Bitcoin Forum
June 01, 2024, 11:14:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 [199] 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 »
3961  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Which Pool ??? on: March 21, 2014, 02:10:42 PM
The weird part is that even though I bitch a bit about luck on a site like Eclipse I did the math with some spreadsheets and the payouts are right on the money for the Month of March. So it is a fine pool to use, it's just the human tendency to focus on the losses (low luck rounds) and ignore the wins (good luck rounds).

Spreadsheets and bitcoin however do not lie. Fascinating.

C
3962  Other / Off-topic / Re: Woooohooooo on: March 21, 2014, 02:38:23 AM
Nice, Are you mining enough to get in profit?
Yes. I have some from doing work for people, some from miners that I upgraded heavily myself. Doing fairly well, got a few more months before electricity eclipses at which point I will begin seriously underclocking to go for some more time.

Brain helps when mining.
3963  Other / Archival / Re: Pictures of your mining rigs! on: March 20, 2014, 03:43:09 PM
[IMG]https://i.imgur.com/r6P8s2d.jpg

When do you expect to see ROI? Smiley

Will you see it at all ?
What is this "ROI" thing?

C
3964  Other / Off-topic / Re: Woooohooooo on: March 20, 2014, 02:57:10 PM
Just spent .5 bitcoins over at Tiger Direct for a new Wii U.

Which is a bit odd since the price I paid was .4937 for a $310 item which means Bitpay is quoting 625/btc while the current price is 590 or so. Which means a really really good deal for me but odd.

We'll see if it comes over.

C
3965  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Which Pool ??? on: March 20, 2014, 02:24:02 AM
Eclipse, DGM, nice, lousy luck this week but that's fine.
Eligius: Nice bunch, takes a day to pay out with .04 payout threshold and 300gh going to it.
P2Pool: No fees, you set up.

C
3966  Other / Off-topic / Re: Woooohooooo on: March 20, 2014, 02:11:03 AM
What I need to do is remember to SPEND bitcoins. Spending promotes adoption, which is gooood.

C
3967  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: The first Bitcoin Solar mining device coming soon - SolarMiner USB2 machine on: March 19, 2014, 04:44:38 PM
FYI my panels are generating about 4kw per day, fed to the grid next to the shed with 225gh of hashing power.

C
3968  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: 1 TH/S dragon miner. Has anyone tried it more than 24 hours? on: March 19, 2014, 01:48:44 PM
All it is is one mans word against another. I'm just wondering why you would choose to believe the guy who is ripping everyone of and not delivering because he can't design a pcb to save his life, or the Chinese manufacturers who have been building, mining & shipping working miners since January.
Belief is irrelevant. If people contracted with a firm to produce chips, paid for development and design, then that firm does not have the right to give away/sell/whatever the resulting IP to anyone they wish. Now, I do not know the finer details of Chinese law or the appropriate terms in the agreement for these chips, however piracy of intellectual property is wrong.

You can consider it to be a moral, spiritual, what have you issue, but it is still wrong.

As for "pre sales" and the like, that is a completely separate and independent discussion from piracy. I have no interest in discussing that or confabulating the issues.

C

3969  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: 1 TH/S dragon miner. Has anyone tried it more than 24 hours? on: March 18, 2014, 07:47:37 PM
You sir, are an idiot. And you are butthurt because now your miners are overpriced.

I can understand you feeling ripped off because you paid so much to a reseller of chinese chips (Bitmain) but to go around spreading falsehoods just so you can try and sell your, now, overpriced miners is idiotic.

Strange. Are you saying that chip development should be free or be considered to have zero value because... well the chips are right there now?

Odd.

C
3970  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Which Pool ??? on: March 18, 2014, 07:45:45 PM
Ignore the mumbo jumbo religious talk about network sanctity and 51% share and what not. Let Gavin worry about that stuff. You are here to get ROI first, right? ... Before your ASIC goes obsolete with the difficulty jumps. So Ghash.io is the way to go. One of every 3 blocks goes to them plus a short PPLNS means you ramp up quickly and start making money. Add a little on Eligius and volla you get half the blocks.... Best way to make $$$ ... and best of all they don't rip you off like the others with fees. I'd donate a little to Eligius though.

Technically any no fee site will have the same return in the long run. I'm bringing my systems back to 33% Eclipse, 33% Eligus, and 33% P2Pool.

