I don't know why it's branded as non free, seeing the source is available online. As for your issue, I can't reproduce (with or without Core installed). I would suggest you build from source to try things out. You'd want to first uninstall armory, then run the following commands in a folder dedicated to the source: git clone https://github.com/goatpig/BitcoinArmory.git
cd BitcoinArmory
git checkout testing
git submodule init
git submodule update
sh autogen.sh
./configure
make -j8
sudo make install
With that done, you can then run Armory from the terminal using 'armory'. You can uninstall by browsing to the source folder and running 'sudo make uninstall' OK I will try that tonight just after Carltons tip. Thank you all. By the way I installed Ubuntu again from fresh disk of 16.04.2. Same behavior. I did use other package managers to install before but not the all terminal option. |
|
|
|
Just tried again after fresh install of Ubuntu. I am just now downloading Ubuntu again and burning a new disk. Might maybe also be of interest is how the package looks in ubuntu SW center. Also if I open the package again, SW center does not recognize it's installed and asks me again if I want to install. If I do, it kind of takes way shorter then the first time. Uninsall just hung up out of SW center which previously worked with the package manager.  |
|
|
|
Same as above. Also no icon for Armory (Offline). I might try another reinstall and install Armory first thing. Just have to find a place to put the blocks I just downloaded meanwhile. |
|
|
|
Should be fixed.
Does that mean there will be a new .deb package soon, or was that another issue? |
|
|
|
Noted, will look into it.
Thx, let me know when you find something. |
|
|
|
run to uninstall the package. Make sure there is nothing left (check /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/lib). Install the package and try again. Uninstalled as you mentioned. checked the locations you mentioned. There was still an armory folder in lib. -> delteted it. The was no bin path at all. I used and search deleted any armory files except for the package. Reinstalled. Same behavior. Edit: Also, this is a completely fresh ubuntu installation and so far only features bitcoin core. |
|
|
|
Try 'ArmoryDB' in terminal
Same response as for the armory command Edit: How it looks.   |
|
|
|
What can I provide to make debugging easier. Or is it know to not run on this system? Any help appreciated.
Does it run from the terminal? Type 'armory' to try. As is x86 Windows? There hasn't been a build for that arch since the 0.92 era. Returns: Illegal instruction (core dumped) Can I still sign transactions with my old Armory version? The installation is still fine and running. Or will that no longer work. All wallets and backups were also generated using this old version. |
|
|
|
|
I am trying to run armory after installing the testing .deb file on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS x64. Installation works just fine. However, I don't see any icons in my launcher. If I search in the file browser I see it has been installed. However, the icons are all blank and when I try to launch it from there I get "There was an error launching the application".
What can I provide to make debugging easier. Or is it know to not run on this system? Any help appreciated.
Edit: It also doesn't show as installed in Software-Center although just after installation it tells me that installation was successful and I would have the option to reinstall. Synaptic shows the armory package as green. And I can also uninstall it from there.
Edit2: Is there no longer a Win 32 installation package? I use Win32 for my offline signing.
|
|
|
|
|
What is the latest downloadable build which is running on Win32? Will there be any interaction problems with 0.94.1?
Edit: Using a 32 bit Win system as offline device for signing.
|
|
|
|
It's a gorgeous coin. The crown jewel when it comes to physical bitcoins. The most desirable coin in the space.
I've sold couple of these for 19+ in the past.
I would say the 1000 BTC 1oz Gold Casascius is the most desirable coin. But then again each has their own opinion. Agreed! Should have picked it up earlier.... |
|
|
|
|
I just quickly want to chime in and also thank all the people that have worked on Armory so far and will do so in the future. I is my favorite wallet and I will follow this new branch closely. What is the best channel to follow about major new features and releases? Is there a donation address for this new OS Armory branch?
|
|
|
|
|
He SoG People
i would like to get involved in the game. I have an alpha account and got 70 crystals or at least that is what was promiswd as a sign up bonus. I have never played the alpha but want to soon.
Now I have this very basic questions:
1. Are cards only sold as single cards or can booster packs be purchased just like in MtG?
2. Are all cards limited (at least per edition) or are there some which are not limited?
3. If I wanted to collect every card existing so far, how may crystals would that potentially cost and what is the equvalent in BTC? Is it feasible?
4. I have seen that new cards e.g. Openbazaar are sold at certain times. Are there imtermediaroes that you can hire to get these cards for you in case you don't have time to pick them up?
5. Are there any salesplaces/merchants already? How would I get the cards?
6. What is the estimated time the apps come out?
7. Edit: I will have just played the alpha if I can and see what it is like. -What other game does the gameplay compare to? Or is it a truly unique experiance?
8. Anything else I need to know?
Sorry for all the questions but I am curious and would love to get involved.
