 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
|
I'm wondering if anyone could give me a pointer. Everything seems to be working, p2pool is running, miners are hashing, yet no shares seem to be accepted. p2pool: 10:02:42.418000 New work for worker! Difficulty: 185.041361 Payout if block: 0.0
05912 BTC Total block value: 50.027310 BTC including 50 transactions
10:02:43.444000 Pool: 98423MH/s in 17418 shares (18014/34711 verified) Recent: 0
.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10
10:02:43.444000 Average time between blocks: 0.63 days
10:02:43.445000 Pool stales: 15%
10:02:44.161000 New work for worker! Difficulty: 191.408557 Payout if block: 0.0
06115 BTC Total block value: 50.027310 BTC including 50 transactions
10:02:46.450000 Pool: 99337MH/s in 17419 shares (18015/34712 verified) Recent: 0
.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10
10:02:46.451000 Average time between blocks: 0.63 days
10:02:46.451000 Pool stales: 15%
10:02:55.466000 Pool: 99337MH/s in 17419 shares (18016/34712 verified) Recent: 0
.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10
10:02:55.467000 Average time between blocks: 0.63 days
10:02:55.467000 Pool stales: 15%
10:02:55.974000 New work for worker! Difficulty: 185.966414 Payout if block: 0.0
05941 BTC Total block value: 50.027310 BTC including 50 transactions
10:02:58.472000 Pool: 98976MH/s in 17420 shares (18017/34713 verified) Recent: 0
.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10
10:02:58.473000 Average time between blocks: 0.63 days
10:02:58.473000 Pool stales: 15%
10:03:07.488000 Pool: 98976MH/s in 17420 shares (18018/34713 verified) Recent: 0
.00% >0H/s Shares: 0 (0 orphan, 0 dead) Peers: 10
10:03:07.489000 Average time between blocks: 0.63 days
10:03:07.489000 Pool stales: 15% Output from ufasoft miner: >bitcoin-miner -o http://USER:PASS@127.0.0.1:9332/ -t 14 -g no -v --algo sse2_64
bitcoin-miner 0.13 Copyright (c) 2011 Ufasoft http://ufasoft.com/open/bitcoin
Mining for http://USER:PASS@127.0.0.1:9332/
14 threads Using SSE2
22.2 MHash/s Also similar results from Phoenix miner. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
Thank you to Mousepotato for providing the list of files to remove before downgrading the OpenCL runtime. Previous attempts at reverting had failed to recover lost performance.
I've now regained ~20MH/s on a 5850 and ~10MH/s per 5830.
Edit:
I'd forgotten that I'd switched to the phatk kernel since it seemed to perform better with 11.12's OpenCL runtime version. Switching back to phatk2 with the 2.4 runtime yields +5 MH/s/card.
|
|
|
|
How was allofmp3.com a scam (to consumers)? Back when I was feeling guilty about not paying for stuff, I bought from them, and every time I bought an mp3, I received it, it was legit, it worked.
What was the scam?
The artists never received that money. You'd have been better off pirating without paying allofmp3. You were simply paying Russian criminals to send you the pirated goods. So then they're not much different than the RIAA companies?  HAHA touché! |
|
|
|
Hi all,
My guess is it will initially boost bitcoin as other payment methods are squeezed out of online grey markets, but will turn in on itself when exchanges start to be blocked or even shutdown by US banks.
How would SOPA lead to exchanges being blocked by banks? What is the connection? SOPA aims to not only allow the US to censor DNS records, but also halt payment processing for websites profiting from piracy. (much like financially strangling Wikileaks by prohibiting donations through Visa) Websites currently charging for pirated content will likely then circumvent such restrictions by offering pirated content in exchange for Bitcoin instead. This move will then focus attention by the MPAA and gov't enforcers on Bitcoin. US-based exchanges will be the first target. |
|
|
|
How was allofmp3.com a scam (to consumers)? Back when I was feeling guilty about not paying for stuff, I bought from them, and every time I bought an mp3, I received it, it was legit, it worked.
What was the scam?
