady. It's just so the community is aware that they are (or in some cases could potentially be) alts. The reason this is done is that if one of these accounts scams they all get tagged right away and the scammer doesn't get off with much. It's not personal. It's to protect the community from nefarious people.
The fact of the matter is that their statements without arguments are not true!where is the proof?

If there is no proof or its not enough to show a strong connection it will be ignored in case of negative ratings. Timelord sometimes posts ideas and potential connections they cant proof.

Why did he write this if he has no proof?
Quote

Why do you ask me this? Its an untrusted neutral rating, get a grip.

This is not whining. This is clarification. I love justice!

You post in reputation instead of just issueing a single statement in your thread. Looks like whining to me.

[ color=black]We are already focused on our project, the team of programmers is constantly working on this[/color]

I dont think you understood me, but its your time not mine. If you think this thread here will help you, good luck.

-snip-
OUR Registered office address
Suite 4424 Mitchell House, 5 Mitchell Street, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH6 7BD

Besides this office building!

Same shit different location.
380  Economy / Reputation / Re: Quartx & Timelord2067 - are gossips and a liar on: March 22, 2017, 06:57:21 AM
Saying you're an alt of someone else doesn't necessarily mean you're doing something illegal or shady. It's just so the community is aware that they are (or in some cases could potentially be) alts. The reason this is done is that if one of these accounts scams they all get tagged right away and the scammer doesn't get off with much. It's not personal. It's to protect the community from nefarious people.
The fact of the matter is that their statements without arguments are not true!where is the proof?

If there is no proof or its not enough to show a strong connection it will be ignored in case of negative ratings. Timelord sometimes posts ideas and potential connections they cant proof.

It does not matter how much we speak English well !!

And our innovation is important only. if You or someone else read between the lines, do not understand the essence of our project, this does not mean that we want to deceive!

Maybe, maybe not. Your actions(!) matter. So instead of whining here about someone not liking you, maybe work on your project?

Posts like these -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1834796.msg18279164#msg18279164

are what you should focus on. And maybe fixing the odd links in your OP could help as well.

We know our work well and will stand on our own!

Quote
your an illiterate bum looking for $1,000,000. Nuff said!

We have a unique idea and a unique solution. What forbids us to want to attract investments in our project? Grin

Nothing, but you cant expect people to just like you. This is probably one of the most paranoid communities, your words mean little here. Too many came before you with empty words.

Quote
10 Great Russell Street, London, United Kingdom, WC1B 3BQ

Too many came before you that used this address. Maybe it used to say "Cool, London", now it says "Just another fucker renting a mailbox to hide who they are". If you cant handle this, go away, you will find no business here.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 546 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!