Last question. There was another trading card game blockchain based. I cant find the site any longer. Did it rebrand to SoG or did the project die? Edit: found it, called Deckbound.
|
|
|
|
|
What is the latest list of players "letsplayagame" could be?
|
|
|
|
Yesterday I found the Github repository myself. I cloned it, gave it a different name and used GitHub pages to display it. Epic falure however: http://simonbelmond.github.io/royalfork_copy/I am not a webmaster and I am not sure what goes wrong. Maybe the java script interpretation is wrong. Also received this mail from GitHub So if anyone has an idea how to fix it, please help me out. I think you just need to remove the CNAME file. Edit: I looked into it a little more. The way that the repository is set up, you need to rename it to simonbelmond.github.io and change the url in the _config.yml file to be simonbelmond.github.io Then you can just visit the site at simonbelmond.github.io and it will show up normally. Thanks. Meanwile I have set it up here: http://royalforkblog.github.io. Will update my post above later, but need to go to work now. |
|
|
|
In another thread about Bitcoin and Chess I received the following post: Sorry to post this here, but this is the only active thread I know about chess and Bitcoin. I used to read and reference many others to royalforkblog.com. It was an excellent blog about Bitcoin. You can find an archived snapshot here: https://web.archive.org/web/20150214051116/http://www.royalforkblog.com/Does anyone know who ran this blog and why it is no longer online? It went down probably 2 month ago. I am the type of learner that profits from the beautiful style. e.g. check out this: https://web.archive.org/web/20150216123331/http://www.royalforkblog.com/2014/08/11/graphical-address-generatorI even had e-mail contact with the guy once but it was all through the royalforkblog address. excerpt from the about section: It’s rather poetic. We have the king; the most important piece in the game which must be protected at all costs; and the queen; a piece stronger than the next 2 most powerful pieces combined. In the above position, the almighty king and dominant queen both find themselves unescapably ensnared by a single, lowly, well positioned knight. The royal fork reminds us that it doesn’t take an army to push around 2 towering, seemingly unassailable pieces…..just an idea and stellar execution.
I think this serves as a decent metaphor for bitcoin. Like the knight, Bitcoin has positioned itself squarely between 2 giant institutions; the State, which regulates the monetary system, and the federal banking system, which runs the monetary system. Unlike the chess analogy, I don’t think the relationship between Bitcoin, States, and banks is or should ever be adversarial. Chess has clear winners and losers; the real world can accommodate success for everyone. The most royal post so far was this one but a it is unfortunately not preserved with all elements: https://web.archive.org/web/20150216055120/http://www.royalforkblog.com/2014/09/04/ecc/Sorry for interrupting the chess game. In case you know anything, please pm me. Interesting blog. I did 60 seconds of research and found these which I assume are related: https://github.com/royalfork?tab=repositories (google image search of his face only leads back to github) https://twitter.com/royalforkblogHere is one more chess thread in case you want to ask there: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1190988.0It is worth noting that one of the 52 accounts https://twitter.com/royalforkblog follows is https://twitter.com/hashbreaker who is someone important to those that follow CryptoNote Good luck! Yesterday I found the Github repository myself. I cloned it, gave it a different name and used GitHub pages to display it. Epic falure however:
http://simonbelmond.github.io/royalfork_copy/Update 20.10.2015: Meanwile I have managed to bring the content back online guerrilla style here: http://royalforkblog.github.ioStill no news about the owner or this whereabouts, however. I am not a webmaster and I am not sure what goes wrong. Maybe the java script interpretation is wrong. Also received this mail from GitHubSo if anyone has an idea how to fix it, please help me out. |
|
|
|
|
Whois also states that the domain has expired but it seems strange to me that someone would let the domain expire after having invested so much time into the blog.
|
|
|
|
Sorry to post this here, but this is the only active thread I know about chess and Bitcoin. I used to read and reference many others to royalforkblog.com. It was an excellent blog about Bitcoin. You can find an archived snapshot here: https://web.archive.org/web/20150214051116/http://www.royalforkblog.com/Does anyone know who ran this blog and why it is no longer online? It went down probably 2 month ago. I am the type of learner that profits from the beautiful style. e.g. check out this (not entirely preserved with graphics and animations but still): https://web.archive.org/web/20150216123331/http://www.royalforkblog.com/2014/08/11/graphical-address-generatorI even had e-mail contact with the guy once but it was all through the royalforkblog address. excerpt from the about section: It’s rather poetic. We have the king; the most important piece in the game which must be protected at all costs; and the queen; a piece stronger than the next 2 most powerful pieces combined. In the above position, the almighty king and dominant queen both find themselves unescapably ensnared by a single, lowly, well positioned knight. The royal fork reminds us that it doesn’t take an army to push around 2 towering, seemingly unassailable pieces…..just an idea and stellar execution.
I think this serves as a decent metaphor for bitcoin. Like the knight, Bitcoin has positioned itself squarely between 2 giant institutions; the State, which regulates the monetary system, and the federal banking system, which runs the monetary system. Unlike the chess analogy, I don’t think the relationship between Bitcoin, States, and banks is or should ever be adversarial. Chess has clear winners and losers; the real world can accommodate success for everyone. The most royal post so far was this one but a it is unfortunately not preserved with all elements: https://web.archive.org/web/20150216055120/http://www.royalforkblog.com/2014/09/04/ecc/Sorry for interrupting the chess game. In case you know anything, please pm me. Edit: There is now also a post about this here, in case you would like to answer of comment: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1212432.msg12721787#msg12721787 |
|
|
|
Update 20.10.2015: I have managed to bring the sites content back online guerrilla style here: http://royalforkblog.github.ioStill no news about the original author or his whereabouts.... Does anyone know where theroyalforkblog.com went? Some of the articles are still accessible through the way back machine but not all dynamic elements work and especially not the elliptic curves graphs. Seriously this was the best tech blog about Bitcoin I knew and I pointed so many people to it. Does anyone know the owner? Why is it down? Is there a way I can get a recent backup of the site? https://web.archive.org/web/20150214051116/http://www.royalforkblog.com/http://www.royalforkblog.comAny help very much appreciated. |
|
|
|
Will Minepeon detect Antminer U2+ if connected with my Raspberry Pi Model B ? Please help me regarding this! Thanks. Yes it will. Source: Have 10 U2+ myself. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
