Theymos banned only mixers, and Wasabi is not a mixer, it is a CoinJoin implementation.
Theymos may not categorize them as mixers, but literally they are mixers. In short, they are referred to as decentralized mixers. What I get is Theymos wants to stay away from trouble but he is making some exceptions when it is necessary. Mixers are not illegal, they are important to break your links. Theymos is still soft for a few mixers who are advertising them as not a mixer but basic business model is the same as mixers. |
|
|
|
You have been winning this chronic disease for a decade, how come you are giving up and have concluded that the disease is now winning. Did your doctor say you cannot win? Is there no money again to further the treatment? If the later is the case, this forum can raise more than enough Leo.
There are no much of your type here, especially in the technical section of the forum. What happens to your privacy gospel. Who will be contesting with LoyceV in the bitcoin Geek category of the annual award.
Leo! Tell us you want to live for some months or years and I'll be fine. You can do something like what Lauda did and I will be fine, don't tell us you gonna die or do you plan to suicide?
Let us respect a person's wish. It's unnecessary to ask him so many questions when he wants to live is peace for rest of the days. It's important he stays with his family and close friends. |
|
|
|
There are no question anyone will have that Kruw's moral is low and mentally illGood riddance o_e_l_e_o. No one else I've interacted with on this forum has done more damage to the future of Bitcoin and future of freedom than you. Even after your involvement with the Chipmixer scam, you knowlingy spread continuous lies about privacy weaknesses in Bitcoin that do not exist. Your scheme of tricking people into giving up their data and stealing their coins will finally come to an end. Ninjastic: https://ninjastic.space/post/63517379It continues even in a separate thread. This is a pathetic post. I would delete it if I were you. This is just proving the kind of person you are. Someone is ill and you say you are happy. Good luck in your life...
Why should I excuse or forgive o_e_l_e_o's continuous attacks on Bitcoin just because he's mortal? Ninjastic: https://ninjastic.space/post/62422359Wasabi team supports censorship and think it's the right way.If people are not convinced yet that wasabi devs are incompetent clowns, here are a few notable assertions from the podcast: You’re changing the acceptance of which coins do you consider valid—not on the Bitcoin consensus layer—that’s the other important thing. Bitcoin consensus is still permissionless and decentralized enough that you can make payments even if you are blacklisted: you can just either get hashrate yourself or bribe a miner to hash a block with your transaction in it—so Bitcoin works. But what we’re talking about here is: will you get access to someone else’s computer? Will someone else allow you to write stuff on his computer, basically? And in my opinion, ultimately it comes down to property rights. A coordinator is just someone else’s computer—and it’s not yours. So you ought to be quite thankful that someone actually provides you a service where you can use his computer for certain things like coordinating a round. This guy just asserted that my decision to join my inputs with someone else is the same as taking control of his computer. He also stated that blacklisting does not happen on Bitcoin because you could bribe a miner, which is not true. The reason you do not get blacklisted is because it is censorship resistant. A mining pool blacklisting transactions would directly attack their revenue and reputation, but even if it did not, then some other pool would mine it sooner or later. By the way why doesn't the same apply on coinjoin? "Coinjoin consensus is still permissionless and decentralized enough that you can make payments even if you are blacklisted: you can just leave Wasasi and use a censorship resistant alternative". But then the more pressing matter is it’s not always gonna be clear-cut, especially when you start making transactions, especially when you have things like CoinSwap, Lightning, PayJoin—we’re working really hard to make the life of chain surveillance miserable, and that means that they’re gonna have many more false positives. This is the plan guys! They are paying a blockchain analysis company so that they can verify beforehand that their product becomes less and less accurate!  [...] Ninjastic: https://ninjastic.space/post/61220171Wasabi is doxxing their competitors.Nope, haven't moved at all. Just waiting for an example:
You already received multiple examples, why would you require more besides the ones I already gave you? Pay attention, this is the article published on April 27th: https://nopara73.medium.com/samouraileaks-samouraidevs-sockpuppet-exposed-7ce654b92c0bYou are attacking the wrong people. A Wasabi developer exposing the Samourai developer using sock puppets to deceive social media users out of their Bitcoins is not "doxxing". Liar and faking. Ninjastic: https://ninjastic.space/post/62421991Thanks to the friend who helped me with giving the information. In a nutshell when you are using wasabi and advertising it, you are helping a team who are [1.] Morally down and wish your death [2.] Lying to you constantly [3.] Supporting censorship and do not care about bitcoin and your privacy [4.] ignorant and do not have basic practice idea of handling bitcoin addresses [5.] thinking it is fine to doxxing their competitor and then lying again. Wasabi is a scam!Boycott Wasabi, educate others to avoid using Wasabi, forward this information to the people who are helping Wasabi. [I am making this topic self-moderating to filter known trolls] |
|
|
|
Kruw's posts on this board are single-handedly making the Wasabi signature campaign look bad. I mean how would it look if people see advertisements for a service whose contributors can't even show some respect for a dying person. These are things even those in favor of blacklisting would be against.
