If he doesn't get banned, he probably at least deserves having negative trust in my opinion. A lot of people are aiming for such rank(both for monetization or coolness purposes) and here he is posting random crap.
Went through 5 pages of his post history, barely a single decent post. Every single one is on an altcoin section.
This could be a solution too, but wonder how can you register back in 2015 and spam for so long without being detected. I thought that this is traded account and some newbie started spamming with it but seems like the owner is the same from the day 1
|
|
|
He is not banned, even though the report is marked as good. I guess he is not going to be banned for the above mentioned plagiarism. He should have putted the text between quote tags but... I don't know, buit if he was a newbie I think the outcome would be different.
|
|
|
Check this analysis from today > https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5052019.0You can see how many newbies have received their first merit by those high ranked members. Just look for the nFirstTime parameter. Based on the table I've given merit to 12 newbies for their first time. I ran a service to help those who needed 1 point to rank up as I had not so many sMerit but I gave them all. I still try to give away all the sMerit I have to keep the wheel rolling
|
|
|
~
Look man, I've been reporting rule-breakers since the time I got involved with this forum. I'm not so experienced as other users or the mods, but after almost 2000 successful reports here is my observation > In this sea of newbies registered every day you can find probably 2-3 users that have real interest in cryptocurrency, and are here to stay the rest are accounts used for > 20% - bumping thread (quite a business here) they are controlled by a few people. 30% - alt accounts for abusing the bounties 30%- legit people heard that they can make money online 15%- banned people, just ban evading. 3% - people having different issues, looking for help. 2% - announcing new projects, services etc. Note > this is just based only on my observation. Big part of those above get banned. I'm talking only for the newbies here, how you can see them in a different way as the majority are here only to harm/pollute the forum? I know that there are good people out there with good intentions and sooner or later they gonna pass trough this shitposting border and come out as legit users but it takes time.
|
|
|
Maybe just an off-topic but, JC why don't you put up a link to the Fit to Talk site in your signature? It will be much easier for people to get there. One more idea, put up a list with links to all your projects and link it in the signature. I still find project you have started and gave up on some time ago but I have never been aware of. You have a bad exposure, use the signature for it. It's powerful tool, you know.
|
|
|
~ Which one of these would you say op falls into: its just a matter of time.humanity used many objects for trade even sea shells and they all took some time because people dont like to changes.especially if its about the money we all want to keep it safe.banks did that for a long time but its time to change now.nothing can resist against revolution.
Fits perfectly to the Level 0-value Analyzer ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) You have a bigger overview of the spam and longer experience generated for years here, I guess you can come up with more categories, but those are the main ones I face every day.
|
|
|
I'm playing with the Trezor password manager, but how can I be sure that my passwords are save with trezor? I see trezor needs permission to access my files in OneDrive,it is there where creates a database I know, but how save this is? Maybe I shall move my question to their thread.
|
|
|
You can count me too. Seems interesting ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) I was just a member when the merit system came and I had not so much content but I can guess what will be the score before the merit - around 41 ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
You have a different levels of spam. - Level The worst Shitposter The lowest level is one word/line shitposters like "Nice", "Good project", "Like", etc. - Level Broken shitposter Posting in so broken english that you cannot understand what he is talking about, example " I conceive that could be viable, mainly in a burly rubberneck loci in organization to construct the pay business in carry easy and fast." I had to copy this one,I just can't make up something like this. To this level belong also the shitposters that post totally offtopic. - Level Advanced Shitposter There you have the one-two liners like, " I like this project, I think this project have a great future, I believe in the project that's why I want to invest in it." or copy-paste previous comments. - Level 0-value Analyzer Then next lever is a bit more sophisticated spam, like analysis of something obvious or something that have no meaning at all like " I like the XXX coin because it's based on CryptoNight which is a proof-of-work algorithm created for mining with ordinary CPU-GPUs" and so on. - Level The Fake Guru Then you have the highest level of spam which is plagiarism from external sources, I'm not talking about the copy-paste the previous shit-post this is normal practice for the fist levels but this is a text copied from Internet and spun trough the Article spinners. Those are the worst level of Spam to detect.
