...my point being that EVERYONE ALIVE call's god 'him', and not 'her'
Ever think to wonder why? Did you never think that males play a smaller role in the creation we are able to observe (human birth) than do females. Probably not... You will find that ancient religeons always used "her", only modern military systems use "he" |
|
|
|
Do I need to do everything myself?
Just the sex bit I would imagine. |
|
|
|
GOD is not hypothetical, the fact we speak of him wether alive or dead, past or present, is evidence of the image of the diety existing. We all create 'that' image of whatever it is we are talking about, sharing the same reality, with each other, proving (if he exists lol) he does.
God IS hypothetical. Granted; god is a hypothesis shared by many, but it's a hypothesis nonetheless. Also you refer to god as "he", so I feel you are succumbing to gender bias and anthropomorphism (you allude to god being a person, a male one at that). If this hypothetical god were to exist then I think the correct description would be "it" or simply stop at "god". Dry debate talk aside, here's some music I hobby wrote some years back, your writings on sound and vibration reminded me of it, the track is called "cymatics": https://www.cortex7.net/music/cymatics.mp3The track uses a voice sample of Dr Peter Guy Manners: http://www.drpeterguymanners.com/If you knew anything you'd see how something guided me in earlier threads to ensnare the weary.. gender bias? I believe in the straight path man/woman way of life, anything else is sadly, in my opinion, nothing more than sexual deviancy. And I'm not stupid enough to allure god to anyone or anything, i do however have to lower myself to the language you clearly have misperceptions of.. my point being that EVERYONE ALIVE call's god 'him', and not 'her', you to me are sexually bias, which shines brighter than any english language you use.. why do you think I as a scotsman want rid of the english? Because I hate them? This explains what you can say to me dude, it's the language I want rid of, and everything it stands for, since it is designed to cast the spit you try to get me to click on.. like I wanna see everything people link to? Nah, I'm on tis site cause i wanna be, not to look into your whatever degree in educated humour.. get a life and go homeless a few times.. then you'll want him.. if he lets you down, it's cause you know nothing of his language. I was actually trying to be friendly in a roundabout way. But at least you entertained me, and probably others: LAUGH1: You thought I was calling you gay because I used the term "gender bias" LAUGH2:(not certain but probable) You dont know what anthropomorphism means LAUGH3: You read "allude" as "allure", is the Scottish dictionary like a travel version of the English one or are you just stupid? LAUGH4: You assume I could gain control of your system through an MP3 file, you are full of fear and ignorance. Perhaps if you pray to your Scottish god then he will fix it. (don't hold your breath) |
|
|
|
GOD is not hypothetical, the fact we speak of him wether alive or dead, past or present, is evidence of the image of the diety existing. We all create 'that' image of whatever it is we are talking about, sharing the same reality, with each other, proving (if he exists lol) he does.
God IS hypothetical. Granted; god is a hypothesis shared by many, but it's a hypothesis nonetheless. Also you refer to god as "he", so I feel you are succumbing to gender bias and anthropomorphism (you allude to god being a person, a male one at that). If this hypothetical god were to exist then I think the correct description would be "it" or simply stop at "god". Dry debate talk aside, here's some music I hobby wrote some years back, your writings on sound and vibration reminded me of it, the track is called "cymatics": https://www.cortex7.net/music/cymatics.mp3The track uses a voice sample of Dr Peter Guy Manners: http://www.drpeterguymanners.com/ |
|
|
|
If the price of bitcoin increases 15-20% annually over the next 30 years I will be very happy!
I predict you will be very happy!  |
|
|
|
They don't need to know what BTC is, they just need to be assured that your sister really does want to transfer those £600 to someone else.
Precisely! It is her money after all. Seems nowadays that banks have started intelligence gathering operations akin to the military, and we're all potential terrorists! I mean... You work hard to get some money, taxed along the way, and then when you come to spend it you get treated like a naughty kid stealing from the cookie jar, things have got to change! Viva Bitcoin! |
|
|
|
 NOTES:
Shapes included (abstracted): Houses, X, C, H
System included (abstract): 2 inputs -> Clearing Process -> 2 outputs.
