The latest update is on 11 August. For more updates in 2020, you can easily get it on their Product updates page. Added support for U.S. based customers going through the KYC/AML process. We are now asking for the country of issuance for the documentation on the Upload Documentation screen. From there, if you choose the U.S., we then ask additional questions such as what your state of residency is, along with your social security number. The flow remains the same as before for international customers, with the exception of asking for the Document ID in addition to the Document Type.
Updated the content for the KYC/AML Verification screen tooltip to make it clear what the requirements are for the KYC process. For U.S. customers, the main thing to pay attention to is the formatting of your address for the State and Zip Code fields.
Improved the user experience for uploading documents for the KYC process. We are now showing a pop up after the document is selected to let customers know how long the upload process could take.
Fixed a bug on the Favorites screen where the search bar would disappear if your search criteria returned zero results.
Fixed a bug where CS:GO Write In bets were not allowed to be created.
Fixed a visual bug on the Submit Results screen for Android where the Delete and Close buttons were appearing (nothing would happen if you tapped on them since the bet had already been accepted).
Fixed some visual design issues throughout iOS.
Fixed a bug on the Prize Money screen within the tournament feature for Android where it was not showing the prize money value if the number was too large.
|
|
|
|
I visit the site with Tor, and the site allows Tor, like it. Check the Terms & conditions: No rules on VPN or Tor as well as IP address. Check FAQs: no content so it should be updated soon. I am happy to see some updates on the Product updateSuggestion, the ANN thread should be more regularly updated by developers. |
|
|
|
|
Scammers tend to go first to PM everyone to setup their traps and find naive people and scam them. They especially like message platforms such as Telegram, Discord where they can fake username and lazy, naive, unknowledgeable people will not notice on identities of real developers.
Next steps are: ask for private key, mnemonic seeds, go first by sending some amount of BTC, etc. Even you don't know how to check identities of real developers, if they ask you one or all things in second steps, they are scammers. When you have connection with such case, it is a good chance for you to look back at their profiles and find difference between them and real developers. What for? To avoid future scammers.
|
|
|
|
You can see the Comparative table on fees among some coins. Pick up one for your need. to have overview on differences in transaction fees (at the time I published the thread). For current difference, you need to visit Blockchair.com's compare to get temp stats. XRP no doubt has very fast speed and low fees. In my thread, people talk about potential attacks but bear in mind not keep all eggs in one bag, and not move all funds in one transaction, even with bitcoin. Hence, I thought people exaggerate the issue too much. |
|
|
|
Minimum Mix: 1 satoshi or 0.00000001 BTC
Is the minimum mix really 1 satoshi? Can not move 1 satoshi (as a fund) on bitcoin network because it is less than transaction fee. Did I not understand it? Mixer Fee ranges between 1 to 2%
How does the service get mixer fee (1 - 2%) from 1 satoshi? |
|
|
|
In addition to Kakmakr mentioned there's also Stake, Bustadice and BVC some of them only allow instant deposits if the transaction uses a very high fee.
Unconfirmed transactions with very high fees. It is an important contributor and I agree. For unconfirmed transactions with low or too low fee, there are risks for casino and if you say risk is zero if casino does not allow withdrawal till at least 1 confirmation appear I think there is another thing to consider. Make a too low fee deposit that takes too long to be confirmed or never, and use it to gamble free on casino. I know if fee is not lower than 1 sat/byte it can be confirmed and almost never won't be confirmed. |
|
|
|
What is the chance of Bitcasino.io changing the deposit and withdrawal system for Bitcoin to allow for Bitcoin deposits to reflect immediately, before even 1 confirmation is received?
Do you mean Pending? Without one confirmation, transaction has not yet been confirmed on the network so it will likely never be confirmed. Pending status with hash of waiting transaction is fine. When one confirmation appears, amount will be credited to account. Problems come from Bitcoin network and the sender sides so casino can and should not take all risks on their sides. If they take risks and if something goes wrong with one transaction, block account can cause support ticket, complaint, drama. It is not needed and casino won't want to create problems from their easier policy. It is unfair for casino. I have never seen a company or a service that accepts zero confirmation transactions. Do I miss something? |
|
|
|
Please stop spreading your site like this but if you don't have the intention to promote a site and seriously ask for good resource to learn, I will share you the Crypto Zombie on Youtube |
|
|
|
A lot of people ask us how to use a Bitcoin service that only accepts Bitcoin and really, there's no other way than to buy Bitcoin first. So if you ever get someone asking you about that, make sure they know the basics of buying. But ask them check to make sure they're not breaking any of the casino’s terms and conditions, and that it’s legal to buy Bitcoin in their country. And whatever else you do, make sure you get your own Bitcoin wallet first at Bitamp A few helpful things to take into consideration before opening a trade: - Trust or Reputation score (if the platform provides it)
- Number of past trades
- Ages of account
- Past trade feedback (the ratio between positive and negative trade feedback)
About casinos, some have a rule in ToS that they don't allow Coin Join or suspicious illegal money from mixing services so if a customer makes a deposit like that they have right to suspend customer account and related fund. Read ToS and FAQ with keywords and search. |
|
|
|
Good projects will grow, new projects will enter the market. Unsuccessful projects will disappear from the market.
This is a very huge pie and every market participant will want to take a bite of the pie.
Currently, the Ethereum network cannot provide high transaction speed, but after the launch of ETH 2.0 phase 2, the rally will begin.
What is happening now is a small prelude to the main performance.
Projects come and go every day, every year. Only projects that are strong enough to survive after 4 years in the market, and enjoy many cycles and situations in the market during 4 years at least can be called as lively projects. It does not mean they are successful projects but they are among projects that can survive in next 4 years. From coinmarketcap.com I see many projects that die gradually after first one or 2 years and did not wake up after that. Their developers (scam or incapable) choose to do easier thing, launch a new project, join the hype and get easy money rather than spend huge efforts to keep their old projects alive and upgrade it technically. I see some methods: swap (from outdated algorithm to new one), swap from failed protocol to new one, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Like YFI, it reminds me the days when Ethereum and DASH was trade above $1000. Crazy days I have ever seen. The value of YFI is even higher because back in those days, Ethereum was traded around 0.15 BTC/ ETH. Now YFI has been traded more than 0.6 BTC for each YFI. It was launched and skyrocketed to Moon. Is life easy as this? I will look at it next 3 to 6 months guys. Good luck to anyone who invest in and believe in tech revolution from YFI.
|
|
|
|
|
Because the confidence and believe in USDT decreased from their unclear financial reports, people lost their faith in USDT. Consequently, those companies try to use Bitcoin as collateral or as backed asset for their company trust. It is their strategies to build up their trust fastly. Bitcoin does not relate to them like past scam projects. They scam and people blamed on Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a scam. No it is not and never been a scam. Only projects or people use Bitcoin as a tool for their companies are scam and scammers.
|
|
|
|
|
It depends on manager and applicants.
If participants think they are truly good quality, and confident on their competitive, and don't want to promote free before get acceptance announcement, they can not wear avatar and signature.
If they think that wear avatar and signature can give them some advantages, they can wear it.
Some managers count posts since the application posts if people wear avatar and signature at the time then get acceptances later.
It is freedom.
|
|
|
|
As a continue of yesterday disclosure, I have this Comparative table on fees among some coins. Pick up one for your need. The casino has dozens of coins so that gamblers can look at the table and pick one coin to withdraw their money or make deposits. Indeed, click on link to blockchair.com to get latest details. I usually use Ethereum to move my funds but recent weeks ETH is not a good tool. Bitcoin (when mempool is clear), Litecoin, Ripple, and Dogecoin are good ones. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
