Maybe it was burned down!  Keep us up to date, please  Oh god, let's hope not! Enough of burning rigs out there... |
|
|
|
Looks like someone got mad at the recent price drop... |
|
|
|
I did ROI... but only because the miner I had was offered  Had a Gridseed 5-chip lying around when they were first released. Also helped setting up Gridseed rigs, and all of them had ROI, as they were set-up early in the game |
|
|
|
marcotheminer, can you please switch my payment address to 38x1EhWuzHHmckWJyzGsNeDbzBGmWZL7aC ? Sorry to bother, but as you know I had issues logging in with my first account and this new account/phone number pair is working correctly |
|
|
|
Are you having trouble with SMS verification? cannot seem to receive any of your confirmation texts. Since I had my session still active on my desktop, I had to go there... From there, I'm trying to switch to another number, but the other number is also not getting texts. Anything up?
It should be working fine. Have you tried the call feature? Yes, still having the same issues. The number works correctly... Meanwhile, tried to create a new account with another phone number and it worked. I had no funds in the other one, so I'll just switch accounts, I think... |
|
|
|
I thought about what the OP is saying myself when I read the release notes on the 0.10 RC... But since the code is always public, I've discarded these thoughts You should have asked. I was surprised people didn't. Though there are many reasons around the level of publicly visible review and software testing, there is more elaboration available now that I couldn't include in the release notes when I wrote them: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2rrxq7/on_why_010s_release_notes_say_we_have_reason_to/Libsecp256k1 isn't done yet. It won't be used for consensus relevant behavior in Bitcoin core until it's more mature and reviewed. Andytoshi gave a good explanation for the why we can be reasonably comfortable with signing-- that it's verified with a separate implementation at runtime (and has been cross verified against other implementations), and the scope for attacks in signing are narrow and auditable through conventional means, though more review is always useful. If you were going to attack cryptosystems used in Bitcoin, OpenSSL would arguably make a much better target due to its complexity, opacity, and people's habit of blindly updating it due to its frequent security issues: see also the recent issues with OpenSSL's latest update breaking Bitcoin nodes. Yes, it's true, I should have asked. It's an important topic that I managed to ignore after quite some time using bitcoind and Bitcoin-QT without issues... I seem to have missed that post on reddit. After that post and this thread, I feel like my initial concerns have been addressed, so thank you for that and thanks for the hardwork on developing Bitcoin Core |
|
|
|
|
Are you having trouble with SMS verification? cannot seem to receive any of your confirmation texts. Since I had my session still active on my desktop, I had to go there... From there, I'm trying to switch to another number, but the other number is also not getting texts. Anything up?
|
|
|
|
Payment recieved, thank you On another note, I tried to login from my phone to withdrawal, but I didn't get the confirmation code... Thankfully my session was still active on my computer! Is this just my issue or someone else had the same? |
|
|
|
People are generally aware of what happens with ponzis, and don't want to risk it. Also, there are many ponzis who just run away with any bitcent they find, as soon as possible, they don't even try hard to trick people, so yeah... There you have it |
|
|
|
it seems they are not licensed in California....
As I've read, they are close (or at least working) to achieving licensing everywhere... So it's probably a matter of time |
|
|
|
Only seen now that you guys have a podcast... Pretty interesting addition |
|
|
|
I think it's a pretty good idea to have a separate section for them... They've been booming lately and filling the Gambling zones! Also, they'll eventually die off, and if they are sit in one section, it will be easier to delete all the threads... haha |
|
|
|
|
Investors, economists and many other "high profile" business people said Bitcoin was crap because they either didn't fully understand it, or wanted to be the first grasping the territory.
Now they say it's amazing because they either realized they can get some profit out of it, or simply want people to go in so they can dump on their faces... At least that's what I envision that's going to happen in near future!
|
|
|
|
What's the best price you've got for CS:GO? also, is it possible to know where do the keys come from?
$9 and no I ain't releasing my methods, 100% legal. Good price... I'll think about it And I understand if you don't want to share more information. But it would be cool to know if the keys are digital, or retail |
|
|
|
It was the year of the altcoin... But maybe not for the best reasons.
Altcoins dominated the headlines many times, and they grew like mushrooms every week. Everyone wanted to have a go at their own coin. Most were unsuccessful, but still, they were here and they tried. So yeah, I kind of agree, 2014 was the year of the altcoin
Really? How was it the year of the alt? I didn't even notice any coverage in the media of anything other than bitcoin and when alt coins where mentioned it was usually secondary and in passing to bitcoin. Mainstream media might talk about almost exclusively about Bitcoin, but crypto related media talked about altcoins many times. During the year we've had big media and social media coverage of coins like Darkcoin and Vericoin. Also, there were many new coins, and that issue was the main topic of many articles I've seen throughout the year... so yeah, altcoins had a massive boom last year, and I think we can say it was a big year for alts. |
|
|
|
|
What's the best price you've got for CS:GO? also, is it possible to know where do the keys come from?
|
|
|
|
NEW:
- Referral System! Get paid 10% of the house edge of every bet placed!
- Muting of jerks in the chat room.
Thank you for these additions, diggit is on the right track, as it always has been And these small details make a huge difference! |
|
|
|
Only now noticed this ad talk is still going... I see no issue whatsoever in it being there. OP manages its thread the way he thinks it is the most convenient and the ad is related to what this thread is supposed to be about
There will be a rate increase!
Good news |
|
|
|
Website looks really nice... Except the converter, that page still looks a bit odd... Anyways, good job! Keep it up |
|
|
|
They don't seem very reasonable profit-wise for me... You've got to weigh in difficulty and price fluctuations, and that only make your calculations worse... Also, your estimated time to ROI is really big (but that's not really something you can make much better nowadays ) Cloud mining sites are usually very "odd" and difficult to be able to profit with... But I wish you luck nevertheless |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
