no one gives a flying fuck about their new design. they are fucking toast. The competition already has a working product while TenX is just a fucking scam.
|
|
|
https://www.newsbtc.com/2018/08/22/fintech-startup-revolut-launches-cryptocurrency-supported-debit-card/ A “dedicated concierge service”, £600 ATM withdrawal fees, “free overseas medical insurance, and Revolut-exclusive offers” are just some of the features that should make the $150 annual fee worth every penny.
Revolut Metal also provides its users with a crypto or fiat cashback on each and every purchase. For purchases made outside of Europe, users will be given a hefty 1% cashback, while in-Europe purchases will only yield one-tenth of the aforementioned cashback rake.And the competition is already in business.............
|
|
|
So many have tried launching a project in the travel/tourism industry but to no avail, the are not successful. I saw that your team is very diverse. So it might be your edge to make this project really works. Good luck!
diverse team won't do anything. ICOs are fucking scammy and are dead.
|
|
|
https://phys.org/news/2018-08-energy-bitcoin.html#jCpStop worrying about how much energy bitcoin usesThe word "bitcoin" is as likely to garnish feverish excitement as it is glaring criticism. The financial community sees speculative promise in the form of trade that currently has little to no regulation. Meanwhile, others argue that it's a distraction that detracts from the overall longevity of U.S. financial institutions.
Bitcoin's energy consumption has become a recent talking point in the debate. A Forbes article published May 30 indicates that bitcoin dramatically increases global energy consumption – and that electricity is its "Achilles heel."
I am a researcher who studies clean energy technology, specifically the transition toward decarbonized energy systems. I think that the conversation around bitcoin and energy has been oversimplified.
New technologies – such as data centers, computers and before them trains, planes and automobiles – are often energy-intensive. Over time, all of these have become more efficient, a natural progression of any technology: Saving energy equates to saving costs.
By talking specifically about just the consumption of energy alone, I believe many fail to understand one of the most basic benefits of renewable energy systems. Electricity production can increase while still maintaining a minimal impact on the environment. Rather than focusing on how much energy bitcoin uses, the discussion should center around who indeed is producing it – and where their power comes from.
Counting consumption
Unlocking a bitcoin requires an intense amount of computational power. Think of bitcoin as sort of a hidden currency code, where its value is derived by solving a programmable puzzle. Getting through this puzzle requires computer brainpower.
Electricity is 90 percent of the cost to mine bitcoin. As such, bitcoin mining uses an exorbitant amount of power: somewhere between an estimated 30 terrawatt hours alone in 2017 alone. That's as much electricity as it takes to power the entire nation of Ireland in one year.
Indeed, this is a lot, but not exorbitant. Banking consumes an estimated 100 terrawatts of power annually. If bitcoin technology were to mature by more than 100 times its current market size, it would still equal only 2 percent of all energy consumption.
Power sources
Bitcoin is certainly consuming an increasing amount of power worldwide, but is it increasing the world's carbon consumption? Bitcoin miners have traditionally set up shop in China, where coal supplies 60 percent of the nation's electricity.
Now, bitcoin mining is exploding in areas with cheap power, like the Pacific Northwest. Power there is mainly cheap due to the massive availability of hydropower, a low-carbon resource.
Bitcoin mining in China, with a largely fossil-based electricity source, may indeed be problematic. China is already one of the world's major contributors of carbon emissions. However, bitcoin mining in Oregon? Not the same thing. Not all types of energy generation are equal in their impact on the environment, nor does the world uniformly rely on the same types of generation across states and markets.
In Europe, for example, Iceland is becoming a popular place for bitcoin mining. That nation relies on nearly 100 percent renewable energy for its production. An abundant supply of geothermal and hydropower energy makes bitcoiners' power demand cheap and nearly irrelevant.
Similarly, in the hydropower-driven Pacific Northwest, miners can still expect to turn a profit without contributing heavily to carbon emissions.
The right discussion
Like many other aspects of the energy industry, bitcoin is not necessarily a "bad guy." It's simply a new, and vaguely understood, industry.
