A former Navy SEAL is invited to talk about military dogs on Jesse Watters’ Fox News show and discusses the dog who helped take down ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. VIDEO -- https://files.catbox.moe/ocb4ji.mp4 |
|
|
|
Tinfoil hat time!  Dog in the park, pizza in the parlour and dadi on the roof. |
|
|
|
|
^^^ Outer space is a hoax, it requires faith in cartoon images and paid actors.
The cosmological model presented in the bible i.e. a flat stationary earth is both observable and measurable, it's consistent with the scientific method.
The globe model is neither observable nor measurable, it requires faith, faith in a government agency called NASA named after the word for deception (to deceive) in Hebrew.
#faith
@TwitchySeal, BADecker is what's known as a gatekeeper.
|
|
|
|
Take a look around, the earth is flat for as far as the eye can see. The globe on the other hand is something that requires faith, it's not something you'll ever see with your own eyes.  Hashtag #faith |
|
|
|
^^^ That post gave me cancer. @BADecker, that link you posted is nonsense and lies. It completely disregards the optical compression that occurs at the angular resolution limit of the eye or camera then starts claiming it's the earth that's curving. The article then goes on to fake a horizon drop with a smartphone theodolite app zeroed off-centre. The icing on this cake of shit is the illustration they provide:  LOL |
|
|
|
|
^^^ You've also got shit-for-brains if you think I'm being paid by Nikon to hock their old camera. I mention the P900 because it has 83x optical zoom and is inexpensive enough for almost anybody to afford especially if it's used.
|
|
|
|
@notbatman,
Stop shitting here please, Buy a telecope, get some vacation to the beach,
if the earth is flat, you'll be able to see the other continent and evrything there
You're a pretty shitty child if you think you can see extreme distances through the atmosphere, you can barely even see mountain ranges in the distance through the blue haze. I haven't even touched on refraction and the angular resolution limit of the zoom lens and I've already dubunked your shit-for-brains claim. It's you that needs to stop dropping deuces here, get a Nikon P900 and go to the beach! Simply watching a boat disappear past the horizon with the naked eye then pulling it back into full view with a P900 debunks the globe. |
|
|
|
^^^ I say: "Perfect mirror image..." The mirror does not curve if it's forming a perfect reflection thus, the earth is flat. At over 4,000 square miles that's some swimming pool. The surface of the ocean does not curve into a sphere, everybody who has taken their Nikon P900 to the beach knows the earth is flat. The opposite of what you say is demonstrably true; a flat and level surface is "readily observable" across the sea. /r/unexpectedkoolaidman |
|
|
|
Perfect mirror image:  The earth is flat. |
|
|
|
|
@philipma1957 he finds your lack of faith, disturbing.
|
|
|
|
^^^ it's a perfect mirror.  |
|
|
|
^^^ Who's the deceiver?  |
|
|
|
Weather on the AE projection map. | https://darksky.net/flatearth"global sea level" -- wiki @Filos if you think the surface of a globe with a radius of 3443 nmi has a sea that's level, you're tripp'n balls.  |
|
|
|
They launch giant mylar balloons in rockets that reach 1000 miles in altitude (see project echo), at this altitude they can see the sun and reflect it back to earth. When ones of these "satellites" pops a military jet "space force" flys up and hooks it. The "real" GPS (not the cellular tower triangulation smartphones use) it uses a network of these balloons. Echo II Satelloon Inflation, 1964 -- https://youtu.be/qz3-b7sB9CA...
PAGEOS (PAssive Geodetic Earth Orbiting Satellite) was a balloon satellite which was launched by NASA in June 1966.
...
