Bitcoin Forum
June 26, 2024, 11:28:35 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 [202] 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 »
4021  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: VMC -- FAST HASH. $6/GH on: November 03, 2013, 01:38:34 PM
Quote
London, UK – October 30, 2013 – Active Mining Corporation (AMC) today announced that they have added over 1TH+ to their hashing rate.  This additional hashing rate has been add from the 68 Klondikes and 1088 Avalon chips that were ordered last May 3rd plus the addition of other hashing resources.  This bring ActiveMining hashing resource to a total of ~1.4 TH/s.  Over the next few week ActiveMining expects to add up to and additional 3 TH/s to their mining operation.

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297543.msg3445996#msg3445996

So a company that initially started their business plan to mine with their own chips are actually shipping with 3rd party chips. WAY TO GO!!!

How are you even able to connect the internet? one must wonder.

I don't. I just turn my computer on and it connects itself to the internet. Now go on and wank kslaugher off.
4022  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: Estimate of ASIC pre-orders: 11 to 13 PH/s (diff 1.5B to 1.8B) by end of 2013 on: November 03, 2013, 01:34:41 PM
Monarch is delayed (shocking!, lol), but this may raise some eyebrows:
"we should be able to product more than 1000 Monarchs per day. "
https://forums.butterflylabs.com/announcements/4414-monarch-information.html#post63779

Thats 12PH worth of 600GH monarchs (the 300GH model was only added later) per month.
Of course this says nothing about how much they actually sold, theoretically its possible they only sold 2 weeks worth of production and may not produce and sell more than that ever, but I kind of doubt that.

sure, BFL and 1.000 devices a day...AND they would ship them instead of mining with them oh their own as happened before...dunno why I can't believe it.  Roll Eyes

They do more pr than engineering and they are dying. They currently try everything to survive, like send themselves a million through bitpay for some attention of news, claim ridiculous numbers and such for implying *there are soooo many BFL-customers out there, become one today ourself*  in order to suck new guys in joining the game lately.

I dont understand why people draw such conclusions. The reason it takes 6+ months for them to ship your order is not because they have no orders, nor because they would self mine in any meaningful way. Simple evidence for that is the network speed, and the fact it doesnt make a lot of sense in the first place. Self mining is no where near as profitable as selling these devices.

The ridiculous long delays is just a combination of incompetence, unwillingness (slow shipping=low network difficulty=high perceived profitability=more preorders) and the sheer amount of orders they did get. Any other company would have stopped taking orders ages ago if they could not ship them in a reasonable time, but BFL keeps advertising and raking in orders they know they will never have to ship, since next year the import tax and electricity alone would make it silly for most customers to accept their 65nm product, and most of them will be switched to "mining by the GH".

BFL are devious, deceitful/dishonest, but they are not stupid, not bankrupt, not selfmining and not short on orders.

Why shouldn't they selfmine since only Paypal customers can get refunds? Considering their way of doing business it actually makes sense that they would mine for a period of time before sending the units out. Customers can't do anything about it and.
4023  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon is shipping 55 nm process chips? on: November 03, 2013, 12:36:56 AM
I thought it was obvious that Avalon should crawl back to their first gen chips buyer(s) after the implosion here on the forums. Fool me once, shame on you!
4024  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Moving Coins. on: November 03, 2013, 12:31:05 AM
It looks like I have it almost all figured out, and I'm teaching you. The primary wallet is the hot wallet you can easily spend bit coins out of. The watch only wallet is the same wallet as the offline storage wallet except it can't spend any coins without consent from the cold storage wallet on the offline computer.

I'm just wondering if you can move the coins over to the cold storage wallet. But I bet it doesn't matter because all the keys have already been made and both wallets have them.  

That's what i was saying Smiley

You talk funny.
4025  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast launches sales of the Baby Jet on: November 02, 2013, 11:21:24 PM

Decides to mine for themselves for 2 months and ship late October.


You can't mine with vaporware!
4026  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Moving Coins. on: November 02, 2013, 10:16:57 PM
Nobody knows for sure how to use the GD Armory wallet? Cheesy

As a newly Armory user i would like to help you, but i really can't understand you. Are you asking questions? Are you making statements?