If this guy is a Dev and this is his moral then I don't think there is a reason to Trust Wasabi wallet. I wonder what is the thought of the people involved in the signature campaign including the manager involved in it. On the other hand, there were some other issues related to Wasabi wallet in the past. The forum does not moderate advertising except mixers in the recent days but I think as the member of the community we really need to avoid such projects that has people with low moral. Someday something may go wrong and they will wish you to die. They may even expose your coin and report it to the agencies who are looking for your information. |
|
|
|
|
You will stay forever in our memory, you are irreplaceable. Live these remaining months only for yourself. Don't give a second thought about who is thinking what. Your life, your rules. Stay with the people you love and enjoy time together. Farewell brother.
|
|
|
|
You really are a nasty woman. Your breasts are disgusting. I am the only entity who has advocated for a safety procedure that could prevent the next 5 pandemics. But since you hate me so much, I will refuse to prevent such pandemics, so the rest of your miserable life will be filled with pain and suffering. Is that what you want? If you want me to be nice to you, then you need to examine whether it is a good idea to be such a hateful pile of rubbish.
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
I have been noticing you for last a few weeks, saw the development, I also sent you PM suggesting what to do because I thought you were truly lost. But it seems that's not the case with you. You are the one who is hateful to everyone even the people who really wanted to help you. If you have a Ph.D then you earned it, why would anyone need to bother about it. You can be a Ph. D. holder but if you don't know the basic of social skills then everyone will be harassed by you everywhere. Learn to respect others, you will receive it in return. Words mean nothing. You want to save the next 5 pandemics, take a schedule and visit The White House. My life has no influence over what you do. I can save the earth from the next natural disaster but I refuse to do it because I hate you. It sounds BS. Adult men don't blame others for their failure. |
|
|
|
F@#$ off. I understand the joke. But you are making the bull@#$% claim that I do not have a Ph.D. when I really do because you really are that f@#$ing stupid. So f@#$ off. And no, I will not try to prove this to you because you are nasty woman. Your breasts are nasty.
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
I seriously doubt you have any social skill. It's very important for a person. The behaviors only proves you are a lonely person with a laptop in your grand mothers basement. You have no job, no business. Your so called Ph. D. is wasted and now you are living a life with the mercy of your grand mother's pension. |
|
|
|
Your degree is fraudulent. I am reporting you for your fraudulent degree.
Sad to know you don't understand a simple joke LOL |
|
|
|
but why it took him 1 year to do it is a question only for him.
I already thought of some which I think you missed to read because I was updating the last post. My guess was close.
Did you have any disagreement, argument where JollyGood felt insulted, did you avoid him in a conversation, did you not support a logic from JollyGood, did you make a post in one of his self-moderated topic which he did not like it? Did you ever piss him off?
