So let me recap. There are two conspiracies going on at the same time. One is to put miners out of business by lowering prices. The other one is to put off "genuine customers" by increasing prices. Mind boggles.
The plot thickens... Sounds like a free market being its unregulated self.
|
|
|
Sorry if this has been answered already, I just did a quick search. What's the word on firmware updates for these things to fix pool compatibility? I know they work on ghash, but I'm pretty sure I'd rather the machine sit idle than mine there.
I'm running one through mining_proxy and seeing the errors come through. Looks like a case of noncompliant share format that some pools aren't tolerating.
us.ozco.in: REJECTED: (-2, u'Incorrect size of extranonce2. Expected 8 chars', None) Eligius: REJECTED: (23, u'H-not-zero', None) mmpool.org: actually accepting shares
Which proxy? The java or the python?
|
|
|
This might be a total newbie question, but do I need to jump 2 pins on the atx connector of my PSUs to get this going?
|
|
|
So you do have 1 hashing now? What sort of stats are you getting?
Not too good 3 chips errors on 2 boards... If you don't mind can you let us know if it gets better or worse? Also I noticed you're clocked at 270... That's overclocked right? Just wondering.
|
|
|
yes indeed 144 screws holes to hold all 4 boards to the heat sinks. tiny little shits too Also that is not counting a handful of holes which are off to the side, as I said still no hashing boards so I am not entirely sure if they are needed. Still counting what I received to then divide by 10. Wow this'll be a fun project...
|
|
|
Sent a PM out to those whom I've not gotten a label from, when you get a chance, please send.
Replied to PM and sent email. Sorry it took so long to send labels. Busy weekend!
|
|
|
Is there any efficiency in terms of shipping to be had orders of w or more tubes? Or are we talking 4 boxes per 2 tubes?
yes, 2 Tubes can fit in 3 large boxes. anything larger than 2 Tubes, I'd have to stage it first, and report. most orders here are for 1 Tube. btw, I still have more Tubes coming Monday than has been ordered on this group. Ok so for 2 tubes, need 3 large flat rate box shipping labels?
|
|
|
Is there any efficiency in terms of shipping to be had orders of w or more tubes? Or are we talking 4 boxes per 2 tubes?
|
|
|
I spent an additional 3+ hours tonight trying the FlashMega suggested by Friedcat and redoing everything I could think of to get them to work. Still unable to get even 1 of 10 to work. Has anyone received theirs and able to make them work? Thanks
Really hope this is just a one-off problem, user error, or trolling... (not calling you a troll blackheart, just saying I'd rather that be the case than non-functional ASICs)
|
|
|
Isn't this for sending international?
|
|
|
Am I understanding right that you link the boards together? So basically I'd have 4 boards from one assembly and 1 board from a second assembly linked and powered by the 1300 and the remaining 3 boards on the second assembly linked and powered by the 850?
That's correct. The boards are electrically separate so the PSU doesn't care. Just do NOT power the same board (ie two touching PCI-E ports) with different PCI-E ports or you'll cross load the PSUs and mess up both. Ok cool I should be good to go then, assuming my current thinking is correct as below: - 200 W per board without overclock - 250 W per board with overclock - that puts my 850W PSU at 600-750 W when powering 3 boards - puts my 1300W PSU at 1000-1250 W when powering 5 boards - 1A x 12v max X 2 (max) for the controller = +24 W, will probably run this from the 850W PSU** - - profit (hopefully?) **This assumes molex connectors on a PSU run on the 12V rail... does anyone know if they do? If not, which rail do they run from? Pretty sure its the 12V though, otherwise GPU manufacturers wouldnt ship molex-to-pcie adapters...
|
|
|
Yes thats fine to use one PSU to help another out as long as you keep them on separate blades. So the 1300 will power 5 blades, the corsair 3. haha just realized im then right on the edge with the 1300 W PSU. Maybe not as close as with the 850. Am I understanding right that you link the boards together? So basically I'd have 4 boards from one assembly and 1 board from a second assembly linked and powered by the 1300 and the remaining 3 boards on the second assembly linked and powered by the 850?
|
|
|
I think there was really just a dip for a while. Even with my lowly GPU mining I've been in the green for the last 2 days or so (although not by a ton, but still profitable).
|
|
|
This is getting exciting.
Ps. I love how he wanted funds by 8/16 and the majority roll in after the fact haha
|
|
|
prices are lower on westhash they will just make an average and pay the same ... i hope they close westhash they are just draggin the price down WTF !
Are you saying lower offer prices on westhash are pulling down the average paying price which lowers the payout to the miner? I don't think separating them again will fix that. there's nothing stopping low price orders from flooding either site...
|
|
|
Welp, I'm in for a second. Time to decommission and sell off my GPU rigs.
|
|
|
I can't get scrypt-n working, all of the other algos switch flawlessly and nice hashrates, but i get constant HW errors and rejected shares with scrypt-n, and sometimes it just crashes the whole pc.
I'm using 14.6 b2 drivers.
Your cards may be overclocked too high. They're at stock right now, I can get the miner running but i'm getting 100% rejected shares above target. I'm guessing it really doesn't like the zuikkis kernel. I think it has to do with drivers and sgminer 5 combination. I have never been able to get the same hashrates I was getting on sgminer 4.2.2 / 13.x drivers. Might also want to try vertmner. To get my scrypt-n at least stable, I had to start with low intensity and slowly ramp it up til I got to an approximate max without getting unstable, but it was still notably less than the hashrates I used to get on previous versions with scrypt-n. The tradeoff here is that X11, X13, X15, Nist5 are all running faster than before.
|
|
|
|