The artists never received that money. You'd have been better off pirating without paying allofmp3. You were simply paying Russian criminals to send you the pirated goods. |
|
|
|
We’ve seen smartphones adopt all kinds of medical technology, from digital stethoscopes to cancer diagnosis, and I’m hopeful that we’ll see similarly stunning med-tech reach even the remotest areas one day. I'm calling bullshit on this one... WTF is an 80 dollar phone? My phone cost me 0$..BUT you have to sign up for a 3 yr contract where you have to give up your first born to pay for it....and that's in CANADA! What kind of contract do these unfortunate soles have to subscribe to to get their $80 phone? This whole article is bullshit without the OP stating the 'total cost of ownership'. Gawd shit like this makes me so mad.... Surely not BS. In kalifornia I got a decent smartphone for $125, maybe $150, no contract required, I bought minutes and data from some second rate provider cheap, can stop anytime and keep the phone. There should be a $50 smartphone already imo, $80 is far from unbelievable. Indeed. Fortune was writing of a $75 (retail) Android device within six months (of Dec 2010). http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2010/12/22/2011-will-be-the-year-android-explodes/ |
|
|
|
WHERE are all the people decrying alt chains as "scams" and proclaiming they won't participate in I0coin for whatever moral reasons?
That's likely because IOcoin is a direct response to the largest complaint against Ixcoin. I0coin is Ixcoin only without the guy who mined solo for three months before public release of the project. |
|
|
|
If I understand correctly, this means all wallets are actually held by bitbills, correct?
The only substantial pieces of information contained in the wallet.dat are the private keys. If one knows a private key, one knows everything needed to construct a wallet.dat file. In theory Bitbills could also keep a record of the private key. I'm in no way accusing them of actually doing so. But it should be noted that if they were to take the unscrupulous action of recording private keys, they could spend the coins at any point in time before you transfer them. |
|
|
|
Right now, no merchants that I know of will accept IxCoins...no exchanges that I know of will trade IxCoins
If they did, I would boycott their services as a matter of principal. check this exchange out... https://ixchange.bitparking.com/mainMy point is that if an established Bitcoin exchange were to decide to offer Ixcoin exchanges as well, I would boycott that business altogether. The same goes for merchants. As someone else said, this is a blatant attempt at a power grab, nothing more; and I for one shall not support any business that would choose to associate with it. That is about as childish and effective of when my 13 year old jr high daughter runs to her room, slams the door and ignores me LOL I'm not expecting a personal boycott to have any significant effect. My participation in the economy is quite a small drop in the bucket. The whole thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth, thus I choose to distance myself from it. I'm not calling for anyone else to boycott anything. I just wanted to express my opinion as everyone else has already done. Please, then take your words and stay away from it and threads that even have the word "IXCOIN" in it. Note that the thread to which I decided to reply was the thread titled "IxCoin is a SCAM." I'm not exactly trolling the actual IxCoin threads. |
|
|
|
Right now, no merchants that I know of will accept IxCoins...no exchanges that I know of will trade IxCoins
If they did, I would boycott their services as a matter of principal. check this exchange out... https://ixchange.bitparking.com/mainMy point is that if an established Bitcoin exchange were to decide to offer Ixcoin exchanges as well, I would boycott that business altogether. The same goes for merchants. As someone else said, this is a blatant attempt at a power grab, nothing more; and I for one shall not support any business that would choose to associate with it. That is about as childish and effective of when my 13 year old jr high daughter runs to her room, slams the door and ignores me LOL I'm not expecting a personal boycott to have any significant effect. My participation in the economy is quite a small drop in the bucket. The whole thing leaves a bad taste in my mouth, thus I choose to distance myself from it. I'm not calling for anyone else to boycott anything. I just wanted to express my opinion as everyone else has already done. |
|
|
|
Right now, no merchants that I know of will accept IxCoins...no exchanges that I know of will trade IxCoins
If they did, I would boycott their services as a matter of principal. check this exchange out... https://ixchange.bitparking.com/mainMy point is that if an established Bitcoin exchange were to decide to offer Ixcoin exchanges as well, I would boycott that business altogether. The same goes for merchants. As someone else said, this is a blatant attempt at a power grab, nothing more; and I for one shall not support any business that would choose to associate with it. |
|
|
|
Right now, no merchants that I know of will accept IxCoins...no exchanges that I know of will trade IxCoins
If they did, I would boycott their services as a matter of principal. |
|
|
|
Any suggestions that you have for non-reversible payment options we will evaluate and use if possible.
Another exchange recently announced the ability to deposit cash at Chase and Wells Fargo bank locations. Sounds about as non-reversible as it gets. |
|
|
|
|
Don't discount the ability of a government to create poorly-phrased, ambiguous, and generally unenforceable laws.
|
|
|
|
What you want is called an "ewallet" service to store bitcoins in the cloud. Be careful though: the site operator could decide to steal your coins, or they could be stolen due to a security breach. For these reasons, it is best practice to only store a small amount in the cloud as a matter of convenience (used to pay for lunch for example). Here is one eWallet service that recently opened: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=35599.0 The site operator is generally considered trustworthy here on the forum. But still, be aware of the risk. |
|
|
|
|