If you had, then your tag is justified. You can not do anything that will upset JollyGood. Be his slave if you don't have strong character on bitcointalk. |
|
|
|
Sign a message using a known bitcoin address so that later you do not create question that it was not you. If you have a staked address then use that address. My guess was close. Did you have any disagreement, argument where JollyGood felt insulted, did you avoid him in a conversation, did you not support a logic from JollyGood, did you make a post in one of his self-moderated topic which he did not like it? Did you ever piss him off? If you had, then your tag is justified. You can not do anything that will upset JollyGood. Be his slave if you don't have strong character on bitcointalk. Unfortunately some members like him so much that they always support him. They like to see all sorts of reputation issue from other members which are directly and indirectly caused by inappropriate use of trust feedback from JollyGood. nutildah 2024-01-05 Reference This user claims to have been hacked when a loan request was made using their account. They claim the reason is they re-used their Bitcointalk password on another forum. I recommend never giving a loan to this user or trusting them with any amount of money. Stalker22 2023-01-26 Reference A cheater with multiple accounts, has cheated in multiple contests and bounties, abuses the merit system... yahoo62278 2023-01-25 Reference Sending merits to their alt, cheating art/pumpkin contest, deceiving users on forum. If I had written any of those three feedbacks I would have written them in red In other words you are telling yahoo62278, nutildah are confused and still have not learn to use the feedback system correctly. Only you and JollyGood learnt the system and using the system appropriately. Nice one. I always said, these days DT become too easy that anyone can gain it easily. You, JollyGood and some others are very good example. but if you can't be trusted, you can't be trusted, period, even if the following happened a year ago It sounds like, I am DT, I can do whatever I can, fuck you. |
|
|
|
The shit-posting crossed so much that Switzerland got angry LOL. I didn't get angry, I got even  To answer your question: I wouldn't leave negative for shitposting or buying an account. The result for this specific user is shit-posting. Let's see what you and other think about the following posts. Example response to topic: My 10 Year ( and some days) Bitcointalk Anniversary It is nice to read part of your journey to Bitcoin and how you ended up at this forum. Well, it certainly was the future more than 10 years ago and here it is Bitcoin is still going strong today (albeit with a much higher price attached).
I wonder how many of those very early year (2009-2011) poker players or other gamblers used Bitcoin when it was worth below $1 and won/loss bets. Some may have held on to their winnings and made a fortune. Others could have lost something worth less than $50 at the time but now worth $millions. This was made on 23rd response to yahoo62278https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5477454.msg63311867#msg63311867Example response to topic: People on this site are questioning my education because they are stupid. Signing your posts with Ph.DD is simply pure gold and clearly rattled the OP  Well, now that his so-called superior intellect has been challenged by your Ph.DD I guess he literally does not know what to do or where to turn when confronted with your own DD intellect. On a serious note, it is very sad to see the way he has been pretending to be a member of a university staff with the sole intention of misusing his name (probably out of spite/revenge). Example response to topic: Should Ratimov aka Symmetrick be in DT1? I echo your words, I have never seen an account of that level of prominence implode the way the Ratimov account did. Though accounts will continue to go down the same path, it might never happen again to another prominent account (or one near that level). Be careful there you do not want to get a reputation for being a regular latecomer. I wonder, what is it that is happening around you that stops you from joining the party on time? There are many similar posts [I echo, I support, it's a nice part: then write some lines which contains backscratching to make the target user happy to continue their support] and even you will find such type of posts in topics which are bumped even from 5 to 10 page back from a board. I wonder we have another user who had the same mentality as JollyGood. He would had a neutral feedback something like: BEWARE: "JollyGood" cannot be trusted. There are serious accusations of this account using AI to post and constantly shit-posting, backscratching. I will remove the feedback if further information is presented.
|
|
|
|
I am lost. What is with the user @Peanutswar? Does it mean user @Peanutswar was a victim of similar case? Please clear. There has been some issue with taking a loan from @shasan recently. My account was compromised and the hacker/scammer tried to take a loan from him using my account.