Orbital parameters
Reference system Geocentric[1]
Eccentricity 0.00301
Perigee altitude 4,207 km (2,614 mi)
Apogee altitude 4,271 km (2,654 mi)
...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAGEOS |
|
|
|
@BADecker, empirical measurement and observation are not faith based! The earth is flat for as far as the eye/camera can see and your claims otherwise are nonsense and lies. The majority of the surface of the earth is water and water forms a flat level surface, this is measurable, testable, verifiable science using the scientific method.  Does this look like a curved fun-house mirror to you? |
|
|
|
|
^^^ I don't need anything to make it work, the earth is observably and measurably flat. Snap the fuck out of it!
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ What you've said doesn't take all the variables into account, you do this with intellectual dishonesty in order to claim NASA's animated balls are for real.
I've said nothing that isn't covered by existing science i.e. trigonometry, holograms, plasma displays, liquid crystals, optics, etc.. The sun is a close small artificial electrical light source, not some absurd thermonuclear bomb that's a million miles wide.
|
|
|
|
... You forget faster than an AI chat bot ... ... I proved last page that the globe is the projection of a plane ... ... | Carl Sagan 1989 flat earth interview -- https://youtu.be/Zg_J_3iCyy8So, you think I forgot, right? But can you refresh my memory with proof that I forgot? And can you supply the proof that the earth is flat rather than only saying that you have proof? After all... You say that the sun is 32 nm in diameter. This means that, using geometry on a FE, if you stand a person looking straight up when the sun is directly overhead, so that he sees the center of the sun, anybody standing 16 nm away from this guy should see the edge of the sun when he looks straight up. Standard, simple geometry. No, not simple geometry. We're using trigonometry and there's an atmospheric lensing effect [ looming] to account for. If the person at the edge of the sun uses an accurate transit, with a powerful telescope, he would be able to prove the edge of the sun, if it is as you say. But all that people see at 16 nm away from the guy with the sun directly overhead, is still the center of the sun. This proves that the sun is much farther away than the inside of the supposed dome you talk about, and that it is much larger than you say. The only other option is that physics is vastly different than the standard physics that we know. Either way, you prove that you don't have proof of FE with this simple observational method. If physics happens to be extremely different than the standard understanding of physics, unless you can show us the accurate, REAL physics, at best you don't know what you are talking about any more than anyone else would.  The rest of what you say disregards the non-zero effect of lensing thus, it too may be disregarded. The sun is a 32 nautical mile disc of electrical plasma on the surface of the topmost layer of a gaseous/liquid crystal atmospheric plane. Above this plane at about ~3100 nautical miles is an electron gas then a concave mirrored surface that reflects directed energy. That being said the plasma forms a hologram from the directed energy and, the curvature of the firmament needs to be accounted for in determining what the observer sees. For example if 5 people go to the beach at sunset all 5 people will claim the long reflection of the sun on the water goes only to their own feet. My point is where the sun is, is unique to each observer. Stars are also electrical plasma, like little sun bits. What are Stars? - Nikon P1000 -- https://youtu.be/z8p5Dk-Aof4 |
|
|
|
^^^ It's not "enhancements", the faggot takes image strips from high altitude aircraft and pastes them on a globe with 3D rendering software, then adds clouds and lighting effects. NASA got $21.5 billion FY2019 and they have to pay mr. sodomite and friends to make cartoon balls. They can't take a photograph of the globe because the earth is flat and provably so. https://i.imgur.com/LezaBvo.jpgIt's easy to say to write all kinds of things. But even if the guy took high altitude strips and pasted them on a globe, it's a globe that the pictures were taken of in the first place. So, it's simply enhancement. If he did this (which you aren't clearly backing up with evidence), he was only clarifying things that are found on many globe photos from space. You forget faster than an AI chat bot, I proved last page that the globe is the projection of a plane.
@Paashaas, For the so-called Eratosthenes experiment, a flat earth's close small sun with divergent rays is mathematically identical to a globe with a sun whose rays are parallel. This is for the assholes at Netflix. | Carl Sagan 1989 flat earth interview -- https://youtu.be/Zg_J_3iCyy8 |
|
|
|
|
^^^ You toss the word religion around like it's a frag grenade.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
