You still have quite a few hours to go too, so you may get ultra lucky and snag another.
|
|
|
it was my rental :-)
{"hashrate1m": "948T", "hashrate5m": "935T", "hashrate1hr": "423T", "hashrate1d": "26.4T", "hashrate7d": "6.6T", "lastupdate": 1448314958, "workers": 756, "shares": 1260797833, "bestshare": 698465193.19520843, "bestever": 203670815116}
950THs for 12h on Miningrentals
Congratulations ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I was actually watching the pool console at the time and saw your hashrate coming online and was hoping someone would strike.
|
|
|
[2015-11-23 21:33:28.905] Possible block solve diff 203670815116.090424 ! [2015-11-23 21:33:30.570] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2015-11-23 21:33:30.571] Solved and confirmed block 385022 by 1Q8VghUJkNeFnaKy553b9buUWKxFYL579G [2015-11-23 21:33:30.571] User 1Q8VghUJkNeFnaKy553b9buUWKxFYL579G:{"hashrate1m": "915T", "hashrate5m": "916T", "hashrate1hr": "337T", "hashrate1d": "20.5T", "hashrate7d": "5.74T"} [2015-11-23 21:33:30.571] Worker 1Q8VghUJkNeFnaKy553b9buUWKxFYL579G:{"hashrate1m": "915T", "hashrate5m": "916T", "hashrate1hr": "337T", "hashrate1d": "20.5T", "hashrate7d": "5.74T"}
https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/block/00000000000000000565fd00a66b66a5c36092dab4e621ce7d9093fdc6df21b1
|
|
|
Congratulations to the winner!!Its nice to see how much hash rating has the solver. I'm very far away from this amount of hash. I'm only with near 500 gh/s
The smallest miner to find a block on this pool had only 500GH so nothing's impossible. 500GH for the user or worker? I think it was the total for the user with only the one device.
|
|
|
Congratulations to the winner!!Its nice to see how much hash rating has the solver. I'm very far away from this amount of hash. I'm only with near 500 gh/s
The smallest miner to find a block on this pool had only 500GH so nothing's impossible.
|
|
|
![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) congrats to 1G9Y29V8zQ1i62c2ugg4xM566NLTmEabJn for Block 384882 solved by @ solo.ckpool.org! [2015-11-23 00:27:13.006] Possible block solve diff 185448442708.376465 ! [2015-11-23 00:27:13.384] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2015-11-23 00:27:13.384] Solved and confirmed block 384882 by 1G9Y29V8zQ1i62c2ugg4xM566NLTmEabJn [2015-11-23 00:27:13.384] User 1G9Y29V8zQ1i62c2ugg4xM566NLTmEabJn:{"hashrate1m": "851T", "hashrate5m": "856T", "hashrate1hr": "849T", "hashrate1d": "766T", "hashrate7d": "321T"} [2015-11-23 00:27:13.384] Worker 1G9Y29V8zQ1i62c2ugg4xM566NLTmEabJn:{"hashrate1m": "851T", "hashrate5m": "856T", "hashrate1hr": "849T", "hashrate1d": "766T", "hashrate7d": "321T"}
The new stats show the user/worker at the time of the solve as well since people like asking how much hashrate the blockfinder had.
|
|
|
This is the most knowledgeable bitcoin mining community on the planet. Just because you don't get free 24/7 support within microseconds on a public forum doesn't mean there aren't people who can help you, but being impatient and offensive is a great way to put off the people that might have otherwise helped you. Well done.
|
|
|
I just set up the proxy to migrate away from p2pool without having to update each miner to a new URL. There seems to be an issue if the username on the miners contains p2pool difficulty settings such as "/256+256" tacked on to the end of the username. The miners using this technique see the ckproxy as dead.
The slash is illegal in the username and pointless to use with p2pool anyway. The + should work though.
|
|
|
from looking at my miner stats it looks like I had a failover to nicehash solo at some point in the last 24h and then back to CK.
