Why don't you use your real account? Don't have the courage to? Ah well, then this conversation is pointless, and your opinion is irrelevant. Welcome to my ignore list.

Just want to say that this is pretty much the philosophy of jl777's superNET. The point is to unite cryptocurrencies in to a single network to work together to absorb as much fiat as possible.

I wonder how much different the alternative currency scene would be if everyone took this view. Whether they're interested in superNET or not is irrelevant really, tearing each other down just drives people away and stops new people from wanting to find out more.

Go further back and see fluffypony instigated that reaction from me, as it seemed he was trying to not show appreciation for any outsider helping. See jl777 imploring him to show appreciation and fluffypony rejecting it. And it was aided by my interpretation of Risto's 4 - 8% proclamation meaning I wouldn't find anything. Risto clarified that his random variable was just whether BCX would attack, but when I blew up above I didn't know that is what he meant.

Your work on the analysis of the whitepaper is not being criticized. If the MEW or anyone expects you to be omniscient, then they are unrealistic. Lack of omniscience is precisely why open source bazaars kickass on well organized top-down cathedrals.

I feel now a sense of duty to attempt to help jl777 with his anonymity design (which I will be going in PMs), because he has shown that he appreciates the gift culture of open source. It is all about showing respect and appreciation to each other. Some are more talented than others in specific areas (e.g. yourself I am sure more knowledgeable than me about the math of cryptography) and others have other attributes to contribute such as their work ethic and their great attitude.

Actually you are detrimental to both Monero and Boolberry projects. I think without you, both would have had substantial progress by now. How are you a lead dev of anything without knowing how to code is beyond shocking. Can you point to any lines of code of significance that you have authored till date to the project? or any open source projects of significance?

The actual coders and contributors of Monero are the ones who should be driving the project forward. You are just a poison everyone has to deal with. If you were fired from the position, both projects would move forward with great pace and no one is going to miss you and we don't have to withstand the army of the gullible that feed off of your negative energy.

Your posts are always vitriolic and you have smeared zoidberg countless number of times. This was an occasion where you could have shown professionalism, but I think the biggest compliment for you is that someone even mentions your name. You are a delusional piece of insignificant garbage.

snip

Saw that in the past when I was too tired. Still tired, but it causes me wonder if someone can do a TW attack, can't they steal all the coins that were created by mining rewards (coinbase tx) in all the blocks in their chain?

Thus isn't that a form of stealing wallets in the current live chain that are derived from those coinbase outputs?

But it isn't stealing, because those wallets never exist in the new chain. It is simply following the protocol. Now if he sells those coins, the new owners are not going to agree to rollback of the block chain.

I assume this is common knowledge right? That is what TW attacks do correct?

This has been a busy day. The taskforce of crypto_zoidberg, AnonyMint, jl777 and some Monero developers and MEW members has diligently worked on the code and is implementing fixes to possible exploits that might give the attacker the upper hand. The code is evaluated so that we can say with certainty that no coinkiller exploit can be used against us, and this makes me thankful for the original coders of CryptoNote. It is too often forgotten that without this unique technology there would be no Monero that has taken the torch, determined to carry it beyond the current limits of cryptoworld.

he certainly isn't doing boolberry any favours.

It's actually quite simple. The altcoin world is a shit storm of everyone trying to boost their own coin by tearing down others, particularly the more successful others. This has nothing to do with first, last, or whatever. Anyone who gets any degree of success at all gets FUDed, shilled, hated, etc.  

You're a great example of this behavior in action.

Can't disagree with you there.


Whatever you want to misinterpret or mischaracterize is up to you. I can't control that.

Where did they vote? On the official vote thread, it is stated that votes to keep the name the same will be deleted (and people have complained that their votes were indeed deleted).


I said before that I don't like the name so why would I argue with people about it. I think in the discussion here a LONG time ago I spoke in favor of changing it, but I'm not sure.

Nice try, but no. You are obviously ignorant of my participation on this thread that goes way back before I was even involved with any other coin.

Your attempt to dismiss the substance of my opinion by attacking my motive is both ineffective and incorrect (the former mostly because of the latter, but not entirely).

I'm not really a "member of the community" although I've mined some and I hold a little, but I agree with the sentiment that a sincere community vote should include the option to retain the name. Otherwise you are making use of the "whoever controls the vote controls the results" principle and the vote is a sham.

it is largely a figment of the imaginations of the criminal attackers of xmr.  occasionally their sockpuppetry has successfully trolled some of the less clever and rational boosters - such as myself - but we're largely immune now.  TWDNKUMUS

Unless Monero devs changed the core CN ring stuff then I would say all Cn coins are at risk.  Then again BBR is the only other coin that needs to care.