Moving on: what are you actually trying? Moving bitcoins outside the bitcoin-qt client to an Armory wallet?


So far I have all my wallets set up. I have moved coins from Coinbase and my Bitcoin-qt client to my online "watch only" wallet.

The way I see it.

1.  My online "primary wallet" is like a normal Bitcoin-qt wallet that you can spend coins out of. Any time with only the encryption pass phrase.

2. My online "watch only wallet" on the other hand.  All transactions have to be signed by the offline Armory "Cold Storage wallet" computer. Which is the same wallet as the online "watch only" wallet.

Should I. Or is their a way to send the coins to the offline computer for more security?


You are sending money from your bitcoin-qt addresses to your Armory addresses, not to wallets. I think you should just send money to your primary wallet. The way i know is that your watch only wallet should have the same addresses like your primary wallet, but it doesn't have the ability to send money. Don't move any money yet and please wait for another confirmation because i may be wrong.
4027  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Moving Coins. on: November 02, 2013, 02:20:50 PM
Nobody knows for sure how to use the GD Armory wallet? Cheesy

As a newly Armory user i would like to help you, but i really can't understand you. Are you asking questions? Are you making statements?

Moving on: what are you actually trying? Moving bitcoins outside the bitcoin-qt client to an Armory wallet?
4028  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory - Discussion Thread on: November 02, 2013, 12:44:10 PM
You're welcome

Ok after 2 days of using Armory all i can say is wow. A big leap from the Bitcoin-qt client who is missing some basic stuff for me (like coin control) and with the weird function of generating a new invisible address for change after a payment (what's the logic behind this function?). I will definately send a donation to etotheipi for this awesome program. Also big THANK YOU etotheipi because life in Bitcoin world without your client sucks.
4029  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [VMC] Official Virtual Mining Corporation Discussion on: November 02, 2013, 12:24:54 PM
This waiting begins until the Delivery is a horror!

It will ROI no worries Wink

In 1 year?
4030  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: BitBurner Fury ~50GH/s IN STOCK 499€ on: November 02, 2013, 01:11:29 AM


screenshot from customer (2 boards)

59 degrees and pushing over 1100mV. Let's see how long till they are toast!
4031  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory - Discussion Thread on: November 01, 2013, 10:26:51 AM

Is there a way to rescan the whole blockchain from Armory in order to update balances?

Now i see both transactions with a new blockchain downloaded.
4032  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory - Discussion Thread on: October 31, 2013, 10:04:13 PM

I made 2 transactions to a newly created Armory wallet, but i only see one. Why? Was the first one sent without any fees or why i can't see it? Address is 1ARkEy4NMhEzvrSQCWCKnqBgBkN6fg2xb3

I see two? https://blockchain.info/address/1ARkEy4NMhEzvrSQCWCKnqBgBkN6fg2xb3 are you certain Bitcoin-QT is synced with the Bitcoin network?



Right now i have some issues with the bitcoin-qt client (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=321117.0) and i have bitcoin installed in 3 different locations, but with the same wallet. The first transaction was made from location A+no armory running, then i switched to location B and ran armory and no transaction. After that i made the second transaction from location B and i had instant balance in armory from that transaction but still not the first one. Right now i am reindexing block on disk from location C to see what happens.

Is there a way to rescan the whole blockchain from Armory in order to update balances?
4033  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: October 31, 2013, 09:54:46 PM

Thanks for the report.

Good to hear the adults have arrived.

Please ignore all the 'nothing has changed because I'm still whining' idiots.   Wink

The report said nothing new (actually it said just nothing) and you post this reply?
4034  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon auctioning their 55nm chips on: October 31, 2013, 09:52:50 PM
Batch 1 ROId,
Batch 2 ROId,
Batch 3 got refunded,
Chips got refunded.

Did anyone got screwed by Avalon? Please tell me, because i stopped following them after batch 2.

Kudos to Avalon. (FY for being unable to find resistors&capacitors in damn China, but at least you didn't screwed everyone as others did).