Progression from dark to light (left to right) to signify the "clearing" process.
Signal flow implied by right blue arrow contrasting against white.
2D logo is derived from a 3D model.
Animated 3D logo ident is possible in future.
For youtube promo vids, application splashscreens etc.
My latest app splashcreen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6IVh2nqbVQ
(OK thats enough...  even I think I'm overtalking this! ) |
|
|
|
Black And Decker ... drilling into the very "soul" of mankind |
|
|
|
Also many young bitcoiners are tweaked up on buzz drinks and computer games. (shakes fist "giiit of my lawn")They are only satisfied when the chart is in expo mode, if it's bumbling along sideways they feel like a junkie without a needle. I am confident we will see a continued noisy rise, and it will retouch or cross the expo line again. EDIT: quoting OP because he nails it... If you do not have patience, go waste your money in Vegas. If you do not have vision, go waste your money on booze. If you have common sense, invest a small percentage of your money in Bitcoin and hodl for at least 10 years.
Remember, if you are not on the train you can NEVER go to the moon |
|
|
|
Bitcoin adoption is still in early stage. $6 billions is just a tiny drop in ocean of finances.
Agreed, most people don't realise just what a chump change sum of money 6G$ is from a global perspective. |
|
|
|
I'm sure landlords think your theory is absolutely great! Don't have one. I didn't imply that you did. But if you have a roof over your head and are rent free then you're onto a good thing, good luck to you! |
|
|
|
Finally, when you own a house you have zero flexibility. I really don't want to own a house thank you very much. I agree with this theory, and I've been pushing it increasingly further over time to see how far I can go. I'm sure landlords think your theory is absolutely great! |
|
|
|
There is more than have enough data to agree with your points I was relating to the OP's point on that point in particular having evidence to prove and back up the argument that it is not a conspiracy theory but a fact that's not very well known. . Just pointing out that so much shit is being posted... Haha, you quoted the stories. I can only assume those are the ones you consider as "so much shit"  |
|
|
|
Smart money is realizing all crypto is backdoored
So crypto the problem
NSA has cooked so much of crypto its got no trust
Backdoored how? |
|
|
|
Honestly, this was more an exercise in thought.
As proven by many of the people posting here, reading comprehension is going down fast. It may well be under 9,000 at this point....
I laughed when I saw someone resurrected this thread because no one reads the original post, and mostly everyone is not reading the title.
I AM SAYING BITCOIN CREATED THE NSA/CIA/FBI!!!!!!!!!!!!
BITCOIN!!!!!!!
sincerely, get some brainz.
Haha, here's what readers can assume: [1] Thread title was written by user for whom English is a second language. This happens quite a lot on this forum, it being international in scope. [2] Somehow a temporal paradox may have occured allowing Bitcoin to have influenced events many decades before Bitcoin ever existed. |
|
|
|
I was always wondering if this random payment is even possible. It would have to be someone who had your BTC address from before, right?
It's possible but not very probable: The probability that a mistyped address is accepted as being valid is 1 in 2^32, that is, approximately 1 in 4.29 billion. source: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/AddressIf by chance an address mistype were a valid address then the sender loses the coins. The coins are sent to that address. If that mistyped valid address is already in use then the user will receive the coin, but that again is a very small chance. Most addresses are not in use. If it is not in use then the coins will still go to it. I am not sure about the mechanism from here though? Say an unused address has coins deposited to it what happens to them, will some future user get lucky and generate a new wallet with that address only to find it with coin already in? I suspect wallet clients will check any newly minted addresses for transactions, if any found then forget it and generate a new one. In which case the coin is gone "forever". |
|
|
|
Thanks friends. I'm not using php so that link is not for me. I will go with sha512 I guess.
Yes, but what random number generator are you using? Some can allow hackers to gain advantage above house edge. |
|
|
|
You need crytpographically secure random func, many standard rand funcs are not. If using PHP server side then take a look at this: http://php.net/manual/en/function.openssl-random-pseudo-bytes.phpThen hash it, if you want to be really tight (maybe overkill for gambling with low max bets) then use multiple hashes of whirlpool. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