The discussion about energy consumption and bitcoin is, I believe, unfair without discussing the energy intensity of new technologies overall, specifically in data centers.
Rather than discussing the energy consumption of bitcoin generally, people should be discussing the carbon production of bitcoin, and understanding whether certain mining towns are adding to an already large environmental burden.
Although there has been extensive discussion in the media of bitcoin's energy consumption, I'm not aware of any studies that actually calculate the comparative carbon footprint of the bitcoin process.
Global electricity consumption is going up overall. The U.S. Energy Information Administration predicts that world use will increase nearly 28 percent over the next two decades. But increasing energy consumption is bad only if we aren't shifting toward less carbon-dense power production. So far, it seems that only miners are currently shifting toward cleaner parts of the world.
So perhaps people should quit criticizing bitcoin for its energy intensity and start criticizing states and nations for still providing new industries with dirty power supplies instead.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Now take your shitty scammy mETH token and shove it far up your ass.
|
|
|
Hasn't he been exposed as being a complete and utter scammer? He was also pretending to have been involved in BTC's development early on according to his rants on twitter... https://twitter.com/DrRoyMurphy/status/1029136994335641600"Please list senior Devs like me making commits to BTC in 2009 that are not now involved in BCH?"
Apparently a fucking senior dev like him who was making commits to BTC could not see that Bitconnect was a fucking ponzi.
|
|
|
I got a pretty big stash of these coins now....lets see if this coin grows.
what's a big stash exactly? A few million?
|
|
|
What I like the most about TenX is that it provides a simple way to use your crypto currencies with a single card. I believe this simplicity of use will be very attractive to bring in "not so technical" people into the crypto currency sphere and contribute to mass adoption and overall growth of the market. The 0% spending and exchange fees are also very attractive compared to other competitors such as Wirex or Xapo.
Except promises at the moment they have nothing. It's been a long time since the ico was completed, but the card is still missing They fucking collected money under false pretences. Their fucking card, was issued by a third party, namely Wavecrest. When Wavecrest got bitch slapped , TenX got rekt. ICO money is being used as a hookers and blow fund by TenX. Hopefully, they will get investigated by the Singapore Authorities.
|
|
|
how the fuck is this piece of shit project still a thing? and that fuck hype machine asshole still around?
carlos is so rekt that he's now doing "water-fasting"
|
|
|
with all due respect, no one on here gives a flying fuck as to whether your CEO is a "celebrity" within his own circle.
What investors want is a solid product that has pamp potential.
|
|
|
Can't give you timeframes but please stay tuned for updates. Thanks for your patience #TenX community! So they have shitty cards but still cannot tell when they will launch properly. Might be next week or next year....
|
|
|
so any actual pictures of your little mining scam?
|
|
|
https://news.bitcoin.com/india-bitconnect-head-arrested/Alleged India Bitconnect head, Divyesh Darji, was arrested this week at a airport in Delhi as he arrived from Dubai. He and conspirators are accused of bilking millions of dollars (Rs 88,000 crore) from Indian investors seeking to find financial refuge during the government’s demonetization campaign.
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/XRPFinancial/status/1031024204148293632Top 10 XRP Fudsters: @CryptoHayes @ZeusZissou @fluffypony @Excellion @WhalePanda @SatoshiLite @crypto_bobby @twobitidiot @ArminVanBitcoin @brian_armstrong Rippletards have been begging Coinbase to list them but then they go on twatter to openly diss the co-founder and CEO of Coinbase... The mind boggles....
|
|
|
The OP is another account that keeps spamming bitcointalk with annoucements probably just to build up their post count. Consensus is a also a shit show. They haven't said when the ERC-20 SEN tokens are being swapped and you can't trade the native tokens on any exchange yet.
|
|
|
What makes this project different from Sia
The OP is just spamming projects.... Just check their post history...
|
|
|
another bitconnect type ponzi.
avoid at all costs.
|
|
|
another masternode scam shitcoin... dev must have a serious hookers and blow habit...
|
|
|
|