What does "importing your PTS wallet" entail? Is holding PTS in your wallet not enough to collect your share of future DACs?
Thanks.
Yes its enough, but you will need to import your wallet in the new DAC qt ( or whatever software it will be ) to be able to spend them ! |
|
|
|
This is not an exchange, it's a portfolio but it would be cool to have BBR quoted. Please vote : http://cryptofolio.info/welcome/voteNo need to login. 1 vote every hour. We are on 2nd position today, yesterday we were 1st. |
|
|
|
|
My hashrate halved with the new code on github (my old code was 3 or 4 days ago) .
And yes I did check the hashrate just before changing version, so that's not a difficulty increase!
I use Linux.
|
|
|
|
I think the marketing has been lacking a little. Even with the current code Memorycoin is quite original and hasn't been rewarded for it. I think it got lost in that January craze of new coins. As soon as the price picks up and the officer's salary becomes noteworthy i'm sure people will get interested as well.
Hopefully a little bit more activity on bitcointalk forums will bring other smart people on board!
Agreed, more bitcointalk activity is definitely needed. Or maybe some people are ninja buying  Any way I'm to lazy to parse square forum, so some resume here from time to time would be good. |
|
|
|
I read the white paper.
Since when sending to X different address is considered a sufficient anonymous feature ?
This won't resist a serious taint analysis !
Jesus Christ man be more specific, not even a sober people could make sense of this jibber jabber. So you are implying that you are drunk ?! The technique explained in the white paper is equivalent to splitting the coins you want to send, and send them to multiple address the receiver own. |
|
|
|
|
I read the white paper.
Since when sending to X different address is considered a sufficient anonymous feature ?
This won't resist a serious taint analysis !
|
|
|
|
|
May be you can put the link to the pool source code in the OP ?
|
|
|
|
You should use the latest version of libboost : 1.55 |
|
|
|
I searched on anonymous feature on other cryptos recently, most of the coins claiming it seems to me hype or scam. I know one coin XC which seems to me close to truth but they did not release any codes yet. So i am not sure. They seem to me they are at early stage just trying with codes. I don't believe any solution via master-nodes like used on TIPS. Please follow cryptos for me and let me know if any coin that seems to have anonymity feature.
Real anonymity is provided by ring signature, check Monero implementation : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0But I don't think it will be easy to implement it in CommunityCoin, or maybe a big hardfork ! |
|
|
|
What about the negative impact of all that MMC being removed? I don't have any on the exchanges but if people who do all the sudden remove it it could harm the value of the coin could it not??? I do like your idea though for the LottoShares. It looks fun. Reminder - Distribution on 31st May - Hold your MMC off-exchange The distribution date for LottoShares is at end of the day on May 31st. https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=4691.0It is vital that you hold your MMC in a private wallet so that you control the private keys at the end of this month. I will be trying to identify and remove balances held by exchanges, so they will not even be in a position to make a distribution of LottoShares. Please remove your MMC from exchanges immediately if you want to receive your shares in LottoShares. Removing your coin from exchange can't have any negative effect. The positives ones are : - Your coin is more secure because you are the only one who can spend it. - The market might go up because of reduced offer. |
|
|
|
So what the exchanges do now is have one wallet for all deposits and users identify themselves to the exchange for account crediting purposes with the payment ID.
A redesigned wallet with a proper database of addresses and a corresponding API would solve this problem. It is going to come up again and again with every type of service that wants to receive payments from customers, especially those that are already designed around the address-per-customer model that is universally used in crypto outside cryptonote. So it needs to be fixed.
I don't see the problem with Payment ID, since you can ask the site to change it each time you make a new transaction. Ok it could be a problem for direct pool payment if you wanted to separate/anonymise all your pool payment. But otherwise, the pool can provide an option for the miners to enter the ID. It's not needed and is bloat, and see below. If you want it changed it each time, then you can't use it for pool payments. That's exactly what regular MRO addresses are for! (i.e. "Unlinkable payments") They are changed each time and prevent linking of payments. A question :
Is the payment ID encrypted in the blockchain or is it readable to anyone ?
It is readable by anyone. You can literally read them right in the block explorer. The exchange can encrypt the contents of the payment ID, but there is nothing to require them to do so. I know in one case they are being generated using sequential numbers. What other information is leaked is hard to say. It's fine as a temporary workaround but really not a good design. Yes, payment ID should have been encrypted . But as you said exchange or merchant could decide to accept encrypted payment ID. You would just have to encrypt it with the same public key of the merchant, and maybe add a flag to say it's encrypted. I think the reason it's not a good idea to have a new address for each merchant client is that the merchant would have to scan the blockchain for each of its client address, and that would take to much time. |
|
|
|
So what the exchanges do now is have one wallet for all deposits and users identify themselves to the exchange for account crediting purposes with the payment ID.
A redesigned wallet with a proper database of addresses and a corresponding API would solve this problem. It is going to come up again and again with every type of service that wants to receive payments from customers, especially those that are already designed around the address-per-customer model that is universally used in crypto outside cryptonote. So it needs to be fixed.
I don't see the problem with Payment ID, since you can ask the site to change it each time you make a new transaction. Ok it could be a problem for direct pool payment if you wanted to separate/anonymise all your pool payment. But otherwise, the pool can provide an option for the miners to enter the ID. A question : Is the payment ID encrypted in the blockchain or is it readable to anyone ? |
|
|
|
what is the time required to mine a block of monero on my intel core 2 duo e7300 2.66 ghz 2 core processor
time in days = your hash rate * 86400 / difficulty Or maybe : Number block per day = your hash rate * 86400 / difficulty |
|
|
|
|
I say No, this will just make it more pump and dump without the value of real NEM.
The value will be assessed on hype and not on real feature.
And forcing to use another coin to redeem it is not a good idea.
NEM should be self sufficient !
Prelauch trading is just for dumpers and the ones who don't trust the coin.
Incentive to download/use the actual software to get your share is better for spreading awareness and use.
|
|
|
|
Alias case sensitive.
Maybe this can lead to some confusion ! |
|
|
|
|
Can you transfer an alias to another address ?
How ?
Are alias case sensitive ?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
