but shouldnt we get like about 0.004 a share at 1500 th/s?
No. |
|
|
|
162.69622134 BTC for dividends, 0.00209952/share
Apparently, this. Fantastic! |
|
|
|
Setting that up was a lot of fun. Thanks for another great machine, pepper-people.  |
|
|
|
I've got my Habanero hooked up to a Corsair H110 cooler. Currently I have the stock fans from Corsair on it. It looks like this: I'm mining w/ cgminer 4.3.3 running on OSX. My cgminer args are as follows: cgminer.exe -o http://site:port -u <user> -p <pass> --hfa-fan 100 --hfa-temp-target 0 --hfa-temp-overheat 110 --hfa-fail-drop 0 --hfa-hash-clock 400 --api-listen --api-network When I bring up the pepper mining app and look at dies, I'm seeing this:  Any suggestions? I've applied Antec Thermal Grease to the chips and torqed down the cooler. FWIW I had almost the same problem -- ASIC 0 & 2 were 10-15 degrees hotter than 1 & 3. I tried tightening the screws on those corners and it had no effect on temperature at all. I hesitated to take the water block off and reseat it because I had been very careful when I applied the grease the first time, it was evenly applied, no bubbles, etc -- but eventually that's what I did, and it's like a different machine, just 4 degrees of difference now. All I did was take the water block off, clean off the old grease, and reapply new grease. Somehow it just worked out better the second time. |
|
|
|
Greetings,
So, namecoins from 2014-03-08 to present have been paid, mostly.
Caught a small issue in my code, again, after the payout was made which underpaid some people who had mined on multiple addresses with options set to pay the same NMC address. Working on that now and getting the balance of payments out to the few people this affected.
-wk
Fantastic! And, received -- thanks! |
|
|
|
|
This is a wretched development. I am truly sorry for your troubles. Thank you for coming back to try to fix things.
|
|
|
|
My apologies for not being able to catch up with the current debate. The current status is that friedcat committed to the 27-MAY as the date to release the financial reports and he communicated his intent to wait for the first round of payments and the financials to release dividends (thus bringing stuff into alignment). That day has now passed without prior announcement of any potential delay. There is no technical reason why dividend payments couldn't be made independently from any financial report release date - it's just a matter of preference. I am currently expecting to hear back on that matter, I have no further information available.
I'd like to reassure shareholders that there is a shared interest in getting this resolved soon. As such I see the responsibility with the board to follow up on this.
Thank you so much. This is very much appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
Just wanted to give this one bump. These are beautiful coins, and the current bid on eBay is $950 for the set (which is roughly 1.7 BTC or 89 LTC). The auction will end tomorrow, Friday, 5/30.
|
|
|
|
|
Were these sold originally as blanks, or have they been redeemed?
|
|
|
|
Dammit. You 1st post, 1000th page post sniper.
happy now? Quiet! Don't use up 1000th page frivolously, or else friedcat might wait for page 2000. |
|
|
|
|
I post this to fluff us closer to 1000.
|
|
|
|
In case anybody missed this, frozencpu.com now takes BTC.
It was blowing up all over reddit  Yeah, that's where I got it. Just sayin. |
|
|
|
I don't know of any company of AM's size that doesn't make an attempt at relations.
Do you know of any company AM's size that creates money printing machines? And by the way, almost every company in bitcoin-space is abominable at public relations. AM at least tells the truth & follows through. |
|
|
|
|
In case anybody missed this, frozencpu.com now takes BTC.
|
|
|
|
I can't wait to get my shipping notification!!!!
Got my notification yesterday.  |
|
|
|
I've gotta say, this sure is pretty rude of him. He must know that everyone was going to be waiting for this day and too not even mention that there was a delay is pretty heartless:(
Imagine taking a loan from a bunch of anonymous people and then paying back that loan like 450%. Then, continuing to pay other people that 'bought' the debt from those random people. To top it all off, all these new random people complain a lot and demand a lot of your attention, calling you heartless etc. I think a healthy dose of perspective is in order. Thank you for saying this so well. I keep thinking it, but haven't been able to sum it up clearly. Yes, friedcat owes shareholder some information. But holy cow, some perspective is in order. This is uncharted territory. |
|
|
|
Even on the Havelock Exchange the original offer said: "All shares are entitled to an equal percentage of dividends and all shares sold in the IPO are considered voting shares."
They also said in their email to subscribers: "Announcing the upcoming public offering for PETA-MINE CryptX (PETA)" which leads me to believe we invested in "PETA-MINE CryptX". PETA-MINE is the project, but the public offering was for "PETA-MINE CryptX". It looks like CryptX is the shortened name for the original "PETA-MINE CryptX".
But if this is all wrong, what can we then vote on? May be all we own is the right to receive dividends but cannot control any aspect of the mining operation?
Yes, this is all confusing and perhaps an explanation is due from CryptX.
In the mean time, let them finish what they're doing. So far, neither Havelock nor CryptX have let us down. It all seems to be getting better and better.
I do think there is a disconnect between the idea of "voting shares" and how the project has actually been managed, and maybe that should be clarified. But frankly, although I love the idea of voting, I think the reality of opening every Peta-Mine decision up to discussion and a vote would be a disaster. There have been so many changes in the past 8 months, if we had stopped to discuss every one of them -- I just can't imagine that could even have been done. We can't even receive a surprise doubling in per-share hashrate without a lengthy, painful and baffling debate over whether that is good or bad. At this point, I'm content knowing that cryptx does check in on this thread and does listen to posted concerns that, you know, make sense. |
|
|
|
I am auctioning off a set of 2 Lealana 10 LTC .5-oz silver coins from series one. In these series one coins, there is a slight bulge in the hologram over the private keys, as the coins did not have a deep enough depression for the keys. This error was fixed in later Lealana coins. They are in like-new condition, and will ship in the original blue leatherette case. I will not break the set. I am holding this auction on eBay, however, so this post is just a notification that it's happening. The ebay auction is here, if you'd like to learn more. Please do not bid here.   Thank you for looking. |
|
|
|
Got mine. It's awesome.  It feels like it could survive a hammer attack. Thanks guys for going such great work! More pictures here. |
|
|
|
mikemikemike has allot of sock-puppet accounts
lets look at PETA from an objective point of view
their profit margin is competitive, no point arguing about what they do with it
assume your choice is between buying hardware, a cloud contract or PETA shares
since PETA does everything for you we will only discuss management of revenue from other options
the intelligent strategy with either the hardware or the cloud contract is to maximize reinvestment's of initial revenue
otherwise you are holding something that is diminishing in value and in returns
with the exponential increase in difficulty, a cloud contract or mining hardware is destined to make a fixed return, you will never make more then double what you made in the first span of difficulty doubling,
aka if you made 6BTC in 2 months, assuming diff doubling rate of 2 months, you will never make more then 12BTC in the lifetime of the hardware or mining contract
so if you instead focus on reinvesting, you can grow to a point where the asymptotic curve of returns is a significant amount in $ for a long period.
I see you posting a lot but you never have anything of substance. "...otherwise you are holding something that is diminishing in value and in returns..." After August 4, 2014 that is exactly what you are holding with Petamine. This is easily seen in CryptX's forecast in the "BTC mined 10 days" column. Numbers speak more than words, so let's see some and add some substance to your words. not in this case, numbers are pure speculation think for second, and look at what i posted, take the point of view of someone wanting to invest in mining BTC PETA is the best strategy forward Agreed. And I have not seen any numbers to refute this. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