The money should roll in regardless.

C

3971  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: The Chili – 30+GH/s BFL based Bitcoin Miner Assembly on: March 17, 2014, 10:15:03 PM
I noticed mine shut down the other day when outside temps dropped below 10f. However it's hash rate is a nice solid 36-38gh now. :-)

C
3972  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: ghash.io is becoming SHOCKINGLY AGGRESSIVE NOW, closing in 45% on: March 17, 2014, 08:00:26 PM
A pool where people could sell their own GH...........

That's a very interesting idea.
3973  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: The Chili – 30+GH/s BFL based Bitcoin Miner Assembly on: March 17, 2014, 07:40:40 PM
Can you pull all the crazy drivers and just use bfgminer? CGMiner is great and all that but it needs weird USB drivers.

C
3974  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: ghash.io is becoming SHOCKINGLY AGGRESSIVE NOW, closing in 45% on: March 17, 2014, 04:47:47 AM
I'm giving them a chance because if I am going to come close to ROI on my ants I need as little variance as possible. Ive been on the guild for a year using PPLNS, paying high fees and the moment I go to us PPS they drop it. I'm sure if a lucky streak returns they will re add it since it is profitable for the Admin and Profits are what matters ... business business business

Variance swings both ways, and ends up dead even in the long run.  That's the only reason PPS was kept as long as it was on BTC Guild, when it's been under consideration for removal for the better part of a year.
It may end up even from a "finding blocks" point of view, but doesn't it degrade along with difficulty? IE: If I have bad luck now and good luck later they will balance out in the number of blocks found. However due to difficulty, bad luck now costs me more in absolute bitcoin than later, eventually no amount of luck will make me whole.

Or am I missing something?
3975  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Which Pool ??? on: March 15, 2014, 11:18:39 PM
In reality though, if you are mining for the long term you will be increasing your hash rate over time. If you grow your hash rate at the same rate as the network, equal (good or bad) luck later will balance out with the equal (bad or good) luck earlier.

Keep in mind though, there is no guarantee luck will ever equal out in either direction. Some people are just luckier than others over a lifetime.
Luck lasts a lifetime if you die young.

That's another good point: The problem with being in mining for me is that it's not much of a profitable venture. Actually it is explicitly impossible to make profits (long term profits) in mining because it's a perfectly elastic market or whatnot. That's a part of the reason I haven't jumped to Ants or 28nm or whatever. I'm mostly in it for the fun, learning, and to keep my house warm in the winter. :-)

There is another way to look at luck; bad luck mining could be absorbing other bad things that could be happening in my life. Losing job, kid, car, things like that are serious bad luck. If my mining is a "luck sink" for the bad joss to go to, that's oddly enough ok for me. But that is one of those woo-woo spiritual things, each roll of the dice is independent of ever other roll...

One odd thing about Eligius though: When I mined there in the beginning during the summer/fall last year they had a horrible streak of luck for the few days I was on. I think I had 50% shelved shares and I thought that sucked. So I switched to eclipse, but left eligius as my backup. And over the next few months I realized I got every one of those shares back at the value from September. Oddly enough eligius' payment system seems to transcend the concept of time coupled with difficulty. Which is very, very interesting.

C
C
3976  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Which Pool ??? on: March 15, 2014, 10:01:34 PM
I'll let others suggest nodes, but I will say you need more than a few days to evaluate p2pool. It is a small pool (about 0.5% of the whole network last I checked) so it only gets a block every day or two. To give it a fair eval you should be willing to wait a few weeks at least. This isn't really any different from other small pools if you have a few hundred GH. If you want to help decentralize things and not run on a huge pool that finds blocks every hour you have to be willing to accept more variance on found blocks.
Variance is fine, as long as the totals even out over a reasonable period of time. Reasonable being the 2 week block retarget period. One thought in my head though is a bad streak of luck now wouldn't be erased by an equally good stream of luck "later" because difficulty keeps creeping up. Does that skew the equations as well?

For example, if I mine a Th at Eclipse then over the past two days I have made .045btc per day due to the crap luck blocks taking 24 and 26 hours to drop. If everything was normal I would get .12btc a day, so I have .09 instead of .24. Now if everything went back to perfect normal but in two weeks I got a string of great luck to cancel out the crappy (say two days of 6 blocks a day), those six blocks would only pay .20 btc so woudl I be out of (heh heh) luck due to the underlying difficulty pop?

