I agree with @haunebu, asking users would most likely result into having different answers because it would depend on their personal preferences and experiences. I got interested with thread because I stopped playing slot games fr a time, and hoping to find some new and better sites. However, just like what @$crypto$ said, these are outdated now. And I’m glad he mentioned something new. Looking forward to finding more new sites here!

If one finds himself not being satisfied with crypto games, then perhaps the traditional online games must be chosen over it instead. I agree with the others that crypto games are created with a purpose and focus to earn while playing a game, and so when it is compared to there games with regards to gameplay, graphics and other features it is surely the underdog. So, if you are not satisfies with crypto games then it is not for you.

I am also one to those who responded that Bitcoin price fluctuations affect the crypto market as a whole, and so other coins are also experiencing fluctuations for sure. And given the high influence of Bitcoin, which most likely its price is the basis of investors their next market decision, then it is not surprising how it impacts the value of the altcoins. Hence, it could either make investors to stop any investment decision for the mean time, or switch to other coins for the time being just like what happened before.

I think that at some point, KYC will still be required by any platform, or any kind of identity verification because it is part of the security and verification protocol of the platforms. Honestly speaking, it is too good to be true to not have such, and mostly those who do not require any verification are scam sites. But perhaps, this crypton exchange is still new that is why no KYC is required. So, let’s see after some time.

Investing on gaming projects is not a bad idea, just like many other investments, it also has its own risks. But in deciding where and what specific project to invest with is the tricky part. A piece of advice that I have received since then is to go for the top and known projects because at lest you would have information regrading the project rather than those that are not sure to be legit.

That’s true. Instead of subscribing to payed crypto signal providers, which are most likely scams, it would be better to use the many available resources we could find online. And by exploring the internet, we could discover a lot as well, just remember to not just be gullible and search on the credibility of the authors and look for another references that state the same thing. It would also be best to explore the forum, and interact with those who are experienced users.

I think that we all should be doubtful with things online, especially the users that we come to have contact with, or claim to be or to have something. And just like what was aforementioned, we must be diligent, and investigate if ever we observe something’s off with the users and their activities. Also, we have the moral obligation to report them to the moderators, and give them a red trust, to protect everyone from their future intentions.

I second @hugeblack, practical skills must need practical practice to be developed. It is true that this tips are just basic and general, but still, it serves its purpose on reminding and impart information to us. But going to its practicality, it would be proven and tested by actually practicing it. Whereas, after doing do, the mistakes and lessons gained from such will be taken into consideration to the following trading moves, and strive to do better.

While that is indeed true that many platforms have been hacked before, I think that it won’t be prevented that users will be rattled, especially that they were not made aware of such happenings. Although, paying those stolen funds may seem to be a way to salvage the situation, having a full disclosure will be highly appreciated by the users for sure.

By the looks of it, it seems to be the situation, they are indeed hiding the situation. However, with this information coming out now, I think that this will affect OpenSea now. I just hope that they focus more on the quality of their security, in order to assure their users, who will surely panic and be worried upon knowing this incident.

I’m so sorry to hear that, OP. I know it is easier said than done, but I hope that this won’t make you lose hope. You have gambled your way and success in investing with such coin, and I bet by now you already know that it would be a dream to hope that the project will be revived and continued by the team. But hoping to that might just give you more heartaches, it is best to move on along with the lessons you have earned from this experience.

Well said. Of course, in doing so, we must also look for coins that have potentials to grow and even raise their value after the correction. As this is hard to assure, the coin being invested to become successful, we must only invest with a number or percentage that we are confident or afford to lose incase things won’t go our way.

Indeed. While it is seen as something to be advantageous, it still require human intervention in reality. And in case of such unpredicted situations, bots cannot think by themselves, strategize the next moves and such. Hence, I personally would not choose to use a poker bot, because aside from being profitable is not assured, same human effort must still be exerted.

I couldn’t agree more. It would be just unfair to make a judgment that is solely based on KYC of a casino. I know and I can relate that many are not fond of KYC because of privacy and information theft matters, but we should also look upon the reasons why it is being implemented and if the procedure is secure and such. We must look at the entirety of the casino.

When De Ligt made the switch to Juventus, I heard from people that it was purely because of the money. I have no idea how much Chelsea are willing to pay him. He will get better at playing in the Premier League. He will not achieve much with the current Juventus. Chelsea normally always compete for the top places. They can use De Ligt well. De Jong from Barcelona by the way. That trainer, Tuchel, I think is a very special personality. Ziyech is often outside the base, while that is an absolute topper.

We'll be looking at how players' experiences are from this site. We can best assess them based on that. I don't think we should judge this site based on the KYC. As long as everything is in the terms and conditions, I don't think this is a problem. It is always such a job to go through the entire conditions. That is actually impossible, you can always miss something. Terms are not always very clear. Good thing is that they offer decent coins variety.

Why not buy both of them? It's better if you are going to divide it rather than focusing on one coin, those two coins were a good even for long term investment and you won't regret on having them both I would also consider buying some alt coins like Avax and Solana since they are good project too but if you want to make sure if it is a good moment to buy you can make your own analysis on the market.

You will only receive mixed opinions here since we have different perspective about the market.

It's really hard not to panic especially seeing your investment around -80% especially for new investors or trader but what we currently experiencing is just a correction which I could say a healthy signal for a market and also a good opportunity to add more to our investment but of course you wouldn't want to invest what you are not ready to lose.

It's been a while since I've read and seen anything about poker bots. It used to be quite popular. Isn't there something in the terms and conditions of a poker site that the use of such bots is not allowed and that it can immediately lead to the closure of an account? Pokerbots are not profitable, I think. Not everyone at the table folds when they should fold. You can play as well as you want, and still lose even if your bot does what it's supposed to do.

These matches can go either way. It's nice to see that low-rated teams can still do well. Many teams have a few good players but the rest is a lot less. I wouldn't be surprised if we get a champion in this tournament where no player plays in a top team of a top European competition. Lots of mistakes are made, but that adds to the entertainment value.