|
|
|
You forgot to put location. Are you shipping worldwide?
|
|
|
He has to sign a message from an address used earlier before the hack which was posted somewhere in the forum and has not been altered. The Ideal case is if he has a stacked Bitcoin address and can sign message from it. Then a DT can tag the account but to get it back it will take some time.
|
|
|
Let's see, something like this? ~snip~ Guess I'll never figure out how to embed the picture direclty into the post ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) There you go I fixed it. And i will prove you wrong... Checked your post history BTW, I'm not giving random merits ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) What I can say is that you have some good posts and many one-liners but are better than most shitposters. Congrats, now you are Jr. I just love Meme's ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Thanks man, appreciate it! What did i do wrong with the picture? I checked a bit on google today but didn't find the answer, also i used the embed forum link of meme generator. Hoping to see many more memes here! You needed 1 merit to rank up and to remove the newbies restriction. If you are newbie you cannot embed pictures.
|
|
|
Hope we can get an input from moderator to see what can we do in this cases. The last few posts are with just one min. difference, so maybe this should be enough to be reported as spam flooding.
|
|
|
Added. I don't think this is Beginner material though, there are many things that can fail. Especially the 64 character password is extremely tricky to remember long term (I can't even remember where I put my paper wallet).
Do we collect only a beginners guides? I didn't knew that. It says [GUIDES] on Bitcointalk in the title. Maybe you can add a caution sign and add that need a certain knowledge to perform the operations given in the guide or just a simple " For advance users" will do the job. (I can't even remember where I put my paper wallet). This sounds bad, it's time to make a new guide on how to store your paper wallets save and remember where you have put it
|
|
|
This is happening from last week, I already reported 2 cases and the OPs got banned/nuked for plagiarism. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg46639115#msg46639115@OP If it falls under copy paste, they deserve a clear ban. But tagging by DT will not stop those, IMO.
You'll notice that they have just added attribution and a small insignificant comment on the end in attempt to make it "comply" to the rules. There is no source mentioned, the text is not in quotes so it is pure case of plagiarism. Seems like the mods are on the same opinion since I got them both banned ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Let's see, something like this? ~snip~ Guess I'll never figure out how to embed the picture direclty into the post ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) There you go I fixed it. And i will prove you wrong... Checked your post history BTW, I'm not giving random merits ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) What I can say is that you have some good posts and many one-liners but are better than most shitposters. Congrats, now you are Jr.
|
|
|
1. Add merit requirements for the participants: Jr. Member 6 and above Member 15 above Full member 110 Sr. member 265 Hero 515 Legendary 1015
2. Add rules for the Bounty Managers and penalties
3. Restrict the participants up to 100 max.
4. Kick out everyone quoting their reports from previous weeks.
5. Pay only in bitcoin/eth to avoid scammers
6. Every manager who have not enough trust rating to you an escrow.
|
|
|
It's better to have a list with all the spam-free bounties running ATM, I've seen a few before. But separate section I don't really thing it's gonna happen any time soon.
|
|
|
most people here only work in the bounty and always obey the rules but sometimes it's always banned
This is why they all get banned. Here is not a working place, it's a forum meant to develop ideas and improve the block-chain ecosystem together with all the concurrency projects, but huge part of the users see it as a main source of income which is completely wrong concept and ruined the idea of discussion. They add no value to the discussions here only posting meaningless content to reach the bounty requirements, all with the sole purpose to be rich one day. If you are drawn to the forum only for income, you are doing it wrong.
|
|
|
some say from several sources that many accounts are banned on this forum and this MOD does it simultaneously, is that true ?? I just want to know this information from here, is it true that this forum will be tightened until it's not clear.
Yeah, you heard it right. And more accounts are to be banned if they don't follow the rules.
|
|
|
|