Keeping your account secure is your responsibility. Do you have a declaration like this? If you have then it's @shasan's fault if he sent the money without verifying the message. But if you don't have such declaration then it's between you and @shasan. If @shasan is not convinced and ask for repay then you have to take the responsibility. I am sure you don't have such announcement. I suggest you make one as soon as possible. |
|
|
|
It's not a big deal anyone can be a Ph.D.
This one was easier 😉.  Thank you for helping me in my third PhD. Mr. Jones always is a kind hearten man. |
|
|
|
So as not to clutter Loyce's thread,
I was reading LoyceV's reply on his self-moderated topic [ 1], [ 2]. The shit-posting crossed so much that Switzerland got angry LOL. But good to read at the some point that we all agree, none of it deserves a red tag. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't have tagged any of those members except perhaps for Symmetrick.
I see many neutral on his feedback page. Not a fan of Symmetrick that does not mean when I get a chance, I will give him a negative feedback where the accusations were one sided. Obviously everything about Symmetrick ended up controversial and perhaps true but without concrete evidences of scamming or confirming by the victim a red tag is very inappropriate. I see Poker Player had the same judgement of leaving a negative feedback. They come with words like, "likely..." but then you see the feedback is red. I always said the DT system become too easy to gain and for some members it became a passion to leave feedback to others page so that they can gain some attention and be included by others. In any case, haven't we covered this ground extensively, thoroughly, and to the point where we don't need another thread about it?
I don't remember but you have to consider my age too. After a certain age, a man starts to old. On the other hand, if we extensively covered the ground then we were supposed to see some improvement but there are no improvement at all. JollyGood still is in DT and still is leaving inappropriate feedback to members pages and demotivating the members to continue their time on the forum. It always happen when someone disagree with his opinion and tries to overrule his words. But my question is, have all of them been presented with information to defend themselves? It seems there's a chance that it will turn to neutral as the feedback says.
It sounds like if anyone wants to demand something from me then they will leave a negative feedback with an speculation then it's my job to invest my time and present unnecessary links, quotes to get the red feedback removed with a neutral feedback? In other words, you hostage me with a negative feedback to demand your needs. |
|
|
|
In my opinion, if someone didn't scam and steal money, they can be forgiven for just about anything. Anything that the forum doesn't deem illegal anyways.
In addition red tags are for failed trade, you covered the proven scam thing anyway. Ask and respect the decision. It may or may not go the way you wish, but that's what you have to deal with. How many inappropriate feedback you will need to see before you make the decision that it's enough with the respect? You are not supporting the reason for the red feedback but you are fine with having JollyGood on your trust list. |
|
|
|
I was reading the topic What is going on???, and was about to reply a user. While I was reading, I noticed the discussion about another inappropriate feedback and it's left by none other but JollyGood. If my memory is working properly then I read someone [a JollyGood fan] was writing or JollyGood himself was saying that JollyGood was revising left feedbacks and updating the inappropriate negative feedbacks in to neutral but it seems he has not changed at all. Check the recent feedbacks he lefts for others [;dt added].borovichok: Received tag for AI posting and Changed hand. tjtonmoy: Merit abuse a year ago jvanname: Attention seeking and trolling. Symmetrick: Changed hand, we know the rest anyway.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1016855;dtThese are from last December and 8 days from January 2024. How many of you really think you were going to tag these guys for the same reason? Will you also address these feedback as inappropriate? Edited to add urls of profile trust pages |
|
|
|
I agree that it should fit better in reputation board. I nearly made one myself back when BC had a piling case against them [now resolved]
You did a good job for BC guys. I will like to see someone is following the above cases against Rollbit and keeping the table updated. Excellent work Peeps Place. |
|
|
|
A skilled copywriter will easily "tweak" the text so that it looks more like it was written by a human. Honestly, that's what it looks like the most to me.
This also could be the case. But if the author is going through the trouble of doing some re-writing, that's OK with me personally, as it means they at least put some thought & time into it. If just one or two words are changed, they add the words "I personally believe" at the beginning, or they add extra punctuation or something cheesy, that's still bad. That's Symmetrick Ratimov was doing but for the OP, we will never know. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
