I can give you pong on a floppy disk  If you have the retail box and the manual, by all means. |
|
|
|
I have Angry Birds,are you interested in it.
That's hardly a vintage game. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for all the responses guys. Yes, it turned out that the PSU was faulty (750W, was giving much less than that) - I replaced it and everything works perfectly. Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
I am on Ubuntu 10.10, just installed my new Sapphire 5970 and started to mine. Every time I start mining on two GPUs, after a few seconds, a continues beep appears. As soon as I stop one miner (doesn't matter which one, so this doesn't seem to depend on one, particular GPU) the noise goes off. Any thoughts?
The temperature on the GPUs is ~55 degrees so the card is not overheating for sure.
|
|
|
|
I think you should use You Tip It for this kind of stuff. |
|
|
|
I have an uncountable number of 1990's computer games! However, most of them do not have their original packaging, if even the CD case. A lot of them are also old grade school education games, like jumpstart type stuff. But, I do have others too.
Any luck with the list? |
|
|
|
|
Paypal or EUR bank transfer accepted. In case of Paypal trusted members only please.
|
|
|
|
|
After reading "Inside Wikileaks" by the OpenLeaks co-founder, Daniel Domscheit-Berg, I think that it is actually more important that OpenLeaks accepts Bitcoin than if WikiLeaks started accepting it now.
|
|
|
|
|
What if you try to connect from the local machine?
What if you put in the actual IP address instead of the wildcard? I am not sure whether you can just use *; in networking it is sometimes necessary to specify IPs like: *.*.*.*
|
|
|
|
i'm referring to the fact that poclbm has to be restarted when it randomly 'fails to connect with bitcoin" even when bitcoin was and still is running.....
That's bullshit. I have >10 miners running constantly, never a single problem with it. Maybe your card is dodgy? I have seen a guy selling 10 of such cards for 350 euro each, but had a feeling not to go for them. How much do you want for yours? EDIT: By "such" I mean there is no manufacturer logo on it, just no-name. |
|
|
|
I was using v2.1 and I can't get it to work. On v2.2 I finally managed to get it working. It's doing ~250MHash, which is great  . Thanks for all your help! What was wrong that you were only getting 700Mhash/s? Happy mining! |
|
|
|
Yes, that's when I got 0 khash/s. I also tried to run other samples from ATI SDK, all are hanging or not working.  Edit: I switched to SDK v2.2 and I got ~700 khash/s, which is worse that my CPU. What's the matter Seems like using your CPU. Were you using SDK v.2.1 before? Does ./poclbm give you two devices? |
|
|
|
Yes, I omitted it to be fully certain that the path is good. I did some fiddling here and there and I got to the point where CLInfo showed my card correctly. But I have another problem - poclbm.py doesn't see it. It displays: In card list. When I pick it, it get's 0 khash/s. Anyone encountered something like this? Cypress is the name of the GPU. Did you add -d 0 to poclbm.py? |
|
|
|
ldd command gives me expected output (libOpenCL.so is in the right place). I've extracted icd-registration to /, so it created /etc/OpenCL/vendors dir and placed two files there fglrxinfo gives me some info about the card (no error): display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series
OpenGL version string: 4.1.10524 Compatibility Profile Context LD_LIBRARY_PATH looks correct, because: Gives me a list of six .so / .bc files from SDK lib directory. Looks to me like you omitted the ":" after exporting the path (marked in red): export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/ati-stream-sdk-v2.1-lnx64/lib/x86_64/ :$LD_LIBRARY_PATH |
|
|
|
$ ./CLInfo
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'cl::Error'
what(): clGetPlatformIDs
Aborted I'm struggling to get pass this error. Help, anyone? - I have 64-bit system - ATI Radeon 5850 - LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set - DISPLAY is set I was getting that after I made a typo in the Library path. Triple check it. |
|
|
|
So what are you hiding from us, mtgox ?
Just because he doesn't answer every question and every beckoned call, doesn't mean he acts like a scammer or is "hiding" anything. What else do you want him to say? He's given you all the info he knows about Baron and the transactions up to date. Shadow, did you ever think that it's none of your damn business, anyway? Would you expect any other financial institution to inform you on the matters of another person's account? We're lucky he's even keeping us posted how he is and not only speaking with Baron privately. Did you ever think that Mt. Gox has a life/business/family to soak up his time instead of sitting on the bitcoin forum answering all of your questions? Some people.... It's been a fucking week. He's told you all he knows about Barons transactions, and is trying to reach Baron further. He reiterated this morning what he knows and what he's trying to do. Give it some time. Go outside. +1 |
|
|
|
|
Maybe we should just start paying the 0.01 BTC transaction fee for the more important transactions. With the increasing difficulty this would be quite fair to the miners.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