Jacob
Pool's been fine all along, presumably there was a routing issue somewhere between you and the pool.
|
|
|
You should download the latest cgminer 4.9.2 instead of using bitmain's old fork with the bmsc junk. https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminerIt was updated to "work better" with the U3, it is much improved over bitmain's old copy. See the readme.asic for new u3 commands instead of the bmsc. He will probably need a link to a site with a precompiled copy for windows..... as most windoes[nt] users won't/cant go through the steps to compile their own..... All official versions of cgminer contain precompiled binary downloads for windows. What made you think it was was only source?
|
|
|
Is there minimum hashrate ? I am planning mine with 90 ghs as a lottery ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ) No minimum, but I'd rather not see anything smaller than a block erupter of 300Mh...
|
|
|
That does sound reasonable, the problem is that I don't have 25 BTC on me. I only have a few BTC. I am mainly spending my extra cash on running this server. I can give you all the Bitcoin I own and also upload all the bills I am paying to be hosting this server if that means anything. I would love to find some way to prove this is very serious to me and I do completely understand I have no trust on this website. I also have me and a few people I have already met that are currently mining on my server (only 4 of us) I am very willing to post all stats shown on my site showing that everyone gets paid properly and I get 0% fee. Do you happen to have other ideas on how I can prove that I am trying to be a legitimate pool operator?
No, unfortunately there is no other way as you're asking people to dedicate millions of dollars worth of hardware to your cause so it's only reasonable that you should also be able to front up thousands worth. I figured my offer was very generous and since you've refused once, I'm withdrawing my initial offer and changing the fee to 0.25 BTC should you reconsider it. I doubt you'll find another member of the forum with as much reputation as I have willing to make such an offer. EDIT: If it looks like I'm just calling someone's bluff, yes that is what I'm doing as I'm sick of seeing the community scammed so easily.
|
|
|
By "low powered" I meant machines running at least 500+Gh/s and with enough people together I was hoping blocks would get solved. My goal is 1Ph/s before the pool becomes fully public.
You cannot reasonably expect people to trust you with over $10000 without any reputation. Given how hard it is to get reputation here and the fact that you are almost certainly going to be assumed to be the same scammer that recently ran off with one solved block, I will offer you a mechanism for which you can gain some small reputation. Send me 25 bitcoin and I will hold it in escrow till you solve your first block. Once you distribute the funds from your first block solved to all the users that have contributed hashrate in that time I will return 24.9 bitcoin to you. Of course this doesn't guarantee you won't run off with the next block you solve but at least it will demonstrate your commitment.
|
|
|
You are requesting someone's services so you are in the wrong area in mining support.
|
|
|
Perhaps someone could connect some lower powered machines to run so a few blocks can be solved. There is a logic fail in that. You have close to zero chance of solving a block without a veritable shitload of hashrate. Lower powered machines will never "solve a few blocks". It will be almost impossible for anyone to trust you on this forum with zero reputation.
|
|
|
With 2TH it will take you approximately 1650 days on average to find a block at current difficulty.
|
|
|
Dear user trying to connect with the slush proxy - please don't as it tries to authorise multiple times over which is invalid and ckpool will keep dropping you instead. If you wish to use a proxy, use ckproxy.
Dear user "Ruination" - please use a valid bitcoin address as your username instead of that one or you will continue to be rejected by the pool and unable to mine here.
|
|
|
I noticed one change in Status: "bestever" .
Thank you
Indeed, nice stats ! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I just noticed the addition of "bestever" to the Json output too, then searched for it in this thread. I may be late to the party, but thanks for adding this ck. Yes that's right, bestever is a new stat. I was actually restarting the pool to incorporate some minor code improvements and figured it was an opportunity to add a couple of features and let the users discover the new stat ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Bestever was requested some time ago and is the best share your user/worker ever had, and is an integer making it easier to read than the best share stat since users don't really care about the precision of the share. It never resets allowing you to see your best share after a block solve and is also worker based so if you have multiple workers and miss the announcement here you can see which worker found the block. In addition I've added some code that allows me to see on the console the user/worker stats from the block finder at the time of the block and I will publish them here when a block is found since people always want to know how big the miner was that found a block. Watch this space, but the announcements will still be colour-free.
|
|
|
|