Never dull, thinking about this stuff. By converse though a round of good luck now is worth a lot more later. Ug....

C
3977  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: Which Pool ??? on: March 15, 2014, 09:40:54 PM
Yeah, also another reason why p2pool nodes need more love. 33% is very close to 50%
Ok, I don't want to be a chump (did that with Catcoin) but I wouldn't mind throwing a few hundred gh somewhere. What's a good solid reliable p2p node I can point some stuff at while I sit down and compile the software on my NeXTStation Turbo?

I'll watch the payout for a few days.

C
3978  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: ghash.io is becoming SHOCKINGLY AGGRESSIVE NOW, closing in 45% on: March 15, 2014, 09:36:20 PM
you make a good point though, and yes there would be a very slight headstart given to a pool that found a block. Its not much, but it may add 1% to the long-term payout
Ok, I'll think about that a bit more. Hm.

Quote
I mine on Slush, which has about 4% of the total hash. In the last two weeks, the pool has gotten about 5 or 6 blocks on average per day. There are 144 blocks given in a 24 hour period. 144 * .04 = 5.76. Sounds about right to me.

But to verify your variance point. One day we got 11 blocks. Two days after that we got only 2.
Indeed. Right now I'm in just a suck pile of luck I guess, or it's a self selecting thing (if blocks drop quickly you don't notice but when a block goes long you see it for longer). We're on block 3 of the "this is taking fucking forever" but I'll give it another week before deciding that I wasted a few weeks. Which is a fallacy of course but damn it is seductive thinking.

C
3979  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: March 15, 2014, 07:32:58 PM
I hadn't thought of it but I guess having a head start on the next block in larger pools can help, but Eligius is consistently pool #2 or #3.  I wonder how much difference it would make over time compared to #1.

I'm not sure. Technically you can't hold the answer for long; if someone else gets it you totally lose. But if you have huge hashing it might be worth it, I don't know. Then again I am probably missing something very very basic, anyone?

Quote
In regards to luck however, no matter what pool, my hunch is that over time it balances out across the entire Bitcoin network.  Sort of like Vegas.  Whether you are having a bad streak, or a lucky streak, the house odds are going to be the same over time.

And that is what I am hanging my hat on right now. It's maddening, but quite true that any pool might never find a block again. Or they might find a thousand blocks in sequence. But over time everything averages out.

Even the 3%, 4%, and 70% luck I am looking at now. Everything. If not then everyone will go to one pool and that will be it for Bitcoin.

C
3980  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [6600Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB (New Thread) on: March 15, 2014, 06:18:37 PM
This is something I have difficulty understanding.  Your mining rig isn't going to run any faster in another pool, and it's definitely going to cost you more to mine somewhere else.

Not necessarily. Eclipse (no I have no connection to them really) does DGM with no fees (but they do keep the tx fees IIRC), and p2pool is no fee as well. Technically it doesn't matter if you mine with a pool or mine solo, your payout over time should be identical. However "time" can be centuries if you mine alone.

That is one question on my mind: Do large pools have any luck advantage because as they generate blocks they have a head start on the next block due to propagation delays? The advantage might be small, but if it's cumulative it could be a problem.

Also a larger pool might have a lower percentage of rejected blocks, it's small but there.

As for fees, neither eclipse or eligius charge fees, however I always seem to have 3% in my "shelved shares", and Eclipse's luck always seems to hover around 47-48%. Actually that might mean a 4-6% less payout, correct?

Quote
It makes absolutely no sense to me that anyone would leave, unless you like paying a fee to see pretty numbers and charts.  The end result of leaving is you end up with less BTC.
One of the biggest draws of Eligius for me (aside from the trust in the provider) is the stats allow me to match my system performance with what they are seeing. On Eclipse I sometimes see a bit less, and I wonder if that's due to lag, pool quality, or chance. I wish they had longer running stats so I could see what my systems were doing.

What I might do is split my 900+gh between three pools: 300 for Eclipse, 300 for Eligius, 300 for p2pool. Once Eligius comes back to a stable state, if they're having capacity problems I will point my stuff elsewhere even though it costs me a bit in that rock-solid reliability I have grown to trust.

C

C
Pages: « 1 ... 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 [199] 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!