You must be joking. They screwed everyone from direct customers to boards manufacturers(burnin was down 20k euros) by delaying their chips and even if they refunded the BTC for chips customers got screwed by paying for assembly...so yeah a big fuck you to avalon.
4035  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory - Discussion Thread on: October 31, 2013, 11:10:40 AM
Noob armory user here. I recently had some problems with the bitcoin-qt client and i would like to switch to Armory, but i need a bit of info first. From what i know using wallets from bitcoin-qt i need to make a backup every time i spend money from that wallet(is this true?). Does this apply to wallets from Armory? If not then all i need to backup is the .wallet file right?
I made 2 transactions to a newly created Armory wallet, but i only see one. Why? Was the first one sent without any fees or why i can't see it? Address is 1ARkEy4NMhEzvrSQCWCKnqBgBkN6fg2xb3
Can i choose from which address i send money?
Any other tips for wallet safety?
Thank you.
4036  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] labcoin ASIC - v.1 @130nm/300Mhz -16 cores chip - European / Chinese Team on: October 31, 2013, 01:54:36 AM

This thread was very entertaining to read! Thank you all. Where do we move now?

Witch-hunt begins on the 15th - LC final deadline.

Shenzhen, Guangdong, China (CST)

Nothing has changed - on the 15th we are waiting for 3TH/s... or see above

Did you start the witch hunt yet?

http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/17psAW21J4twanAFWmbcd5WdX2pKeX3trm

I see 0 TH! Status?
4037  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [VMC] Official Virtual Mining Corporation Discussion on: October 31, 2013, 12:46:02 AM
Quote
London, UK – October 30, 2013 – Active Mining Corporation (AMC) today announced that they have added over 1TH+ to their hashing rate.  This additional hashing rate has been add from the 68 Klondikes and 1088 Avalon chips that were ordered last May 3rd plus the addition of other hashing resources.  This bring ActiveMining hashing resource to a total of ~1.4 TH/s.  Over the next few week ActiveMining expects to add up to and additional 3 TH/s to their mining operation.

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297543.msg3445996#msg3445996

So a company that initially started their business plan to mine with their own chips are actually shipping with 3rd party chips. WAY TO GO!!! They are mining with the most inefficient chips out there (avalon) and they the first ones to mine on the loss once the difficulty rises. So funny!
4038  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: VMC -- FAST HASH. $6/GH on: October 31, 2013, 12:44:12 AM
Quote
London, UK – October 30, 2013 – Active Mining Corporation (AMC) today announced that they have added over 1TH+ to their hashing rate.  This additional hashing rate has been add from the 68 Klondikes and 1088 Avalon chips that were ordered last May 3rd plus the addition of other hashing resources.  This bring ActiveMining hashing resource to a total of ~1.4 TH/s.  Over the next few week ActiveMining expects to add up to and additional 3 TH/s to their mining operation.

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297543.msg3445996#msg3445996

So a company that initially started their business plan to mine with their own chips are actually shipping with 3rd party chips. WAY TO GO!!!
4039  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s on: October 31, 2013, 12:42:26 AM
Batch 2 will probably ship by Dec 31 2013
HF isn't saying anything else

They haven't given me solid details, but you'll be the first to receive a product for sure.


Are you actually getting paid to post the information that was already on the forum? Man HF are idiots!
4040  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin-qt error on: October 31, 2013, 12:39:17 AM
Maybe you need to have a look at your dat file to see if it have write permissions on? Sometimes when you copied files these things changed and can cause this kind of errors. Right click your .dat file and check properties - security.

You can also compare these permissions on the .dat file on the hdd where it works with the .dat file on the hdd were it not works.

Maybe it can solve the problem.

They are the same.

Ok let me get this straight. When moving to a new folder/hdd i just have to copy the wallet.dat file right? If not then what any other file do i need?

What happens if my wallet.dat file is corrupted and i have all or some private keys for addresses from wallet.dat file? Let's say i have 5 wallets, and i have privkeys for 2-3. If i have 2 bitcoins and i spend 1 from one of the addresses which i have the privkeys then bitcoin-qt is moving the 1 bitcoin left to a newly generated address? If yes and i import the privkey of the original address then i will have the remaining 1 bitcoin or do i have to own the privkey of the newly generated address?
Pages: « 1 ... 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 [202] 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!