|
Also, any news on compatibility with Enterpoint-Hardware? Last post sounded promising, but now it got silent.
At least it's no longer that urgent because 200+ MH/s bitstreams are now available... But I would like to try TML nonetheless.
|
|
|
|
And they have never CLAIMED to. What did they never claim? They are claiming to deliver x GH/s at y Watts. Nothing else is claimed by cablepair. Both have a history of delivering FPGA-based products. If you are trusting BFL, why don't you trust cablepair? I really don't see a reason why you shouldn't. (If I had to choose, I would certainly not believe BFL because many people who *do* have experience in this field say their claims aren't realistic.) Disclaimer: I never bought any products from BFL or cablepair. |
|
|
|
It's in his signature  |
|
|
|
|
GEIL, wird jetzt sogar schon in einem Bitcoin-Forum den Leuten mit "freier Energie" das Geld aus der Tasche gezogen?
Die Knaller sind ja schon alle gekommen, "Prof. Dr. Claus Turtur" - hat seinen Titel wohl bei der Tombola gewonnen (von diesem "Experten" habe ich schon früher sachen gehört/gesehen)
"Und vergesse bitte den zweiten thermodynamischen Hauptsatz, denn das Physikmodell auf dem er beruht ist nicht mehr aktuell!"
NEIN, ist nicht wahr? Warum kümmerst du dich um ein paar popelige Bitcoins wenn du einen Nobelpreis haben könntest?
Es ist ja wirklich nicht zu fassen, nirgends wird man mehr von diesem Müll verschont. Ich nehme an mit "Dr. Axel Stoll" bist du auch ziemlich dicke, oder?
Danke für den Lacher am Abend!
(Disclaimer: Ich habe Physik studiert.)
Edit: PS: Wenn du tatsächlich eine Wette über den zweiten Hauptsatz einrichtest, bitte von Anfang an mit Escrow. Leuten, die "freie Energie" aussprechen und dabei ein ernstes Gesicht machen, vertraue ich nicht.
|
|
|
|
Yes... Mt. Red was running great for weeks (months?), until the hashrate climbed from ~200 GH/s to 800 GH/s. Now the pool has more down- than uptime, sadly  |
|
|
|
Current rewards, i.e. balance/unconfirmed and historical rewards (i.e. sum of all payouts) Thanks  |
|
|
|
|
Is there no API for earnings/payouts?
|
|
|
|
No one said to start bitcoin mining with nvidia hardware. The nvidia hardware is pretty much useless till specific workloads that suits it comes around (and I finish the code to make the most of it). At no stage will nvidia hardware suddenly become profitable to bitcoin mine with. Correct. That's why I'm saying it would be unfair to pay prices based on bitcoin mining performance for doing other HPC tasks. But as jjshabadoo said, CoinLab is already working on a solution. |
|
|
|
|
Indeed. Just a small calculation... I think a setup of two 580 GTX uses ~700W under full load. That would be more than 3 Euro per day for me just for electricity. If I get paid 2,5$/GH/s/day at 0,3 GH/s that would not even close cover electricity.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks con.
Another question: I guess most of the HPC work will require Nvidia GPUs (except for cryptographic stuff). The first post says "We may perform other types of computation with your GPU besides Bitcoin mining. We will calculate your earnings based on the equivalent number of credits your card would have produced for the same amount of work.". Problem is, Nvidia GPUs are very bad when it comes to bitcoin mining. So using a 580 GTX, which barely reaches 150 MH/s, will put me in bad position (compare it to a 7970 that reaches 550 MH/s with stock clocks). When doing HPC tasks I would say a 580 GTX should earn no less than a 7970, otherwise there would be no reason to deploy Nvidia GPUs in my rigs.
Edit: In other words: Currently payouts are based on the performance in bitcoin mining. I think the performance of GPUs should be "normalized" in some way - because AMD is great for some applications (cryptography) where NVidia is bad and the other way round.
Or am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to sign up now, build up Loyalty Points with FPGA bitcoin-mining and redeem the points later with a GPU rig?
|
|
|
|
|
Because you are a bad person?! (why would somebody DDoS a pool?)
|
|
|
|
(MH/s) div 71.5 = (U/min) |
|
|
|
|
As I said, I'm ok with paying out the bounty.
|
|
|
|
Just curious due to a point that was made on 420's thread about PPS rates. I knew that Mt. Red waited for coins to confirm for payouts, but it rose a question that I haven't been able to identify the answer to. Does Mt. Red still pay out shares on orphaned blocks (which it should as a "Pure PPS" pool)?
Yes, orphan blocks are paid. At least that's what the OP said some time ago. |
|
|
|
|
What's the current status regarding the bounty? The way I see it, all requirements for paying out the bounty are met... (I cannot judge point 6, documentation)
|
|
|
|
|
makomk's overclocked 200 mhz bitstream is running without any problems on my SN 26 board for two days now. U is 5.47+5.43.
Either the pre-50 boards are not that bad at all or I'm just really lucky!?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
